1
|
Gao Y, Chen H, Yang W, Wang S, Gong D, Zhang X, Huang Y, Kumar V, Huang Q, Kandegama WMWW, Hao G. New avenues of combating antibiotic resistance by targeting cryptic pockets. Pharmacol Res 2024; 210:107495. [PMID: 39491636 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2024] [Revised: 10/02/2024] [Accepted: 11/01/2024] [Indexed: 11/05/2024]
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance is a global health concern that is rapidly spreading among human and animal pathogens. Developing novel antibiotics is one of the most significant approaches to surmount antibiotic resistance. Given the difficult in identifying novel targets, cryptic binding sites provide new pockets for compounds design to combat antibiotic resistance. However, there exists a lack of comprehensive analysis and discussion on the successful utilization of cryptic pockets in overcoming antibiotic resistance. Here, we systematically analyze the crucial role of cryptic pockets in neutralizing antibiotic resistance. First, antibiotic resistance development and associated resistance mechanisms are summarized. Then, the advantages and mechanisms of cryptic pockets for overcoming antibiotic resistance were discussed. Specific cryptic pockets in resistant proteins and successful case studies of designed inhibitors are exemplified. This review provides insight into the discovery of cryptic pockets for drug design as an approach to overcome antibiotic resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yangyang Gao
- State Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Center for Research and Development of Fine Chemicals, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, PR China
| | - Huimin Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, PR China
| | - Weicheng Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Center for Research and Development of Fine Chemicals, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, PR China
| | - Shuang Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Center for Research and Development of Fine Chemicals, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, PR China
| | - Daohong Gong
- State Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Center for Research and Development of Fine Chemicals, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, PR China
| | - Xiao Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Center for Research and Development of Fine Chemicals, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, PR China
| | - Yuanqin Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Center for Research and Development of Fine Chemicals, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, PR China
| | - Vinit Kumar
- State Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Center for Research and Development of Fine Chemicals, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, PR China
| | - Qiuqian Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Center for Research and Development of Fine Chemicals, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, PR China
| | - W M W W Kandegama
- State Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Center for Research and Development of Fine Chemicals, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, PR China; Department of Horticulture and Landscape Gardening, Faculty of Agriculture and Plantation Management, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, Makandura, Gonawila, 60170 Sri Lanka
| | - Gefei Hao
- State Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Center for Research and Development of Fine Chemicals, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, PR China; State Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shibata M, Lin X, Onuchic JN, Yura K, Cheng RR. Residue coevolution and mutational landscape for OmpR and NarL response regulator subfamilies. Biophys J 2024; 123:681-692. [PMID: 38291753 PMCID: PMC10995415 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2024.01.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 12/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
DNA-binding response regulators (DBRRs) are a broad class of proteins that operate in tandem with their partner kinase proteins to form two-component signal transduction systems in bacteria. Typical DBRRs are composed of two domains where the conserved N-terminal domain accepts transduced signals and the evolutionarily diverse C-terminal domain binds to DNA. These domains are assumed to be functionally independent, and hence recombination of the two domains should yield novel DBRRs of arbitrary input/output response, which can be used as biosensors. This idea has been proved to be successful in some cases; yet, the error rate is not trivial. Improvement of the success rate of this technique requires a deeper understanding of the linker-domain and inter-domain residue interactions, which have not yet been thoroughly examined. Here, we studied residue coevolution of DBRRs of the two main subfamilies (OmpR and NarL) using large collections of bacterial amino acid sequences to extensively investigate the evolutionary signatures of linker-domain and inter-domain residue interactions. Coevolutionary analysis uncovered evolutionarily selected linker-domain and inter-domain residue interactions of known experimental structures, as well as previously unknown inter-domain residue interactions. We examined the possibility of these inter-domain residue interactions as contacts that stabilize an inactive conformation of the DBRR where DNA binding is inhibited for both subfamilies. The newly gained insights on linker-domain/inter-domain residue interactions and shared inactivation mechanisms improve the understanding of the functional mechanism of DBRRs, providing clues to efficiently create functional DBRR-based biosensors. Additionally, we show the feasibility of applying coevolutionary landscape models to predict the functionality of domain-swapped DBRR proteins. The presented result demonstrates that sequence information can be used to filter out bioengineered DBRR proteins that are predicted to be nonfunctional due to a high negative predictive value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayu Shibata
