1
|
Karimi H, Laasmaa M, Pihlak M, Vendelin M. Statistical analysis of fluorescence intensity transients with Bayesian methods. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2025; 11:eads4609. [PMID: 40249821 PMCID: PMC12007579 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.ads4609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2025] [Indexed: 04/20/2025]
Abstract
Molecular movement and interactions at the single-molecule level, particularly in live cells, are often studied using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS). While powerful, FCS has notable drawbacks: It requires high laser intensities and long acquisition times, increasing phototoxicity, and often relies on problematic statistical assumptions in data fitting. We introduce fluorescence intensity trace statistical analysis (FITSA), a Bayesian method that directly analyzes fluorescence intensity traces. FITSA offers faster, more stable convergence than previous approaches and provides robust parameter estimation from far shorter measurements than conventional FCS. Our results demonstrate that FITSA achieves comparable precision to FCS while requiring substantially fewer photons. This advantage becomes even more pronounced when accounting for statistical dependencies in FCS analysis, which are often overlooked but necessary for accurate error estimation. By reducing laser exposure, FITSA minimizes phototoxicity effects, representing a major advancement in the quantitative analysis of molecular processes across fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamed Karimi
- Laboratory of Systems Biology, Department of Cybernetics, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Martin Laasmaa
- Laboratory of Systems Biology, Department of Cybernetics, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Margus Pihlak
- Division of Mathematics, Department of Cybernetics, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Marko Vendelin
- Laboratory of Systems Biology, Department of Cybernetics, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xu LWQ, Jazani S, Kilic Z, Pressé S. Single-molecule reaction-diffusion. Biophys J 2025:S0006-3495(25)00220-6. [PMID: 40221837 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2025.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2024] [Revised: 03/19/2025] [Accepted: 04/08/2025] [Indexed: 04/15/2025] Open
Abstract
We propose capturing reaction-diffusion on a molecule-by-molecule basis from the fastest acquirable timescale, namely individual photon arrivals. We illustrate our method on the intrinsically disordered human protein linker histone H1.0 and its chaperone prothymosin α, as these diffuse through an illuminated confocal spot and interact, forming larger ternary complexes on millisecond timescales. Most importantly, single-molecule reaction-diffusion (smRD) reveals single-molecule properties without the requirement to trap or otherwise confine molecules to surfaces. We achieve smRD within a Bayesian paradigm and term our method Bayes-smRD. Bayes-smRD is further free of the average, bulk results inherent to analyzing long photon arrival traces by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. In learning from mere thousands of photon arrivals, continuous spatial positions, and discrete conformational and photophysical state changes, Bayes-smRD estimates kinetic parameters on a molecule-by-molecule basis with two to three orders of magnitude less data than tools such as fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, thereby also dramatically reducing sample photodamage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lance W Q Xu
- Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona; Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
| | - Sina Jazani
- Department of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Zeliha Kilic
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Steve Pressé
- Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona; Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona; School of Molecular Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sgouralis I, Xu LWQ, Jalihal AP, Kilic Z, Walter NG, Pressé S. BNP-Track: a framework for superresolved tracking. Nat Methods 2024; 21:1716-1724. [PMID: 39039336 PMCID: PMC11399105 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-024-02349-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
Superresolution tools, such as PALM and STORM, provide nanoscale localization accuracy by relying on rare photophysical events, limiting these methods to static samples. By contrast, here, we extend superresolution to dynamics without relying on photodynamics by simultaneously determining emitter numbers and their tracks (localization and linking) with the same localization accuracy per frame as widefield superresolution on immobilized emitters under similar imaging conditions (≈50 nm). We demonstrate our Bayesian nonparametric track (BNP-Track) framework on both in cellulo and synthetic data. BNP-Track develops a joint (posterior) distribution that learns and quantifies uncertainty over emitter numbers and their associated tracks propagated from shot noise, camera artifacts, pixelation, background and out-of-focus motion. In doing so, we integrate spatiotemporal information into our distribution, which is otherwise compromised by modularly determining emitter numbers and localizing and linking emitter positions across frames. For this reason, BNP-Track remains accurate in crowding regimens beyond those accessible to other single-particle tracking tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Sgouralis
- Department of Mathematics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA
| | - Lance W Q Xu
- Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
- Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - Ameya P Jalihal
- Department of Cell Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Zeliha Kilic
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Nils G Walter
- Single Molecule Analysis Group and Center for RNA Biomedicine, Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Steve Pressé
- Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
- Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
- School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fazel M, Grussmayer KS, Ferdman B, Radenovic A, Shechtman Y, Enderlein J, Pressé S. Fluorescence Microscopy: a statistics-optics perspective. ARXIV 2023:arXiv:2304.01456v3. [PMID: 37064525 PMCID: PMC10104198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Abstract
