Selectivity in reactions of alkyl-aryl-transition-metal complexes with electrophiles

Multimetallic-Catalyzed C-C Bond-Forming Reactions: From Serendipity to Strategy

The use of two or more metal catalysts in a reaction is a powerful synthetic strategy to access complex targets efficiently and selectively from simple starting materials. While capable of uniting distinct reactivities, the principles governing multimetallic catalysis are not always intuitive, making the discovery and optimization of new reactions challenging. Here, we outline our perspective on the design elements of multimetallic catalysis using precedent from well-documented C-C bond-forming reactions. These strategies provide insight into the synergy of metal catalysts and compatibility of the individual components of a reaction. Advantages and limitations are discussed to promote further development of the field.

Hydrogen Bonding in Platinum Indolylphosphine Polyfluorido and Fluorido Complexes

The reaction of the Pt complexes cis-[Pt(CH₃ )(Ar){Ph₂ P(Ind)}₂ ] (Ind=2-(3-methyl)indolyl, Ar=4-tBuC₆ H₄ (1 a)_, 4-CH₃ C₆ H₄ (1 b), Ph (1 c), 4-FC₆ H₄ (1 d), 4-ClC₆ H₄ (1 e), 4-CF₃ C₆ H₄ (1 f)) with HF afforded the polyfluorido complexes trans-[Pt(F(HF)₂ )(Ar){Ph₂ P(Ind)}₂ ] 2 a-f, which can be converted into the fluoride derivatives trans-[Pt(F)(Ar){Ph₂ P(Ind)}₂ ] (3 a-f) by treatment with CsF. The compounds 2 a-f and 3 a-f were characterised thoroughly by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy. The data reveal hydrogen bonding of the fluorido ligand with HF molecules and the indolylphosphine ligand. Polyfluorido complexes 2 a-f show larger |¹ J(F,Pt)|, but lower ¹ J(H,F) coupling constants when compared to the fluorido complexes 3 a-f. Decreasing ¹ J(P,Pt) coupling constants in 2 a-f and 3 a-f suggest a cis influence of the aryl ligands in the following order: 4-tBuC₆ H₄ (a) ≈4-CH₃ C₆ H₄ (b)<Ph (c)≪4-FC₆ H₄ (d)<4-ClC₆ H₄ (e)<4-CF₃ C₆ H₄ (f). In addition, the larger cis influence of aryl ligands bearing electron-withdrawing groups in the para position correlates with decreasing magnitudes of |¹ J(F,Pt)| coupling constants. The interpretation of the experimental data was supported by quantum-chemical DFT calculations.

C–Cl Oxidative Addition and C–C Reductive Elimination Reactions in the Context of the Rhodium-Promoted Direct Arylation

A cycle of stoichiometric elemental reactions defining the direct arylation promoted by a redox-pair Rh(I)–Rh(III) is reported. Starting from the rhodium(I)-aryl complex RhPh{κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} (xant(PⁱPr₂)₂ = 9,9-dimethyl-4,5-bis(diisopropylphosphino)xanthene), the reactions include C–Cl oxidative addition of organic chlorides, halide abstraction from the resulting six-coordinate rhodium(III) derivatives, C–C reductive coupling between the initial aryl ligand and the added organic group, oxidative addition of a C–H bond of a new arene, and deprotonation of the generated hydride-rhodium(III)-aryl species to form a new rhodium(I)-aryl derivative. In this context, the kinetics of the oxidative additions of 2-chloropyridine, chlorobenzene, benzyl chloride, and dichloromethane to RhPh{κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} and the C–C reductive eliminations of biphenyl and benzylbenzene from [RhPh₂{κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]}]BF₄ and [RhPh(CH₂Ph){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]}]BF₄, respectively, have been studied. The oxidative additions generally involve the cis addition of the C–Cl bond of the organic chloride to the rhodium(I) complex, being kinetically controlled by the C–Cl bond dissociation energy; the weakest C–Cl bond is faster added. The C–C reductive elimination is kinetically governed by the dissociation energy of the formed bond. The C(sp³)–C(sp²) coupling to give benzylbenzene is faster than the C(sp²)–C(sp²) bond formation to afford biphenyl. In spite of that a most demanding orientation requirement is needed for the C(sp³)–C(sp²) coupling than for the C(sp²)–C(sp²) bond formation, the energetic effort for the pregeneration of the C(sp³)–C(sp²) bond is lower. As a result, the weakest C–C bond is formed faster.

