Transient-State Kinetic Analysis of the RNA Polymerase II Nucleotide Incorporation Mechanism

Evidence for Stepwise Disruption of E. coli RNA Polymerase: λPR Promoter Contacts and Duplex Formation in Transcription Initiation

To initiate transcription, the σ70 subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) binds duplex promoter DNA regions upstream of the transcription start site (TSS). Then σ70 and core RNAP bind and separate the individual DNA strands to open 13 base pairs, including TSS, forming an open complex (OC) that initiates upon binding NTP. To escape the promoter, RNAP uses translocation stress to break RNAP-promoter and σ70-core contacts, allowing duplex formation and releasing σ70. Here, to determine the timing and mechanism of contact disruption and duplex formation in promoter escape, we measure and interpret the effects of urea and glycine betaine (GB) on rates of individual nucleotide-incorporation steps at the λPR promoter. These solutes report on step-by-step changes in the amount and type of water-accessible surface area (ASA). We empirically separate contributions to solute effects from contact disruption/duplex formation and from NTP-binding/catalysis/translocation. This separation reveals that contacts are disrupted stepwise throughout mid- and late-initiation (5-mer to 11-mer synthesis). Overall net effects of urea (favorable) and GB (unfavorable) on contact disruption/duplex formation are large in magnitude and well-predicted from OC structures and solute-interaction strengths from model compound data. Comparing predicted and observed solute effects, we deduce that contact disruption/duplex formation proceeds from downstream to upstream. RNAP contacts with open strands break in steps 5-9, allowing duplex formation, while σ70 contacts with upstream duplex DNA and core RNAP break in steps 10 and 11, allowing σ70 release and promoter escape. These findings validate the stepwise mechanism of contact disruption and demonstrate the power of solutes in mechanistic studies.

NTPs compete in the active site of RNA polymerases I and II

Eukaryotes express at least three RNA polymerases (Pols) carry out transcription, while bacteria and archaea use only one. Using transient state kinetics, we have extensively examined and compared the kinetics of both single and multi-nucleotide additions catalyzed by the three Pols. In single nucleotide addition experiments we have observed unexpected extension products beyond one incorporation, which can be attributed to misincorporation, the presence of nearly undetectable amounts of contaminating NTPs, or a mixture of the two. Here we report the development and validation of an analysis strategy to account for the presence of unexpected extension products, when they occur. Using this approach, we uncovered evidence showing that non-cognate nucleotide, thermodynamically, competes with cognate nucleotide for the active site within the elongation complex of Pol I, ΔA12 Pol I, and Pol II. This observation is unexpected because base pairing interactions provide favorable energetics for selectivity and competitive binding indicates that the affinities of cognate and non-cognate nucleotides are within an order of magnitude. Thus, we show that application of our approach will allow for the extraction of additional information that reports on the energetics of nucleotide entry and selectivity.

Biochemical characterization of Mycobacterial RNA polymerases

Tuberculosis is caused by the bacterium Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). While eukaryotic species employ several specialized RNA polymerases (Pols) to fulfill the RNA synthesis requirements of the cell, bacterial species use a single RNA polymerase (RNAP). To contribute to the foundational understanding of how Mtb and the related non-pathogenic mycobacterial species, Mycobacterium smegmatis (Msm), perform the essential function of RNA synthesis, we performed a series of in vitro transcription experiments to define the unique enzymatic properties of Mtb and Msm RNAPs. In this study, we characterize the mechanism of nucleotide addition used by these bacterial RNAPs with comparisons to previously characterized eukaryotic Pols I, II, and III. We show that Mtb RNAP and Msm RNAP demonstrate similar enzymatic properties and nucleotide addition kinetics to each other but diverge significantly from eukaryotic Pols. We also show that Mtb RNAP and Msm RNAP uniquely bind a nucleotide analog with significantly higher affinity than canonical nucleotides, in contrast to eukaryotic RNA polymerase II. This affinity for analogs may reveal a vulnerability for selective inhibition of the pathogenic bacterial enzyme.IMPORTANCETuberculosis, caused by the bacterium Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), remains a severe global health threat. The World Health Organization (WHO) has reported that tuberculosis is second only to COVID-19 as the most lethal infection worldwide, with more annual deaths than HIV and AIDS (WHO.int). The first-line treatment for tuberculosis, Rifampin (or Rifampicin), specifically targets the Mtb RNA polymerase. This drug has been used for decades, leading to increased numbers of multi-drug-resistant infections (Stephanie, et al). To effectively treat tuberculosis, there is an urgent need for new therapeutics that selectively target vulnerabilities of the bacteria and not the host. Characterization of the differences between Mtb enzymes and host enzymes is critical to inform these ongoing drug design efforts.

Global kinetic mechanism describing single nucleotide incorporation for RNA polymerase I reveals fast UMP incorporation

RNA polymerase I (Pol I) is responsible for synthesizing ribosomal RNA, which is the rate limiting step in ribosome biogenesis. We have reported wide variability in the magnitude of the rate constants defining the rate limiting step in sequential nucleotide additions catalyzed by Pol I. in this study we sought to determine if base identity impacts the rate limiting step of nucleotide addition catalyzed by Pol I. To this end, we report a transient state kinetic interrogation of AMP, CMP, GMP, and UMP incorporations catalyzed by Pol I. We found that Pol I uses one kinetic mechanism to incorporate all nucleotides. However, we found that UMP incorporation is faster than AMP, CMP, and GMP additions. Further, we found that endonucleolytic removal of a dimer from the 3' end was fastest when the 3' terminal base is a UMP. It has been previously shown that both downstream and upstream template sequence identity impacts the kinetics of nucleotide addition. The results reported here show that the incoming base identity also impacts the magnitude of the observed rate limiting step.

