1
|
Blane J, Gillis G, Griffanti L, Mitchell R, Pretorius PM, Forster S, Shabir S, Maffei L, O'Donoghue MC, Fossey J, Raymont V, Martos L, Mackay CE. Prevalence of dementia risk factors in the Oxford Brain Health Clinic. Sci Rep 2025; 15:7765. [PMID: 40044700 PMCID: PMC11882794 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91178-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2025] [Indexed: 03/09/2025] Open
Abstract
With promising disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) emerging and good evidence to support risk reduction in the delay of dementia onset and progression, it is important to understand the profile of patients attending memory assessment services to estimate what proportion of patients might benefit from different types of interventions. The Oxford Brain Health Clinic (OBHC) is a psychiatry-led, clinical-research service that offers memory clinic patients detailed clinical assessments and equal access to research opportunities as part of their secondary care pathway. In this work, we describe the characteristics of OBHC patients in terms of demographics, diagnoses and prevalence of potentially modifiable risk factors compared with a cohort of healthy volunteers and the average memory clinic population. Our results suggest that high research consent rates (91.5%) in the OBHC resulted in a highly representative cohort of the clinical population. Based on Lecanemab trial inclusion criteria, 24.6% of the OBHC population may be suitable for further investigation into DMTs. Furthermore, 67.4% of OBHC patients have at least one potentially modifiable risk factor that may benefit from lifestyle interventions, particularly those focused on depression, sleep and physical activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Blane
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
| | - G Gillis
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - L Griffanti
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - R Mitchell
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - P M Pretorius
- Department of Neuroradiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - S Forster
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S Shabir
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - L Maffei
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - M C O'Donoghue
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - J Fossey
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - V Raymont
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - L Martos
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - C E Mackay
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hazelton JL, Della Bella G, Barttfeld P, Dottori M, Gonzalez-Gomez R, Migeot J, Moguilner S, Legaz A, Hernandez H, Prado P, Cuadros J, Maito M, Fraile-Vazquez M, González Gadea ML, Çatal Y, Miller B, Piguet O, Northoff G, Ibáñez A. Altered spatiotemporal brain dynamics of interoception in behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia. EBioMedicine 2025; 113:105614. [PMID: 39987747 PMCID: PMC11894334 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2024] [Revised: 02/07/2025] [Accepted: 02/08/2025] [Indexed: 02/25/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dysfunctional allostatic-interoception, altered processing of bodily signals in response to environmental demands, occurs in behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) patients. Previous research has not investigated the dynamic nature of interoception using methods like intrinsic neural timescales. We hypothesised that longer intrinsic neural timescales of interoception would occur in bvFTD patients, evidencing dysfunctional allostatic-interoception. METHODS One-hundred and twelve participants (31 bvFTD patients, 35 Alzheimer's disease patients, AD and 46 healthy controls) completed a well-validated task measuring cardiac-interoception and exteroception. Simultaneous EEG and ECG were recorded. Intrinsic neural timescales were measured via the autocorrelation window (ACW) of broadband EEG signals from each heartbeat and a time-lagged version of itself. Spatiotemporal clustering analyses identified clusters with significant between-group differences in each condition. Voxel-based morphometry was used to target the allostatic-interoceptive network. Neuropsychological tests of cognition and social cognition were assessed. FINDINGS In bvFTD patients, longer interoceptive-ACWs than controls were observed in the bilateral fronto-temporal and parietal regions. In AD patients, longer interoceptive-ACWs than controls were observed in central and occipitoparietal brain regions. No differences were observed during exteroception. In bvFTD patients only, longer interoceptive-ACW was linked to worse sociocognitive performance. Structural neural correlates of interoceptive-ACW in bvFTD involved the anterior cingulate, insula, orbitofrontal cortex, hippocampus, and angular gyrus. INTERPRETATION Our findings suggest a core allostatic-interoceptive deficit occurs in people with bvFTD. Further, altered interoceptive intrinsic neural timescales may provide a neurobiological mechanism underpinning the complex behaviours observed in bvFTD patients. Our findings support synergistic models of brain disease and can inform clinical practice. FUNDING All funding sources are reported in the Acknowledgements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L Hazelton
- Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile; Cognitive Neuroscience Centre (CNC), Universidad de San Andres, Buenos Aires, Argentina; The University of Sydney, Brain and Mind Centre, School of Psychology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Gabriel Della Bella
- Cognitive Science Group, Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi, CONICET-UNC), Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina; Facultad de Matemática Astronomía y Física (FaMAF), Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Pablo Barttfeld
- Cognitive Science Group, Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPsi, CONICET-UNC), Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Martin Dottori
- Cognitive Neuroscience Centre (CNC), Universidad de San Andres, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Raul Gonzalez-Gomez
- Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile
| | - Joaquín Migeot
- Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile
| | - Sebastian Moguilner
- Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile
| | - Agustina Legaz
- Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile; Cognitive Neuroscience Centre (CNC), Universidad de San Andres, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Hernan Hernandez
- Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile
| | - Pavel Prado
- Escuela de Fonoaudiología, Facultad de Odontología y Ciencias de la Rehabilitación, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Jhosmary Cuadros
- Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile; Advanced Centre for Electrical and Electronic Engineering (AC3E), Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Valparaíso, Chile; Grupo de Bioingeniería, Decanato de Investigación, Universidad Nacional Experimental del Táchira, San Cristóbal, 5001, Venezuela
| | - Marcelo Maito
- Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile; Cognitive Neuroscience Centre (CNC), Universidad de San Andres, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Matias Fraile-Vazquez
- Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile; Cognitive Neuroscience Centre (CNC), Universidad de San Andres, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Life Span Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA
| | - María Luz González Gadea
- Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile; National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Yasir Çatal
- Mind, Brain Imaging and Neuroethics, Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Bruce Miller
- Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), University of California San Francisco (UCSF), California, USA; Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Olivier Piguet
- The University of Sydney, Brain and Mind Centre, School of Psychology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Georg Northoff
- Mind, Brain Imaging and Neuroethics, Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Mental Health Centre, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China; Centre for Cognition and Brain Disorders, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Agustin Ibáñez
- Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile; Cognitive Neuroscience Centre (CNC), Universidad de San Andres, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), University of California San Francisco (UCSF), California, USA; Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cerajewska TL, Davies M, Allen-Birt SJ, Swirski M, Coulthard EJ, West NX. A feasibility study to recruit, retain and treat periodontitis in volunteers with mild dementia, whilst monitoring their cognition. J Dent 2024; 150:105355. [PMID: 39293537 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2024] [Revised: 09/12/2024] [Accepted: 09/13/2024] [Indexed: 09/20/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Dementia patients are challenging to manage dentally. This study determined whether individuals with mild dementia and periodontitis, could be recruited, retained and demonstrate sustained oral health improvements over 2 years following personalised professional periodontitis treatment. The feasibility of same visit cognition measurements was assessed. METHODS A non-randomised study in individuals with mild dementia, capacity to consent, periodontitis and ≥6 teeth. Following enrolment and dental/cognitive assessments, personalised periodontal treatment, followed by 3-monthly supportive periodontal care was performed. Cognitive and periodontal assessments were undertaken at 6, 12, 24-months. Participants and project-partners fed back on homecare regimens. RESULTS 18 participants were recruited, 15 completed 12- & 8 completed 24-months, 1 participant failed to attend one appointment, and early study termination due to COVID19. From baseline to 12-months mean percentage bleeding sites, Turesky plaque score ≥2 and periodontal pockets ≥4 mm decreased significantly (34.4 vs 14.75, p < 0.01; 78.49 vs 57.5, p < 0.01; 18.38 vs 5.14, p < 0.001). Significant change from baseline was retained at 24-months for mean percentage periodontal pockets ≥4 mm (14.47 vs 4.29, p < 0.05; n = 8). Cognition declined significantly to 12-months (mean ACEIII 71.47 vs 65.40, p < 0.05), but not between 12- and 24-months (67.5 vs 65.38, n = 8). Most reported home-care regimen as easy/OK to follow. CONCLUSIONS Mild dementia participants with periodontitis can be recruited, retained in a 24-month study and periodontally treated with personalised professional and at-home care regimens. Cognitive assessments can be performed at the same treatment visit. This demonstrates sustained engagement and supports oral health compliance can be successful in challenging cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanya L Cerajewska
- Periodontology, Clinical Trials Unit, Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LY, UK
| | - Maria Davies
- Periodontology, Clinical Trials Unit, Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LY, UK
| | | | - Marta Swirski
- Clinical Neurosciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Nicola X West
- Periodontology, Clinical Trials Unit, Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LY, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Delgado‐Álvarez A, Valles‐Salgado M, Delgado‐Alonso C, Matias‐Guiu J, Matias‐Guiu JA. Conversion between the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale and Mini-Mental State Examination test scores in majority and minority populations. Brain Behav 2024; 14:e3650. [PMID: 39219244 PMCID: PMC11366778 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/14/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) having significant advantages as a cognitive screening tool, particularly for minority populations, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) test is the most widely used test for cognitive screening in Alzheimer's disease (AD). This study aimed to develop a conversion table to predict MMSE scores from observed RUDAS scores, allowing an easy-to-use method to compare both screening tests. METHODS The equipercentile equating method was used to develop the conversion table using a training sample consisting of cognitively intact participants and individuals with early-stage AD. The resulting conversion table was validated in two samples, comprising participants from majority and minority populations assessed in Spanish. RESULTS The conversion table demonstrated excellent reliability with intraclass correlation coefficients of.92 in both validation samples. CONCLUSION This study provides a conversion table between RUDAS and MMSE scores, improving the comparability of these cognitive screening tools for use in clinical and research purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfonso Delgado‐Álvarez
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, San Carlos Institute for Health Research (IdiSSC)Universidad Complutense de MadridMadridSpain
- Department of Psychobiology & Behavioral Sciences MethodsUniversidad Complutense de MadridMadridSpain
| | - Maria Valles‐Salgado
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, San Carlos Institute for Health Research (IdiSSC)Universidad Complutense de MadridMadridSpain
| | - Cristina Delgado‐Alonso
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, San Carlos Institute for Health Research (IdiSSC)Universidad Complutense de MadridMadridSpain