Ligand-Controlled Csp2-H versus Csp3-H Bond Formation in Cycloplatinated Complexes: A Joint Experimental and Theoretical Mechanistic Investigation

The cyclometalated platinum(II) complexes [PtMe(C^∧N)(L)] [1_PS: C^∧N = 2-phenylpyridinate (ppy), L = SMe₂; 1_BS: C^∧N = benzo[h]quinolate (bhq), L = SMe₂; 1_PP: C^∧N = ppy, L = PPh₃; and 1_BP: C^∧N = bhq, L = PPh₃] containing two different cyclometalated ligands and two different ancillary ligands have been investigated in the reaction with CX₃CO₂H (X = F or H). When L = SMe₂, the Pt-Me bond rather than the Pt-C bond of the cycloplatinated complex is cleaved to give the complexes [Pt(C^∧N)(CX₃CO₂)(SMe₂)]. When L = PPh₃, the selectivity of the reaction is reversed. In the reaction of [PtMe(C^∧N)(PPh₃)] with CF₃CO₂H, the Pt-C^∧N bond is cleaved rather than the Pt-Me bond. The latter reaction gave [PtMe(κ¹N-Hppy)(PPh₃)(CF₃CO₂)] as an equilibrium mixture of two isomers. For L = PPh₃, no reaction was observed with CH₃CO₂H. The reasons for this difference in selectivity for complexes 1 are computationally discussed based on the energy barrier needed for the protonolysis of the Pt-C_sp³ bond versus the Pt-C_sp² bond. Two pathways including the direct one-step acid attack at the Pt-C bond (S_E2) and stepwise oxidative-addition on the Pt(II) center followed by reductive elimination [S_E(ox)] are proposed. A detailed density functional theory (DFT) study of these protonations along with experimental UV-vis kinetics suggests that a one-step electrophilic attack (S_E2) at the Pt-C bond is the most likely mechanism for complexes 1, and changing the nature of the ancillary ligand can influence the selectivity in the Pt-C bond cleavage. The effect of the nature of the acid and cyclometalated ligand (C^∧N) is also discussed.

Gold-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions: An Overview of Design Strategies, Mechanistic Studies, and Applications

Transition-metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions are central to many organic synthesis methodologies. Traditionally, Pd, Ni, Cu, and Fe catalysts are used to promote these reactions. Recently, many studies have showed that both homogeneous and heterogeneous Au catalysts can be used for activating selective cross-coupling reactions. Here, an overview of the past studies, current trends, and future directions in the field of gold-catalyzed coupling reactions is presented. Design strategies to accomplish selective homocoupling and cross-coupling reactions under both homogeneous and heterogeneous conditions, computational and experimental mechanistic studies, and their applications in diverse fields are critically reviewed. Specific topics covered are: oxidant-assisted and oxidant-free reactions; strain-assisted reactions; dual Au and photoredox catalysis; bimetallic synergistic reactions; mechanisms of reductive elimination processes; enzyme-mimicking Au chemistry; cluster and surface reactions; and plasmonic catalysis. In the relevant sections, theoretical and computational studies of Au^I /Au^III chemistry are discussed and the predictions from the calculations are compared with the experimental observations to derive useful design strategies.

