Anakinra as rescue therapy for steroid-dependent idiopathic recurrent pericarditis in children: case report and literature review

Myocarditis and Inflammatory Cardiomyopathy in Dilated Heart Failure

Inflammatory cardiomyopathy is a condition that is characterised by the presence of inflammatory cells in the myocardium, which can lead to a significant deterioration in cardiac function. The etiology of this condition involves multiple factors, both infectious and non-infectious causes. While it is primarily associated with viral infections, other potential causes include bacterial, protozoal, or fungal infections, as well as a wide variety of toxic substances and drugs, and systemic immune-mediated pathological conditions. In spite of comprehensive investigation, the presence of inflammatory cardiomyopathy accompanied by left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure or arrhythmia is indicative of an unfavourable outcome. The reasons for the occurrence of either favourable outcomes, characterised by the absence of residual myocardial injury, or unfavourable outcomes, marked by the development of dilated cardiomyopathy, in patients afflicted by the condition remain to be elucidated. The relative contributions of pathogenic agents, genomic profiles of the host, and environmental factors in disease progression and resolution remain subjects of ongoing discourse. This includes the determination of which viruses function as active inducers and which merely play a bystander role. It remains unknown which changes in the host immune profile are critical in determining the outcome of myocarditis caused by various viruses, including coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3), adenoviruses, parvoviruses B19 and SARS-CoV-2. The objective of this review is unambiguous: to provide a concise summary and comprehensive assessment of the extant evidence on the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy. Its focus is exclusively on virus-induced and virus-associated myocarditis. In addition, the extant lacunae of knowledge in this field are identified and the extant experimental models are evaluated, with the aim of proposing future directions for the research domain. This includes differential gene expression that regulates iron and lipid and metabolic remodelling. Furthermore, the current state of knowledge regarding the cardiovascular implications of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is also discussed, along with the open questions that remain to be addressed.

Pediatric Pericarditis: Update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

While there have now been a variety of large reviews on adult pericarditis, this detailed review specifically focuses on the epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of pediatric pericarditis. We have tried to highlight most pediatric studies conducted on this topic, with special inclusion of important adult studies that have shaped our understanding of and management for acute and recurrent pericarditis.

RECENT FINDINGS

We find that the etiology of pediatric pericarditis differs from adult patients with pericarditis and has evolved over the years. Also, with the current COVID-19 pandemic, it is important for pediatric clinicians to be aware of pericardial involvement both due to the infection and from vaccination. Oftentimes, pericarditis maybe the only cardiac involvement in children with COVID-19, and so caregivers should maintain a high index of suspicion when they encounter children with pericarditis.  Large-scale contemporary epidemiological data regarding incidence and prevalence of both acute and recurrent pericarditis is lacking in pediatrics, and future studies should focus on highlighting this important research gap. Most of the current management strategies for pediatric pericarditis are from experiences gathered from adult data. Pediatric multicenter trials are warranted to understand the best management strategy for those with acute and recurrent pericarditis.

CASE VIGNETTE

A 6-year-old child with a past history of pericarditis almost 2 months ago comes in with a 2-day history of chest pain and fever. Per mother, he stopped his steroids about 2 weeks ago, and for the last 2 days has had a temperature of 102F and has been complaining of sharp mid-sternal chest pain that gets worse when he lies down and is relieved when he sits up and leans forward. On examination, he is tachycardic (heart rate 160 bpm), with normal blood pressure for age. He appears to be in pain (5/10), and on auscultation has a pericardial friction rub. His lab studies are notable for elevated white blood cell count and inflammatory markers (CRP and ESR). His electrocardiogram reveals sinus tachycardia and diffuse ST-elevation in all precordial leads. His echocardiogram demonstrates normal biventricular function and a trace pericardial effusion. His cardiac MRI confirms recurrent pericarditis. He is started on indomethacin and colchicine. He has complete resolution of his symptoms by day 3 of admission and is discharged with close follow-up.

Efficacy of anakinra treatment in pediatric rheumatic diseases: Our single-center experience

Objectives

This study aims to present our experience on anakinra, a recombinant interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor antagonist, and efficacy results in pediatric rheumatic diseases in our clinic.

Patients and methods

Between July 1^st, 2016 and July 1^st, 2020, a total of 33 pediatric patients (18 males, 15 females; mean age: 6±3.4 years; range 4 to 13 years) with pediatric rheumatic diseases who were treated with anakinra were retrospectively analyzed. The patients with over one-month treatment period and followed for at least one year were included. Demographic and clinical findings, outcomes, adverse events, prior and/or additional treatments were collected at baseline, at 3 and 12 months of therapy.

