Putative Synthetic Cannabinoids MEPIRAPIM, 5F-BEPIRAPIM (NNL-2), and Their Analogues Are T-Type Calcium Channel (CaV3) Inhibitors

Differential regulation of Cav 3.2 and Cav 2.2 calcium channels by CB1 receptors and cannabidiol

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cannabinoids are a promising therapeutic avenue for chronic pain. However, clinical trials often fail to report analgesic efficacy of cannabinoids. Inhibition of voltage gate calcium (Ca_v ) channels is one mechanism through which cannabinoids may produce analgesia. We hypothesized that cannabinoids and cannabinoid receptor agonists target different types of Ca_v channels through distinct mechanisms.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Electrophysiological recordings from tsA-201 cells expressing either Ca_v 3.2 or Ca_v 2.2 were used to assess inhibition by HU-210 or cannabidiol (CBD) in the absence and presence of the CB₁ receptor. Homology modelling assessed potential interaction sites for CBD in both Ca_v 2.2 and Ca_v 3.2. Analgesic effects of CBD were assessed in mouse models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain.

KEY RESULTS

HU-210 (1 μM) inhibited Ca_v 2.2 function in the presence of CB₁ receptor but had no effect on Ca_v 3.2 regardless of co-expression of CB₁ receptor. By contrast, CBD (3 μM) produced no inhibition of Ca_v 2.2 and instead inhibited Ca_v 3.2 independently of CB₁ receptors. Homology modelling supported these findings, indicating that CBD binds to and occludes the pore of Ca_v 3.2, but not Ca_v 2.2. Intrathecal CBD alleviated thermal and mechanical hypersensitivity in both male and female mice, and this effect was absent in Ca_v 3.2 null mice.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Our findings reveal differential modulation of Ca_v 2.2 and Ca_v 3.2 channels by CB₁ receptors and CBD. This advances our understanding of how different cannabinoids produce analgesia through action at different voltage-gated calcium channels and could influence the development of novel cannabinoid-based therapeutics for treatment of chronic pain.

MEPIRAPIM-derived synthetic cannabinoids inhibit T-type calcium channels with divergent effects on seizures in rodent models of epilepsy

Background: T-type Ca²⁺ channels (Ca_v3) represent emerging therapeutic targets for a range of neurological disorders, including epilepsy and pain. To aid the development and optimisation of new therapeutics, there is a need to identify novel chemical entities which act at these ion channels. A number of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) have been found to exhibit activity at T-type channels, suggesting that cannabinoids may provide convenient chemical scaffolds on which to design novel Ca_v3 inhibitors. However, activity at cannabinoid type 1 (CB₁) receptors can be problematic because of central and peripheral toxicities associated with potent SCRAs. The putative SCRA MEPIRAPIM and its analogues were recently identified as Ca_v3 inhibitors with only minimal activity at CB₁ receptors, opening the possibility that this scaffold may be exploited to develop novel, selective Ca_v3 inhibitors. Here we present the pharmacological characterisation of SB2193 and SB2193F, two novel Ca_v3 inhibitors derived from MEPIRAPIM. Methods: The potency of SB2193 and SB2193F was evaluated in vitro using a fluorometric Ca²⁺ flux assay and confirmed using whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology. In silico docking to the cryo-EM structure of Ca_v3.1 was also performed to elucidate structural insights into T-type channel inhibition. Next, in vivo pharmacokinetic parameters in mouse brain and plasma were determined using liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy. Finally, anticonvulsant activity was assayed in established genetic and electrically-induced rodent seizure models. Results: Both MEPIRAPIM derivatives produced potent inhibition of Ca_v3 channels and were brain penetrant, with SB2193 exhibiting a brain/plasma ratio of 2.7. SB2193 was further examined in mouse seizure models where it acutely protected against 6 Hz-induced seizures. However, SB2193 did not reduce spontaneous seizures in the Scn1a ^+/- mouse model of Dravet syndrome, nor absence seizures in the Genetic Absence Epilepsy Rat from Strasbourg (GAERS). Surprisingly, SB2193 appeared to increase the incidence and duration of spike-and-wave discharges in GAERS animals over a 4 h recording period. Conclusion: These results show that MEPIRAPIM analogues provide novel chemical scaffolds to advance Ca_v3 inhibitors against certain seizure types.