| | - Jorge Matias‐Guiu
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, San Carlos Institute for Health Research (IdiSSC)Universidad Complutense de MadridMadridSpain
| | - Jordi A. Matias‐Guiu
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, San Carlos Institute for Health Research (IdiSSC)Universidad Complutense de MadridMadridSpain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dobson R, Patterson K, Malik R, Mandal U, Asif H, Humphreys R, Payne M, O-Charoenrat E, Huzzey L, Clare A, Green K, Morton M, Sohrabi C, Singh N, Pasupathy A, Patel M, Whiteman S, Maxmin K, Bass N, Gupta B, Cooper C, Marshall C, Weil RS, Mummery CJ. Eligibility for antiamyloid treatment: preparing for disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2024; 95:796-803. [PMID: 38862265 PMCID: PMC11347253 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2024-333468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) have early evidence of efficacy. Widespread delivery of DMTs will require major service reconfiguration. Treatment pathways will need to include triaging for eligibility, regular infusions and baseline and follow-up MRI scanning. A critical step in planning is provision of real-world estimates of patients likely to be eligible for triaging, but these are challenging to obtain. METHODS We performed a retrospective service evaluation of patients attending five memory services across North and East London and a national specialist cognitive disorders service. We examined the likely proportion of patients who would (1) be referred for triaging for DMTs and (2) potentially be suitable for treatments. RESULTS Data from a total of 1017 patients were included, 517 of whom were seen in community memory services and 500 in a specialist clinic. In the memory services, 367/517 (71%) were diagnosed with possible AD. After exclusions of those in whom cognitive and frailty scores, MRI contraindications or anticoagulant use indicated they would be unlikely to be suitable, an estimated 32% would be eligible for triaging. In the specialist cognitive clinic, where additional investigations are available, 14% of those seen (70/500) would be potentially eligible for treatment. CONCLUSIONS While a sizeable proportion of patients attending memory clinics may be referred for triaging for DMTs for AD, only a minority are likely to be suitable for these, as demonstrated in patients seen in specialist cognitive services. This will need to be considered when designing pathways for DMT delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Dobson
- Centre for Preventive Neurology, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Academic Health Science Centre, UCL Partners, London, UK
| | | | - Reshad Malik
- Haringey Memory Service, Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Enfield Memory Service, Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Uttara Mandal
- Haringey Memory Service, Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Hina Asif
- Haringey Memory Service, Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Ros Humphreys
- Haringey Memory Service, Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Michael Payne
- Haringey Memory Service, Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Eng O-Charoenrat
- Haringey Memory Service, Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Lauren Huzzey
- Enfield Memory Service, Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Adam Clare
- Enfield Memory Service, Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Kate Green
- Enfield Memory Service, Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Maija Morton
- Barnet Memory Service, Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Catrin Sohrabi
- Barnet Memory Service, Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Navreen Singh
- Barnet Memory Service, Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Amirtha Pasupathy
- Barnet Memory Service, Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Milan Patel
- Camden Memory Service, Camden and Islington Mental Health and Social Care Trust, London, UK
| | - Sam Whiteman
- Camden Memory Service, Camden and Islington Mental Health and Social Care Trust, London, UK
| | - Kate Maxmin
- Camden Memory Service, Camden and Islington Mental Health and Social Care Trust, London, UK
| | - Nicholas Bass
- Tower Hamlets Memory Service, East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Bhavya Gupta
- Tower Hamlets Memory Service, East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Claudia Cooper
- East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Centre for Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Charles Marshall
- Centre for Preventive Neurology, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Tower Hamlets Memory Service, East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rimona Sharon Weil
- Academic Health Science Centre, UCL Partners, London, UK
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - Catherine J Mummery
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Laurell AAS, Venkataraman AV, Schmidt T, Montagnese M, Mueller C, Stewart R, Lewis J, Mundell C, Isaacs JD, Krishnan MS, Barber R, Rittman T, Underwood BR. Estimating demand for potential disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer's disease in the UK. Br J Psychiatry 2024; 224:198-204. [PMID: 38235531 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2023.166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Phase three trials of the monoclonal antibodies lecanemab and donanemab, which target brain amyloid, have reported statistically significant differences in clinical end-points in early Alzheimer's disease. These drugs are already in use in some countries and are going through the regulatory approval process for use in the UK. Concerns have been raised about the ability of healthcare systems, including those in the UK, to deliver these treatments, considering the resources required for their administration and monitoring. AIMS To estimate the scale of real-world demand for monoclonal antibodies for Alzheimer's disease in the UK. METHOD We used anonymised patient record databases from two National Health Service trusts for the year 2019 to collect clinical, demographic, cognitive and neuroimaging data for these cohorts. Eligibility for treatment was assessed using the inclusion criteria from the clinical trials of donanemab and lecanemab, with consideration given to diagnosis, cognitive performance, cerebrovascular disease and willingness to receive treatment. RESULTS We examined the records of 82 386 people referred to services covering around 2.2 million people. After applying the trial criteria, we estimate that a maximum of 906 people per year would start treatment with monoclonal antibodies in the two services, equating to 30 200 people if extrapolated nationally. CONCLUSIONS Monoclonal antibody treatments for Alzheimer's disease are likely to present a significant challenge for healthcare services to deliver in terms of the neuroimaging and treatment delivery. The data provided here allows health services to understand the potential demand and plan accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel A S Laurell