Selectivity in carbon–carbon coupling reactions at palladium(IV) and platinum(IV)

The isomerization and reductive elimination reactions from octahedral organometallic complexes of palladium(IV) and platinum(IV) usually occur through five-coordinate intermediates that cannot be directly detected. This paper reports a computational study of five-coordinate complexes of formulae [PtMe3(bipy)]+, [PtMe2Ph(bipy)]+, and [PtMe(CH2CMe2C6H4)(bipy)]+ (M = Pd or Pt, bipy = 2,2′-bipyridine), particularly with respect to reactivity and selectivity in reductive elimination. All of the complexes are predicted to have square pyramidal structures with the bipy and two R groups in the equatorial positions and one R group in the axial position, and axial–equatorial exchange occurs by a pairwise mechanism, with the transition state having a pinched trigonal bipyramidal (PTBP) stereochemistry, with one nitrogen and two R groups in the trigonal plane. The activation energy for isomerization is lower than that for reductive elimination in all cases. For the complexes [MMe2Ph(bipy)]+, the activation energies for reductive elimination with Me–Me or Me–Ph coupling are similar. For the complexes [MMe(CH2CMe2C6H4)(bipy)]+, the reductive elimination with Me–C6H4 bond formation from the isomer with the methyl group in the axial position is predicted and is attributed to it having the best conformation of the Me and C6H4 groups for C–C bond formation. In all cases, the selectivity for reductive elimination is similar for M = Pd or Pt, but reactivity is higher for M = Pd. The relevance of this work to selectivity in catalysis is discussed.

Mild and selective Pd-Ar protonolysis and C-H activation promoted by a ligand aryloxide group

A bidentate nitrogen-donor ligand with an appended phenol group, C₅H₄NCH[double bond, length as m-dash]N-2-C₆H₄OH, H(L1) was treated with a palladium cycloneophyl complex [Pd(CH₂CMe₂C₆H₄)(COD)], with both Pd-aryl and Pd-alkyl bonds, to give a Pd-alkyl complex, [Pd(CH₂CMe₂C₆H₅)(κ³-N,N',O-OC₆H₄N[double bond, length as m-dash]CH(2-C₅H₄N))], 1. The cleavage of the Pd-aryl bond and the deprotonation of the ligand phenol to afford a bound aryloxide, indicates facile Pd-aryl bond protonolysis. Deuterium labelling experiments confirmed that the ligand phenol promotes protonolysis and that the reverse, aryl C-H activation, occurs under very mild reaction conditions (within 10 min at room temperature). An unusual isomerization of the Pd-alkyl complex 1 to a Pd-aryl complex, [Pd(C₆H₄(2-t-Bu))(κ³-N,N',O-OC₆H₄N[double bond, length as m-dash]CH(2-C₅H₄N))], 2, was observed to give an equilibrium with [2]/[1] = 9 after 5 days in methanol. The isomerization requires that both aryl C-H activation and Pd-alkyl protonolysis steps occur. The very large KIE value (k_H/k_D = ca. 40) for isomerization of 1 to 2, suggests a concerted S_E2-type mechanism for the Pd-alkyl protonolysis step.

Selective C-C coupling at a Pt(iv) centre: 100% preference for sp2-sp3 over sp3-sp3

The oxidative addition of three different organic halides RX to the non-symmetric platinum(ii) mer coordinated dicyclometallated C^N^C complex 1 yielded short-lived six-coordinate platinum(iv) complexes 2(R) (R = Me, allyl, Bn), with the incoming groups trans across the platinum centre. A spontaneous reductive coupling reaction then occurred with, in each case, a completely chemoselective sp²-sp³ coupling, and exclusively gave R-3, with the newly introduced R group bonded to the previously cyclometallated aryl ring. Following a recyclometallation reaction, the oxidative addition/reductive elimination cycle was repeated and gave the same selectivity. A one-pot route to doubly alkylating the aryl ring was developed. The observed selectivity might have been predicted on the normal basis of a steric barrier associated with non-flat sp³ hybridised groups, but we suggest that it arises from the stereochemistry at the metal, and the orientation of the ligands.

Exclusive Csp(3)-Csp(3) vs Csp(2)-Csp(3) Reductive Elimination from Pt(IV) Governed by Ligand Constraints

Selective reductive elimination of ethane (Csp(3)-Csp(3) RE) was observed following bromide abstraction and subsequent thermolysis of a Pt(IV) complex bearing both Csp(3)- and Csp(2)-hybridized hydrocarbyl ligands. Through a comparative experimental and theoretical study with two other Pt(IV) complexes featuring greater conformational flexibility of the ligand scaffold, we show that the rigidity of a meridionally coordinating ligand raises the barrier for Csp(2)-Csp(3) RE, resulting in unprecedented reactivity.

