Handedness and corpus callosal morphology in Williams syndrome

Corpus callosum morphology does not depend on hand preference or hemispheric dominance for language

It is traditionally assumed that the corpus callosum has a pivotal role in supporting hemispheric lateralisation, which originated from a series of studies suggesting differences in callosal morphology in relation to handedness. However, recent systematic reviews document that the callosal differences are only inconsistently reported, and it has been speculated that these inconsistencies might arise from focussing on handedness alone, without considering other lateralized functional modules. To address this short-coming, the present pre-registered study was designed to re-examine possible effects on callosal morphology while considering hand preference in interaction with hemispheric dominance for language. It was predicted that only those individuals who write with the hand ipsilateral to their language dominant hemisphere, have an increased need for interhemispheric integration that is reflected in detectable alteration to callosal morphology. That is, individual writing with the left hand (LW) while being left hemispheric dominant for language (LLD) are predicted to have a larger or thicker corpus callosum than individuals in which hand motor and language production are controlled by the same hemisphere. We tested this prediction by comparing the corpus callosum between the three common groups that result when combing the preferred writing hand (LW vs. right writers, RW) and the hemisphere dominant for language processing. For this purpose, language dominance (LLD vs. right dominance, RLD) was determined using a verbal-fluency task in functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) that has been previously validated. The study included N = 220 participants of both sexes, of which 97 were classified as LW/LLD, 73 as RW/LLD, and 50 as LW/RLD. The morphology of the corpus callosum was assessed on T1-weighted structural MR images as midsagittal surface area (subdivided into the three subregions genu, truncus, posterior third) as well as regional thickness (at 100 measuring points). The statistical analyses did not reveal any evidence to support our predictions and our sample size provides sufficient test power to rule out comparatively small effects with reasonable confidence. Thus, the midsagittal corpus callosum appears not substantially affected by the supposed increased requirement for interhemispheric integration in LW/LLD as compared with RW/LLD and LW/RLD individuals.

Multisensory Texture Perception in Individuals with Williams Syndrome

The sensory profile of people with Williams syndrome (WS) is characterised by atypical visual and auditory perceptions that affect their daily lives and learning. However, no research has been carried out on the haptic perception, in particular in multisensory (visual and haptic) situations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the communication of texture information from one modality to the other in people with WS. Children and adults with WS were included, as well as typically developing (TD) participants matched on chronological age (TD-CA), and TD children matched on mental age (TD-MA). All participants (N = 69) completed three matching tasks in which they had to compare two fabrics (same or different): visual, haptic and visuo-haptic. When the textures were different, the haptic and visual performances of people with WS were similar to those of TD-MA participants. Moreover, their visuo-haptic performances were lower than those of the two TD groups. These results suggest a delay in the acquisition of multisensory transfer abilities in individuals with WS. A positive link between MA and visual and visuo-haptic abilities only in people with WS suggests that they could benefit from an early intervention to develop their abilities to process and transfer multisensory information.

Handedness and midsagittal corpus callosum morphology: a meta-analytic evaluation

Following a series of seminal studies in the 1980s, left or mixed hand preference is widely thought to be associated with a larger corpus callosum than right handedness, influencing the interpretation of findings and various theories related to interhemispheric processing, brain lateralisation, and hand preference. Recent reviews, however, find inconsistencies in the literature and cast doubt on the existence of such an association. The present study was conducted to clarify the relationship between hand preference and callosal morphology in a series of meta-analyses. For this purpose, articles were identified via a search in PubMed and Web Of Science databases. Studies reporting findings relating to handedness (assessed as hand preference) and corpus-callosum morphology in healthy participants were considered eligible. On the basis of a total of k = 24 identified studies and databases, random-effects meta-analyses were conducted considering four different group comparisons: (a) dominantly right- (dRH) and left-hand preference (dLH), (b) consistent right (cRH) and non-cRH preference, (c) cRH with mixed-hand preference (MH), and (d) cRH with consistent left-hand hand preference (cLH). For none of these meta-analyses did we find a significant effect of hand preference, and narrow confidence intervals suggest that the existence of population effects larger than 1% explained variance could be excluded. For example, considering the comparison of dRH and dLH (k = 14 studies; 1910 dRH and 646 dLH participants) the mean effect size was Hedge’s g = 0.016 (95% confidence interval: − 0.12 to 0.15; explained variance: < 0.001%). Thus, the common practice of assuming an increase in callosal connectivity based on mixed or left hand preference is likely invalid.

Lateral preference in Williams-Beuren syndrome is associated with cognition and language

Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS) is a genetically defined neurodevelopmental disorder presenting with intellectual disability associated with a specific neurocognitive profile characterized by anxiety, hypersociability, poor visuospatial skills and relatively preserved language. We have defined the lateral preference in 69 individuals (40 males and 29 females, age range 5-47 years) with WBS confirmed by molecular testing, and explored its correlation with cognition, behavior problems, the main aspects of the behavioral phenotype, and specific molecular variants (parental origin and size of the 7q11.23 deletion). Lateral preference (hand, foot, eye and ear) and neurobehavioral features [intelligence quotient (IQ), sociability, visuospatial construction, narrative skills and behavior] were assessed by a battery of tests and parental interviews. A large proportion of WBS individuals showed either left or mixed handedness (26 and 19%, respectively). Hand, foot and ear lateral preference showed significant association with IQ, with individuals with mixed lateral preference presenting lower general IQ, especially verbal IQ, with respect to subjects with well-defined laterality. Approachability, visuospatial ability, behavior problems or molecular variants were not associated with lateral preference. Our results indicate that, as in other neurodevelopmental disorders, laterality is poorly defined in a significant proportion of WBS individuals, and reinforces the idea that a correct definition of lateral preference is important for cognition and language.

Morphometry of corpus callosum in Williams syndrome: shape as an index of neural development

Brain abnormalities in Williams syndrome (WS) have been consistently reported, despite few studies have devoted attention to connectivity between different brain regions in WS. In this study, we evaluated corpus callosum (CC) morphometry: bending angle, length, thickness and curvature of CC using a new shape analysis method in a group of 17 individuals with WS matched with a typically developing group. We used this multimethod approach because we hypothesized that neurodevelopmental abnormalities might result in both volume changes and structure deformation. Overall, we found reduced absolute CC cross-sectional area and volume in WS (mean CC and subsections). In parallel, we observed group differences regarding CC shape and thickness. Specifically, CC of WS is morphologically different, characterized by a larger bending angle and being more curved in the posterior part. Moreover, although CC in WS is shorter, a larger relative thickness of CC was found in all callosal sections. Finally, groups differed regarding the association between CC measures, age, white matter volume and cognitive performance. In conclusions, abnormal patterns of CC morphology and shape may be implicated in WS cognitive and behavioural phenotype.