Pattern and Dynamics of FLT3 Duplications

Identification of inhibitors targeting the FLT3-ITD mutation through 4D-QSAR, in vitro, and in silico

The FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutation is a key target for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment. The second-generation inhibitors such as Gilteritinib still present off-target effects and associated side effects. Therefore, identifying novel FLT3-ITD inhibitors has become a promising strategy for AML treatment. In this study, a 4D-QSAR model was developed based on Gilteritinib and its analogues, and it was found that introducing hydrophobic bulky groups at the piperazine or piperidine of Gilteritinib would enhance the binding affinity to FLT3-ITD. So, three series of targeted compounds (A1-A5, B1-B5 and C1-C5) were designed and synthesized. The antiproliferative activity against MOLM-13 cells was evaluated in vitro. Compound A1 (IC50 = 25.65 nM), with a cubane group at the piperazine position; Compounds B2 (IC50 = 63.38 nM) and C2 (IC50 = 54.96 nM), with a norbornene group at the piperidine position, showed the strongest inhibition in their series. Their IC50 values were comparable to that of the positive control Gilteritinib (IC50 = 22.37 nM). FLT3-ITD was confirmed as the degradation target through a kinase inhibition assay, where the IC50 values were 2.12 nM (Compound A1), 1.29 nM (Compound B2), and 3.06 nM (Compound C2), which were comparable to that of Gilteritinib (IC50 = 0.43 nM). Additionally, molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations showed that Compounds A1, B2, and C2 had similar binding modes to that of Gilteritinib with more stable affinities. Overall, these results demonstrated that Compounds A1, B2, and C2 were promising inhibitors for targeting AML with FLT3-ITD mutation.

In silico and in vitro study of FLT3 inhibitors and their application in acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common hematological cancer in the adult population worldwide. Approximately 35% of patients with AML present internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutations in the FMS‑like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) receptor associated with poor prognosis, and thus, this receptor is a relevant target for potential therapeutics. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are used to treat AML; however, their molecular interactions and effects on leukemic cells are poorly understood. The present study aimed to gain insights into the molecular interactions and affinity forces of four TKI drugs (sorafenib, midostaurin, gilteritinib and quizartinib) with the wild‑type (WT)‑FLT3 and ITD‑mutated (ITD‑FLT3) structural models of FLT3, in its inactive aspartic acid‑phenylalanine‑glycine motif (DFG‑out) and active aspartic acid‑phenylalanine‑glycine motif (DFG‑in) conformations. Furthermore, the present study evaluated the effects of the second‑generation TKIs gilteritinib and quizartinib on cancer cell viability, apoptosis and proliferation in the MV4‑11 (ITD‑FLT3) and HL60 (WT‑FLT3) AML cell lines. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from a healthy volunteer were included as an FLT3‑negative group. Molecular docking analysis indicated higher affinities of second‑generation TKIs for WT‑FLT3/DFG‑out and WT‑FLT3/DFG‑in compared with those of the first‑generation TKIs. However, the ITD mutation changed the affinity of all TKIs. The in vitro data supported the in silico predictions: MV4‑11 cells presented high selective sensibility to gilteritinib and quizartinib compared with the HL60 cells, whereas the drugs had no effect on PBMCs. Thus, the current study presented novel information about molecular interactions between the FLT3 receptors (WT or ITD‑mutated) and some of their inhibitors. It also paves the way for the search for novel inhibitory molecules with potential use against AML.

Understanding mechanisms of resistance to FLT3 inhibitors in adult FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia to guide treatment strategy

The presence of FLT3 mutations, including the most common FLT3-ITD (internal tandem duplications) and FLT3-TKD (tyrosine kinase domain), is associated with an unfavorable prognosis in patients affected by acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this setting, in recent years, new FLT3 inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy in improving survival and treatment response. Nevertheless, the development of primary and secondary mechanisms of resistance poses a significant obstacle to their efficacy. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for developing novel therapeutic approaches to overcome resistance and improve the outcomes of patients. In this context, the use of novel FLT3 inhibitors and the combination of different targeted therapies have been studied. This review provides an update on the molecular alterations involved in the resistance to FLT3 inhibitors, and describes how the molecular monitoring may be used to guide treatment strategy in FLT3-mutated AML.

Synergy and antagonism between azacitidine and FLT3 inhibitors

Synergetic interactions between drugs can make a drug combination more effective. Alternatively, they may allow to use lower concentrations and thus avoid toxicities or side effects that not only cause discomfort but might also reduce the overall survival. Here, we studied whether synergy exists between agents that are used for treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Azacitidine is a demethylation agent that is used in the treatment of AML patients that are unfit for aggressive chemotherapy. An activating mutation in the FLT3 gene is common in AML patients and in the absence of specific treatment makes prognosis worse. FLT3 inhibitors may be used in such cases. We sought to determine whether combination of azacitidine with a FLT3 inhibitor (gilteritinib, quizartinib, LT-850-166, FN-1501 or FF-10101) displayed synergy or antagonism. To this end, we calculated dose-response matrices of these drug combinations from experiments in human AML cells and subsequently analysed the data using a novel consensus scoring algorithm. The results show that combinations that involved non-covalent FLT3 inhibitors, including the two clinically approved drugs gilteritinib and quizartinib were antagonistic. On the other hand combinations with the covalent inhibitor FF-10101 had some range of concentrations where synergy was observed.

