An epicardial pacing safety net: an alternative technique for pacing in the young

Transvenous Lead Extraction in Pediatric Patients - Is It the Same Procedure in Children as in Adults?

BACKGROUND

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are very rare in the pediatric population. In children with CIED, transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is often necessary. The course and effects of TLE in children are different than in adults. Thus, this study determined the differences and specific characteristics of TLE in children vs. adults.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A post hoc analysis of TLE data in 63 children (age ≤18 years) and 2,659 adults (age ≥40 years) was performed. The 2 groups were compared with respect to risk factors, procedure complexity, and effectiveness. In children, the predominant pacing mode was a single chamber ventricular system and lead dysfunction was the main indication for lead extraction. The mean implant duration before TLE was longer in children (P=0.03), but the dwell time of the oldest extracted lead did not differ significantly between adults and children. The duration (P=0.006) and mean extraction time per lead (P<0.001) were longer in children, with more technical difficulties during TLE in the pediatric group (P<0.001). Major complications were more common, albeit not significantly, in children. Complete radiographic and procedural success were significantly lower in children (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

TLE in children is frequently more complex, time consuming, and arduous, and procedural success is more often lower. This is related to the formation of strong fibrous tissue surrounding the leads in pediatric patients.

A Cautionary Tale on Atrial Capture Management, Biventricular Pacing, and Recurrent Asystole

Capture management algorithms in current cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) can enhance device performance and battery longevity. Although generally safe, these algorithms have on rare occasions been implicated in the onset of significant complications, especially in pacemaker-dependent patients. CIEDs implanted in patients with postoperative congenital heart disease (CHD) often require epicardial pacing leads rather than transvenous leads; unfortunately, epicardial leads can experience higher rates of malfunction. We herein report on a young adult with a status of postoperative CHD and complete atrioventricular block following implantation of a epicardial dual-chamber cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (CRT-P; Consulta^®; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) who developed frequent periods of asystole after malfunction of one of the ventricular leads. The underlying cause of asystole was found to be due to the atrial capture management (ACM) algorithm of the CRT-P device, temporarily converting biventricular to right ventricular–only pacing as part of the algorithm. This case highlights implications of the ACM algorithm in devices with a similar platform for pacemaker-dependent patients.

Permanent epicardial pacing in children: long-term results and factors modifying outcome

AIMS

To evaluate the results of permanent epicardial pacing in children.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All consecutive patients from one country (n = 119, period 1977-2009) undergoing permanent epicardial pacemaker implantation at <18 years of age (median 1.8 years, inter-quartile range 0.3-6.4 years) were studied retrospectively. Median patient follow up was 6.4 years (inter-quartile range 2.9-11.1 years); 207 generators, 89 atrial and 153 ventricular pacing leads were implanted. The probability of absence of any pacing system dysfunction was 70.1 and 47.2% at 5 and 10 years after implantation, respectively. Overall probability of continued epicardial pacing was 92.8 and 76.1% at 5 and 10 years, respectively, and increased in the recent implantation era (post-2000, P = 0.04). The use of steroid-eluting leads decreased the risk of exit block with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.20 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09-0.44, P < 0.001)]. The use of bipolar Medtronic 4968 leads reduced the risk of surgical reintervention because of fracture, insulation break, outgrowth or exit block in comparison to the unipolar 4965 lead design (HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.04-0.40, P < 0.001). The AutoCapture™ feature (HR 0.08, 95% CI 0.02-0.36, P < 0.001) and steroid-eluting leads (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.11-0.84, P = 0.021) decreased the risk of battery depletion.

CONCLUSION

The probability of continued epicardial pacing in children was 76% at 10 years after implantation, increased for implantation in recent years, and allowed transvenous pacing to be deferred to a significantly greater age. The use of bipolar steroid-eluting leads and of a beat-to-beat capture tracking feature significantly increased pacing system longevity and decreased the need for surgical reinterventions.