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK; and Older People and Adult Community Directorate, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ashwin V Venkataraman
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Tatjana Schmidt
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Christoph Mueller
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Robert Stewart
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Lewis
- Informatics Department, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Clare Mundell
- Pharmacy Department, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jeremy D Isaacs
- Department of Neurology, Atkinson Morley Regional Neuroscience Centre, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; and Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's, University of London, UK
| | - Mani S Krishnan
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, UK
| | - Robert Barber
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Timothy Rittman
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Benjamin R Underwood
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK; and Older People and Adult Community Directorate, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kudlicka A, Martyr A, Bahar-Fuchs A, Sabates J, Woods B, Clare L. Cognitive rehabilitation for people with mild to moderate dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 6:CD013388. [PMID: 37389428 PMCID: PMC10310315 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013388.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive impairments affect functional ability in people with dementia. Cognitive rehabilitation (CR) is a personalised, solution-focused approach that aims to enable people with mild-to-moderate dementia to manage everyday activities and maintain as much independence as possible. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of CR on everyday functioning and other outcomes for people with mild-to-moderate dementia, and on outcomes for care partners. To identify and explore factors that may be associated with the efficacy of CR. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group Specialised Register, which contains records from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, LILACS, and other clinical trial databases, and grey literature sources. The most recent search was completed on 19 October 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CR with control conditions and reporting relevant outcomes for the person with dementia and/or the care partner. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We extracted relevant data from published manuscripts and contacted trial authors if necessary. Within each of the comparisons, we pooled data for each outcome of interest and conducted inverse-variance, random-effects meta-analyses. We evaluated the certainty of the evidence using GRADEpro GDT. MAIN RESULTS We identified six eligible RCTs published in English between 2010 and 2022, which together included 1702 participants. The mean age of participants ranged from 76 to 80 and the proportion of male participants was between 29.4% and 79.3%. Most participants, in the studies where the type of dementia was reported, had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD; n = 1002, 58.9% of the whole sample, 81.2% of the participants for whom the specific diagnosis was reported). Risk of bias in the individual studies was relatively low. The exception was a high risk of bias in relation to blinding of participants and practitioners, which is not usually feasible with psychosocial interventions. Our primary outcome of everyday functioning was operationalised in the included studies as goal attainment in relation to activities targeted in the intervention. For our main comparison of CR with usual care, we pooled data for goal attainment evaluated from three perspectives (self-rating of performance, informant rating of performance, and self-rating of satisfaction with performance) at end of treatment and at medium-term follow-up (3 to 12 months). We could also pool data at these time points for 20 and 19 secondary outcomes respectively. The review findings were strongly driven by one large, high-quality RCT. We found high-certainty evidence of large positive effects of CR on all three primary outcome perspectives at the end of treatment: participant self-ratings of goal attainment (standardised mean difference (SMD) 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26 to 1.66; I2 = 0%; 3 RCTs, 501 participants), informant ratings of goal attainment (SMD 1.61, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.21; I2 = 41%; 3 RCTs, 476 participants), and self-ratings of satisfaction with goal attainment (SMD 1.31, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.54; I2 = 5%; 3 RCTs, 501 participants), relative to an inactive control condition. At medium-term follow-up, we found high-certainty evidence showing a large positive effect of CR on all three primary outcome perspectives: participant self-ratings of goal attainment (SMD 1.46, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.68; I2 = 0%; 2 RCTs, 432 participants), informant ratings of goal attainment (SMD 1.25, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.72; I2 = 29%; 3 RCTs, 446 participants), and self-ratings of satisfaction with goal attainment (SMD 1.19, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.66; I2 = 28%; 2 RCTs, 432 participants), relative to an inactive control condition. For participants at the end of treatment we found high-certainty evidence showing a small positive effect of CR on self-efficacy (2 RCTs, 456 participants) and immediate recall (2 RCTs, 459 participants). For participants at medium-term follow-up we found moderate-certainty evidence showing a small positive effect of CR on auditory selective attention (2 RCTs, 386 participants), and a small negative effect on general functional ability (3 RCTs, 673 participants), and we found low-certainty evidence showing a small positive effect on sustained attention (2 RCTs, 413 participants), and a small negative effect on memory (2 RCTs, 51 participants) and anxiety (3 RCTs, 455 participants). We found moderate- and low-certainty evidence indicating that at the end of treatment CR had negligible effects on participant anxiety, quality of life, sustained attention, memory, delayed recall, and general functional ability, and at medium-term follow-up on participant self-efficacy, depression, quality of life, immediate recall, and verbal fluency. For care partners at the end of treatment we found low-certainty evidence showing a small positive effect on environmental aspects of quality of life (3 RCTs, 465 care partners), and small negative effects of CR on level of depression (2 RCTs, 32 care partners) and on psychological wellbeing (2 RCTs, 388 care partners). For care partners at medium-term follow-up we found high-certainty evidence showing a small positive effect of CR on social aspects of quality of life (3 RCTs, 436 care partners) and moderate-certainty evidence showing a small positive effect on psychological aspects of quality of life (3 RCTs, 437 care partners). We found moderate- and low-certainty evidence at the end of treatment that CR had negligible effects on care partners' physical health, psychological and social aspects of quality of life, and stress, and at medium-term follow-up for the physical health aspect of care partners' quality of life and psychological wellbeing. