1
|
Gruper Y, Ben-Shmuel A, Scherz-Shouval R. HSF1 renders NK cells too stressed to respond. Nat Cell Biol 2024:10.1038/s41556-024-01472-1. [PMID: 39223374 DOI: 10.1038/s41556-024-01472-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Yael Gruper
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Aviad Ben-Shmuel
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Ruth Scherz-Shouval
- Department of Biomolecular Sciences, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Morgan JE, Jaferi N, Shonibare Z, Huang GS. ARID1A in Gynecologic Precancers and Cancers. Reprod Sci 2024; 31:2150-2162. [PMID: 38740655 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-024-01585-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
The highest frequency of genetic alterations in the tumor suppressor ARID1A occurs in malignancies of the female reproductive tract. The prevalence of ARID1A alterations in gynecologic precancers and cancers is summarized from the literature, and the putative mechanisms of tumor suppressive action examined both in benign/precursor lesions including endometriosis and atypical hyperplasia and in malignancies of the ovary, uterus, cervix and vagina. ARID1A alterations in gynecologic cancers are usually loss-of-function mutations, resulting in diminished or absent protein expression. ARID1A deficiency results in pleiotropic downstream effects related not only to its role in transcriptional regulation as a SWI/SNF complex subunit, but also related to the functions of ARID1A in DNA replication and repair, immune modulation, cell cycle progression, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and oxidative stress. The most promising actionable signaling pathway interactions and therapeutic vulnerabilities of ARID1A mutated cancers are presented with a critical review of the currently available experimental and clinical evidence. The role of ARID1A in response to chemotherapeutic agents, radiation therapy and immunotherapy is also addressed. In summary, the multi-faceted role of ARID1A mutation in precancer and cancer is examined through a clinical lens focused on development of novel preventive and therapeutic interventions for gynecological cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaida E Morgan
- Yale College, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Nishah Jaferi
- Yale College, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Zainab Shonibare
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Gloria S Huang
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, Yale University, PO Box 208063, New Haven, CT, 06520-8063, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Williams I, DeHart H, O'Malley M, Walker B, Ulhaskumar V, Ray H, Delaney JR, Nephew KP, Carpenter RL. MYC and HSF1 Cooperate to Drive PLK1 inhibitor Sensitivity in High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.06.11.598486. [PMID: 38915574 PMCID: PMC11195273 DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.11.598486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is a deadly female cancer with high rates of recurrence. The primary treatment strategy for patients is platinum-based therapy regimens that almost universally develop resistance. Consequently, new therapeutic avenues are needed to overcome the plateau that current therapies have on patient outcomes. We describe a gene amplification involving both HSF1 and MYC, wherein these two genes on chromosome 8q are co-amplified in over 7% of human tumors that is enriched to over 30% of patients with ovarian cancer. We further found that HSF1 and MYC transcriptional activity is correlated in human tumors and ovarian cancer cell lines, suggesting they may cooperate in ovarian cancer cells. CUT&RUN for HSF1 and MYC in co-amplified ovarian cancer cells revealed that HSF1 and MYC have overlapping binding at a substantial number of locations throughout the genome where their binding peaks are near identical. Consistent with these data, a protein-protein interaction between HSF1 and MYC was detected in ovarian cancer cells, implying these two transcription factors have a molecular cooperation. Further supporting their cooperation, growth of HSF1-MYC co-amplified ovarian cancer cells were found to be dependent on both HSF1 and MYC. In an attempt to identify a therapeutic target that could take advantage of this dependency on both HSF1 and MYC, PLK1 was identified as being correlated with HSF1 and MYC in primary human tumor specimens, consistent with a previously established effect of PLK1 on HSF1 and MYC protein levels. Targeting PLK1 with the compound volasertib (BI-6727) revealed a greater than 200-fold increased potency of volasertib in HSF1-MYC co-amplified ovarian cancer cells compared to ovarian cancer cells wild-type HSF1 and MYC copy number, which extended to several growth assays, including spheroid growth. Volasertib, and other PLK1 inhibitors, have not shown great success in clinical trials and this study suggests that targeting PLK1 may be viable in a precision medicine approach using HSF1-MYC co-amplification as a biomarker for response.
Collapse
|
4
|
Nikotina AD, Vladimirova SA, Kokoreva NE, Nevdakha VA, Lazarev VF, Kuznetcova LS, Komarova EY, Suezov RV, Efremov S, Leonova E, Kartsev VG, Aksenov ND, Margulis BA, Guzhova IV. Novel mechanism of drug resistance triggered by tumor-associated macrophages through Heat Shock Factor-1 activation. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2024; 73:25. [PMID: 38280079 PMCID: PMC10821977 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-023-03612-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2024]
Abstract
Macrophages constitute a major part of tumor microenvironment, and most of existing data demonstrate their ruling role in the development of anti-drug resistance of cancer cell. One of the most powerful protection system is based on heat shock proteins whose synthesis is triggered by activated Heat Shock Factor-1 (HSF1); the inhibition of the HSF1 with CL-43 sensitized A549 lung cancer cells to the anti-cancer effect of etoposide. Notably, analyzing A549 tumor xenografts in mice we observed nest-like pattern of co-localization of A549 cells demonstrating enhanced expression of HSF1 with macrophages, and decided to check whether the above arrangement has a functional value for both cell types. It was found that the incubation of A549 or DLD1 colon cancer cells with either human monocytes or THP1 monocyte-like cells activated HSF1 and increased resistance to etoposide. Importantly, the same effect was shown when primary cultures of colon tumors were incubated with THP1 cells or with human monocytes. To prove that HSF1 is implicated in enhanced resistance caused by monocytic cells, we generated an A549 cell subline devoid of HSF1 which did not respond to incubation with THP1 cells. The pharmacological inhibition of HSF1 with CL-43 also abolished the effect of THP1 cells on primary tumor cells, highlighting a new target of tumor-associated macrophages in a cell proteostasis mechanism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina D Nikotina
- Laboratory of Cell Protection Mechanisms, Institute of Cytology of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia
| | - Snezhana A Vladimirova
- Laboratory of Cell Protection Mechanisms, Institute of Cytology of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia
| | - Nadezhda E Kokoreva
- Laboratory of Cell Protection Mechanisms, Institute of Cytology of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia
| | - Valeria A Nevdakha
- Laboratory of Cell Protection Mechanisms, Institute of Cytology of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia
| | - Vladimir F Lazarev
- Laboratory of Cell Protection Mechanisms, Institute of Cytology of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia
| | - Liubov S Kuznetcova
- Laboratory of Cell Protection Mechanisms, Institute of Cytology of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia
| | - Elena Y Komarova
- Laboratory of Cell Protection Mechanisms, Institute of Cytology of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia
| | - Roman V Suezov
- Laboratory of Cell Protection Mechanisms, Institute of Cytology of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Center for Tumor- and Immune Biology, Philipps University of Marburg, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| | - Sergei Efremov
- Saint-Petersburg State University Hospital, 190103, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Elizaveta Leonova
- Saint-Petersburg State University Hospital, 190103, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | | | - Nikolay D Aksenov
- Laboratory of Cell Protection Mechanisms, Institute of Cytology of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia
| | - Boris A Margulis
- Laboratory of Cell Protection Mechanisms, Institute of Cytology of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia
| | - Irina V Guzhova
- Laboratory of Cell Protection Mechanisms, Institute of Cytology of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia.
| |
Collapse
|