Defining Steric Requirements at CB1 and CB2 Cannabinoid Receptors Using Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists 5F-AB-PINACA, 5F-ADB-PINACA, PX-1, PX-2, NNL-1, and Their Analogues

Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) are a diverse class of new psychoactive substances (NPS). They commonly comprise N-alkylated indole, indazole, or 7-azaindole scaffolds with amide-linked pendant amino acid groups. To explore the contribution of the amino acid side chain to the cannabinoid pharmacology of SCRA NPS, a systematic library of side chain-modified SCRAs was prepared based on the recent detections of amino acid derivatives 17 (5F-AB-PINACA), 18 (5F-ADB-PINACA), 15 (PX-1), 19 (PX-2), and 20 (NNL-1). In vitro binding affinities and functional activities at cannabinoid type 1 and 2 receptors (CB₁ and CB₂, respectively) were determined for all the library members using radioligand competition experiments and a fluorescence-based membrane potential assay. Binding affinities and functional activities varied widely across compounds (K_i = 0.32 to >10 000 nM, EC₅₀ = 0.24-1259 nM), with several clear structure-activity relationships (SARs) emerging. Affinity and potency at CB₁ changed as a function of the heterocyclic core (indazole > indole > 7-azaindole) and the pendant amino acid side chain (tert-butyl > iso-propyl > iso-butyl > benzyl > ethyl > methyl > hydrogen). Ensemble docking at CB₁ revealed a clear steric basis for observed SAR trends. Interestingly, although 15 (PX-1) and 19 (PX-2) have been detected in recreational drug markets, they failed to induce centrally CB₁-mediated effects (e.g., hypothermia) in mice using radiobiotelemetry. Together, these data provide insights regarding structural contributions to the cannabimimetic profiles of 17 (5F-AB-PINACA), 18 (5F-ADB-PINACA), 15 (PX-1), 19 (PX-2), 20 (NNL-1), and other SCRA NPS.

Off-target pharmacological profiling of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists including AMB-FUBINACA, CUMYL-PINACA, PB-22, and XLR-11

INTRODUCTION

Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) are a diverse class of new psychoactive substances that have been associated with multiple instances and types of toxicity. Some SCRAs appear to carry a greater toxicological burden than others, or compared to the prototypical cannabis-derived agonist Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ⁹-THC), despite a common primary mechanism of action via cannabinoid 1 (CB1) receptors. "Off-target" (i.e., non-CB1 receptor) effects could underpin this differential toxicity, although there are limited data around the activity of SCRAs at such targets.

METHODS

A selection of 7 SCRAs (AMB-FUBINACA, XLR11, PB-22, AKB-48, AB-CHMINICA, CUMYL-PINACA, and 4F-MDMB-BUTINACA), representing several distinct chemotypes and toxicological profiles, underwent a 30 μM single-point screen against 241 G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) targets in antagonist and agonist mode using a cellular β-arrestin recruitment assay. Strong screening "hits" at specific GPCRs were followed up in detail using concentration-response assays with AMB-FUBINACA, a SCRA with a particularly notable history of toxicological liability.

RESULTS

The single-point screen yielded few hits in agonist mode for any compound aside from CB1 and CB2 receptors, but many hits in antagonist mode, including a range of chemokine receptors, the oxytocin receptor, and histamine receptors. Concentration-response experiments showed that AMB-FUBINACA inhibited most off-targets only at the highest 30 μM concentration, with inhibition of only a small subset of targets, including H₁ histamine and α_2B adrenergic receptors, at lower concentrations (≥1 μM). AMB-FUBINACA also produced concentration-dependent CB1 receptor signaling disruption at concentrations higher than 1 μM, but did not produce overt cytotoxicity beyond CP55,940 or Δ⁹-THC in CB1 expressing cells.

DISCUSSION

These results suggest that while some "off-targets" could possibly contribute to the SCRA toxidrome, particularly at high concentrations, CB1-mediated cellular dysfunction provides support for hypotheses concerning on-target, rather than off-target, toxicity. Further investigation of non-GPCR off-targets is warranted.