1
|
Orndorff PB, van der Vaart A. Systematic assessment of the flexibility of uracil damaged DNA. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2024; 42:3958-3968. [PMID: 37261803 DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2023.2217683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Uracil is a common DNA lesion which is recognized and removed by uracil DNA-glycosylase (UDG) as a part of the base excision repair pathway. Excision proceeds by base flipping, and UDG efficiency is thought to depend on the ease of deformability of the bases neighboring the lesion. We used molecular dynamics simulations to assess the flexibility of a large library of dsDNA strands, containing all tetranucleotide motifs with U:A, U:G, T:A or C:G base pairs. Our study demonstrates that uracil damaged DNA largely follows trends in flexibility of undamaged DNA. Measured bending persistence lengths, groove widths, step parameters and base flipping propensities demonstrate that uracil increases the flexibility of DNA, and that U:G base paired strands are more flexible than U:A strands. Certain sequence contexts are more deformable than others, with a key role for the 3' base next to uracil. Flexibilities are large when this base is an A or G, and repressed for a C or T. A 5' T adjacent to the uracil strongly promotes flexibility, but other 5' bases are less influential. DNA bending is correlated to step deformations and base flipping, and bending aids flipping. Our study implies that the link between substrate flexibility and UDG efficiency is widely valid, helps explain why UDG prefers to bind U:G base paired strands, and suggests that the DNA bending angle of the UDG-substrate complex is optimal for base flipping.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul B Orndorff
- Department of Chemistry, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Orndorff PB, Poddar S, Owens AM, Kumari N, Ugaz BT, Amin S, Van Horn WD, van der Vaart A, Levitus M. Uracil-DNA glycosylase efficiency is modulated by substrate rigidity. Sci Rep 2023; 13:3915. [PMID: 36890276 PMCID: PMC9995336 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30620-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Uracil DNA-glycosylase (UNG) is a DNA repair enzyme that removes the highly mutagenic uracil lesion from DNA using a base flipping mechanism. Although this enzyme has evolved to remove uracil from diverse sequence contexts, UNG excision efficiency depends on DNA sequence. To provide the molecular basis for rationalizing UNG substrate preferences, we used time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy, NMR imino proton exchange measurements, and molecular dynamics simulations to measure UNG specificity constants (kcat/KM) and DNA flexibilities for DNA substrates containing central AUT, TUA, AUA, and TUT motifs. Our study shows that UNG efficiency is dictated by the intrinsic deformability around the lesion, establishes a direct relationship between substrate flexibility modes and UNG efficiency, and shows that bases immediately adjacent to the uracil are allosterically coupled and have the greatest impact on substrate flexibility and UNG activity. The finding that substrate flexibility controls UNG efficiency is likely significant for other repair enzymes and has major implications for the understanding of mutation hotspot genesis, molecular evolution, and base editing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul B Orndorff
- Department of Chemistry, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA
| | - Souvik Poddar
- School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA
- The Biodesign Institute Center for Single Molecule Biophysics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA
| | - Aerial M Owens
- School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA
- The Biodesign Institute Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA
| | - Nikita Kumari
- School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA
- The Biodesign Institute Center for Single Molecule Biophysics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA
| | - Bryan T Ugaz
- School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA
- The Biodesign Institute Center for Single Molecule Biophysics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA
| | - Samrat Amin
- Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA
| | - Wade D Van Horn
- School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
- The Biodesign Institute Virginia G. Piper Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
| | - Arjan van der Vaart
- Department of Chemistry, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA.
| | - Marcia Levitus
- School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
- The Biodesign Institute Center for Single Molecule Biophysics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|