C–H Nickelation of Aryl Phosphinites: Mechanistic Aspects

Reactions of cyclonickelated complexes with hydroxylamines and TEMPO˙: isolation of new TEMPOH adducts of Ni(II) and their reactivities with nucleophiles and oxidants

This contribution describes a study on the reactivities of the complexes [{κP,κC-(i-Pr)2PO-Ar}Ni(μ-Br)]2, 1a-d (Ar: C6H4, a; 3-Cl-C6H3, b; 3-OMe-C6H3, c; 4-OMe-napthalenyl, d), with hydroxylamines in the presence of TEMPO˙ (TEMPO˙ = (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidinyl-1-yl)oxyl). The results of this study showed that treating 1a-d with a mixture of Et2NOH and TEMPO˙ did not afford the desired oxidation-induced functionalization of the Ni-aryl moiety in 1a-d, giving instead the corresponding κO-TEMPOH adducts [{κP,κC-(i-Pr)2PO-Ar}Ni(Br)(κO-TEMPOH)], 3a-d (TEMPOH = N-hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine). The TEMPOH moiety in these zwitterionic compounds 3 can be displaced by a large excess of acetonitrile (MeCN), 10 equiv. of morpholine, or 1-2 equivalents of imidazole. Although these reactions have given the authenticated products [{κP,κC-(i-Pr)2PO-C6H4}Ni(Br)(NCMe)], 4a, [{κP,κC-(i-Pr)2PO-C6H4}Ni(Br)(morpholine)], 5a, and [{κP,κC-(i-Pr)2PO-C6H4}Ni(imidazole)2]Br, 6a, a few other products were also detected by NMR, indicating that the observed reactivities are far more complex than simple substitution of the TEMPOH moiety. Similarly, treating 3a with AgOC(O)CF3 results in the isolation of [{κP,κC-(i-Pr)2PO-C6H4}Ni{OC(O)CF3}(κO-TEMPOH)], 7a, arising from the substitution of the bromo ligand, whereas spectroscopic evidence suggests further reactivity, possibly including displacement of TEMPOH and oxidative decomposition.

Reactivities of cyclonickellated complexes with hydroxylamines: formation of κO-hydroxylamine and κN-imine adducts and a κO, κN-aminoxide derivative

This report discusses the reactivities of hydroxylamines with a family of nickellacyclic complexes prepared by C-H nickellation of aryl phosphinites. Treating the dimeric complexes κ^C,κ^P-{2-OPR₂,4-R'-C₆H₄}₂Ni₂(μ-Br)₂ (R = i-Pr; R' = H, Cl, OMe, NMe₂) or their monomeric acetonitrile adducts κ^C,κ^P-{2-OPR₂,4-R'-C₆H₄}Ni(Br)(NCMe) with hydroxylamines showed three types of reactivities depending on the Ni complex, the reaction solvent, and the substrate used: (1) the benzyl-protected substrate PhCH₂ONH₂ gave simple N-bound adducts with all Ni complexes; (2) the parent Ni dimer (R' = H) reacted with Et₂NOH and (PhCH₂)₂NOH in CH₂Cl₂ to give, respectively, the zwitterionic amine oxide κ^C,κ^P-{2-OPR₂-C₆H₅}Ni(κ^O-ONHEt₂)Br and the bidentate aminoxide (i-R₂POPh)Ni{κ^O,κ^N-ON(CH₂Ph)₂}Br; (3) the analogous reaction of substituted Ni complexes (R' = Cl, OMe, NMe₂) with hydroxylamines in acetonitrile gave adducts of imines derived from dehydration of Et₂NOH and (PhCH₂)₂NOH. The latter reactivity proceeds optimally in acetonitrile, but it also occurs to a lesser extent in C₆D₆ if the reaction is allowed to go for more than 24 h. Different mechanistic scenarios have been considered to rationalize the observed hydroxylamine → imine transformation.

Structure-Reactivity Relationships of Buchwald-Type Phosphines in Nickel-Catalyzed Cross-Couplings

The dialkyl-ortho-biaryl class of phosphines, commonly known as Buchwald-type ligands, are among the most important phosphines in Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling. These ligands have also been successfully applied to several synthetically valuable Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling methodologies and, as demonstrated in this work, are top performing ligands in Ni-catalyzed Suzuki Miyaura Coupling (SMC) and C-N coupling reactions, even outperforming commonly employed bisphosphines like dppf in many circumstances. However, little is known about their structure-reactivity relationships (SRRs) with Ni, and limited examples of well-defined, catalytically relevant Ni complexes with Buchwald-type ligands exist. In this work, we report the analysis of Buchwald-type phosphine SRRs in four representative Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions. Our study was guided by data-driven classification analysis, which together with mechanistic organometallic studies of structurally characterized Ni(0), Ni(I), and Ni(II) complexes allowed us to rationalize reactivity patterns in catalysis. Overall, we expect that this study will serve as a platform for further exploration of this ligand class in organonickel chemistry as well as in the development of new Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling methodologies.

Large Isotope Effects in Organometallic Chemistry

The kinetic isotope effect (KIE) is key to understanding reaction mechanisms in many areas of chemistry and chemical biology, including organometallic chemistry. This ratio of rate constants, k_H /k_D , typically falls between 1-7. However, KIEs up to 105 have been reported, and can even be so large that reactivity with deuterium is unobserved. We collect here examples of large KIEs across organometallic chemistry, in catalytic and stoichiometric reactions, along with their mechanistic interpretations. Large KIEs occur in proton transfer reactions such as protonation of organometallic complexes and clusters, protonolysis of metal-carbon bonds, and dihydrogen reactivity. C-H activation reactions with large KIEs occur with late and early transition metals, photogenerated intermediates, and abstraction by metal-oxo complexes. We categorize the mechanistic interpretations of large KIEs into the following three types: (a) proton tunneling, (b) compound effects from multiple steps, and (c) semi-classical effects on a single step. This comprehensive collection of large KIEs in organometallics provides context for future mechanistic interpretation.

Reactions of a pincer proligand with copper iodide: bridging instead of C–H metalation

Various precursors of divalent copper have been treated with the meta-disubstituted phenylene-based proligand POC(H)OP (1,3-(i-Pr2PO)2C6H4) with the objective of preparing classical pincer complexes (POCOP)CuX. However, in no case was such species obtained, presumably owing to the difficult C–H metallation step. Analogous reactions of monovalent precursors were also unsuccessful, whereas reaction of POC(H)OP with CuI under different conditions gave the non-metallated adducts {(μ, κP, [Formula: see text]-POC(H)OP)Cu(μ-Ι)}2, 1, {(μ, κP, [Formula: see text]-POC(H)OP)Cu2(μ-Ι)2(DMAP)2}, 2 (DMAP = 4-dimethylaminopyridine), and {(μ, κP, [Formula: see text]-POC(H)OP)Cu2(μ3-Ι)2}2, 3. Treating 1 with DMAP gave the adduct 2, whereas 3 could be obtained by treating 1 with BuLi or by sublimation of 1. The solid state structures of these complexes revealed the tetrahedral geometry that might be anticipated for the d10 Cu(I) centers, in addition to fairly close I–H distances; on the other hand, no C–H interaction (agostic or otherwise) was observed with the Cu centers in any of these structures. The unsuccessful metallation of the C(2)–H moiety is thought to be a result of the strong preference of monovalent copper center to form bridging interactions with iodide and the POC(H)OP ligand; this appears to prevent the approach of the central carbon of the ligand to the Cu centers.