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS CR is helpful in enabling people with mild or moderate dementia to improve their ability to manage the everyday activities targeted in the intervention. Confidence in these findings could be strengthened if more high-quality studies contributed to the observed effects. The available evidence suggests that CR can form a valuable part of a clinical toolkit to assist people with dementia in overcoming some of the everyday barriers imposed by cognitive and functional difficulties. Future research, including process evaluation studies, could help identify avenues to maximise CR effects and achieve wider impacts on functional ability and wellbeing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alex Bahar-Fuchs
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
- Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Julieta Sabates
- Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Bob Woods
- Dementia Services Development Centre Wales, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Linda Clare
- University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fittipaldi S, Legaz A, Maito M, Hernandez H, Altschuler F, Canziani V, Moguilner S, Gillan C, Castillo J, Lillo P, Custodio N, Avila-Funes J, Cardona J, Slachevsky A, Henriquez F, Fraile-Vazquez M, de Souza LC, Borroni B, Hornberger M, Lopera F, Santamaria-Garcia H, Matallana D, Reyes P, Gonzalez-Campo C, Bertoux M, Ibanez A. Heterogeneous factors influence social cognition across diverse settings in brain health and age-related diseases. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3007086. [PMID: 37333384 PMCID: PMC10274952 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3007086/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
Aging may diminish social cognition, which is crucial for interaction with others, and significant changes in this capacity can indicate pathological processes like dementia. However, the extent to which non-specific factors explain variability in social cognition performance, especially among older adults and in global settings, remains unknown. A computational approach assessed combined heterogeneous contributors to social cognition in a diverse sample of 1063 older adults from 9 countries. Support vector regressions predicted the performance in emotion recognition, mentalizing, and a total social cognition score from a combination of disparate factors, including clinical diagnosis (healthy controls, subjective cognitive complaints, mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia), demographics (sex, age, education, and country income as a proxy of socioeconomic status), cognition (cognitive and executive functions), structural brain reserve, and in-scanner motion artifacts. Cognitive and executive functions and educational level consistently emerged among the top predictors of social cognition across models. Such non-specific factors showed more substantial influence than diagnosis (dementia or cognitive decline) and brain reserve. Notably, age did not make a significant contribution when considering all predictors. While fMRI brain networks did not show predictive value, head movements significantly contributed to emotion recognition. Models explained between 28-44% of the variance in social cognition performance. Results challenge traditional interpretations of age-related decline, patient-control differences, and brain signatures of social cognition, emphasizing the role of heterogeneous factors. Findings advance our understanding of social cognition in brain health and disease, with implications for predictive models, assessments, and interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - José Avila-Funes
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Pablo Reyes
- Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Maito MA, Santamaría-García H, Moguilner S, Possin KL, Godoy ME, Avila-Funes JA, Behrens MI, Brusco IL, Bruno MA, Cardona JF, Custodio N, García AM, Javandel S, Lopera F, Matallana DL, Miller B, Okada de Oliveira M, Pina-Escudero SD, Slachevsky A, Sosa Ortiz AL, Takada LT, Tagliazuchi E, Valcour V, Yokoyama JS, Ibañez A. Classification of Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia using routine clinical and cognitive measures across multicentric underrepresented samples: A cross sectional observational study. LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. AMERICAS 2023; 17:100387. [PMID: 36583137 PMCID: PMC9794191 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Global brain health initiatives call for improving methods for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) in underrepresented populations. However, diagnostic procedures in upper-middle-income countries (UMICs) and lower-middle income countries (LMICs), such as Latin American countries (LAC), face multiple challenges. These include the heterogeneity in diagnostic methods, lack of clinical harmonisation, and limited access to biomarkers. Methods This cross-sectional observational study aimed to identify the best combination of predictors to discriminate between AD and FTD using demographic, clinical and cognitive data among 1794 participants [904 diagnosed with AD, 282 diagnosed with FTD, and 606 healthy controls (HCs)] collected in 11 clinical centres across five LAC (ReDLat cohort). Findings A fully automated computational approach included classical statistical methods, support vector machine procedures, and machine learning techniques (random forest and sequential feature selection procedures). Results demonstrated an accurate classification of patients with AD and FTD and HCs. A machine learning model produced the best values to differentiate AD from FTD patients with an accuracy = 0.91. The top features included social cognition, neuropsychiatric symptoms, executive functioning performance, and