Reversible Kinetics in Multi-nucleotide Addition Catalyzed by S. cerevisiae RNA polymerase II Reveal Slow Pyrophosphate Release

Eukaryotes express at least three nuclear DNA dependent RNA polymerases (Pols). Pols I, II, and III synthesize ribosomal (r) RNA, messenger (m) RNA, and transfer (t) RNA, respectively. Pol I and Pol III have intrinsic nuclease activity conferred by the A12.2 and C11 subunits, respectively. In contrast, Pol II requires the transcription factor (TF) IIS to confer robust nuclease activity. We recently reported that in the absence of the A12.2 subunit Pol I reverses bond formation by pyrophosphorolysis in the absence of added PPi, indicating slow PPi release. Thus, we hypothesized that Pol II, naturally lacking TFIIS, would reverse bond formation through pyrophosphorolysis. Here we report the results of transient-state kinetic experiments to examine the addition of nine nucleotides to a growing RNA chain catalyzed by Pol II. Our results indicate that Pol II reverses bond formation by pyrophosphorolysis in the absence of added PPi. We propose that, in the absence of endonuclease activity, this bond reversal may represent kinetic proofreading. Thus, given the hypothesis that Pol I evolved from Pol II through the incorporation of general transcription factors, pyrophosphorolysis may represent a more ancient form of proofreading that has been evolutionarily replaced with nuclease activity.

Transcription elongation mechanisms of RNA polymerases I, II, and III and their therapeutic implications

Transcription is a tightly regulated, complex, and essential cellular process in all living organisms. Transcription is comprised of three steps, transcription initiation, elongation, and termination. The distinct transcription initiation and termination mechanisms of eukaryotic RNA polymerases I, II, and III (Pols I, II, and III) have long been appreciated. Recent methodological advances have empowered high-resolution investigations of the Pols' transcription elongation mechanisms. Here, we review the kinetic similarities and differences in the individual steps of Pol I-, II-, and III-catalyzed transcription elongation, including NTP binding, bond formation, pyrophosphate release, and translocation. This review serves as an important summation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast) Pol I, II, and III kinetic investigations which reveal that transcription elongation by the Pols is governed by distinct mechanisms. Further, these studies illustrate how basic, biochemical investigations of the Pols can empower the development of chemotherapeutic compounds.

Quantifying the impact of initial RNA primer length on nucleotide addition by RNA polymerase I

Transient state kinetic studies of eukaryotic DNA-dependent RNA polymerases (Pols) in vitro provide quantitative characterization of enzyme activity at the level of individual nucleotide addition events. Previous work revealed heterogeneity in the rate constants governing nucleotide addition by yeast RNA polymerase I (Pol I) for each position on a template DNA. In contrast, the rate constants that described nucleotide addition by yeast RNA polymerase II (Pol II) were more homogeneous. This observation led to the question, what drives the variability of rate constants governing RNA synthesis by Pol I? Are the kinetics of nucleotide addition dictated by the position of the nascent RNA within the polymerase or by the identity of the next encoded nucleotide? In this study, we examine the impact of nucleotide position (i.e. nascent RNA primer length) on the rate constants governing nine sequential nucleotide addition events catalyzed by Pol I. The results reveal a conserved trend in the observed rate constants at each position for all primer lengths used, and highlight that the 9-nucleotide, or 9-mer, RNA primer provides the fastest observed rate constants. These findings suggest that the observed heterogeneity of rate constants for RNA synthesis by Pol I in vitro is driven primarily by the template sequence.

The A12.2 Subunit Plays an Integral Role in Pyrophosphate Release of RNA Polymerase I

RNA polymerase I (Pol I) synthesizes ribosomal RNA (rRNA), which is the first and rate-limiting step in ribosome biosynthesis. A12.2 (A12) is a critical subunit of Pol I that is responsible for activating Pol I's exonuclease activity. We previously reported a kinetic mechanism for single-nucleotide incorporation catalyzed by Pol I lacking the A12 subunit (ΔA12 Pol I) purified from S. cerevisae and revealed that ΔA12 Pol I exhibited much slower incorporation compared to Pol I. However, it is unknown if A12 influences each nucleotide incorporation in the context of transcription elongation. Here, we show that A12 contributes to every repeating cycle of nucleotide addition and that deletion of A12 results in an entirely different kinetic mechanism compared to WT Pol I. We found that instead of one irreversible step between each nucleotide addition cycle, as reported for wild type (WT) Pol I, the ΔA12 variant requires one reversible step to describe each nucleotide addition. Reversibility fundamentally requires slow PPi release. Consistently, we show that Pol I is more pyrophosphate (PPi) concentration dependent than ΔA12 Pol I. This observation supports the model that PPi is retained in the active site of ΔA12 Pol I longer than WT Pol I. These results suggest that A12 promotes PPi release, revealing a larger role for the A12.2 subunit in the nucleotide addition cycle beyond merely activating exonuclease activity.

Protocol for monitoring and analyzing single nucleotide incorporation by S. cerevisiae RNA polymerases

Here we present an optimized protocol for monitoring and analyzing single nucleotide incorporation by RNA polymerases. This protocol describes the assembly of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA polymerase I elongation complexes in a promoter-independent system in vitro. We describe how to collect a time course using a quench-flow, a rapid mixing instrument, and subsequently resolve reactions on a polyacrylamide gel. Finally, we detail how to quantify the gel images. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Appling et al. (2015).1.