Fundamental properties of light unavoidably impose features on images collected using fluorescence microscopes. Modeling these features is ever more important in quantitatively interpreting microscopy images collected at scales on par or smaller than light's wavelength. Here we review the optics responsible for generating fluorescent images, fluorophore properties, microscopy modalities leveraging properties of both light and fluorophores, in addition to the necessarily probabilistic modeling tools imposed by the stochastic nature of light and measurement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamadreza Fazel
- Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
- Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
| | - Kristin S Grussmayer
- Department of Bionanoscience, Faculty of Applied Science and Kavli Institute for Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Boris Ferdman
- Russel Berrie Nanotechnology Institute and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Aleksandra Radenovic
- Laboratory of Nanoscale Biology, Institute of Bioengineering, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Yoav Shechtman
- Russel Berrie Nanotechnology Institute and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Jörg Enderlein
- III. Institute of Physics - Biophysics, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Steve Pressé
- Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
- Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xu (徐伟青) LW, Jazani S, Kilic Z, Pressé S. Single-Molecule Reaction-Diffusion. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.09.05.556378. [PMID: 37732202 PMCID: PMC10508780 DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.05.556378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
We propose to capture reaction-diffusion on a molecule-by-molecule basis from the fastest acquirable timescale, namely individual photon arrivals. We illustrate our method on intrinsically disordered human proteins, the linker histone H1.0 as well as its chaperone prothymosin α , as these diffuse through an illuminated confocal spot and interact forming larger ternary complexes on millisecond timescales. Most importantly, single-molecule reaction-diffusion, smRD, reveals single molecule properties without trapping or otherwise confining molecules to surfaces. We achieve smRD within a Bayesian paradigm and term our method Bayes-smRD. Bayes-smRD is further free of the average, bulk, results inherent to the analysis of long photon arrival traces by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. In learning from thousands of photon arrivals continuous spatial positions and discrete conformational and photophysical state changes, Bayes-smRD estimates kinetic parameters on a molecule-by-molecule basis with two to three orders of magnitude less data than tools such as fluorescence correlation spectroscopy thereby also dramatically reducing sample photodamage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lance W.Q. Xu (徐伟青)
- Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
- Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Sina Jazani
- Department of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Zeliha Kilic
- Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
| | - Steve Pressé
- Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
- Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
- School of Molecular Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sgouralis I, Xu (徐伟青) LW, Jalihal AP, Walter NG, Pressé S. BNP-Track: A framework for superresolved tracking. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.04.03.535459. [PMID: 37066320 PMCID: PMC10104004 DOI: 10.1101/2023.04.03.535459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
Assessing dynamic processes at single molecule scales is key toward capturing life at the level of its molecular actors. Widefield superresolution methods, such as STORM, PALM, and PAINT, provide nanoscale localization accuracy, even when distances between fluorescently labeled single molecules ("emitters") fall below light's diffraction limit. However, as these superresolution methods rely on rare photophysical events to distinguish emitters from both each other and background, they are largely limited to static samples. In contrast, here we leverage spatiotemporal correlations of dynamic widefield imaging data to extend superresolution to simultaneous multiple emitter tracking without relying on photodynamics even as emitter distances from one another fall below the diffraction limit. We simultaneously determine emitter numbers and their tracks (localization and linking) with the same localization accuracy per frame as widefield superresolution does for immobilized emitters under similar imaging conditions (≈50nm). We demonstrate our results for both in cellulo data and, for benchmarking purposes, on synthetic data. To this end, we avoid the existing tracking paradigm relying on completely or partially separating the tasks of emitter number determination, localization of each emitter, and linking emitter positions across frames. Instead, we develop a fully joint posterior distribution over the quantities of interest, including emitter tracks and their total, otherwise unknown, number within the Bayesian nonparametric paradigm. Our posterior quantifies the full uncertainty over emitter numbers and their associated tracks propagated from origins including shot noise and camera artefacts, pixelation, stochastic background, and out-of-focus motion. Finally, it remains accurate in more crowded regimes where alternative tracking tools cannot be applied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Sgouralis
- Department of Mathematics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
| | - Lance W.Q. Xu (徐伟青)
- Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
- Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Ameya P. Jalihal
- Department of Cell Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Nils G. Walter
- Single Molecule Analysis Group and Center for RNA Biomedicine, Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Steve Pressé
- Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
- Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
- School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| |
Collapse
|