1
|
Whiteoak B, Dawson SL, Callaway L, de Jersey S, Eley V, Evans J, Kothari A, Navarro S, Gallegos D. Food Insecurity Is Associated with Diet Quality in Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nutrients 2024; 16:1319. [PMID: 38732568 PMCID: PMC11085356 DOI: 10.3390/nu16091319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2024] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Household food insecurity (HFI) and poorer prenatal diet quality are both associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. However, research assessing the relationship between HFI and diet quality in pregnancy is limited. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted to examine the relationship between HFI and diet quality among 1540 pregnant women in Australia. Multiple linear regression models were used to examine the associations between HFI severity (marginal, low, and very low food security compared to high food security) and diet quality and variety, adjusting for age, education, equivalised household income, and relationship status. Logistic regression models were used to assess the associations between HFI and the odds of meeting fruit and vegetable recommendations, adjusting for education. Marginal, low, and very low food security were associated with poorer prenatal diet quality (adj β = -1.9, -3.6, and -5.3, respectively; p < 0.05), and very low food security was associated with a lower dietary variety (adj β = -0.5, p < 0.001). An association was also observed between HFI and lower odds of meeting fruit (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.49-0.76, p < 0.001) and vegetable (AOR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.19-0.84, p = 0.016) recommendations. Future research should seek to understand what policy and service system changes are required to reduce diet-related disparities in pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bree Whiteoak
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 149 Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia;
- Centre for Childhood Nutrition Research, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 62 Graham Street, South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia;
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Rd., Herston, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Samantha L. Dawson
- Food & Mood Centre, IMPACT—The Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia;
| | - Leonie Callaway
- Women’s and Newborns Services, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia;
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Rd., Herston, QLD 4006, Australia; (V.E.); (A.K.)
| | - Susan de Jersey
- Department of Dietetics and Foodservices, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia;
- Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Rd., Herston, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Victoria Eley
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Rd., Herston, QLD 4006, Australia; (V.E.); (A.K.)
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Joanna Evans
- Maternity Services, Caboolture Hospital, McKean Street, Caboolture, QLD 4510, Australia;
| | - Alka Kothari
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Rd., Herston, QLD 4006, Australia; (V.E.); (A.K.)
- Redcliffe Hospital, Anzac Avenue, Redcliffe, QLD 4020, Australia
| | - Severine Navarro
- Centre for Childhood Nutrition Research, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 62 Graham Street, South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia;
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Rd., Herston, QLD 4006, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Rd., Herston, QLD 4006, Australia; (V.E.); (A.K.)
| | - Danielle Gallegos
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 149 Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia;
- Centre for Childhood Nutrition Research, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 62 Graham Street, South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meloncelli N, O’Connor H, Wilkinson SA, Nitert MD, Kearney L, de Jersey S. Preventing Gestational Diabetes with a Healthy Gut Diet: Protocol for a Pilot, Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2023; 15:4653. [PMID: 37960306 PMCID: PMC10649061 DOI: 10.3390/nu15214653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Around 14% of pregnancies globally are affected by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), making it one of the most common disorders experienced by women in pregnancy. While dietary, physical activity and supplement interventions have been implemented to prevent GDM, with varying levels of success, altering the gut microbiota through diet is a promising strategy for prevention. Several studies have demonstrated that women with GDM likely have a different gut microbiota to pregnant women without GDM, demonstrating that the gut microbiota may play a part in glycemic control and the development of GDM. To date, there have been no randomized controlled trials using diet to alter the gut microbiota in pregnancy with the aim of preventing GDM. Here, we present the study protocol for a single-blind randomized controlled trial which aims to determine the effectiveness of the Healthy Gut Diet on reducing the diagnosis of GDM in pregnant women with one or more risk factors. Consenting women will be randomized into either the Healthy Gut Diet intervention group or the usual care (control) group after 11 weeks gestation. The women in the intervention group will receive three telehealth counseling appointments with an Accredited Practicing Dietitian with the aim of educating and empowering these women to build a healthy gut microbiota through their diet. The intervention was co-designed with women who have lived experience of GDM and incorporates published behavior change techniques. The control group will receive the usual care and will also be shown a brief (3 min) video on general healthy eating in pregnancy. The primary outcome is the diagnosis of GDM at any stage of the pregnancy. Secondary outcomes include changes to gut microbiota composition and diversity; gestational weight gain; maternal and infant outcomes; management of GDM (where relevant); dietary quality and intake; physical activity; and depression scoring. We aim to recruit 120 women over 16 months. Recruitment commenced in January 2023. The trial has been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622001285741).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Meloncelli
- Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia
- Office of the Chief Allied Health Practitioner, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia
| | - Hannah O’Connor
- Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia
| | - Shelley A. Wilkinson
- Department of Obstetric Medicine, Mater Mothers Hospital, South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia;
- Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia
| | - Marloes Dekker Nitert
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia;
| | - Lauren Kearney
- Women’s and Newborn Service Group, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Metro North Health, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia;
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia
| | - Susan de Jersey
- Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia
- Department of Dietetics and Foodservices, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Metro North Health, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mollard E, Cottrell C. Lifestyle and the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in nulliparous women in the United States: a secondary data analysis of the nuMom2b. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:201. [PMID: 36959650 PMCID: PMC10035211 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05522-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are a leading cause of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality and a significant risk factor for future cardiovascular disease development in women. This study aimed to explore lifestyle wellness-related variables and how they impact the risk of hypertension in pregnancy. METHODS This is a secondary analysis of data from the prospective cohort study Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-To-Be (nuMoM2b). Data was collected through questionnaires, clinical evaluations, and medical records review at 8 academic medical centers in the United States. Four study visits were scheduled throughout the participant's pregnancy (visits one-four): 60-136, 160-216, and 220-296 weeks gestation and birth. A series of statistical modeling and logistical regression were performed using 15 lifestyle variables related to sleep, nutrition, resilience, illness avoidance, and physical activity were selected as predictor variables with an outcome variable of hypertension. RESULTS Of 9289 nulliparous participants considered for inclusion in our analyses, 1464 had any HDP during study participation, and 554 participants had complete data available for the study and were included in our final sample. Results were statistically significant at a level of p < 0.05. Of the sleep variables, snoring at visit 1 increased the risk of hypertension in pregnancy. Greater vegetable consumption reported at visit one decreased risks of hypertension in pregnancy. Physical activity reported at visit two and visit three were associated with decreased risk of hypertension. Physical activity reported at visit three combined with more hours of sleep each night, or through napping habit reported at visit one decreased hypertension risk. Increased fish oil consumption combined with more hours of sleep at visit one increased odds of hypertension in pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS Our results support that lifestyle wellness-related variables relating to sleep, physical activity and nutrition affect hypertension in pregnancy. The studied variables and others should be considered in future research and intervention development to reduce hypertension in pregnancy and improve maternal wellness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Mollard
- College of Nursing, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 550 North 19Th St, # 357, Lincoln, NE, 68588-0620, USA.
| | - Constance Cottrell
- Office of Nursing Research and Innovation, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave/T4, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Parents' Perspective on Probiotics in Preschool Children: A Cross-sectional Survey. Zdr Varst 2022; 62:5-12. [PMID: 36694790 PMCID: PMC9837815 DOI: 10.2478/sjph-2023-0002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The composition of the human gut microbiota, which can also be regulated by the consumption of probiotics, has a significant impact on host health. The main source of probiotics can be foods such as fermented foods, yogurts, fermented drinks and/or probiotic supplements. While parents play a critical role in ensuring the well-being of their children, this cross-sectional study is focused on parents' perspectives regarding the use of probiotics in the preschool period. Methods The self-administered online survey consisted of 24 questions arranged across two thematic sections. The final data analysis included 102 parents (96% F; 4% M), aged between 22 and 47. Their children were aged up to 6 years. Results The majority (52%) of the parents were familiar with the term 'probiotics' and 86.3% were including probiotics in their children's diet at the time of the survey. The main source was probiotic food (36.3%), of which yoghurt was the most commonly consumed (87.2%). The inclusion of probiotic supplements in a child's diet was positively correlated with parents' consumption and level of knowledge about the term 'probiotics'. Digestive tract-related disorders were the most frequently reported motive for the initial introduction of probiotics into children's diet. Conclusions Based on our study results, parents are familiar with probiotics and include them in their children's diet. However, an attempt should be made to close the gaps in parents' knowledge that our research identified. Further studies are needed to determine the recommended amount of probiotic foods, as well as strategies to educate parents about the benefits of including probiotic foods in their children's diet.
Collapse
|