The Process of Patient Engagement in Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs

Comparing the effect of the Model of Therapeutic Engagement in cardiac rehabilitation on the sense of coherence and adherence to treatment: a randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a traditional cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program with an enhanced program incorporating the model of therapeutic engagement (MTE) and extended remote support for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a randomized controlled trial, 88 CABG patients were assigned to experimental and control groups. The experimental group received integrated MTE cardiac rehabilitation, and assessments were conducted at three time points: pre-CR, one month later, and three months post-CR. The study measured medication adherence (MARS-5) and sense of coherence (SoC-13) scales.

RESULTS

The study found no significant differences in demographic factors between the experimental and control groups. However, significant differences were observed in MARS and individuals' SoC scores over time in the experimental group, with notable improvements (p < 0.001). The control group showed significant changes only up to one month. Group effects were evident, with consistent increases in the experimental group's outcomes at each assessment point.

CONCLUSION

Integrating the MTE into CR programs offers benefits in terms of medication adherence and individuals' sense of coherence, which warrants further investigation and clinical implementation.

Surgery patients' perspectives of their role in postoperative pain: A scoping review

Background

Post-operative pain is a major factor in surgical recovery. There is evidence that pain remains undermanaged. Complications related to the undermanagement of acute pain can increase length of stay and contribute to readmission and the development of chronic pain. It is well acknowledged that pain assessment is critical to pain management and that self-report of pain is the gold standard. As a result, patients play a central role in their own pain management. A preliminary review of the literature failed to provide a clear or consistent description of this key patient role.

Objective

A scoping review was conducted with the objective of reviewing literature that described adult patients' perspectives or highlighted the adult patient's role in post-operative pain management, including assessment. Understanding patients' attitudes toward their roles in pain management through a scoping review of the current literature is critical for informing research and improvements in post-operative pain management.

Design

Scoping review.

Methods

The databases searched for the review included CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, and SCOPUS (ending May 2022). Thematic analysis, using the methodology of Arksey and O'Malley, was applied to the records identified.

Results

Of the 106 abstracts initially identified, 26 papers were included in the final analysis. Two major themes identified through thematic analysis were attitudes toward pain and pain management, with the subthemes of patient expectations and beliefs and desire to treat; and care and communication, with the subthemes of pain assessment and education.

Conclusions

This paper provides one of the first known comprehensive scoping reviews of surgical patients' perspectives of their role in pain management, including assessment, and offers an important global awareness of this patient role. The findings suggest that improved understanding of patients' perspectives of their roles in pain assessment and treatment is critical to improving post-operative pain management. Engaging patients as partners in their care can facilitate enhanced communication and improving congruence in pain assessment and treatment decisions. The complex nature of patients' beliefs, expectations, and subjective experiences of pain present challenges for health care practitioners. These challenges can be met with enhanced education for patients, respect for patients' beliefs and expectations, and the provision of dignified care.

The Impact of Socio-environmental Barriers on the Process of Engagement in Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a multi-disciplinary intervention designed to stabilise, slow, or reverse CVD, restore health following a cardiac event and facilitate the prevention of further events. The Model of Therapeutic Engagement (MTE) is a comprehensive conceptual model for explaining the process of engagement in rehabilitation. Of concern is that the role of socio-environmental factors is absent from explaining individual engagement in the MTE. There is also a lack of prospective studies investigating the impact of socio-environmental barriers on engagement in CR programs over time. This study aimed to expand the MTE, by illuminating the role of socio-environmental barriers in a three-stage process of engagement in CR programs. A prospective study was conducted, with 217 individuals recruited from the Cardiology Ward in the Gold Coast University Hospital (GCUH) and the Robina Cardiac Rehabilitation Centre. The collected data were examined using a structural equation model that added socio-environmental factors into the MTE, using multi-group analyses. In this study, we found that socio-environmental factors were not associated with intention to engage in the CR program, but were related to actual attendance and maintenance of participation in CR programs. Knowing how these socio-environmental barriers affect the process of engagement at different stages may help to tailor more accessible CR programs for the population.