Structure of Ultrafine Bubbles and Their Effects on Protein and Lipid Membrane Structures Studied by Small- and Wide-Angle X-ray Scattering

Review on the Significant Interactions between Ultrafine Gas Bubbles and Biological Systems

Having sizes comparable with living cells and high abundance, ultrafine bubbles (UBs) are prone to inevitable interactions with different types of cells and facilitate alterations in physiological properties. The interactions of four typical cell types (e.g., bacterial, fungal, plant, and mammalian cells) with UBs have been studied over recent years. For bacterial cells, UBs have been utilized in creating the capillary force to tear down biofilms. The release of high amounts of heat, pressure, and free radicals during bubble rupture is also found to affect bacterial cell growth. Similarly, the bubble gas core identity plays an important role in the development of fungal cells. By the proposed mechanism of attachment of UBs on hydrophobin proteins in the fungal cell wall, oxygen and ozone gas-filled ultrafine bubbles can either promote or hinder the cell growth rate. On the other hand, reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation and mass transfer facilitation are two means of indirect interactions between UBs and plant cells. Likewise, the use of different gas cores in generating bubbles can produce different physical effects on these cells, for example, hydrogen gas for antioxidation against infections and oxygen for oxidation of toxic metal ions. For mammalian cells, the importance of investigating their interactions with UBs lies in the bubbles' action on cell viability as membrane poration for drug delivery can greatly affect cells' survival. UBs have been utilized and tested in forming the pores by different methods, ranging from bubble oscillation and microstream generation through acoustic cavitation to bubble implosion.

Nanobubble boundary layer thickness quantified by solvent relaxation NMR

HYPOTHESIS

The boundary layer holds the key to solve the puzzle of the unusual stability of the nanobubbles in solution. The quantitative determination on its mechanical and structural properties has not been achieved due to its diffusive and dynamic nature, lack of distinctive interfaces, and difficult differentiation from bulk background. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate this boundary using more sensitive interface analysis technologies to effectively differentiate the water molecules at the interface from those in the bulk.

EXPERIMENTS

An in-situ and non-deconstructive method, solvent relaxation nuclear magnetic resonance, was used to investigate the boundary layer on bulk nanobubbles, where the relaxation rate of the water in the layer and its thickness were measured by solvent relaxation NMR and the ratio between the water molecules at the bubble interfaces and those in the bulk and the corresponding boundary layer thickness were determined.

FINDINGS

The spin-spin relaxation time for the water in the layer (∼10¹ms) is found to be two orders of magnitude lower than that of the free water (∼10³ms). As the first attempt, the determined boundary layer thickness is around 35-45 nm and 17.0 %-8.7 % of the effective gaseous size of the nanobubbles, which increases with the decrease of the bubble diameter. As a result, a quantitative measurement model for bubble boundary layer has been established in order to better understand the interfacial properties and stabilization mechanism for bulk nanobubbles.

Stimuli-responsive nanobubbles for biomedical applications

Stimuli-responsive nanobubbles have received increased attention for their application in spatial and temporal resolution of diagnostic techniques and therapies, particularly in multiple imaging methods, and they thus have significant potential for applications in the field of biomedicine. This review presents an overview of the recent advances in the development of stimuli-responsive nanobubbles and their novel applications. Properties of both internal- and external-stimuli responsive nanobubbles are highlighted and discussed considering the potential features required for biomedical applications. Furthermore, the methods used for synthesis and characterization of nanobubbles are outlined. Finally, novel biomedical applications are proposed alongside the advantages and shortcomings inherent to stimuli-responsive nanobubbles.