Iodinated Contrast Encephalopathy

Contrast-induced encephalopathy mimicking total anterior circulation stroke: a case report and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Contrast-induced encephalopathy is a rare and usually reversible entity due to the administration of iodinated contrast. Clinical manifestations include cortical blindness, encephalopathy, seizures and focal neurological deficits.

METHODS

We report the case of a 56-year-old woman who developed global aphasia and right hemiplegia after a cerebral angiography performed for a subarachnoid haemorrhage. A prompt brain MRI resulted negative, while CT scan revealed left cerebral oedema with the cerebral sulci effacement. Complete recovery was observed in 10 days.

DISCUSSION

Diagnosis of contrast-induced encephalopathy requires a temporal correlation between neurological dysfunction and administration of iodinated contrast. Usually, the symptomatology is transient with a full recovery within 48-72 h. The most common symptom is cortical blindness, while other symptoms have been rarely reported. Only 20 cases previously reported global aphasia and/or hemiplegia or mimed anterior circulation strokes. Prompt brain neuroimaging is essential in order to exclude an alternative diagnosis that requires a distinct therapeutic approach.

HARMless: Transient Cortical and Sulcal Hyperintensity on Gadolinium-Enhanced FLAIR after Elective Endovascular Coiling of Intracranial Aneurysms

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cortical and sulcal hyperintensity on gadolinium-enhanced FLAIR has been increasingly recognized after iodinated contrast medium exposure during angiographic procedures. The goal of this study was to assess the relationship of cortical and sulcal hyperintensity on gadolinium-enhanced FLAIR against various variables in patients following elective endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 58 patients with 62 MR imaging studies performed within 72 hours following endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Patient demographics, aneurysm location, and vascular territory distribution of cortical and sulcal hyperintensity on gadolinium-enhanced FLAIR were documented. Analysis of cortical and sulcal hyperintensity on gadolinium-enhanced FLAIR with iodinated contrast medium volume, procedural duration, number of angiographic runs, and DWI lesions was performed.

RESULTS

Cortical and sulcal hyperintensity on gadolinium-enhanced FLAIR was found in 32/62 (51.61%) post-endovascular treatment MR imaging studies, with complete resolution of findings in all patients on the available follow-up studies (27/27). Angiographic iodinated contrast medium injection and arterial anatomy matched the vascular distribution of cortical and sulcal hyperintensity on gadolinium-enhanced FLAIR. No significant association was found between cortical and sulcal hyperintensity on gadolinium-enhanced FLAIR with iodinated contrast medium volume (P = .56 value) and the presence of DWI lesions (P = .68). However, a significant association was found with procedural time (P = .001) and the number of angiographic runs (P = .019). No adverse clinical outcomes were documented.

CONCLUSIONS

Cortical and sulcal hyperintensity on gadolinium-enhanced FLAIR is a transient observation in the arterial territory exposed to iodinated contrast medium during endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Cortical and sulcal hyperintensity on gadolinium-enhanced FLAIR is significantly associated with procedural time, and the frequency of angiographic runs suggesting a potential technical influence on the breakdown of the BBB, but no reported adverse clinical outcome or association with both iodinated contrast medium volume and DWI lesions was found. Recognition of cortical and sulcal hyperintensity on gadolinium-enhanced FLAIR as a benign incidental finding is vital to avoid unnecessary investigation.