Hand hygiene promotion delivered by change agents-Two attitudes, similar outcome

Leveraging agents of change to improve the use of an electronic hand hygiene monitoring system

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the effectiveness of an "agents of change" intervention in enhancing hand hygiene compliance (HHC) with an electronic hand hygiene monitoring system (EHHMS), and improving perceptions of the EHHMS among health care workers.

METHODS

Two intervention units and 1 control unit were selected. Thirteen agents received training, then worked independently on the intervention units to improve their colleagues' perceptions and behaviors toward the EHHMS. Agents and unit health care workers were surveyed before and after the intervention to measure perceptions of the EHHMS and impact of the intervention. HHC was electronically monitored across all units 8weeks before, 5weeks during, and 8weeks after the intervention.

RESULTS

Postintervention, 70% of agents believed they influenced their colleagues' behaviors, but 50% felt they changed attitudes. Unit-level surveys confirmed minimal change in attitudes and culture. Average HHC rates increased by 6.8% and 5% in the intervention units during the intervention (both P<.01), whereas the control did not. One intervention unit maintained improvement in the post period, whereas the other returned to baseline. Compliance rates for all units were similar in the post period.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing an agents of change program to target EHHMS compliance is feasible, but sustained improvement is less certain.

Acceptability and tolerability of alcohol-based hand rubs among health workers and concessionaires in Malaysia during the COVID pandemic: a hospital-wide cross-sectional study using a modified WHO protocol

This study evaluated the acceptability and tolerability of three alcohol-based hand rubs (ABHRs) at Sarawak General Hospital, Malaysia. Conducted from 12-26 November 2021 using a modified WHO Protocol, it involved a survey among health workers and concessionaires, with a 35% response rate (1,598 of 4,628 participants). The majority were nurses (60.8%), with the medical division most represented (28.4%). Most respondents (93.2%) used ABHRs at least five days a week and found them easily accessible (72.3%). Product B was the preferred ABHR (65%), primarily for its color and fragrance, surpassing WHO's 50% approval rate in these aspects. However, no other product features met WHO criteria. There were no significant differences in self-reported skin tolerability across the products, and none achieved overall WHO approval. These results offer important insights for ABHR selection in developing countries and highlight the value of the WHO Protocol in assessing product acceptability and tolerability.

Ten years of hand hygiene excellence: a summary of outcomes, and a comparison of indicators, from award-winning hospitals worldwide

BACKGROUND

Hand hygiene is a crucial measure for the prevention of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). The Hand Hygiene Excellence Award (HHEA) is an international programme acknowledging healthcare facilities for their leadership in implementing hand hygiene improvement programmes, including the World Health Organisation's Multimodal Improvement Strategy. This study aimed at summarising the results of the HHEA campaign between 2010 and 2021 and investigating the relationship between different hand hygiene parameters based on data from participating healthcare facilities.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on datasets from HHEA forms, including data on hand hygiene compliance, alcohol-based handrub (ABHR) consumption, and Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework (HHSAF) scores. Descriptive statistics were reported for each variable. The correlation between variables was inspected through Kendall's test, while possible non-linear relationships between hand hygiene compliance, ABHR consumption and HHSAF scores were sought through the Locally Estimated Scatterplot Smoothing or logistic regression models. A tree-structured partitioning model was developed to further confirm the obtained findings.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven healthcare facilities from 28 countries in three world regions (Asia-Pacific, Europe, Latin America) were awarded the HHEA and thus included in the analysis. HHSAF scores indicated an advanced hand hygiene promotion level (median 445 points, IQR 395-480). System change (100 [95-100] points) and institutional safety climate (85 [70-95] points) showed the highest and lowest score, respectively. In most cases, hand hygiene compliance was above 70%, with heterogeneity between countries. ABHR consumption above 20 millilitres per patient-day (ml/PD) was widely reported, with overall increasing trends. HHSAF scores were positively correlated with hand hygiene compliance (τ = 0.211, p = 0.007). We observed a positive correlation between compliance rates and ABHR consumption (τ = 0.193, p < 0.001), although the average predicted consumption was stable around 55-60 ml/PD for compliance rates above 80-85%. Logistic regression and partitioning tree analyses revealed that higher HHSAF scores were more likely in the high-ABHR consumption group at cut-offs around 57-59 ml/PD.

CONCLUSION

Ten years after its inception, the HHEA proves to be a valuable hand hygiene improvement programme in healthcare facilities worldwide. Consistent results were provided by the different hand hygiene indicators and the HHSAF score represents a valuable proxy measure of hand hygiene compliance.

Roles and effectiveness of knowledge brokers for translating clinical practice guidelines in health-related settings: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Poor translation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) into clinical practice is a barrier to the provision of consistent and high-quality evidence-based care. The objective was to systematically review the roles and effectiveness of knowledge brokers (KBs) for translating CPGs in health-related settings.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL Plus were searched from 2014 to June 2022. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), controlled and uncontrolled preintervention and postintervention studies involving KBs, either alone or as part of a multicomponent intervention, that reported quantitative postintervention changes in guideline implementation in a healthcare setting were included. A KB was defined as an intermediary who facilitated knowledge translation by acting in at least two of the following core roles: knowledge manager, linkage agent or capacity builder. Specific activities undertaken by KBs were deductively coded to the three core roles, then common activities were inductively grouped. Screening, data extraction, quality assessment and coding were performed independently by two authors.

