Bipolar Electrocoagulation on Cortex after AVMs Lesionectomy for Seizure Control

New approaches for brain arteriovenous malformations-related epilepsy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this review is to present the current literature and to highlight the most recent findings in brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVM)-related epilepsy research.

METHODS

We searched Medline, PubMed, Biblioinserm, Cochrane Central to study the latest research reports about the different factors that could be responsible for the genesis of bAVM-related epilepsy. We analyzed if epileptogenesis has any characteristics traits and its relation with the vascular malformation. The results of different treatments on epilepsy were considered. Typical errors that may lead towards incorrect or worse management of the seizures for these patients were also examined.

RESULTS

The development of bAVM results from multifactorial etiologies and bAVM-related epileptogenesis is likely specific for this pathology. Different types of evidence demonstrate a bidirectional relationship between bAVM and epilepsy. Currently, there is not enough published data to determine what may be the right management for these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A better understanding of epileptogenesis in conjunction with knowledge of the complex alterations of structures and functions following bAVM-related seizures is necessary. Identification of biomarkers that can identify subgroups most likely to benefit from a specific intervention are needed to help guide clinical management. A new concept for the treatment of epilepsy related to an unruptured bAVM that cannot be treated invasively is proposed as well as new therapeutic perspectives. The next necessary step will be to propose additional algorithms to improve the development of future trials.

Seizure Outcomes After Interventional Treatment in Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformation-Associated Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Seizures are the second most common presenting symptom of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). Evidence supporting different treatment modalities is continuously evolving and it remains unclear which modality offers better seizure outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To compare various interventional treatment modalities (i.e., microsurgery, radiosurgery, endovascular embolization, or multimodality treatment), regarding outcomes in AVM-associated epilepsy.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched on December 31, 2020 for studies that evaluated outcomes in patients with AVM-associated epilepsy after undergoing different treatment modalities. Pooled analysis was performed using a random-effects model and stratified by different modalities.

RESULTS

Forty-nine studies including 2668 patients were included. Interventional management was associated with a 56.0% probability of seizure freedom and a 73.0% probability of seizure improvement. The probability of discontinuing antiepileptic drugs was estimated at 38.0%. The stratified analysis showed that microsurgery was associated with a higher probability of seizure freedom and seizure improvement than was radiosurgery, endovascular, or multimodality treatment. The probability of antiepileptic drug cessation was also higher after microsurgery compared with radiation therapy; however, only clinical but not statistical significance could be inferred because of the lack of comparative analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventional management of AVM-related epilepsy was associated with seizure freedom and seizure improvement in 56% and 73% of cases. Microsurgery seemed to be associated with a higher incidence of seizure freedom and seizure improvement than did other modalities. Future well-designed comparative studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions regarding each modality.

Factors associated with seizures at initial presentation in pediatric patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformations

OBJECTIVE

Children with cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) can present with seizures, potentially increasing morbidity and impacting clinical management. However, the factors that lead to seizures as a presenting sign are not well defined. While AVM-related seizures have been described in case series, most studies have focused on adults and have included patients who developed seizures after an AVM rupture. To address this, the authors sought to analyze demographic and morphological characteristics of AVMs in a large cohort of children.

METHODS

The demographic, clinical, and AVM morphological characteristics of 189 pediatric patients from a single-center database were studied. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to test the effect of these characteristics on seizures as an initial presenting symptom in patients with unruptured brain AVMs.

RESULTS

Overall, 28 of 189 patients initially presented with seizures (14.8%). By univariate comparison, frontal lobe location (p = 0.02), larger AVM size (p = 0.003), older patient age (p = 0.04), and the Supplemented Spetzler-Martin (Supp-SM) grade (0.0006) were associated with seizure presentation. Multivariate analysis confirmed an independent effect of frontal lobe AVM location and higher Supp-SM grade. All patients presenting with seizures had AVMs in the cortex or subcortical white matter.