Results

There were 33 patients with different pediatric rheumatic diseases (11 with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis [sJIA] complicated by macrophage activation syndrome [MAS], six with hyperimmunoglobulin-D syndrome, five with cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome, five with familial Mediterranean fever, four with idiopathic recurrent pericarditis, one with NLRP12-associated periodic fever syndrome and one with unclassified systemic autoinflammatory disease), in the study group. The complete response was observed 69.7% of patients, partial response in 24.2%, and no response in 6.1% at three months of treatment. Inactive disease status was achieved in 45.5% of the patients with remission-on medication and 18.2% of the patients with remission-off medication at the end of a year. Anakinra was switched to other biological treatments in 51.5% of patients (n=17). Biological switch to canakinumab and tocilizumab were observed in 70.6% and 29.4% of these patients. Except for local reactions (n=2), no adverse events were observed in any of the patients.

Conclusion

Anakinra appears to be a promising treatment alternative owing to its rapid effect as a result of its short half-life in autoinflammatory conditions. While short-term therapy seems to be sufficient for the sJIA complicated by MAS, the patients with systemic autoinflammatory diseases maintenance a more anakinra-dependent course.

Rilonacept: A Newly Approved Treatment for Recurrent Pericarditis

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of rilonacept for the prevention and treatment of recurrent pericarditis (RP).

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search was conducted between January 2006 and April 2021 using the following terms: rilonacept, pharmacology, pericarditis, recurrent pericarditis, interleukin (IL) antagonist, and pharmacology; prescribing information was also used.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

English-language studies assessing pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of IL antagonists were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Rilonacept traps IL-1α and IL-1β. In the Phase III trial, rilonacept was associated with a lower risk of recurrence, more persistent clinical response, and higher amount of days with no or minimal pericarditis symptoms, compared with placebo. The median time to pain response was 5 days, and median time to normalization of C-reactive protein was 7 days with rilonacept. All patients receiving rilonacept during the run-in period were able to be weaned off of standard background therapy, leading to transition to rilonacept monotherapy. The most common adverse effects were upper respiratory tract infections and injection site reactions.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Rilonacept may be used for the prevention and treatment of multiple recurrences in patients receiving background therapy for RP, and reduction in risk of recurrence in adults and adolescents ≥12 years with elevated C-reactive protein. Rilonacept may be considered to wean patients from standard background therapy.

CONCLUSION

Rilonacept is a safe, once weekly, subcutaneously administered IL-1 "trap," indicated for the treatment of RP, and reduction in risk of recurrent pericarditis in adults and children ≥12 years of age.

Anakinra in Recurrent Pericarditis: Current Evidence on Clinical Use, Effectiveness, and Safety

Anakinra is a recombinant human interleukin 1 receptor antagonist that competes and blocks the biologic effects of interleukin 1, reducing systemic inflammatory responses. In the 2015 guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases of the European Society of Cardiology, anakinra was established as a third-line therapy option for refractory recurrent pericarditis (RP). Recently, important studies that investigates the effect and safety of anakinra in RP were published, such as the AIRTRIP trial and the International Registry of Anakinra for Pericarditis. This article presents the current evidence about the effectiveness and safety of anakinra in RP and discusses its clinical application and mechanisms.

Myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy: current evidence and future directions

Inflammatory cardiomyopathy, characterized by inflammatory cell infiltration into the myocardium and a high risk of deteriorating cardiac function, has a heterogeneous aetiology. Inflammatory cardiomyopathy is predominantly mediated by viral infection, but can also be induced by bacterial, protozoal or fungal infections as well as a wide variety of toxic substances and drugs and systemic immune-mediated diseases. Despite extensive research, inflammatory cardiomyopathy complicated by left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure or arrhythmia is associated with a poor prognosis. At present, the reason why some patients recover without residual myocardial injury whereas others develop dilated cardiomyopathy is unclear. The relative roles of the pathogen, host genomics and environmental factors in disease progression and healing are still under discussion, including which viruses are active inducers and which are only bystanders. As a consequence, treatment strategies are not well established. In this Review, we summarize and evaluate the available evidence on the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy, with a special focus on virus-induced and virus-associated myocarditis. Furthermore, we identify knowledge gaps, appraise the available experimental models and propose future directions for the field. The current knowledge and open questions regarding the cardiovascular effects associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection are also discussed. This Review is the result of scientific cooperation of members of the Heart Failure Association of the ESC, the Heart Failure Society of America and the Japanese Heart Failure Society.

Anaphylactic reaction to anakinra in a child with steroid-dependent idiopathic recurrent pericarditis and successful management with canakinumab

Conventional algorithm for treatment of pericarditis and prevention of recurrences consists of non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs and/or colchicine, followed by corticosteroids in resistant patients. Anakinra has emerged as a promising and safe treatment modality for steroid-dependent idiopathic recurrent pericarditis. However, the efficacy and safety of canakinumab, another anti-interleukin-1 agent, has not been assessed up to date. Herein, we present development of an anaphylactic reaction due to anakinra and a successful subsequent treatment with canakinumab for the first time in the literature.