Rapid Phenotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Using a Coulter Counter and Proliferation Rate Discrepancy

Methods for screening and evaluation of antimicrobial activity: A review of protocols, advantages, and limitations

Infectious diseases pose a formidable global challenge, compounded by the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Consequently, researchers are actively exploring novel antimicrobial compounds as potential solutions. This endeavor underscores the pivotal role of methods employed for screening and evaluating antimicrobial activity-a critical step in discovery and characterization of antimicrobial agents. While traditional techniques such as well-diffusion, disk-diffusion, and broth-dilution are commonly utilized in antimicrobial assays, they may encounter limitations concerning reproducibility and speed. Additionally, a diverse array of antimicrobial assays including cross-streaking, poisoned-food, co-culture, time-kill kinetics, resazurin assay, bioautography, etc., are routinely employed in antimicrobial evaluations. Advanced techniques such as flow-cytometry, impedance analysis, and bioluminescent technique may offer rapid and sensitive results, providing deeper insights into the impact of antimicrobials on cellular integrity. However, their higher cost and limited accessibility in certain laboratory settings may present challenges. This article provides a comprehensive overview of assays designed to characterize antimicrobial activity, elucidating their underlying principles, protocols, advantages, and limitations. The primary objective is to enhance understanding of the methodologies designed for evaluating antimicrobial agents in our relentless battle against infectious diseases. By selecting the appropriate antimicrobial testing method, researchers can discern suitable conditions and streamline the identification of effective antimicrobial agents.

Simultaneous Multipass Resistive-Pulse Sensing and Fluorescence Imaging of Liposomes

Simultaneous multipass resistive-pulse sensing and fluorescence imaging have been used to correlate the size and fluorescence intensity of individual E. coli lipid liposomes composed of E. coli polar lipid extracts labeled with membrane-bound 3,3-dioctadecyloxacarbocyanine (DiO) fluorescent molecules. Here, a nanopipet serves as a waveguide to direct excitation light to the resistive-pulse sensing zone at the end of the nanopipet tip. Individual DiO-labeled liposomes (>50 nm radius) were multipassed back and forth through the orifices of glass nanopipets' 110-150 nm radius via potential switching to obtain subnanometer sizing precision, while recording the fluorescence intensity of the membrane-bound DiO molecules. Fluorescence was measured as a function of liposome radius and found to be approximately proportional to the total membrane surface area. The observed relationship between liposome size and fluorescence intensity suggests that multivesicle liposomes emit greater fluorescence compared to unilamellar liposomes, consistent with all lipid membranes of the multivesicle liposomes containing DiO. Fluorescent and nonfluorescent liposomes are readily distinguished from each other in the same solution using simultaneous multipass resistive-pulse sensing and fluorescence imaging. A fluorescence "dead zone" of ∼1 μm thickness just outside of the nanopipet orifice was observed during resistive-pulse sensing, resulting in "on/off" fluorescent behavior during liposome multipassing.