Combination strategies to overcome drug resistance in FLT+ acute myeloid leukaemia

BACKGROUND

Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) remains difficult to treat despite the development of novel formulations and targeted therapies. Activating mutations in the FLT3 gene are common among patients and make the tumour susceptible to FLT3 inhibitors, but resistance to such inhibitors develops quickly.

METHODS

We examined combination therapies aimed at FLT3+-AML, and studied the development of resistance using a newly developed protocol. Combinations of FLT3, CDK4/6 and PI3K inhibitors were tested for synergism.

RESULTS

We show that AML cells express CDK4 and that the CDK4/6 inhibitors palbociclib and abemaciclib inhibit cellular growth. PI3K inhibitors were also effective in inhibiting the growth of AML cell lines that express FLT3-ITD. Whereas resistance to quizartinib develops quickly, the combinations overcome such resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that a multi-targeted intervention involving a CDK4/6 inhibitor with a FLT3 inhibitor or a pan-PI3K inhibitor might be a valuable therapeutic strategy for AML to overcome drug resistance. Moreover, many patients cannot tolerate high doses of the drugs that were studied (quizartinib, palbociclib and PI3K inhibitors) for longer periods, and it is therefore of high significance that the drugs act synergistically and lower doses can be used.

Resistance to a tyrosine kinase inhibitor mediated by changes to the conformation space of the kinase

Gilteritinib is a highly selective and effective inhibitor of the FLT3/ITD mutated protein, and is used successfully in treating acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Unfortunately, tumour cells gradually develop resistance to gilteritinib due to mutations in the molecular drug target. The atomistic details behind this observed resistance are not clear, since the protein structure of the complex is only available in the inactive state, while the drug binds better to the active state. To overcome this limitation, we used a computer-aided approach where we docked gilteritinib to the active site of FLT3/ITD and calculated the Gibbs free energy difference between the binding energies of the parental and mutant enzymes. These calculations agreed with experimental estimations for one mutation (F691L) but not the other (D698N). To further understand how these mutations operate, we used metadynamics simulations to study the conformational landscape of the activation process. Both mutants show a lower activation energy barrier which suggests that they are more likely to adopt an active state until inhibited, making the mutant enzymes more active. This suggests that a higher efficiency of tyrosine kinases contributes to resistance not only against type 2 but also against type 1 kinase inhibitors.

The molecular mechanisms behind activation of FLT3 in acute myeloid leukemia and resistance to therapy by selective inhibitors

Acute myeloid leukemia is an aggressive cancer, which, in spite of increasingly better understanding of its genetic background remains difficult to treat. Mutations in the FLT3 gene are observed in ≈30% of the patients. Most of these mutations are internal tandem duplications (ITDs) of a sequence within the protein coding region, an activation mechanism that is almost non-existent with other genes and cancers. As patients each carry their own unique set of mutations, it is challenging to understand how ITDs activate the protein, and ascertain the risk for each individual patient. Available treatment options are limited due to development of drug resistance. Here, recent studies are reviewed that help to better understand the molecular mechanism behind activation of the FLT3 protein due to mutations. It is argued that difference in mutation sequences and especially location might be coupled to prognosis. When it comes to FLT3 inhibitors, key differences between them can be attributed to the mode of inhibition (type-1 and type-2 inhibitors), effective inhibitory coefficient in the blood plasma and off-target binding. Accounting for the position and length of insertions may in the future be used to predict prognosis and rationalise treatment. Development of new inhibitors must take into account the potential for resistance mutations. Inhibitors aimed at multiple specific targets are currently being developed. These, and as well as combination therapies will hopefully lead to longer periods during which targeted FLT3 therapy will remain effective.

Combating drug resistance in acute myeloid leukaemia by drug rotations: the effects of quizartinib and pexidartinib

BACKGROUND

Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is an aggressive blood cancer. In approximately 30% of the cases, driver mutations in the FLT3 gene are identified. FLT3 inhibitors are used in treatment of such patients together with cytotoxic drugs or (in refractory AML) as single agents. Unfortunately, resistance to FLT3 inhibitors limits their efficacy. Resistance is often due to secondary mutations in the gene encoding the molecular target. The gatekeeper mutation F691L confers resistance to specific FLT3 inhibitors such as quizartinib, but pexidartinib is much less resistance to this mutation. Pexidartinib alone is however sensitive to many other resistance mutations. In chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), it has been suggested that rotation between drugs with a different landscape of resistance mutations might postpone the emergence of resistance.

METHODS

We studied the effect of quizartinib and pexidartinib in AML cell lines that express FLT3 (MOLM-14 and MV4-11). Using a rotation protocol, we further examined whether the emergence of resistance could be postponed. Computational modelling was used to analyse the onset of resistance and suggest which mutations are most likely to occur in a quantitative fashion.

RESULTS

The cells were sensitive to both inhibitors but quickly developed resistance that could be inherited, suggesting a genetic origin. Rotation protocols were not useful to postpone the emergence of resistance, which implies that such protocols, or changing from pexidartinib to quizartinib (or vice-versa) should not be used in patients. The computational modelling led to similar conclusions and suggested that F691L is the most common mutation to occur with quizartinib, and also when both drugs are used in rotation.

CONCLUSIONS

AML patients are not likely to benefit from a quizartinib/pexidartinib rotation protocol. A combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (with different molecular targets) might be more useful in the future. Development of specific FLT3 inhibitors that are less sensitive to resistance mutations might also lead to a better outcome.