Promoting C-C Bond Coupling of Benzyne and Methyl Ligands in Electron-Deficient (triphos)Pt-CH3+ Complexes

In situ generated benzyne reacts at room temperature with (triphos)Pt–CH₃⁺ to form a five-coordinate π-complex (2) that is isolable and stable in solution. Thermolysis of 2 at 60 °C generates (triphos)Pt(o-tolyl)⁺ (3), which is the product of formal migratory insertion of CH₃^– onto the coordinated benzyne. The reaction of 2 with the acid Ph₂NH₂⁺ yields toluene at room temperature over the course of 8 h, while the same reaction with 3 only proceeds to 40% conversion over 2 days. These data indicate that the protonolysis of 2 does not proceed by CH₃ migration onto benzyne to form 3 followed by protodemetalation. Instead, the data suggest either that protonation of 2 is first and is followed by H migration to yield a Pt^IVPh(Me) dication or that this latter species is generated by direct protonolysis of coordinated benzyne prior to reductive elimination of toluene.

Pt−Me bond cleavage in the reactions of dimethylplatinum(II) complexes containing chelating phosphine ligands with organotin(IV) chlorides

Selective Pt−Me bond activation of dimethylplatinum(II) complexes [PtMe2(PP)] (PP = dppm (bis(diphenylphosphino)methane), dppe (1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane), dppp (1,3-bis(diphenylphosphino)propane)) was achieved by SnMe2Cl2 to yield the corresponding platinum(II) complexes [PtMeCl(PP)] (PP = dppm, dppe, dppp) and cis-[PtCl2(PP)] (PP = dppm, dppp). On the other hand, the reactions of complexes [PtMe2(PP)] (PP = dppm, dppe, dppp) with SnPh3Cl resulted in the selective cleavage of the Pt−Me bond to afford the methylplatinum(II) complexes [PtMeCl(PP)]. Notably, the reaction of [PtMe2(dppm)] with SnMe2Cl2 and SnPh3Cl also gave the ionic A-frame complex [Pt2Me2(μ-Cl)(μ-dppm)2]Cl. The variable-temperature 1H and 31P NMR spectroscopy shows that the cleavage of the Pt−Me bond occurs very rapidly and the short-lived platinum(IV) intermediate is difficult to detect during the reaction. An explanation is presented on the basis of the nature of the strong π-acceptance of the phosphine ligand, which resulted in the formation of a very unstable platinum(IV) intermediate.

Organogold(I) macrocycles and [2]catenanes containing pyridyl and bipyridyl substituents — Organometallic catenanes as ligands

The synthesis of achiral gold(I) macrocycles [RCH(4-C6H4OCH2C≡CAu)2(µ-Ph2PZPPh2)] and the corresponding chiral gold(I) [2]catenanes, bearing substituents R = 2-pyridyl, 4-pyridyl, and 4-(2,2′-bipyridyl), is reported. The gold(I) compounds form by self-assembly on reaction of oligomeric digold(I) diacetylides [{RCH(4-C6H4OCH2C≡CAu)2}n] or the isocyanide complexes [RCH(4-C6H4OCH2C≡CAuC≡N-t-Bu)2] with diphosphine ligands Ph2PZPPh2, Z = CC or (CH2)n with n = 2–5, or on reaction of [Au2(O2CCF3)2(µ-Ph2PZPPh2)] with diacetylenes RCH(4-C6H4OCH2C≡CH)2 in the presence of a base. The equilibrium between macrocycles and chiral [2]catenanes in solution was established by NMR spectroscopy, while the structures of several [2]catenanes in the solid state were established crystallographically. The coordination of the gold(I) compounds with R = 4-(2,2′-bipyridyl) to platinum(IV), by formation of the corresponding [PtIMe3(bipy)] units, is established, showing that organometallic [2]catenanes can act as ligands.Key words: gold, macrocycle, catenane, platinum.