Frozen–thawed cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in high responder patients

Optimal embryo management strategies for patients undergoing antagonist protocols in IVF treatment

PURPOSE

Selection of optimal embryo transfer strategies for IVF patients treated with antagonist protocols.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted to assess whether whole embryo culture to the blastocyst stage could enhance the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). The study included data from the first oocyte retrieval cycle of 4131 patients who underwent IVF treatment between January 2018 and June 2022. Patients were categorized into two strategies based on whether they underwent partial blastocyst culture (PBC) or whole embryo culture (WEC), and were further subdivided into three subgroups according to the number of high-quality embryos on Day 3: 0-2 embryos (subgroup 1), 3-7 embryos (subgroup 2), and 8 or more embryos (subgroup 3). Propensity score matching was used to perform a 1:1 match for patients across the three subgroups. The primary outcome measure was the CLBR per oocyte retrieval cycle.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, there were no statistically significant differences in the baseline data among patients across the three corresponding subgroups for the PBC and WEC strategies. The analysis of CLBR in single oocyte retrieval cycles revealed that subgroup 1 had a significantly higher rate with the PBC strategy compared to the WEC strategy (33.0% vs. 25.7%, P = 0.018). In subgroups 2 and 3, there were no statistically significant differences in the CLBR between patients using the two embryo management strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

When patients have 0-2 high-quality embryos on Day 3, opting for Day 3 embryo transfer rather than blastocyst culture can increase the chances of embryo transfer and improve the CLBR.

Trade-off between double cleavage-stage embryos transfer and single blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in patients with few good quality embryos in antagonist cycles: a retrospective study using a propensity score matching analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the per OPU clinical outcomes for transfer of Day 3 double cleavage-stage embryos (DET) and Day 5 single blastocyst-stage (SBT) in patients with five or fewer good quality embryos on day 3 per occyte pick-up cycle (OPU) in antagonist cycles with consideration of blastocyst formation failure.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational cohort study of 2,116 cases of OPU treated with antagonist protocol in the affiliated Chenggong Hospital of Xiamen University between January 2013 and December 2020. DET was performed in 1,811cycles and SBT was performed in 305 cycles. The DET group was matched to the SBT group by propensity score (PS) matching according to multiple maternal baseline covariates. After PS matching, there were 303 ET cycles in each group. The primary outcomes were the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR), cumulative multiple pregnancy rate(CMPR)per OPU and the number of ET to achieve live birth per OPU. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of clinical pregnancy(CPR), live birth rate(LBR), multiple pregnancy rate(MPR).

RESULTS

Following PS mating, the CLBR was slightly higher (48.8% versus 40.3% ; P = 0.041) and the CMPR was significantly higher in the DET group compared to SBT group(44.2% versus 7.9%, P < 0.001). The CPR, LBR and MPR per fresh transfer were higher in DET group compared to SBT group(50.2% versus 28.7%; 41.3% versus 21.5%;29.6% versus 0%, P < 0.001). The number of ET to achieve live birth per OPU in SBT group was obiviously more than in DET group(1.48 ± 0.578 versus 1.22 ± 0.557 ,P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

With a marginal difference cumulative live birth rate, the lower live birth rate per fresh transfer and higher number of ET per OPU in the SBT group suggested that it might take longer time to achieve a live birth with single blastocyst strategy. A trade-off decision should be made between efficiency and safety.

Effect of sequential embryo transfer on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Sequential embryo transfer has been recognized as a strategy to increase pregnancy rates in women undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). However, its impact on assisted reproductive outcomes remains to be substantiated by robust evidence. This systematic review aims to summarize and analyze the available evidence to investigate the effect of sequential embryo transfer on assisted reproductive outcomes.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was executed across the Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus databases in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data were aggregated utilizing a random effects model, and the resultant outcomes were articulated as odds ratios (ORs) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

The pooled results revealed a statistically significant enhancement in reproductive outcomes for infertile patients undergoing sequential embryo transfer as evidenced by elevated rates of chemical pregnancy (OR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.23-2.27), clinical pregnancy (OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.43-2.21), and ongoing pregnancy (OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.03-2.31). Compared with cleavage-stage embryo transfer, sequential transfer yielded superior outcomes in terms of chemical pregnancy rate (OR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.35-3.19) and clinical pregnancy rate (OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.37-2.31). Furthermore, among the repeated implantation failure (RIF) cohort, sequential embryo transfer surpassed blastocyst-stage transfer, delivering a heightened chemical pregnancy rate (OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.19-2.53) and clinical pregnancy rate (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.19-2.27).

