1
|
Munroe B, Curtis K, Fry M, Balzer S, Perara P, Couttie T, Royston K, Yu P, Tidswell N, Considine J. Impact of an emergency department rapid response system on inpatient clinical deterioration: A controlled pre-post study. Australas Emerg Care 2023; 26:333-340. [PMID: 37210333 DOI: 10.1016/j.auec.2023.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
AIM To determine the impact implementation of Emergency Department Clinical Emergency Response System (EDCERS) on inpatient deterioration events and identify contributing causal factors. METHODS EDCERS was implemented in an Australian regional hospital, integrating a single parameter track and trigger criteria for escalation of care, and emergency, specialty and critical care clinician response to patient deterioration. In this controlled pre-post study, electronic medical records of patients who experienced a deterioration event (rapid response call, cardiac arrest or unplanned intensive care admission) on the ward within 72 h of admission from the emergency department (ED) were reviewed. Causal factors contributing to the deteriorating event were assessed using a validated human factors framework. RESULTS Implementation of EDCERS reduced the number of inpatient deterioration events within 72 h of emergency admission with failure or delayed response to ED patient deterioration as a causal factor. There was no change in the overall rate of inpatient deterioration events. CONCLUSION This study supports wider implementation of rapid response systems in the ED to improve management of deteriorating patients. Tailored implementation strategies should be used to achieve successful and sustainable uptake of ED rapid response systems and improve outcomes in deteriorating patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belinda Munroe
- Emergency Services, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Australia; Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Australia.
| | - Kate Curtis
- Emergency Services, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Australia; Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Australia; Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sydney, Australia; George Institute for Global Health, Australia
| | - Margaret Fry
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sydney, Australia; University of Technology Sydney, Australia; Northern Sydney Local Health District, Australia
| | - Sharyn Balzer
- Emergency Services, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Australia; Shoalhaven Hospital Group, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Australia
| | - Panchalee Perara
- Wollongong Hospital, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Australia
| | - Tracey Couttie
- Division of Child and Families, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Australia
| | - Karlie Royston
- Shoalhaven Hospital Group, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Australia
| | - Ping Yu
- Centre for Digital Transformation, University of Wollongong, Australia
| | - Natasha Tidswell
- Emergency Services, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Australia
| | - Julie Considine
- School of Nursing and Midwifery and Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research - Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chan SL, Lee JW, Ong MEH, Siddiqui FJ, Graves N, Ho AFW, Liu N. Implementation of Prediction Models in the Emergency Department from an Implementation Science Perspective-Determinants, Outcomes, and Real-World Impact: A Scoping Review. Ann Emerg Med 2023; 82:22-36. [PMID: 36925394 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Prediction models offer a promising form of clinical decision support in the complex and fast-paced environment of the emergency department (ED). Despite significant advancements in model development and validation, implementation of such models in routine clinical practice remains elusive. This scoping review aims to survey the current state of prediction model implementation in the ED and to provide insights on contributing factors and outcomes from an implementation science perspective. METHODS We searched 4 databases from their inception to May 20, 2022: MEDLINE (through PubMed), Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL. Articles that reported implementation outcomes and/or contextual determinants under the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM)/Practical, Robust, Implementation, and Sustainability Model (PRISM) framework were included. Characteristics of studies, models, and results of the RE-AIM/PRISM domains were summarized narratively. RESULTS Thirty-six reports on 31 implementations were included. The most common prediction models implemented were early warning scores. The most common implementation strategies used were training stakeholders, infrastructural changes, and using evaluative or iterative strategies. Only one report examined ED patients' perspectives, whereas the rest were focused on the experience of health care workers or organizational stakeholders. Key determinants of successful implementation include strong stakeholder engagement, codevelopment of workflows and implementation strategies, education, and usability. CONCLUSION Examining ED prediction models from an implementation science perspective can provide valuable insights and help guide future implementations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sze Ling Chan
- Health Services Research Center, Singapore Health Services, Singapore; Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Jin Wee Lee
- Center for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Marcus Eng Hock Ong
- Health Services Research Center, Singapore Health Services, Singapore; Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Nicholas Graves
- Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Andrew Fu Wah Ho
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Prehospital Emergency Research Center, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Nan Liu
