A qualitative study exploring men’s experience of sexual dysfunction as a result of radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy to treat prostate cancer

Qualitative studies on men with prostate cancer: a systematic meta-synthesis

PURPOSE

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer among men. Despite advancements in clinical interventions and improvements in public health outreach, a multi-dimensional lack of understanding of the lived experiences of men diagnosed with PCa continues. Improving the quantity and quality of knowledge about this subject could guide clinical decisions and interventions for this group.

METHODS

This paper reviews qualitative studies focusing on PCa patients using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool (CASP), synthesizes the data, and maps the overarching themes through a systematic meta-synthesis.

RESULTS

The authors identified 3546 manuscripts, of which 103 met the inclusion criteria. Six themes were identified that addressed: support needs, diagnosis, and treatment experiences, lived experiences, information accessibility, care, and threats to masculinity.

CONCLUSION

Treatment side-effects caused a re-configuration and re-evaluation of masculine ideologies. Men mainly relied on close family and support groups to cope with their feelings of stigma, uncertainty, and recovery. Professional healthcare and consultation quality eased their anxiety concerning long-term treatment and other factors associated with their condition. The studies were socio-demographically heterogeneous. Thus, researchers could use qualitative research to explore knowledge gaps in the following interconnected themes: masculinity care, masculinity support, masculinity information, and incorporating a more diverse socio-demographical sample.

Sexual Dysfunction in Prostate Cancer Patients According to Disease Stage and Treatment Modality

AIMS

To investigate physical and psychological sexual dysfunction (SD) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients, according to disease stage and treatment modality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants diagnosed with PCa completed an online survey reporting sexual side effects across 13 domains, the importance of sexual function, and their support needs. Disease stage and treatment data were collected to identify variations in experience. Results were analysed descriptively and with chi-squared significance testing.

RESULTS

Six hundred fifty-four participants diagnosed with localised (66.1%), locally advanced (25.1%), and advanced (8.9%) PCa responded to the survey. Their disease management included radical prostatectomy (RP; 49.7%), radiotherapy (RT; 45.9%), and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT; 43.6%). More than 98% reported new-onset post-treatment sexual problems. The most common physical dysfunctions were erectile dysfunction (ED; 91.0%), ejaculatory disturbance (82.9%), and anatomical penile change (70.0%). The most common psychosexual dysfunctions were loss of sexual confidence (76.2%), loss of sex drive (67.1%), and loss of self-esteem (57.1%). Participants diagnosed with advanced disease were significantly more likely to report SD than participants with localised or locally advanced disease in 5 of 13 domains (p < .05). Participants whose treatment included a combination of RP, RT, and ADT were most likely to report SD in 7 of 13 domains. Overall, 78.3% of participants said sexual activity was important to them, with 61.8% placing sexual problems in their top three current concerns. Furthermore, 78.3% wanted to discuss sexual problems with a healthcare professional, with most wishing to focus on ED, loss of sexual confidence, and low libido.

CONCLUSION

SD is a common, wide-ranging, and distressing side effect of treatment, and PCa survivors place a high level of importance on sexual recovery. Those with advanced disease are among the worst affected and report high levels of psychosexual problems. Holistic rehabilitation strategies addressing a broad range of side effects would benefit all, but particularly those treated with permanent ADT.

Men's perceptions and preferences regarding prostate cancer radiation therapy: A systematic scoping review

Purpose

To assess the literature on men's preferences and perceptions regarding prostate cancer radiation therapy.

Methods

A scoping review was undertaken as per JBI guidelines. Searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and Science Direct with search terms including "prostate cancer," "radiotherapy," "radiation therapy," "radiation oncology," "patient preferences," "patient perceptions" and "patient experience." The resultant studies were mapped and grouped according to the emergent themes and pathway stages.

Results

A total of 779 titles and abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers. Fifty-two full-text studies were reviewed, with 27 eligible for inclusion. There were 4 pre-treatment, 13 during treatment and 10 post-treatment studies covering broad themes of information needs (n = 3), preferences and decisions (n = 6), general experiences (n = 8), side effects (n = 6), and support (n = 4). There were a mix of methodologies, including 11 qualitative, 14 quantitative (including four preference studies), one mixed methods and one narrative review.

Conclusion

There were only four preference studies, with the remaining 23 reporting on perceptions. Overall, there is a paucity of literature regarding patient preferences and perceptions of prostate cancer radiation therapy, particularly when considering how many clinical and technical studies are published in the area. This highlights opportunities for future research.

Adequacy of sexual care information given to prostate cancer patients receiving radical external beam radiotherapy

Background:

Despite the acknowledged value of providing prostate radiotherapy patients with sexual dysfunction (SD) information, there is little evidence related to patient perceptions of this or the extent to which information is provided to them. This study aimed to critically evaluate the quality and format of SD information given to patients before, during and after radical EBRT to treat prostate cancer.

Method:

Members of UK prostate cancer support groups were asked to complete an anonymous online survey tool seeking opinions of the SD information they were given before, during and after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).

Results:

There were 56 responses to the survey with over 42% of respondents reporting that they had not received any SD information. Of those who did, 78·1% (25/32) received information before the start of EBRT. Physicians were the most involved in the provision of SD information, with nurses and therapeutic radiographers being underutilised. Responses were mostly negative, or neutral regarding the quality of SD information and the information received about impact on relationships, psychological and emotional health. Many participants wanted more information and support.

Conclusion:

This study demonstrates that prostate cancer patients who have undergone radical EBRT have not received adequate information relating to potential sexual function side effects and the psychological and emotional effects of SD. This information should be included in verbal and written information provided at all stages of the radiotherapy pathway.

Supportive care needs of men with prostate cancer: A systematic review update

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer is highly prevalent and impacts profoundly on patients' quality of life, leading to a range of supportive care needs.

METHODS

An updated systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative data using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) reporting guidelines, to explore prostate cancer patients' experience of, and need for, supportive care. Five databases (Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Emcare and ASSIA) were searched; extracted data were synthesised using Corbin and Strauss's 'Three Lines of Work' framework.

RESULTS

Searches identified 2091 citations, of which 105 were included. Overarching themes emerged under the headings of illness, everyday life and biographical work. Illness work needs include consistency and continuity of information, tailored to ethnicity, age and sexual orientation. Biographical work focused on a desire to preserve identity in the context of damaging sexual side effects. Everyday life needs centred around exercise and diet support and supportive relationships with partners and peers. Work-related issues were highlighted specifically by younger patients, whereas gay and bisexual men emphasised a lack of specialised support.

CONCLUSION

While demonstrating some overarching needs common to most patients with prostate cancer, this review offers novel insight into the unique experiences and needs of men of different demographic backgrounds, which will enable clinicians to deliver individually tailored supportive care.