CONCLUSIONS

While children and adults share some risk factors for seizure presentation, their risk factor profiles do not entirely overlap. Pediatric patients with cortical AVMs in the frontal lobe were more likely to present with seizures. Additionally, the Supp-SM grade was highly associated with seizure presentation. Future clinical research should focus on the effect of therapeutic interventions targeting AVMs on seizure control in these patients.

Arteriovenous malformation presenting with epilepsy: a multimodal approach to diagnosis and treatment

Arteriovenous malformation (AVM) presenting with epilepsy significantly impacts patient quality of life, and it should be considered very much a seizure disorder. Although hemorrhage prevention is the primary treatment aim of AVM surgery, seizure control should also be at the forefront of therapeutic management. Several hemodynamic and morphological characteristics of AVM have been identified to be associated with seizure presentation. This includes increased AVM flow, presence of long pial draining vein, venous outflow obstruction, and frontotemporal location, among other aspects. With the advent of high-throughput image processing and quantification methods, new radiographic attributes of AVM-related epilepsy have been identified. With respect to therapy, several treatment approaches are available, including conservative management or interventional modalities; this includes microsurgery, radiosurgery, and embolization or a combination thereof. Many studies, especially in the domain of microsurgery and radiosurgery, evaluate both techniques with respect to seizure outcomes. The advantage of microsurgery lies in superior AVM obliteration rates and swift seizure response. In addition, by incorporating electrophysiological monitoring during AVM resection, adjacent or even remote epileptogenic foci can be identified, leading to extended lesionectomy and improved seizure control. Radiosurgery, despite resulting in reduced AVM obliteration and prolonged time to seizure freedom, avoids the risks of surgery altogether and may provide seizure control through various antiepileptic mechanisms. Embolization continues to be used as an adjuvant for both microsurgery and radiosurgery. In this study, the authors review the latest imaging techniques in characterizing AVM-related epilepsy, in addition to reviewing each treatment modality.

Microsurgical Outcome of Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Single-Center Experience

OBJECTIVE

We describe our single-center experience treating unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (uBAVMs) with microsurgical treatment.

METHODS

During a 7-year period, 282 patients with uBAVMs were surgically treated at our institution. Patient clinical features, postsurgical complications, arteriovenous malformation obliteration rate, seizure control, and functional outcome were collected and analyzed. Seizure control was evaluated with the Engel classification system. Patient functional outcome was assessed with modified Rankin Scale score.

RESULTS

Complete obliteration was achieved in 98.2% of cases. Surgical mortality rate was zero, and overall mortality rate was 1.1%. Good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1) was achieved in 86.9% of all patients, including 92.5% of patients with Spetzler-Martin (S-M) grade I and II uBAVMs, 80.6% of patients with S-M grade III uBAVMs, and 62.5% of patients with S-M grade IV and V uBAVMs. Poor outcome was significantly associated with arteriovenous malformation size ≥6 cm, deep venous drainage, eloquent location, and poor seizure control (all P < 0.05). For 177 patients with presurgical seizures, good seizure outcome (Engel class I) was achieved in 124 (70.1%) patients after microsurgical treatment. A short history of seizure occurrence, fewer presurgical seizures, and generalized tonic-clonic seizure type may be predictors of good seizure outcome (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Good functional outcome can be achieved by microsurgical resection in S-M grade I and II and selected grade III uBAVMs. Surgical resection for high-grade (grade IV and V) uBAVMs is challenging. A high seizure-free rate can be achieved in patients with initial seizure presentation.