- Health Services Research Center, Singapore Health Services, Singapore; Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Center for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; SingHealth AI Office, Singapore Health Services, Singapore; Institute of Data Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alhmoud B, Bonicci T, Patel R, Melley D, Hicks L, Banerjee A. Implementation of a digital early warning score (NEWS2) in a cardiac specialist and general hospital settings in the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. BMJ Open Qual 2023; 12:bmjoq-2022-001986. [PMID: 36914225 PMCID: PMC10015673 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate implementation of digital National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) in a cardiac care setting and a general hospital setting in the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN Thematic analysis of qualitative semistructured interviews using the non-adoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, sustainability framework with purposefully sampled nurses and managers, as well as online surveys from March to December 2021. SETTINGS Specialist cardiac hospital (St Bartholomew's Hospital) and general teaching hospital (University College London Hospital, UCLH). PARTICIPANTS Eleven nurses and managers from cardiology, cardiac surgery, oncology and intensive care wards (St Bartholomew's) and medical, haematology and intensive care wards (UCLH) were interviewed and 67 were surveyed online. RESULTS Three main themes emerged: (1) implementing NEWS2 challenges and supports; (2) value of NEWS2 to alarm, escalate and during the pandemic; and (3) digitalisation: electronic health record (EHR) integration and automation. The value of NEWS2 was partly positive in escalation, yet there were concerns by nurses who undervalued NEWS2 particularly in cardiac care. Challenges, like clinicians' behaviours, lack of resources and training and the perception of NEWS2 value, limit the success of this implementation. Changes in guidelines in the pandemic have led to overlooking NEWS2. EHR integration and automated monitoring are improvement solutions that are not fully employed yet. CONCLUSION Whether in specialist or general medical settings, the health professionals implementing early warning score in healthcare face cultural and system-related challenges to adopting NEWS2 and digital solutions. The validity of NEWS2 in specialised settings and complex conditions is not yet apparent and requires comprehensive validation. EHR integration and automation are powerful tools to facilitate NEWS2 if its principles are reviewed and rectified, and resources and training are accessible. Further examination of implementation from the cultural and automation domains is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baneen Alhmoud
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.,University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Timothy Bonicci
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.,University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Riyaz Patel
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Amitava Banerjee
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK .,University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Munroe B, Curtis K, Balzer S, Roysten K, Fetchet W, Tucker S, Pratt W, Morris R, Fry M, Considine J. Translation of evidence into policy to improve clinical practice: the development of an emergency department rapid response system. Australas Emerg Care 2020; 24:197-209. [PMID: 32950439 DOI: 10.1016/j.auec.2020.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Undetected clinical deterioration is a major cause of high mortality events in Emergency Department (ED) patients. Yet, there is no known model to guide the recognition and response to clinical deterioration in the ED, integrating internal and external resources. METHODS An integrative review was firstly conducted to identify the critical components of recognising and responding to clinical deterioration in the ED. Components identified from the review were analysed by clinical experts and informed the development of an ED Clinical Emergency Response System (EDCERS). RESULTS Twenty four eligible studies were included in the review. Eight core components were identified: 1) vital sign monitoring; 2) track and trigger system; 3) communication plan; 4) response time; 5) emergency nurse response; 6) emergency physician response; 7) critical care team response; and 8) specialty team response. These components informed the development of the EDCERS protocol, integrating responses from staff internal and external to the ED. CONCLUSIONS EDCERS was based on the best available evidence and considered the cultural context of care. Future research is needed to determine the useability and impact of EDCERS on patient and health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belinda Munroe
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mallet St, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Emergency Services, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
| | - Kate Curtis
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mallet St, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Emergency Services, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Sharyn Balzer
- Emergency Department, Shoalhaven Memorial District Hospital, Shoalhaven, NSW, Australia
| | - Karlie Roysten
- Clinical Emergency Response, Executive Services, Shoalhaven Hospital Groups, Shoalhaven, NSW, Australia
| | - Wendy Fetchet
- Emergency Department, Shoalhaven Memorial District Hospital, Shoalhaven, NSW, Australia
| | - Simon Tucker
- Emergency Department, Shoalhaven Memorial District Hospital, Shoalhaven, NSW, Australia
| | - William Pratt
- Department of Medicine, Shoalhaven Memorial District Hospital, Shoalhaven, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard Morris
- Intensive Care Unit, Shoalhaven Memorial District Hospital, Shoalhaven, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW
| | - Margaret Fry
- University of Technology Sydney School of Nursing and Midwifery Broadway NSW 2007; Northern Sydney Local Health District
| | - Julie Considine
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, and Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research - Eastern Health Partnership, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Objectives: A simple evaluation tool for patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) could assist the physicians to triage COVID-19 patients effectively and rapidly. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of 5 early warning scores based on the admission data of critical COVID-19 patients. Methods: Overall, medical records of 319 COVID-19 patients were included in the study. Demographic and clinical characteristics on admission were used for calculating the Standardized Early Warning Score (SEWS), National Early Warning Score (NEWS), National Early Warning Score2 (NEWS2), Hamilton Early Warning Score (HEWS), and Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS). Data on the outcomes (survival or death) were collected for each case and extracted for overall and subgroup analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed. Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the SEWS, NEWS, NEWS2, HEWS, and MEWS in predicting mortality were 0.841 (95% CI: 0.765-0.916), 0.809 (95% CI: 0.727-0.891), 0.809 (95% CI: 0.727-0.891), 0.821 (95% CI: 0.748-0.895), and 0.670 (95% CI: 0.573-0.767), respectively. Conclusions: SEWS, NEWS, NEWS2, and HEWS demonstrated moderate discriminatory power and, therefore, offer potential utility as prognostic tools for screening severely ill COVID-19 patients. However, MEWS is not a good prognostic predictor for COVID-19.
Collapse
|