Antibiotic spectrum index: A new tool comparing antibiotic use in three NICUs

Applying quality improvement methods to reduce antibiotic use in neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aims to explore effective interventions and observation indicators for reducing antibiotic use in neonates through quality improvement (QI) methods, while quantitatively analysing whether these methods increase the risk of neonatal mortality and serious adverse outcomes.

METHODS

By 27 August 2024, we reviewed all pertinent literature. A descriptive statistical analysis was conducted on all intervention measures, outcome indicators, process indicators, and balance indicators. The group utilizing QI interventions was designated as the intervention group, with the baseline period serving as the control group. The mortality rates and incidence of serious adverse outcomes were treated as dichotomous variables. The risk ratio (RR) and 95% CIs were effect indicators.

RESULTS

In total, 57 studies published between 2016 and 2024 were included. All studies were uncontrolled before-and-after studies. The most studied country was the United States of America. From these 57 studies, 27 effective intervention measures were identified, and all observation indicators and main results were presented in tabular form. According to the meta-analysis, the mortality rate in the intervention group decreased by 30% compared with the control group (RR = 0.7; 95% CI: 0.604-0.81; P < 0.001), while there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of serious adverse outcomes between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

QI methods can safely and effectively reduce the use of antibiotics in neonates, highlighting their potential for clinical applications.

Influence of Antibiotic Exposure Intensity on the Risk of Clostridioides difficile Infection

BACKGROUND

Antibiotics are a strong risk factor for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), and CDI incidence is often measured as an important outcome metric for antimicrobial stewardship interventions aiming to reduce antibiotic use. However, risk of CDI from antibiotics varies by agent and dependent on the intensity (ie, spectrum and duration) of antibiotic therapy. Thus, the impact of stewardship interventions on CDI incidence is variable, and understanding this risk requires a more granular measure of intensity of therapy than traditionally used measures like days of therapy (DOT).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study to measure the independent association between intensity of antibiotic therapy, as measured by the antibiotic spectrum index (ASI), and hospital-associated CDI (HA-CDI) at a large academic medical center between January 2018 and March 2020. We constructed a marginal Poisson regression model to generate adjusted relative risks for a unit increase in ASI per antibiotic day.

RESULTS

We included 35 457 inpatient encounters in our cohort. Sixty-eight percent of patients received at least 1 antibiotic. We identified 128 HA-CDI cases, which corresponds to an incidence rate of 4.1 cases per 10 000 patient-days. After adjusting for known confounders, each additional unit increase in ASI per antibiotic day was associated with 1.09 times the risk of HA-CDI (relative risk = 1.09; 95% CI: 1.06-1.13).

CONCLUSIONS

The ASI was strongly associated with HA-CDI and could be a useful tool in evaluating the impact of antibiotic stewardship on HA-CDI rates, providing more granular information than the more commonly used DOT.

Antibiotic Stewardship in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Antibiotic stewardship is a multidisciplinary, evidence-based approach to optimize antibiotic use and mitigate development of antibiotic resistance. Neonates have high rates of antibiotic exposure, particularly those born preterm and admitted to the NICU, and mounting evidence describes the adverse consequences of such exposures in the absence of infection. Here, we review the general principles of antibiotic stewardship and how they can be applied in NICUs. The unique characteristics of NICUs and patients cared for in this setting, which warrant unique implementation strategies and special considerations are discussed. We summarize current antibiotic use metrics for assessment of responses to stewardship interventions and changes over time, and review evidence-based infection prevention practices in the NICU. Current recommendations for empiric antibiotic use in the NICU and the utility of infection biomarkers are summarized. Lastly, given the growing global threat of increasing antibiotic resistance, specific threats in the NICU are highlighted.

[Use of antimicrobials in a mother-child university hospital center in Canada: An observational study]

INTRODUCTION

The proper use of antimicrobials is a challenge in healthcare establishments.

OBJECTIVES

Describe the detailed antimicrobial consumption profile in 2021-2022. Describe the annual evolutionary profile of the use of antimicrobials in days of therapy/1000 patient days, antibiotic spectrum index/1000 patients days and according to the proportion of days of therapy administered by parenteral route from 2005-2006 to 2021-2022.

