Implementation of a surgical site infection prevention bundle: Patient adherence and experience

Patient compliance with the implementation of a decolonization strategy for Staphylococcus aureus in hip and knee replacements

BACKGROUND

A preoperative, in-community antimicrobial decolonization protocol combining chlorohexidine gluconate (CHG) sponges and mupirocin ointment to reduce surgical site infections amongst hip and knee replacement patients has been adopted in Alberta, Canada. Patient compliance with the protocol is essential for effectiveness. It is, therefore, important to understand patterns, and reasons why, patients do, and do not, comply.

METHODS

A descriptive survey of patients having elective total hip or knee replacement at seven clinics in Alberta was conducted to determine patient compliance and reasons for noncompliance. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression were computed.

RESULTS

Patient compliance was assessed in 3,427 patients. There were no differences in compliance based on the baseline protocols and enhanced protocols, but there was a difference based on clinic location. The odds of compliance with three CHG sponges were 4.47 times higher in rural versus urban clinics (P < .001). The most common reason for noncompliance for patients instructed to use 3 CHG sponges was "patient forgot".

CONCLUSIONS

Compliance did not change when enhanced protocols were introduced; however, compliance differed by clinic location. Reasons for noncompliance included "sponges not provided", "patient forgot", and "surgery date moved". Results may inform clinics on areas where improvements could be made to increase patient compliance.

Implementation of a Prevention Bundle to Decrease Rates of Staphylococcus aureus Surgical Site Infection at 11 Veterans Affairs Hospitals

Importance

While current evidence has demonstrated a surgical site infection (SSI) prevention bundle consisting of preoperative Staphylococcus aureus screening, nasal and skin decolonization, and use of appropriate perioperative antibiotic based on screening results can decrease rates of SSI caused by S aureus, it is well known that interventions may need to be modified to address facility-level factors.

Objective

To assess the association between implementation of an SSI prevention bundle allowing for facility discretion regarding specific component interventions and S aureus deep incisional or organ space SSI rates.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This quality improvement study was conducted among all patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, cardiac valve replacement, or total joint arthroplasty (TJA) at 11 Veterans Administration hospitals. Implementation of the bundle was on a rolling basis with the earliest implementation occurring in April 2012 and the latest implementation occurring in July 2017. Data were collected from January 2007 to March 2018 and analyzed from October 2020 to June 2023.

Interventions

Nasal screening for S aureus; nasal decolonization of S aureus carriers; chlorhexidine bathing; and appropriate perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis according to S aureus carrier status. Facility discretion regarding how to implement the bundle components was allowed.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was deep incisional or organ space SSI caused by S aureus. Multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equation (GEE) and interrupted time-series (ITS) models were used to compare SSI rates between preintervention and postintervention periods.

Results

Among 6696 cardiac surgical procedures and 16 309 TJAs, 95 S aureus deep incisional or organ space SSIs were detected (25 after cardiac operations and 70 after TJAs). While the GEE model suggested a significant association between the intervention and decreased SSI rates after TJAs (adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31-0.98), there was not a significant association when an ITS model was used (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.32-2.39). No significant associations after cardiac operations were found.

Conclusions and Relevance

Although this quality improvement study suggests an association between implementation of an SSI prevention bundle and decreased S aureus deep incisional or organ space SSI rates after TJAs, it was underpowered to see a significant difference when accounting for changes over time.

Strategies for the implementation of a nasal decolonization intervention to prevent surgical site infections within the Veterans Health Administration

As part of a multicenter evidence-based intervention for surgical site infection prevention, a qualitative study was conducted with infection control teams and surgical staff members at three Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare Systems in the USA. This study aimed to identify strategies used by nurses and other facility champions for the implementation of a nasal decolonization intervention. Site visit observations and field notes provided contextual information. Interview data were analyzed with inductive and deductive content analysis. Interview data was mapped to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation of implementation strategies. These strategies were then considered in the context of power and relationships as factors that influence implementation. We found that implementation of this evidence-based surgical site infection prevention intervention was successful when nurse champions drove the day-to-day implementation. Nurse champions sustained implementation strategies through all phases of implementation. Findings also suggest that nurse champions leveraged the influence of their role as champion along with their understanding of social networks and relationships to help achieve implementation success. Nurse champions consciously used multiple overlapping and iterative implementation strategies, adapting and tailoring strategies to stakeholders and settings. Commonly used implementation categories included: "train and educate stakeholders," "use evaluative and iterative strategies," "adapt and tailor to context," and "develop stakeholder interrelationships." Future research should examine the social networks for evidence-based interventions by asking specifically about relationships and power dynamics within healthcare organizations. Implementation of evidence-based interventions should consider if the tasks expected of a nurse champion fit the level of influence or power held by the champion.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02216227.