The brief cognitive assessment tool (BCAT): cross-validation in a community dwelling older adult sample

Predicting Functional Dependence in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Differential Contributions of Memory and Executive Functions

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) exclude functional deficits, yet recent studies suggest that older adults with MCI can exhibit impairment in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). To assist health care providers in detecting functional vulnerabilities that often precipitate loss of independence, we: (a) compared IADL dependence in MCI to older adults without cognitive impairment and those with dementia, (b) estimated the odds of dependence on specific IADLs in MCI, and (c) investigated the differential contributions of memory and executive functions to IADL dependence.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Participants were older adults (Mage = 77.58 ± 11.05) in Maryland, USA (N = 512) community and postacute rehabilitation settings. Analysis was performed on Brief Cognitive Assessment Tool (BCAT) and the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) data that assessed participants' cognitive functioning and IADL dependence, respectively.

RESULTS

61.04% of participants with MCI were dependent on one or more IADLs. MCI was associated with significantly greater odds of dependence than normal cognition on 7 of the 10 IADLs (odds ratios = 2.62-4.66). Impairment in memory and executive functions significantly predicted IADL dependence (18.52% of variance beyond demographics); executive functions were the stronger predictor, particularly for complex finances, complex cooking, and remembering events.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

IADL dependence can occur even in MCI. Testing suggestive of MCI should alert clinicians to further investigate the older adult's profile of cognitive and functional limitations to highlight targets for caregiver support and promote independence by "right-sizing" community or facility resources.

Disparities in Dementia Occurrence and Rate of Cognitive Decline Between African American and White Long-Term Care Residents

The objective of the current study was to investigate possible racial disparities in dementia among long-term care (LTC) residents. Participants were 1,239 residents (age ≥50) from 61 nursing home and assisted living facilities in Maryland. Retrospective analysis was performed to compare Brief Cognitive Assessment Tool (BCAT®) scores between African American and White participants. African American participants had 1.43 times greater odds of dementia and 1.86 times greater odds of severe-stage dementia than White residents. African American residents were significantly younger than their White peers by approximately 9 years within mild-moderate dementia levels and by 5 years at the severe stage. The rate of cognitive decline did not significantly differ by race despite a more negative curvilinear relationship between BCAT scores and age for African American participants than White participants. Implications of these findings are discussed for successful resident-centered care in LTC settings as well as for care transitions. [Research in Gerontological Nursing, xx(x), xx-xx.].

Verbal test of practical judgment (VPJ): a new test of judgment that predicts functional skills for older adults

OBJECTIVES

The clinical assessment of older adults' judgment is important for mitigating safety risks that often precipitate loss of independence. Our national survey of geriatric healthcare providers (N = 496; M years of experience = 17.11 ± 10.60) indicated that formal judgment tests are underutilized in clinical practice. We developed the Verbal Test of Practical Judgment (VPJ) as a new test of judgment for older adults intended to identify difficulty performing instrumental activities of daily living (IADL).

METHOD

In two prospective studies, participants were long-term care facility residents (age ≥ 50) in Maryland, USA (Study 1, N = 51; Study 2, N = 110) referred to licensed psychologists for neuro-cognitive and mood evaluation by facility attending physicians. Psychometric analyses were performed to examine the construct validity of the VPJ.

RESULTS

The VPJ evidenced adequate reliability and strong construct validity across both studies. Receiver operating characteristic analysis yielded an optimal VPJ cut score for identifying impaired judgment. The VPJ significantly predicted IADL performance beyond clinician and participant ratings.

CONCLUSION

The VPJ appears to be a valid tool for assessing judgment among older adults with suspected cognitive impairment. VPJ score inferences can inform clinicians on the odds of requiring assistance for specific IADLs.

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in long-term care patients: subtype classification and occurrence

OBJECTIVES

This study examines mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in long-term care settings by identifying and quantifying MCI subtypes in a combined sample of nursing home and assisted-living patients. We compared impairment thresholds of 1-SD and 1.5-SD to determine if different cut-offs differentially affect occurrence rates.

METHOD

One hundred and eight participants who met general criteria for MCI were included for the purposes of this study. The general diagnosis of MCI was based on criteria. Participants were further grouped into MCI subtypes. Based on previously established norms, Brief Cognitive Assessment Tool (BCAT) factor scores were used to assess whether MCI participants met either the 1-SD and 1.5-SD impairment thresholds for memory, executive functions, and attentional capacity.

RESULTS

Using both 1-SD and 1.5-SD impairment thresholds, three clear MCI subtypes were identified: amnestic, single-domain; non-amnestic, single-domain (executive); and amnestic, multi-domain (memory and executive). A fourth category (undifferentiated) was identified in patients who did not meet criteria for a distinct MCI subtype, but still had cognitive impairments. The stricter impairment threshold of 1.5-SD resulted in fewer patients classified as having any of the three domain-specific subtypes.

CONCLUSION

Based on a sample of nursing home and assisted-living patients, we identified three MCI subtypes, and a fourth category consisting of participants with general MCI, but without clear evidence of domain-specific cognitive impairment. When selecting impairment thresholds, one should consider the impact on the identification of MCI subtypes and the probability of misdiagnoses.

A comparison of cognitive functioning in long-term care and short-stay nursing home residents

It can be challenging to provide person-centred care for individuals with cognitive impairment if they are unable to communicate their needs to facility providers clearly. The high base rates of dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in US nursing homes is well documented; however, our understanding of the unique prevalence of cognitive levels in long-term care and short-stay residents is limited. Our aim is to determine whether there are significant differences in specific cognitive levels between these two groups. Long-term care and short-stay residents (N = 579) were randomly selected from 18 Maryland, US skilled nursing facilities; 345 met inclusion criteria for participation (mean age 79.41) and completed a cognitive test (Brief Cognitive Assessment Tool (BCAT)). Based on BCAT scores, 78.9 per cent of the long-term care residents had dementia compared to 61.4 per cent for short-stay residents. The proportions of MCI, mild, and moderate to severe dementia were significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.00). The odds of residents having moderate to severe dementia were 2.76 times greater for long-term care compared to short-stay residents. BCAT total and factor scores were significantly different between long-term care and short-stay nursing home residents (p < 0.001). We discuss the implications of these empirical findings in terms of facilitating person-centred care in nursing homes.