cognitive screening; with secondary contributions from age, educational attainment, and sex. Interpretation Results demonstrate that data-driven techniques applied in archival clinical datasets could enhance diagnostic procedures in regions with limited resources. These results also suggest specific fine-grained cognitive and behavioural measures may aid in the diagnosis of AD and FTD in LAC. Moreover, our results highlight an opportunity for harmonisation of clinical tools for dementia diagnosis in the region. Funding This work was supported by the Multi-Partner Consortium to Expand Dementia Research in Latin America (ReDLat), funded by NIA/NIH (R01AG057234), Alzheimer's Association (SG-20-725707-ReDLat), Rainwater Foundation, Takeda (CW2680521), Global Brain Health Institute; as well as CONICET; FONCYT-PICT (2017-1818, 2017-1820); PIIECC, Facultad de Humanidades, Usach; Sistema General de Regalías de Colombia (BPIN2018000100059), Universidad del Valle (CI 5316); ANID/FONDECYT Regular (1210195, 1210176, 1210176); ANID/FONDAP (15150012); ANID/PIA/ANILLOS ACT210096; and Alzheimer's Association GBHI ALZ UK-22-865742.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelo Adrián Maito
- Cognitive Neuroscience Center (CNC), Universidad de San Andrés, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Hernando Santamaría-García
- Global Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Ph.D Program of Neuroscience, Psychiatry Department, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
- Center for Memory and Cognition Intellectus, Hospital San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Sebastián Moguilner
- Cognitive Neuroscience Center (CNC), Universidad de San Andrés, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Katherine L. Possin
- Global Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - María E. Godoy
- Cognitive Neuroscience Center (CNC), Universidad de San Andrés, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - José Alberto Avila-Funes
- Geriatrics Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias médicas y nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
- Centre de Recherche Inserm, U897, Brodeaux, France
- University Victor Segalen Bourdeaux 2, Bordeaux, France
| | - María I. Behrens
- Centro de Investigación Clínica Avanzada (CICA) Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Departamento de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Departamento de Neurociencia, Facultad de medicina Universidad de Chile and Departamento de Neurología y Psiquiatría, Clínica Alemana-Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
| | - Ignacio L. Brusco
- Universidad Buenos Aires & Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y técnicas (CONICET), Argentina
| | - Martín A. Bruno
- Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas de la Universidad Católica de Cuyo & Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y técnicas (CONICET), Argentina
| | | | - Nilton Custodio
- Unit Cognitive Impairment and Dementia Prevention, Peruvian Institute of Neurosciences, Lima, Peru
| | - Adolfo M. García
- Cognitive Neuroscience Center (CNC), Universidad de San Andrés, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Global Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Departamento de Lingüística y Literatura, Facultad de Humanidades, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Shireen Javandel
- Global Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Francisco Lopera
- Neuroscience Research Group, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Diana L. Matallana
- PhD Program of Neuroscience, Aging Institute, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Bruce Miller
- Global Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Maira Okada de Oliveira
- Global Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Hospital Santa Marcelina, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Stefanie D. Pina-Escudero
- Global Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrea Slachevsky
- Neurology Department, Geroscience Center for Brain Health and Metabolism, Santiago, Chile
- Laboratory of Neuropsychology and Clinical Neuroscience (LANNEC), Physiopathology Program ICBM, East Neurologic and Neurosciences Departments, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital del Salvador and Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Servicio de Neurología, Departamento de Medicina, Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo, University of Chile, Neuropsychiatry and Memory Disorders clinic (CMYN), Santiago, Chile
| | - Ana L. Sosa Ortiz
- Instituto Nacional de Neurología y neurocirugía, Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - Leonel T. Takada
- Hospital de Clinicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Brazil
| | - Enzo Tagliazuchi
- Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibañez, Santiago de Chile, Chile
- Departamento de Física, Universidad de Buenos Aires & Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires (FIBA – CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Victor Valcour
- Global Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Ph.D Program of Neuroscience, Psychiatry Department; Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Jennifer S. Yokoyama
- Global Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Agustín Ibañez
- Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibañez, Santiago de Chile, Chile
- Universidad de San Andrés & Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y técnicas (CONICET), Argentina
- Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), Trinity College Dublin, (TCD), Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Utility of Chinese Versions of Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination: A Narrative Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10102052. [DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10102052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination (ACE) is a cognitive screening tool that has developed through three stages: ACE, ACE-Revised (ACE-R), and ACE-Ⅲ. In addition, mini-Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (M-ACE) and ACE mobile are the additional versions that is derived from ACE-III. ACE and its related versions show better performance than Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in detecting mild cognitive impairment in different neurological disorders. It has been translated into numerous languages, including Chinese. Through reviewing the history, validity, and comparison with other cognitive tests of Chinese versions of ACE, it aims to facilitate the clinical and scientific use, further development, improvement, and validation of Chinese versions of ACE in various neurological disorders and ultimately promote early identification and management of cognitive impairment in China.
