Poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline)-b-poly(tetrahydrofuran)-b-poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline) Amphiphilic Triblock Copolymers: Synthesis, Physicochemical Characterizations, and Hydrosolubilizing Properties

Micellization of Sequence-Controlled Polyurethane Ionomers in Mixed Aqueous Solvents

While the impact of compositional parameters such as block length and ionic content on the micellization of (polymeric) amphiphiles is widely investigated, the influence of monomer sequence has received far less attention until recently. Here, we report the synthesis of two sequence-controlled polyurethane ionomers (PUIs) prepared via a stepwise coupling-deprotection strategy, and compare their solution association in aqueous-organic mixtures. The two PUIs are highly similar in mass and overall composition, yet differ markedly in the sequence of building blocks. PUI-A2 comprises a polytetrahydrofuran (pTHF) block connected to an alternation of isophorone diamine (IPDA) and dimethylolpropionic acid (DMPA) units that together are also arranged in a blockwise manner. The result is a macromolecular structure with a comparatively hydrophobic tail (pTHF) and a hydrophilic headgroup, which structure is reminiscent of those of traditional surfactants, albeit much larger in size. PUI-S2 instead resembles a bolaamphiphilic architecture with a pTHF midblock connected on either end to a singly charged segment comprising DMPA and IPDA. We detect micellization below a threshold cosolvent volume fraction (φsolv) of 0.4 in aqueous-organic mixtures with tetrahydrofuran (THF), ethanol, and isopropyl alcohol. We use scattering tools to compare the aggregation number (N agg) and hydrodynamic radius (R h) of PUI-S2 and PUI-A2 micelles. Irrespective of the solvent composition, we observe in the micellar window of φsolv < 0.4, lower N agg for PUI-S2 micelles compared to PUI-A2, which we attribute to packing restraints associated with its bolaamphiphilic architecture. The increase in micellar size with increasing φsolv is much more pronounced for PUI-S2 than for PUI-A2. The micellar mass decreases with increasing φsolv for both PUIs; the effect is modest for PUI-S2 compared to PUI-A2 and is not observed in the most apolar cosolvent studied (THF). Upon the approach of the micellization boundary φsolv ≈ 0.4, both types of PUI micelles become less compact in structure, as (in most cases) PUIs are released and as micellar dimensions increase.

Sequence of Polyurethane Ionomers Determinative for Core Structure of Surfactant-Copolymer Complexes

The core of micelles self-assembled from amphiphiles is hydrophobic and contains little water, whereas complex coacervate core micelles co-assembled from oppositely charged hydrophilic polymers have a hydrophilic core with a high water content. Co-assembly of ionic surfactants with ionic-neutral copolymers yields surfactant-copolymer complexes known to be capable of solubilizing both hydrophilic and hydrophobic cargo within the mixed core composed of a coacervate phase with polyelectrolyte-decorated surfactant micelles. Here we formed such complexes from asymmetric (PUI-A2) and symmetric (PUI-S2), sequence-controlled polyurethane ionomers and poly(N-methyl-2-vinylpyridinium iodide)29-b-poly(ethylene oxide)204 copolymers. The complexes with PUI-S2 were 1.3-fold larger in mass and 1.8-fold larger in radius of gyration than the PUI-A2 complexes. Small-angle X-ray scattering revealed differences in the packing of the similarly sized PUI micelles within the core of the complexes. The PUI-A2 micelles were arranged in a more ordered fashion and were spaced further apart from each other (10 nm vs. 6 nm) than the PUI-S2 micelles. Hence, this work shows that the monomer sequence of amphiphiles can be varied to alter the internal structure of surfactant-copolymer complexes. Since the structure of the micellar core may affect both the cargo loading and release, our findings suggest that these properties may be tuned through control of the monomer sequence of the micellar constituents.

Effects of major parameters of nanoparticles on their physical and chemical properties and recent application of nanodrug delivery system in targeted chemotherapy

Chemotherapy is still one of the main cancer therapy treatments, but the curative effect of chemotherapy is relatively low, as such the development of a new cancer treatment is highly desirable. The gradual maturation of nanotechnology provides an innovative perspective not only for cancer therapy but also for many other applications. There are a diverse variety of nanoparticles available, and choosing the appropriate carriers according to the demand is the key issue. The performance of nanoparticles is affected by many parameters, mainly size, shape, surface charge, and toxicity. Using nanoparticles as the carriers to realize passive targeting and active targeting can improve the efficacy of chemotherapy drugs significantly, reduce the mortality rate of cancer patients, and improve the quality of life of patients. In recent years, there has been extensive research on nanocarriers. In this review, the effects of several major parameters of nanoparticles on their physical and chemical properties are reviewed, and then the recent progress in the application of several commonly used nanoparticles is presented.

Amphiphilic star-shaped poly(sarcosine)-block-poly(ε-caprolactone) diblock copolymers: one-pot synthesis, characterization, and solution properties

We firstly synthesized amphiphilic three-armed star-shaped poly(sarcosine)-block-poly(ε-caprolactone) diblock copolymers (s-PSar-b-PCLs), and investigated the solution properties and biocompatibility of the copolymers.