RESULTS

16 studies comprising 6 RCTs, 8 uncontrolled precomparisons-postcomparisons, 1 controlled precomparison-postcomparison and 1 interrupted time series were included. 14 studies (88%) were conducted in hospital settings. Knowledge manager roles included creating and distributing guideline material. Linkage agent roles involved engaging with internal and external stakeholders. Capacity builder roles involved audit and feedback and educating staff. KBs improved guideline adherence in 10 studies (63%), had mixed impact in 2 studies (13%) and no impact in 4 studies (25%). Half of the RCTs showed KBs had no impact on guideline adherence. KBs acted as knowledge managers in 15 (94%) studies, linkage agents in 11 (69%) studies and capacity builders in all studies.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge manager and capacity builder roles were more frequently studied than linkage agent roles. KBs had mixed impact on translating CPGs into practice. Further RCTs, including those in non-hospital settings, are required.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022340365.

Hand Hygiene Behaviours Monitored by an Electronic System in the Intensive Care Unit-A Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Hand hygiene (HH) compliance is hard to improve and underlying behaviours are not clearly understood among healthcare workers.

AIM

To study healthcare workers' HH behaviours.

METHODS

Prospective observational study. Sanibit electronic hand hygiene system was installed in a 10-bed surgical intensive care unit that automatically detected HH opportunities when healthcare workers entered or exited a patient room, and tracked healthcare worker's HH compliance. HH compliance rate and patient contact time were calculated and analyzed at both the ICU and individual levels over time.

FINDINGS

A total of 27,692 HH opportunities were recorded during this 6-month trial period. The HH compliance rate was significantly higher when healthcare workers exited patient rooms than when they entered rooms (37.3% vs. 26.1%, P < 0.001). The full, partial, and total HH compliance rates of quick in-out of room (in room less than 3 seconds) events were significantly lower than those of long in-out room (in room more than 30 seconds) events (23.45% vs 32.77%, 21.44% vs 35.03%, and 44.88% vs 67.81% respectively) (P-value <0.001). There was also significantly differences in HH compliance among individual healthcare workers (P < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was found in overall HH compliance rate and patient contact time over hours of the day or days of the week except partial HH compliance rates.

CONCLUSION

Patterns of healthcare workers' HH behaviors are complex and variable, which could facilitate targeted and personalized interventions to improve HH compliance.

Hand-hygiene-related clinical trials reported between 2014 and 2020: a comprehensive systematic review

BACKGROUND

There is general consensus that hand hygiene is the most effective way to prevent healthcare-associated infections. However, low rates of compliance amongst healthcare workers have been reported globally. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has further emphasized the need for global improvement in hand hygiene compliance by healthcare workers.

AIM

This comprehensive systematic review provides an up-to-date compilation of clinical trials, reported between 2014 and 2020, assessing hand hygiene interventions in order to inform healthcare leaders and practitioners regarding approaches to reduce healthcare-associated infections using hand hygiene.

METHODS

CINAHL, Cochrane, EMbase, Medline, PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for clinical trials published between March 2014 and December 2020 on the topic of hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers. In total, 332 papers were identified from these searches, of which 57 studies met the inclusion criteria.

FINDINGS

Forty-five of the 57 studies (79%) included in this review were conducted in Asia, Europe and the USA. The large majority of these clinical trials were conducted in acute care facilities, including hospital wards and intensive care facilities. Nurses represented the largest group of healthcare workers studied (44 studies, 77%), followed by physicians (41 studies, 72%). Thirty-six studies (63%) adopted the World Health Organization's multi-modal framework or a variation of this framework, and many of them recorded hand hygiene opportunities at each of the 'Five Moments'. However, recording of hand hygiene technique was not common.

CONCLUSION

Both single intervention and multi-modal hand hygiene strategies can achieve modest-to-moderate improvements in hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers.

Citywide preparedness for a pandemic: A crosssectional survey of knowledge, attitudes, and practices about respiratory infection prevention in Bogotá, Colombia

Introduction: Healthcare personnel plays an important role in the prevention of acute respiratory infections in hospital settings.Objective: Our aim was to establish the level of knowledge about respiratory virus infections and the attitudes and practices among healthcare workers, leaders of infection control committees in hospitals of Bogotá, Colombia.Materials and methods: We used a self-administered questionnaire of 28 items during the monthly meeting sponsored by the local health authority. “Yes or no” and “true or false” questions were applied to measure knowledge. Attitudes and practices were measured with a Likert-type scale according to the agreement degree.Results: We surveyed 70 healthcare workers. Respondents demonstrated a good level of knowledge as 80% of them answered correctly more than five questions. A total of 54.4% showed a low degree of agreement when asked if their institutions have the policy to stay home when they are sick with respiratory symptoms and 67.1% never or rarely remain at home under such conditions.Conclusion: Healthcare worker leaders of infection control committees in Bogotá’s ospitals have adequate knowledge about the prevention of seasonal respiratory viruses. There is a need for implementing urgent sick leave policies as a measure to prevent the spread of potential coronavirus infections in hospitals.