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis indicates that sequential transfer may enhance clinical pregnancy rate in a small subgroup of well-selected women. While promising, further evidence from prospective studies is needed.

Does Day 3 embryo status matter to reproductive outcomes of single blastocyst transfer cycles? A cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether Day 3 (D3) embryo status matter to reproductive outcomes of blastocyst transfer cycles.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Assisted Reproduction Department of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.

POPULATION

A total of 6906 vitrified-thawed single blastocyst transfer cycles in 6502 women were included.

METHODS

Generalised estimated equation regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the associations between embryo status and pregnancy outcomes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage, live birth.

RESULTS

High-quality blastocysts derived from poor-grade D3 embryos had comparable pregnancy outcomes to those derived from high-grade D3 embryos (40.0% versus 43.2%, aOR 1.00, 95% CI 0.85-1.17 for live birth rate; 8.3% versus 9.5%, aOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.63-1.07 for miscarriage rate). Cycles with low D3 cell number (five cells or fewer) had significantly higher miscarriage rate (9.2% versus 7.6%, aOR 1.33, 95% CI 1.02-1.75) compared with cycles with eight cells on D3.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor-quality cleavage embryos should be cultivated to the blastocyst stage because high-quality blastocysts derived from poor-grade D3 embryos had acceptable pregnancy outcomes. When the blastocyst grade is identical, choosing embryos with higher D3 cell number (eight or more cells) for transfer could reduce the risk of early miscarriage.

Comparing the effect of sequential embryo transfer versus double blastocyst embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles in patients with repeated implantation failure: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is the main challenge in assisted reproductive technology (ART) practice. Sequential embryo transfer, in which both, cleavage-stage embryo on day 3 and blastocyst on day 5, are sequentially transferred in the same cycle, has been suggested for increasing embryo implantation in RIF patients. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of sequential embryo transfer versus double blastocyst embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)/frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles in RIF patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study was enrolled 224 RIF patients undergoing ICSI/FET cycles and randomly divided to sequential and control groups. In sequential group, embryo transfer was conducted on day 3 (cleavage stage) and day 5 (blastocyst stage). In control group, two top-quality blastocysts were transferred on day 5.

RESULTS

Two hundred and two couples accomplished the trial, and their data were analyzed. Results demonstrated that sequential embryo transfer on day 3 and day 5 compared to double blastocyst transfer on day 5 significantly increased implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy rate in RIF patients (p-value = 0.0142, p-value = 0.0154, p-value = 0.0201, respectively). However, there were no significant differences in terms of chemical pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate and ectopic pregnancy rate in the studied groups.

CONCLUSION

Sequential embryo transfer is associated with improved pregnancy outcomes in RIF patients. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes are required to validate these results.

Calcium ionophore improves embryonic development and pregnancy outcomes in patients with previous developmental problems in ICSI cycles

BACKGROUND

Calcium (Ca²⁺) ionophores are now mainly considered as efficient treatments for fertilization failure. Recently, its application for rescuing poor embryo development was proposed but still non-routine. This study aimed to explore whether Ca²⁺ ionophore improves embryo development and pregnancy outcomes in patients with poor embryo development in previous intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.

METHODS

This study included 97 patients undergoing assisted oocyte activation (AOA) with Ca²⁺ ionophore (calcimycin, A23187) treatment. Preimplantation embryonic development and clinical outcomes were compared between ICSI-AOA cycles (AOA group) and previous ICSI cycles of the same patients in which poor embryo developmental potential was present (non-AOA group). Subgroups stratified by maternal age (< 35, 35-40, ≥ 40 years, respectively) were analyzed separately.

RESULTS

A total of 642 MII oocytes were collected in AOA group, and 689 in non-AOA group. Significantly higher day 3 good quality embryo rate (P = 0.034), good quality blastocyst formation rate (P <  0.001), and utilization rate (P <  0.001) were seen in AOA group. Similar results were seen in each subgroup. For pregnancy outcomes, there were significant differences in clinical pregnancy rate (P = 0.039) and live birth rate (P = 0.045) in total group. In subgroup aged < 35 years, biochemical (P = 0.038), clinical (P = 0.041), and ongoing pregnancy rate (P = 0.037) in AOA group were significantly higher than that in non-AOA group. No significant improvement for clinical outcomes for subgroups aged 35-40 and aged ≥40.

CONCLUSION

The study suggests that calcimycin could improve preimplantation development and pregnancy outcomes in patients aged < 35 years with embryo developmental problems in previous ICSI cycles.