Collapse
|
11
|
Alves J, Cardoso M, Morgado M, De Witte E, Satoer D, Hall A, Jesus LMT. Language assessment in awake brain surgery: the Portuguese adaptation of the Dutch linguistic intraoperative protocol (DuLIP). CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS 2021; 35:1113-1131. [PMID: 33412951 DOI: 10.1080/02699206.2020.1868022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Awake brain surgery, combined with neurophysiological evaluation and intraoperative mapping, is one of the preferential lines of treatment when approaching low-grade gliomas. Speech and language assessment is used while applying Direct Electrical Stimulation (DES) and during the resection of a lesion/tumour, as it allows to establish related eloquent areas and optimise the extent of the resection and avoid impairments. Patients need to be assessed pre, intra and post-surgery, but in under resourced countries such as Portugal, there are still no standardised and validated tools to conduct this type of evaluation. To address this need, the tasks of the Dutch Linguistic Intraoperative Protocol (DuLIP) were adapted to European Portuguese, and the resulting materials were standardised for a group of 144 Portuguese participants. For each task, the impact of age, gender and schooling were measured. The resulting Portuguese version of the DuLIP (DuLIP-EP) consists of 17 tasks, including phonological, syntactic, semantic, naming and articulatory tests. No significant differences were found between male and female participants. However, schooling influenced phonological and syntactic fluency, object naming and verb generation. Schooling and age had a significant impact on semantic fluency and reading with semantic odd word out tasks. This is the first contribution to the standardisation of a tool that can be used during an awake brain surgery in Portugal, which includes a new phonological odd word out task that is not currently available in the Dutch version.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joana Alves
- Hospital das Forças Armadas - Pólo Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Mafalda Cardoso
- Unidade de Cuidados Continuados Solar Billadonnes, Penacova, Portugal
| | | | - Elke De Witte
- Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Djaina Satoer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andreia Hall
- Department of Mathematics (DMat) and Center for Research and Development in Mathematics and Applications (CIDMA), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Luis M T Jesus
- School of Health Sciences (ESSUA) and Institute of Electronics and Informatics Engineering of Aveiro (IEETA), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hlávka JP, Kinoshita AT, Fang S, Hunt A. Clinical Outcome Measure Crosswalks in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review. J Alzheimers Dis 2021; 83:591-608. [PMID: 34334392 PMCID: PMC10382157 DOI: 10.3233/jad-210060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A key challenge in studies that model outcomes, disease progression, and cost-effectiveness of existing and emerging dementia treatments is the lack of conversion criteria to translate, or 'crosswalk', scores on multiple measurement scales. Clinical status in dementia is commonly characterized in the cognitive, functional, and behavioral domains. OBJECTIVE We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed dementia measure crosswalks in the three domains. METHODS We systematically reviewed published literature for crosswalks between scales used to measure cognitive, functional, or behavioral outcomes in Alzheimer's and related dementias. The search was conducted in PubMed, and additional crosswalks were identified through snowballing and expert input from dementia modelers. RESULTS Of the reviewed articles, 2,334 were identified through a PubMed search, 842 articles were sourced from backward and forward citation snowballing, and 8 additional articles were recommended through expert input. 31 papers were eligible for inclusion, listing 74 unique crosswalks. Of those, 62 (83.8%) were between endpoints of the cognitive domain and 12 (16.2%) were either between endpoints of the functional domain or were hybrid in nature. Among crosswalks exclusively in the cognitive domain, a majority involved the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (37 crosswalks) or the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and its variants (25 crosswalks). MMSE was directly compared to MoCA or MoCA variants in 16 crosswalks. CONCLUSION Existing crosswalks between measures of dementia focus largely on a limited selection of outcome measures, particularly MMSE and MoCA. Few crosswalks exist in the functional domain, and no crosswalks were identified for solely behavioral measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakub P Hlávka
- Sol Price School of Public Policy, Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andrew T Kinoshita
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Samantha Fang
- Sol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Adriana Hunt
- College of Science, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
McCombe N, Liu S, Ding X, Prasad G, Bucholc M, Finn DP, Todd S, McClean PL, Wong-Lin K. Practical Strategies for Extreme Missing Data Imputation in Dementia Diagnosis. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2021; 26:818-827. [PMID: 34288882 DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2021.3098511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Accurate computational models for clinical decision support systems require clean and reliable data but, in clinical practice, data are often incomplete. Hence, missing data could arise not only from training datasets but also test datasets which could consist of a single undiagnosed case, an individual. This work addresses the problem of extreme missingness in both training and test data by evaluating multiple imputation and classification workflows based on both diagnostic classification accuracy and computational cost. Extreme missingness is defined as having ~50% of the total data missing in more than half the data features. In particular, we focus on dementia diagnosis due to long time delays, high variability, high attrition rates and lack of practical data imputation strategies in its diagnostic pathway. We identified and replicated the extreme missingness structure of data from a real-world memory clinic on a larger open dataset, with the original complete data acting as ground truth. Overall, we found that computational cost, but not accuracy, varies widely for various imputation and classification approaches. Particularly, we found that iterative imputation on the training dataset combined with a reduced-feature classification model provides the best approach, in terms of speed and accuracy. Taken together, this work has elucidated important factors to be considered when developing a predictive model for a dementia diagnostic support system.