- Graduate School of Humanities and Sciences, Ochanomizu University, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan; Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston Texas
| | - Xingcheng Lin
- Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina; Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina
| | - José N Onuchic
- Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston Texas; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Chemistry, and Biosciences, Rice University, Houston, Texas
| | - Kei Yura
- Graduate School of Humanities and Sciences, Ochanomizu University, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan; Center for Interdisciplinary AI and Data Science, Ochanomizu University, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan; Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryan R Cheng
- Department of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Perspectives on the landscape and flux theory for describing emergent behaviors of the biological systems. J Biol Phys 2022; 48:1-36. [PMID: 34822073 PMCID: PMC8866630 DOI: 10.1007/s10867-021-09586-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
We give a review on the landscape theory of the equilibrium biological systems and landscape-flux theory of the nonequilibrium biological systems as the global driving force. The emergences of the behaviors, the associated thermodynamics in terms of the entropy and free energy and dynamics in terms of the rate and paths have been quantitatively demonstrated. The hierarchical organization structures have been discussed. The biological applications ranging from protein folding, biomolecular recognition, specificity, biomolecular evolution and design for equilibrium systems as well as cell cycle, differentiation and development, cancer, neural networks and brain function, and evolution for nonequilibrium systems, cross-scale studies of genome structural dynamics and experimental quantifications/verifications of the landscape and flux are illustrated. Together, this gives an overall global physical and quantitative picture in terms of the landscape and flux for the behaviors, dynamics and functions of biological systems.
Collapse
|
4
|
Chu WT, Yan Z, Chu X, Zheng X, Liu Z, Xu L, Zhang K, Wang J. Physics of biomolecular recognition and conformational dynamics. REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS. PHYSICAL SOCIETY (GREAT BRITAIN) 2021; 84:126601. [PMID: 34753115 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6633/ac3800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Biomolecular recognition usually leads to the formation of binding complexes, often accompanied by large-scale conformational changes. This process is fundamental to biological functions at the molecular and cellular levels. Uncovering the physical mechanisms of biomolecular recognition and quantifying the key biomolecular interactions are vital to understand these functions. The recently developed energy landscape theory has been successful in quantifying recognition processes and revealing the underlying mechanisms. Recent studies have shown that in addition to affinity, specificity is also crucial for biomolecular recognition. The proposed physical concept of intrinsic specificity based on the underlying energy landscape theory provides a practical way to quantify the specificity. Optimization of affinity and specificity can be adopted as a principle to guide the evolution and design of molecular recognition. This approach can also be used in practice for drug discovery using multidimensional screening to identify lead compounds. The energy landscape topography of molecular recognition is important for revealing the underlying flexible binding or binding-folding mechanisms. In this review, we first introduce the energy landscape theory for molecular recognition and then address four critical issues related to biomolecular recognition and conformational dynamics: (1) specificity quantification of molecular recognition; (2) evolution and design in molecular recognition; (3) flexible molecular recognition; (4) chromosome structural dynamics. The results described here and the discussions of the insights gained from the energy landscape topography can provide valuable guidance for further computational and experimental investigations of biomolecular recognition and conformational dynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Ting Chu
- State Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhiqiang Yan
- State Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiakun Chu
- Department of Chemistry & Physics, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States of America
| | - Xiliang Zheng
- State Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, People's Republic of China
| | - Zuojia Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, People's Republic of China
| | - Li Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, People's Republic of China
| | - Kun Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, People's Republic of China
| | - Jin Wang
- Department of Chemistry & Physics, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|