Domain Architecture of the DRpp29 Protein and Its Interaction with the RNA Subunit of Dictyostelium discoideum RNase P

Human RNase P: overview of a ribonuclease of interrelated molecular networks and gene-targeting systems

The seminal discovery of ribonuclease P (RNase P) and its catalytic RNA by Sidney Altman has not only revolutionized our understanding of life, but also opened new fields for scientific exploration and investigation. This review focuses on human RNase P and its use as a gene-targeting tool, two topics initiated in Altman's laboratory. We outline early works on human RNase P as a tRNA processing enzyme and comment on its expanding nonconventional functions in molecular networks of transcription, chromatin remodeling, homology-directed repair, and innate immunity. The important implications and insights from these discoveries on the potential use of RNase P as a gene-targeting tool are presented. This multifunctionality calls to a modified structure-function partitioning of domains in human RNase P, as well as its relative ribonucleoprotein, RNase MRP. The role of these two catalysts in innate immunity is of particular interest in molecular evolution, as this dynamic molecular network could have originated and evolved from primordial enzymes and sensors of RNA, including predecessors of these two ribonucleoproteins.

Sequence Analysis and Comparative Study of the Protein Subunits of Archaeal RNase P

RNase P, a ribozyme-based ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex that catalyzes tRNA 5′-maturation, is ubiquitous in all domains of life, but the evolution of its protein components (RNase P proteins, RPPs) is not well understood. Archaeal RPPs may provide clues on how the complex evolved from an ancient ribozyme to an RNP with multiple archaeal and eukaryotic (homologous) RPPs, which are unrelated to the single bacterial RPP. Here, we analyzed the sequence and structure of archaeal RPPs from over 600 available genomes. All five RPPs are found in eight archaeal phyla, suggesting that these RPPs arose early in archaeal evolutionary history. The putative ancestral genomic loci of archaeal RPPs include genes encoding several members of ribosome, exosome, and proteasome complexes, which may indicate coevolution/coordinate regulation of RNase P with other core cellular machineries. Despite being ancient, RPPs generally lack sequence conservation compared to other universal proteins. By analyzing the relative frequency of residues at every position in the context of the high-resolution structures of each of the RPPs (either alone or as functional binary complexes), we suggest residues for mutational analysis that may help uncover structure-function relationships in RPPs.

Two-codon T-box riboswitch binding two tRNAs

T-box riboswitches control transcription of downstream genes through the tRNA-binding formation of terminator or antiterminator structures. Previously reported T-boxes were described as single-specificity riboswitches that can bind specific tRNA anticodons through codon-anticodon interactions with the nucleotide triplet of their specifier loop (SL). However, the possibility that T-boxes might exhibit specificity beyond a single tRNA had been overlooked. In Clostridium acetobutylicum, the T-box that regulates the operon for the essential tRNA-dependent transamidation pathway harbors a SL with two potential overlapping codon positions for tRNA(Asn) and tRNA(Glu). To test its specificity, we performed extensive mutagenic, biochemical, and chemical probing analyses. Surprisingly, both tRNAs can efficiently bind the SL in vitro and in vivo. The dual specificity of the T-box is allowed by a single base shift on the SL from one overlapping codon to the next. This feature allows the riboswitch to sense two tRNAs and balance the biosynthesis of two amino acids. Detailed genomic comparisons support our observations and suggest that "flexible" T-box riboswitches are widespread among bacteria, and, moreover, their specificity is dictated by the metabolic interconnection of the pathways under control. Taken together, our results support the notion of a genome-dependent codon ambiguity of the SLs. Furthermore, the existence of two overlapping codons imposes a unique example of tRNA-dependent regulation at the transcriptional level.

tRNA processing by protein-only versus RNA-based RNase P: kinetic analysis reveals mechanistic differences

In Arabidopsis thaliana, RNase P function, that is, endonucleolytic tRNA 5'-end maturation, is carried out by three homologous polypeptides ("proteinaceous RNase P" (PRORP) 1, 2 and 3). Here we present the first kinetic analysis of these enzymes. For PRORP1, a specificity constant (k(react)/K(m(sto))) of 3×10(6) M(-1) min(-1) was determined under single-turnover conditions. We demonstrate a fundamentally different sensitivity of PRORP enzymes to an Rp-phosphorothioate modification at the canonical cleavage site in a 5'-precursor tRNA substrate; whereas processing by bacterial RNase P is inhibited by three orders of magnitude in the presence of this sulfur substitution and Mg(2+) as the metal-ion cofactor, the PRORP enzymes are affected by not more than a factor of five under the same conditions, without significantly increased miscleavage. These findings indicate that the catalytic mechanism utilized by proteinaceous RNase P is different from that of RNA-based bacterial RNase P, taking place without a direct metal-ion coordination to the (pro-)Rp substituent. As Rp-phosphorothioate and inosine modification at all 26 G residues of the tRNA body had only minor effects on processing by PRORP, we conclude that productive PRORP-substrate interaction is not critically dependent on any of the affected (pro-)Rp oxygens or guanosine 2-amino groups.

RNA binding properties of conserved protein subunits of human RNase P

Human nuclear RNase P is required for transcription and processing of tRNA. This catalytic RNP has an H1 RNA moiety associated with ten distinct protein subunits. Five (Rpp20, Rpp21, Rpp25, Rpp29 and Pop5) out of eight of these protein subunits, prepared in refolded recombinant forms, bind to H1 RNA in vitro. Rpp20 and Rpp25 bind jointly to H1 RNA, even though each protein can interact independently with this transcript. Nuclease footprinting analysis reveals that Rpp20 and Rpp25 recognize overlapping regions in the P2 and P3 domains of H1 RNA. Rpp21 and Rpp29, which are sufficient for reconstitution of the endonucleolytic activity, bind to separate regions in the catalytic domain of H1 RNA. Common themes and discrepancies in the RNA-protein interactions between human nuclear RNase P and its related yeast and archaeal counterparts provide a rationale for the assembly of the fully active form of this enzyme.