Collapse
|
14
|
Clarke N, Barrick TR, Garrard P. A Comparison of Connected Speech Tasks for Detecting Early Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning. FRONTIERS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE 2021. [DOI: 10.3389/fcomp.2021.634360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has a long pre-clinical period, and so there is a crucial need for early detection, including of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Computational analysis of connected speech using Natural Language Processing and machine learning has been found to indicate disease and could be utilized as a rapid, scalable test for early diagnosis. However, there has been a focus on the Cookie Theft picture description task, which has been criticized. Fifty participants were recruited – 25 healthy controls (HC), 25 mild AD or MCI (AD+MCI) – and these completed five connected speech tasks: picture description, a conversational map reading task, recall of an overlearned narrative, procedural recall and narration of a wordless picture book. A high-dimensional set of linguistic features were automatically extracted from each transcript and used to train Support Vector Machines to classify groups. Performance varied, with accuracy for HC vs. AD+MCI classification ranging from 62% using picture book narration to 78% using overlearned narrative features. This study shows that, importantly, the conditions of the speech task have an impact on the discourse produced, which influences accuracy in detection of AD beyond the length of the sample. Further, we report the features important for classification using different tasks, showing that a focus on the Cookie Theft picture description task may narrow the understanding of how early AD pathology impacts speech.
Collapse
|
15
|
Manuel AL, Roquet D, Landin-Romero R, Kumfor F, Ahmed RM, Hodges JR, Piguet O. Interactions between decision-making and emotion in behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2020; 15:681-694. [PMID: 32613246 PMCID: PMC7393308 DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsaa085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2020] [Revised: 05/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Negative and positive emotions are known to shape decision-making toward more or less impulsive responses, respectively. Decision-making and emotion processing are underpinned by shared brain regions including the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and the amygdala. How these processes interact at the behavioral and brain levels is still unclear. We used a lesion model to address this question. Study participants included individuals diagnosed with behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD, n = 18), who typically present deficits in decision-making/emotion processing and atrophy of the vmPFC, individuals with Alzheimer’s disease (AD, n = 12) who present with atrophy in limbic structures and age-matched healthy controls (CTRL, n = 15). Prior to each choice on the delay discounting task participants were cued with a positive, negative or neutral picture and asked to vividly imagine witnessing the event. As hypothesized, our findings showed that bvFTD patients were more impulsive than AD patients and CTRL and did not show any emotion-related modulation of delay discounting rate. In contrast, AD patients showed increased impulsivity when primed by negative emotion. This increased impulsivity was associated with reduced integrity of bilateral amygdala in AD but not in bvFTD. Altogether, our results indicate that decision-making and emotion interact at the level of the amygdala supporting findings from animal studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélie L Manuel
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Brain & Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition & its Disorders, Sydney, Australia.,Laboratory for Research in Neuroimaging LREN, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Roquet
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Brain & Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition & its Disorders, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ramon Landin-Romero
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Brain & Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition & its Disorders, Sydney, Australia
| | - Fiona Kumfor
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Brain & Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition & its Disorders, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rebekah M Ahmed
- Brain & Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition & its Disorders, Sydney, Australia.,Clinical Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - John R Hodges
- Brain & Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition & its Disorders, Sydney, Australia.,Clinical Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Olivier Piguet
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Brain & Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition & its Disorders, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kudlicka A, Martyr A, Bahar-Fuchs A, Woods B, Clare L. Cognitive rehabilitation for people with mild to moderate dementia. THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anthony Martyr
- University of Exeter; REACH: The Centre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive Health; South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road Exeter UK EX1 2LU
| | - Alex Bahar-Fuchs
- University of Melbourne; Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, Department of Psychiatry; 34-54 Poplar Road Parkville Melbourne Victoria Australia 3052
| | - Bob Woods
- Bangor University; Dementia Services Development Centre Wales; Ardudwy, Holyhead Road Bangor Gwynedd UK LL57 2PZ
| | - Linda Clare
- University of Exeter; REACH: The Centre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive Health; South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road Exeter UK EX1 2LU
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ramos CCF, Amado DK, Borges CR, Bergamaschi E, Nitrini R, Brucki SMD. Oxford Cognitive Screen - Brazilian Portuguese version (OCS-Br) A pilot study. Dement Neuropsychol 2018; 12:427-431. [PMID: 30546855 PMCID: PMC6289483 DOI: 10.1590/1980-57642018dn12-040014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Cognitive impairment is very common in stroke patients and underdiagnosed. Symptoms such as language, praxis, visuospatial, visuoconstructive and memory impairment are prominent. The screening cognitive tests available do not address some specific characteristics of stroke patients and have major limitations in relation to the most impaired cognitive domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel Krempel Amado
- Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology Group - Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Conrado Regis Borges
- Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology Group - Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Eduardo Bergamaschi
- Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology Group - Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Ricardo Nitrini
- Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology Group - Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Sonia Maria Dozzi Brucki
- Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology Group - Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|