Cerebral inflammatory response during and after cardiac surgery

Neurological biomarkers in the perioperative period

The rapid detection and evaluation of patients presenting with perioperative neurological dysfunction is of great clinical relevance. Biomarkers have been defined as biological molecules that can be used as an indicator of new onset or progression of a biological process or effect of treatment. Biomarkers have become increasingly important in this setting to supplement other modalities of diagnosis such as EEG, sensory- or motor-evoked potential, transcranial Doppler, near-infrared spectroscopy, or imaging methods. A number of neuro-proteins have been identified and are currently under investigation for potential to provide insights into injury severity, outcome, and the ability to monitor cellular damage and molecular events that occur during neurological injury. S100B is a protein released by glial cells and is considered a marker of blood-brain barrier dysfunction. Clinical studies in patients undergoing cardiac and non-cardiac surgery indicate that serum levels of S100B are increased intraoperatively and after operation. The neurone-specific enolase has also been extensively investigated as a potential marker of neuronal injury in the context of cardiac and non-cardiac surgery. A third biomarker of interest is the Tau protein, which has been linked to neurodegenerative disorders. Tau appears to be more specific than the previous two biomarkers since it is only found in the central nervous system. The metalloproteinase and ubiquitin C terminal hydroxylase-L1 (UCH-L1) are the most recently researched markers; however, their usefulness is still unclear. This review presents a comprehensive overview of S100B, neuronal-specific enolase, metalloproteinases, and UCH-L1 in the perioperative period.

Pharmacogenomics and end-organ susceptibility to injury in the perioperative period

Genomic medicine has provided new mechanistic understanding for many complex diseases over the last 5-10 years. More recently genomic approaches have been applied to the perioperative paradigm, facilitating identification of patients at high risk for adverse events, as well as those who will respond better/worse to specific pharmacologic therapies. The consistent biological theme emerging is that while inflammation is important in healing from surgical trauma, patients who are too robustly proinflammatory appear to be at higher risk for adverse perioperative events. Precise predictors of each adverse event are being elucidated so that corrective therapeutics can be instituted to improve outcomes in high-risk patients. While the field of perioperative genomics could be considered in its infancy, such approaches are the wave of the future.

Therapeutic hypothermia

Therapeutic hypothermia, introduced more than 5 decades ago, remains an important neuroprotective factor in the surgery for the correction of congenital heart disease, in particular when intraoperative circulatory arrest is required. Hypothermia decreases cerebral metabolism and energy consumption and reduces the extent of degenerative processes such as the excitotoxic cascade, apoptotic and necrotic cell death, microglial activation, oxidative stress, and inflammation. Neurological outcome has become the focus of several studies in the recent years, and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest durations of more than 40 minutes are associated with increased mid- and long-term disability. Physiologic cerebral flow-metabolism coupling seems to be preserved with moderate and mild hypothermia, but cerebral blood flow autoregulation is probably altered after deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, suggesting disordered cerebral metabolism and oxygen use. Although evidence from animal studies suggests potential benefit from very low temperatures, postoperative development of choreoathetosis has been found to correlate with the degree of intraoperative hypothermia, recommending the use of central temperatures greater than 15 degrees C in the clinical practice. Cooling times longer than 20 minutes are needed to obtain homogeneous brain cooling and effective neuroprotection. Finally, there is evidence that the sites of temperature monitoring used in the clinical practice may underestimate brain temperature after cardiopulmonary bypass, with the risk of postoperative hyperthermic brain damage.