Medical vs. invasive therapy in AVM-related epilepsy: Systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare invasive arteriovenous malformation (AVM) therapy to conservative management using only antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for achieving seizure freedom in patients with AVM-related epilepsy.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central up to June 2015 using epilepsy and AVM Medical Subject Headings and keywords. We included original research involving controlled observational cohort studies or randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing seizure outcomes between invasive AVM treatments vs. AED management alone, and uncontrolled case series of invasive AVM therapy for seizures that contained ≥20 patients. The estimates of seizure freedom were pooled using meta-analysis for the controlled trials, while the estimates for the case series were evaluated using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Of 2,166 identified abstracts, 98 were reviewed in full text, of which 31 were included in the final dataset. We identified 2 controlled observational studies (n = 106 patients) and 29 uncontrolled case series. We identified 1 RCT but it did not report seizure outcomes. The pooled risk ratio for seizure freedom in controlled studies (0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69, 1.43) did not indicate superiority to either approach. Seizure freedom in case series varied from 19% (95% CI 11, 30%) to 95% (95% CI 76, 99%) at last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence available to determine if invasive AVM management is superior to AED only for controlling seizures. An RCT of interventional vs. medical management using standardized epilepsy-specific presurgical protocols is warranted.

Seizure Outcomes in Patients With Surgically Treated Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations

BACKGROUND:

Epilepsy is the second most common symptom in cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM) patients. The consecutive reduction of life quality is a clinically underrated problem because treatment usually focuses on the prevention of intracerebral hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate postoperative seizure outcome with the aim of more accurate counseling for postoperative seizure outcome.

METHODS:

From 1985 to 2012, 293 patients with an AVM were surgically treated by J.S. One hundred twenty-six patients with preoperative seizures or epilepsy could be identified; 103 of 126 had a follow-up of at least 12 months and were included in the analysis. The different epilepsy subtypes were categorized (sporadic seizures, chronic epilepsy, drug-resistant epilepsy [DRE]). Preoperative workup and surgical technique were evaluated. Seizure outcome was analyzed by using International League Against Epilepsy classification.

RESULTS:

Sporadic seizures were identified in 41% of patients (chronic epilepsy and DRE were identified in 36% and 23%, respectively). Detailed preoperative epileptological workup was done in 13%. Seizure freedom was achieved in 77% (79% at 5 years, 84% at 10 years). Outcome was significantly poorer in DRE cases. More extensive resection was performed in 11 cases with longstanding symptoms (&gt;24 months) and resulted in better seizure outcome as well as the short duration of preoperative seizure history.

CONCLUSION:

Patients presenting with AVM-associated epilepsy have a favorable seizure outcome after surgical treatment. Long-standing epilepsy and the progress into DRE markedly deteriorate the chances to obtain seizure freedom and should be considered an early factor in establishing the indication for AVM removal.

The outlook for adults with epileptic seizure(s) associated with cerebral cavernous malformations or arteriovenous malformations

Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) and arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are common: their asymptomatic prevalence on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is 1 in 625 and 1 in 2,000, respectively. The risk of epileptic seizure(s) for people with AVMs and CCMs affects their domestic, social, and professional lives, and may influence their decisions about treatment. This article summarizes the seizure risks for people with AVMs and CCMs, gleaned from published original articles indexed in OVID Medline and Embase before 1 January 2012. In the absence of prior intracranial hemorrhage and nonhemorrhagic focal neurologic deficit, a population-based study in Scotland, United Kingdom, found that the 5-year risks of first seizure were 8% for AVM and 4% for CCM; presentation with intracranial hemorrhage or focal neurologic deficit raised this risk for AVM (23%) but not for CCM (6%). Features associated with the occurrence of epileptic seizures for CCM are lesion multiplicity and cortical CCM location, whereas for AVM the most consistently reported associations are younger age, temporal location, cortical involvement, and nidus diameter >3 cm. In the absence of prior intracranial hemorrhage and nonhemorrhagic focal neurologic deficit, the 5-year risk of developing epilepsy following a first seizure is 58% for AVM and 94% for CCM, though there is no difference in the chance of achieving 2-year seizure freedom in this time frame (45% AVM vs. 47% CCM). Observational case series describe encouraging differences in seizure frequency before and after AVM and CCM treatment, but the shortage of studies demonstrating dramatic effects in comparison to concurrent control groups justifies the need for more controlled studies, ideally with randomized treatment allocation when the benefits of AVM or CCM treatment are uncertain.