Effect of elevated progesterone levels the day before ovulation on pregnancy outcomes in natural cycles of frozen thawed embryo transfer

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to analyze whether elevated progesterone levels on the day before ovulation affected pregnancy outcomes in natural cycles of frozen thawed embryo transfer (NC-FET).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted in a public university hospital. Data on clinical pregnancy, live birth, ectopic pregnancy, and miscarriage rates were collected, along with other patient data. Patients were divided into two groups according to their progesterone levels the day before ovulation: the progesterone elevation (PE) group (progesterone level >1.0 ng/mL) and the normal progesterone (NP) group (progesterone level ≤1.0 ng/mL). We assessed the effect of elevated progesterone levels in NC-FET by performing multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Overall 1159 women with tubal factor infertility who underwent NC-FET were enrolled, including 666 women who received cleavage-stage embryo transfers and 493 women who received blastocyst embryo transfers. When two cleavage-stage embryos were transferred, the clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the PE than in the NP group following NC-FET (p < .05). After correcting for various confounders, we found that elevated progesterone levels (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.672; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.089-2.566, p = .018) improved the clinical pregnancy rate following transfer of two cleavage-stage embryos but did not affect the pregnancy rate when blastocyst-stage embryos were transferred (adjusted OR: 0.856; 95% CI: 0.536-1.369; p = .517).

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that in patients undergoing cleavage-stage NC-FET, progesterone levels >1.0 ng/mL improved the clinical pregnancy rates. However, the level of progesterone had no effect on the clinical pregnancy rate for patients undergoing blastocyst-stage NC-FET.

Laser-assisted selection of immotile spermatozoa has no effect on obstetric and neonatal outcomes of TESA-ICSI pregnancies

BACKGROUND

Azoospermic patients have benefited from both epididymal and testicular spermatozoa intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment and lasers have been used to identify viable, immotile spermatozoa before the procedure. There are limited studies on the safety of laser-assisted selection of immotile spermatozoa. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of laser-assisted selection of immotile spermatozoa on the obstetric and neonatal outcomes after ICSI.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative study was conducted on outcomes of ICSI cycles with testicular spermatozoa from June 2014 to June 2018. Of 132 cycles, 33 were allocated to the test group and oocytes were injected with immotile spermatozoa selected by laser, 99 cycles were allocated as control group.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, no significant differences were found in the pregnancy, implantation, miscarriage and live birth rates in the test group in either fresh or frozen transfer cycles. The cumulative live birth rate in the test group was 69.70%, which was slightly higher than in the control group (60.61%), but this was not statistically different. There were no differences in the average gestational age, premature birth rate, neonatal birth weight, and the malformation rate between the test and control groups (P > 0.05). In addition, the obstetric outcome between the two groups were not different (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

No negative effect on perinatal and neonatal outcomes was seen by using laser-assisted selection of immotile spermatozoa for TESA-ICSI. This study endorses the use of laser-assisted selection of viable spermatozoa for ICSI cycles.

Educational needs of fertility healthcare professionals using ART: a multi-country mixed-methods study

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the most pressing educational needs of fertility healthcare professionals using assisted reproductive technologies (ART)?

DESIGN

This mixed-methods study combined qualitative interviews with quantitative surveys. Participants included physicians and nurses specialized in reproductive endocrinology or in obstetrics/gynaecology, and laboratory specialists, with a minimum of 3 years of experience, practising in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Spain or the UK. Maximum variation purposive sampling was used to ensure a mix of experience and settings. Interviews were transcribed and coded through thematic analysis. Quantitative data were analysed using frequency tables, cross-tabulations and chi-squared tests to compare results by reimbursement context.

RESULTS

A total of 535 participants were included (273 physicians, 145 nurses and 117 laboratory specialists). Knowledge gaps, skills gaps and attitude issues were identified in relation to: (i) ovarian stimulation (e.g. knowledge of treatments and instruction protocols for ovarian stimulation), (ii) embryo culture and cryopreservation/vitrification (e.g. diverging opinions on embryo freezing, (iii) embryo assessment (e.g. performing genetic testing), (iv) support of luteal phase and optimizing pregnancy outcomes (e.g. knowledge of assessment methods for endometrial receptivity), and (v) communication with patients (e.g. reluctance to address emotional distress).

CONCLUSIONS

This descriptive, exploratory study corroborates previously reported gaps in fertility care and identifies potential causes of these gaps. Findings provide evidence to inform educational programmes for healthcare professionals who use ART in their practice and calls for the development of case-based education and interprofessional training programmes to improve care for patients with fertility issues.