Chemocavity: Specific Concavity in Protein Reserved for the Binding of Biologically Functional Small Molecules

Identification of Similar Binding Sites to Detect Distant Polypharmacology

The ability of small molecules to interact with multiple proteins is referred to as polypharmacology. This property is often linked to the therapeutic action of drugs but it is known also to be responsible for many of their side effects. Because of its importance, the development of computational methods that can predict drug polypharmacology has become an important line of research that led recently to the identification of many novel targets for known drugs. Nowadays, the majority of these methods are based on measuring the similarity of a query molecule against the hundreds of thousands of molecules for which pharmacological data on thousands of proteins are available in public sources. However, similarity-based methods are inherently biased by the chemical coverage offered by the active molecules present in those public repositories, which limits significantly their capacity to predict interactions with proteins structurally and functionally unrelated to any of the already known targets for drugs. It is in this respect that structure-based methods aiming at identifying similar binding sites may offer an alternative complementary means to ligand-based methods for detecting distant polypharmacology. The different existing approaches to binding site detection, representation, comparison, and fragmentation are reviewed and recent successful applications presented.

Computational approaches to identifying and characterizing protein binding sites for ligand design

Given the three-dimensional structure of a protein, how can one find the sites where other molecules might bind to it? Do these sites have the properties necessary for high affinity binding? Is this protein a suitable target for drug design? Here, we discuss recent developments in computational methods to address these and related questions. Geometric methods to identify pockets on protein surfaces have been developed over many years but, with new algorithms, their performance is still improving. Simulation methods show promise in accounting for protein conformational variability to identify transient pockets but lack the ease of use of many of the (rigid) shape-based tools. Sequence and structure comparison approaches are benefiting from the constantly increasing size of sequence and structure databases. Energetic methods can aid identification and characterization of binding pockets, and have undergone recent improvements in the treatment of solvation and hydrophobicity. The "druggability" of a binding site is still difficult to predict with an automated procedure. The methodologies available for this purpose range from simple shape and hydrophobicity scores to computationally demanding free energy simulations.

Use of amino acid composition to predict epitope residues of individual antibodies

We identified specific amino acid propensities at the interfaces of antigen-antibody interactions in non-redundant qualified antigen-antibody complex structures from Protein Data Bank. Propensities were expressed by the frequency of each of the 20 x 20 standard amino acid pairs that appeared at the interfaces of the complexes and were named the antibody-specific epitope propensity (ASEP) index. Using this index, we developed a novel method of predicting epitope residues for individual antibodies by narrowing down candidate epitope residues which was predicted by the conventional method. The 74 benchmarked antigens were used in ASEP prediction. The efficiency of this method was assessed using the leave-one-out approach. On elimination of residues with ASEP indices in the lowest 10% of all measured, true positives were enriched for 49 antigens. On subsequent elimination of residues with ASEP indices in the lowest 50%, true positives were enriched for 40 of the 74 antigens assessed. The ASEP index is the first benchmark proposed to predict epitope residues for an individual antibody. Used in combination with mutation experiments, this index has the potential to markedly increase the success ratio of epitope analysis.