Control of Hexamerization, Assembly, and Excluded Strand Specificity for the Sulfolobus solfataricus MCM Helicase

Mechanisms of hexameric helicases

Ring-shaped hexameric helicases are essential motor proteins that separate duplex nucleic acid strands for DNA replication, recombination, and transcriptional regulation. Two evolutionarily distinct lineages of these enzymes, predicated on RecA and AAA+ ATPase folds, have been identified and characterized to date. Hexameric helicases couple NTP hydrolysis with conformational changes that move nucleic acid substrates through a central pore in the enzyme. How hexameric helicases productively engage client DNA or RNA segments and use successive rounds of NTPase activity to power translocation and unwinding have been longstanding questions in the field. Recent structural and biophysical findings are beginning to reveal commonalities in NTP hydrolysis and substrate translocation by diverse hexameric helicase families. Here, we review these molecular mechanisms and highlight aspects of their function that are yet to be understood.

Atomic Force Microscopy Investigation of the Interactions between the MCM Helicase and DNA

The MCM (minichromosome maintenance) protein complex forms an hexameric ring and has a key role in the replication machinery of Eukaryotes and Archaea, where it functions as the replicative helicase opening up the DNA double helix ahead of the polymerases. Here, we present a study of the interaction between DNA and the archaeal MCM complex from Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus by means of atomic force microscopy (AFM) single molecule imaging. We first optimized the protocol (surface treatment and buffer conditions) to obtain AFM images of surface-equilibrated DNA molecules before and after the interaction with the protein complex. We discriminated between two modes of interaction, one in which the protein induces a sharp bend in the DNA, and one where there is no bending. We found that the presence of the MCM complex also affects the DNA contour length. A possible interpretation of the observed behavior is that in one case the hexameric ring encircles the dsDNA, while in the other the nucleic acid wraps on the outside of the ring, undergoing a change of direction. We confirmed this topographical assignment by testing two mutants, one affecting the N-terminal β-hairpins projecting towards the central channel, and thus preventing DNA loading, the other lacking an external subdomain and thus preventing wrapping. The statistical analysis of the distribution of the protein complexes between the two modes, together with the dissection of the changes of DNA contour length and binding angle upon interaction, for the wild type and the two mutants, is consistent with the hypothesis. We discuss the results in view of the various modes of nucleic acid interactions that have been proposed for both archaeal and eukaryotic MCM complexes.

Amidst multiple binding orientations on fork DNA, Saccharolobus MCM helicase proceeds N-first for unwinding

DNA replication requires that the duplex genomic DNA strands be separated; a function that is implemented by ring-shaped hexameric helicases in all Domains. Helicases are composed of two domains, an N- terminal DNA binding domain (NTD) and a C- terminal motor domain (CTD). Replication is controlled by loading of helicases at origins of replication, activation to preferentially encircle one strand, and then translocation to begin separation of the two strands. Using a combination of site-specific DNA footprinting, single-turnover unwinding assays, and unique fluorescence translocation monitoring, we have been able to quantify the binding distribution and the translocation orientation of Saccharolobus (formally Sulfolobus) solfataricus MCM on DNA. Our results show that both the DNA substrate and the C-terminal winged-helix (WH) domain influence the orientation but that translocation on DNA proceeds N-first.

Contacts and context that regulate DNA helicase unwinding and replisome progression

Hexameric DNA helicases involved in the separation of duplex DNA at the replication fork have a universal architecture but have evolved from two separate protein families. The consequences are that the regulation, translocation polarity, strand specificity, and architectural orientation varies between phage/bacteria to that of archaea/eukaryotes. Once assembled and activated for single strand DNA translocation and unwinding, the DNA polymerase couples tightly to the helicase forming a robust replisome complex. However, this helicase-polymerase interaction can be challenged by various forms of endogenous or exogenous agents that can stall the entire replisome or decouple DNA unwinding from synthesis. The consequences of decoupling can be severe, leading to a build-up of ssDNA requiring various pathways for replication fork restart. All told, the hexameric helicase sits prominently at the front of the replisome constantly responding to a variety of obstacles that require transient unwinding/reannealing, traversal of more stable blocks, and alternations in DNA unwinding speed that regulate replisome progression.