Prospective, blinded trial of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography positron emission tomography in staging primary and recurrent cancer of the head and neck

Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/MRI, MRI, and 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of synchronous cancers and distant metastases in patients with oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

In this prospective study, we sought to compare the clinical utility of fluorodeoxyglucose PET/MRI, MRI, and PET/CT in the detection of synchronous cancers and distant metastases in patients with oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OHSCC).

METHODS

We examined 198 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven OHSCC who agreed to receive chemoradiation. All patients underwent pretreatment PET/MRI and PET/CT on the same day. Patients were followed-up for a minimum of 12 months or until death. The McNemar's test and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare sensitivity/specificity and the diagnostic capabilities of PET/MRI, MRI, and PET/CT, respectively.

RESULTS

We identified 55 patients (27.7%) who had synchronous cancers and/or distant metastases (number of involved sites: 83). The results of site-based analysis revealed that the sensitivity of PET/MRI was 15.7% higher than that of MRI (73.5% versus 57.8%, p < 0.001) and 3.6% higher compared with PET/CT (73.5% versus 69.9%, p = 0.083), whereas the sensitivity of PET/CT was 12.1% higher than that of MRI (69.9% versus 57.8%, p = 0.012). On a patient-basis, ROC curve analysis demonstrated that PET/MRI yielded a greater area under curve than MRI (0.930 versus 0.905, p = 0.023). There were no significant differences in terms of diagnostic capability between MRI and PET/CT (0.905 versus 0.917, p = 0.469) and between PET/MRI and PET/CT (0.930 versus 0.917, p = 0.062).

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, PET/MRI showed a significantly higher diagnostic capability than MRI and no significant difference compared with PET/CT for the detection of synchronous cancers or distant metastases in patients with OHSCC.

Appropriateness criteria of FDG PET/CT in oncology

(18)Fluorine-2-fluoro-2-Deoxy-d-glucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) is a well-established functional imaging method widely used in oncology. In this article, we have incorporated the various indications for (18)FDG PET/CT in oncology based on available evidence and current guidelines. Growing body of evidence for use of (18)FDG PET/CT in select tumors is also discussed. This article attempts to give the reader an overview of the appropriateness of using (18)F-FDG PET/CT in various malignancies.

PET/CT in head and neck oncology: State-of-the-art 2013

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Combined positron emission tomography with simultaneous computed tomography (PET/CT performed using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose [FDG] as a radiopharmaceutical) results in improvement in anatomic localization of tumor. This review explores the contemporary application of PET/CT to pretreatment assessment, posttreatment monitoring, and subsequent treatment planning for patients with squamous carcinoma of the head and neck.

DATA SOURCES

Contemporary publications on the use of PET/CT in head and neck oncology are reviewed and synthesized.

REVIEW METHOD

This review presents selected literature interpreted by expert opinion.

RESULTS

PET/CT is highly sensitive in staging of patients with squamous cancer of the head and neck. The sensitivity is limited by tumor size, and PET/CT cannot currently replace the information obtained from elective neck dissection in the assessment of cervical metastases. In the setting of posttreatment monitoring, PET/CT allows for identification of persistent carcinoma prior to clinical observation in approximately two-thirds of cases. However, contemporary reports do not allow assessment of cost effectiveness, and they do not allow determination if the application of PET/CT in this setting results in improved treatment outcomes. PET/CT is insensitive to evaluation of patients with glandular tumors, and those with low volume tumors and cystic metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

PET/CT requires further evaluation before recommendations can be made regarding comparative effectiveness when compared to CT or MRI for posttreatment monitoring. The improved sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT during treatment planning justifies its use in this setting for patients with advanced stage squamous cancer of the head and neck.

Comparison between whole-body MRI and Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET or PET/CT in oncology: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The aim of the article is to systematically review published data about the comparison between positron emission tomography (PET) or PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) using Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) in patients with different tumours.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of studies published in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Embase databases through April 2012 and regarding the comparison between FDG-PET or PET/CT and WB-MRI in patients with various tumours was carried out.

RESULTS

Forty-four articles comprising 2287 patients were retrieved in full-text version, included and discussed in this systematic review. Several articles evaluated mixed tumours with both diagnostic methods. Concerning the specific tumour types, more evidence exists for lymphomas, bone tumours, head and neck tumours and lung tumours, whereas there is less evidence for other tumour types.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, based on the literature findings, WB-MRI seems to be a valid alternative method compared to PET/CT in oncology. Further larger prospective studies and in particular cost-effectiveness analysis comparing these two whole-body imaging techniques are needed to better assess the role of WB-MRI compared to FDG-PET or PET/CT in specific tumour types.

Role of Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in Head and Neck Cancer

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNC) is the sixth most common cancer worldwide. In the United States, it accounts for approximately 2% of all cancers and 2% of cancer deaths. The introduction of integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) has revolutionized imaging by permitting improved and more accurate anatomic localization of functional abnormalities in the complex territory of the head and neck region, and PET/CT has become a standard clinical imaging modality in patients with HNC. The main indications for PET/CT in HNC are in pretherapy staging, detection of unknown primaries, and monitoring of therapy response or disease surveillance. Although PET/CT is a promising tool in diagnosis and surveillance of HNC, there is lack of consensus as to its use, accuracy, and implications for patient management. The existing literature on the role of PET/CT in the management of HNC is reviewed, and a summary of the current debate is provided. Second primary cancers are the main cause of death among HNC patients with early disease, and the presence of distant metastases greatly impairs the survival of patients with advanced HNC. Therefore, early detection of second primary and metastatic tumors is imperative for optimizing survival outcome. However, given the lack of randomized, prospective trials addressing the role of PET/CT after chemoradiotherapy, the ideal function of PET/CT in disease surveillance has yet to be defined.

(18)FDG-PET/CT for detecting distant metastases and second primary cancers in patients with head and neck cancer. A meta-analysis

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the role of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)FDG-PET/CT) in detecting distant metastases and second primary cancers in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) at staging. Studies about (18)FDG-PET/CT for detecting distant metastases and second primary cancers in patients with HNC were systematically searched in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and EBM Review databases from January 1, 2000 to March 1, 2011. A software called "Meta-DiSc" was used to obtain pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios, summary receiver operating characteristic curves, and Q* index. Twelve articles fulfilled all inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and Q* index estimates with 95% confidence interval for PET/CT were 0.888 (0.827-0.928), 0.951 (0.936-0.963), and 0.937 (0.844-0.964). Subgroup analysis showed similar pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and Q* index for initial staging and restaging, nasopharyngeal cancer and all other sites of HNC. (18)FDG-PET/CT has good diagnostic performance in detecting distant metastases and second primary cancers in patients with HNC.