METHOD

Descriptive and retrospective study. All patients admitted to our mother-child hospital center between April 1, 2005 and March 31, 2022 were included. The study covers the consumption of all antimicrobials through the AWare classification of the World Health Organization and antibiotic spectrum index.

RESULTS

A total of 673.9 days of therapy/1000 patients days was calculated in 2021-2022, i.e. 550.8 for antibiotics, 46.5 for antivirals, 67.9 for antifungals and 8.7 for others. A total of 2436 ASI/1000 patient days was calculated in 2021-2021. According to the AWaRe classification, in 2021-2022, 52.1% (287/551) of days of therapy/1000 patients days referred to the "Access" group, 47.8% (263/551) to the "Watch" group and 0.2% (1/551) to the "Reserve" group.

CONCLUSION

This study aims to explore the use of antimicrobials in a mother-child hospital center. It puts into perspective a stable or even slightly decreasing use of a selection of antimicrobials and compares favorably with published data. Antibiotic governance is based in particular on the periodic evaluation of consumption. Our study illustrates different approaches to quantify and describe this use.

Antimicrobial Stewardship in Neonates with Necrotizing Enterocolitis: A Quality Improvement Initiative

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic overutilization in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) has many adverse effects, and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is one of the most common indications for antibiotics in premature infants. Evidence for a preferred antibiotic regimen for NEC is lacking. This project aims to reduce piperacillin-tazobactam use and overall antibiotic duration in neonates with NEC through the implementation of an antibiotic stewardship pathway based on the modified Bell stage classification system.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team consisting of neonatology, pharmacy, infectious disease, and surgery developed an antibiotic protocol for the management of NEC based on Bell stage. Recommendations included 48 h of ampicillin/gentamicin (AG) for stage I, 5-10 days of AG for stage II, the addition of metronidazole for stage IIIA, and 7-14 days of piperacillin-tazobactam (PT) for stage IIIB. We evaluated overall antibiotic and PT exposure, progression to surgical NEC, NEC recurrence, antibiotic resistance, bacteremia/fungemia, and mortality 1 year pre- and post-protocol implementation.

RESULTS

27 patients pre-intervention and 44 post-intervention were analyzed. Antibiotic exposure was reduced from a median 119.19 to 80.65 days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient days (p = 0.11). PT exposure decreased after protocol implementation (median 68.78 vs. 7.97 DOT per 1000 patient days, p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in morbidity or mortality outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotic stewardship strategies can be implemented in the NICU without compromising outcomes in patients with NEC. Bell stage stratification appears to be an effective method for antibiotic selection. Further studies are needed in a larger population to optimize regimens and ensure safety.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective comparative study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The rapid detection of respiratory pathogens in critically ill children

PURPOSE

Respiratory infections are the most common reason for admission to paediatric intensive care units (PICU). Most patients with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) receive broad-spectrum antimicrobials, despite low rates of bacterial culture confirmation. Here, we evaluated a molecular diagnostic test for LRTI to inform the better use of antimicrobials.

METHODS

The Rapid Assay for Sick Children with Acute Lung infection Study was a single-centre, prospective, observational cohort study of mechanically ventilated children (> 37/40 weeks corrected gestation to 18 years) with suspected community acquired or ventilator-associated LRTI. We evaluated the use of a 52-pathogen custom TaqMan Array Card (TAC) to identify pathogens in non-bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (mini-BAL) samples. TAC results were compared to routine microbiology testing. Primary study outcomes were sensitivity and specificity of TAC, and time to result.

RESULTS

We enrolled 100 patients, all of whom were tested with TAC and 91 of whom had matching culture samples. TAC had a sensitivity of 89.5% (95% confidence interval (CI₉₅) 66.9-98.7) and specificity of 97.9% (CI₉₅ 97.2-98.5) compared to routine bacterial and fungal culture. TAC took a median 25.8 h (IQR 9.1-29.8 h) from sample collection to result. Culture was significantly slower: median 110.4 h (IQR 85.2-141.6 h) for a positive result and median 69.4 h (IQR 52.8-78.6) for a negative result.

CONCLUSIONS

TAC is a reliable and rapid adjunct diagnostic approach for LRTI in critically ill children, with the potential to aid early rationalisation of antimicrobial therapy.