Effect of beta-alkyl substitution on D-1 dopamine agonist activity: absolute configuration of beta-methyldopamine

Silica-supported polyphosphoric acid in the synthesis of 4-substituted tetrahydroisoquinoline derivatives

We report herein an application of an α-amidoalkylation reaction, as an alternative efficient synthesis of 4-aryl- and 4-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline derivatives. The amides required for this purpose would result from reaction of aminoacetaldehyde dimethylacetal with different substituted benzenes in polyphosphoric acid, followed by acylation of the obtained amines with different acid chlorides or sulfochlorides. We compared the cyclisation step using conventional (milieu of acetic-trifluoracetic acid = 4:1) and solid supported reagents (SiO₂/PPA), as recovered, regenerated and reused without loss of its activity catalyst. We found that in comparison to conventional methods, the yields of the reaction are greater and the reaction time is shorter.

Identification of a 2-phenyl-substituted octahydrobenzo[f]quinoline as a dopamine D₃ receptor-selective full agonist ligand

This work describes the identification of a novel class of octahydrobenzo[f]quinolines as dopamine D(3)-selective full agonists. We developed a facile method that utilizes Suzuki coupling for easy incorporations of various substituted pendant rings into the scaffold. A small focused library of octahydrobenzo[f]quinolines 5 was synthesized, and these compounds demonstrated at least 14-fold D(2)-like selectivity over D(1) in native porcine striatal tissue. Furthermore, n-propyl analog 5f was found to be a high affinity (K(i)=1.1 nM) D(3) dopamine full agonist with 145-fold selectivity over the D(2) receptor and about 840-fold selectivity over the D(1) receptor.

Analogues of doxanthrine reveal differences between the dopamine D1 receptor binding properties of chromanoisoquinolines and hexahydrobenzo[a]phenanthridines

Efforts to develop selective agonists for dopamine D(1)-like receptors led to the discovery of dihydrexidine and doxanthrine, two bioisosteric β-phenyldopamine-type full agonist ligands that display selectivity and potency at D(1)-like receptors. We report herein an improved methodology for the synthesis of substituted chromanoisoquinolines (doxanthrine derivatives) and the evaluation of several new compounds for their ability to bind to D(1)- and D(2)-like receptors. Identical pendant phenyl ring substitutions on the dihydrexidine and doxanthrine templates surprisingly led to different effects on D(1)-like receptor binding, suggesting important differences between the interactions of these ligands with the D(1) receptor. We propose, based on the biological results and molecular modeling studies, that slight conformational differences between the tetralin and chroman-based compounds lead to a shift in the location of the pendant ring substituents within the receptor.

Assessment of dopamine D₁ receptor affinity and efficacy of three tetracyclic conformationally-restricted analogs of SKF38393

To assess the effect of conformational mobility on receptor activity, the β-phenyl substituent of dopamine D(1) agonist ligands of the phenylbenzazepine class, (±)-6,6a,7,8,9,13b-hexahydro-5H-benzo[d]naphtho[2,1-b]azepine-11,12-diol (8), and its oxygen and sulfur bioisosteres 9 and 10, respectively, were synthesized as conformationally-restricted analogs of SKF38393, a dopamine D(1)-selective partial agonist. Compounds trans-8b, 9, and 10 showed binding affinity comparable to that of SKF38393, but functionally, they displayed only very weak agonist activity. These results suggest that the conformationally-restricted structure of the analogs cannot adopt a binding orientation that is necessary for agonist activity.

Iterative approach to the discovery of novel degarelix analogues: substitutions at positions 3, 7, and 8. Part II

Degarelix (FE200486, Ac-d-2Nal(1)-d-4Cpa(2)-d-3Pal(3)-Ser(4)-4Aph(l-Hor)(5)-d-4Aph(Cbm)(6)-Leu(7)-ILys(8)-Pro(9)-d-Ala(10)-NH(2)) is a potent and very long acting antagonist of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) after subcutaneous administration in mammals including humans. Analogues of degarelix were synthesized, characterized, and screened for the antagonism of GnRH-induced response in a reporter gene assay in HEK-293 cells expressing the human GnRH receptor. The duration of action was also determined in the castrated male rat assay to measure the extent (efficacy and duration of action) of inhibition of luteinizing hormone (LH) release. Structurally, this series of analogues has novel substitutions at positions 3, 7, and 8 and N(alpha)-methylation at positions 6, 7, and 8 in the structure of degarelix. These substitutions were designed to probe the spatial limitations of the receptor's cavity and to map the steric and ionic boundaries. Some functional groups were introduced that were hypothesized to influence the phamacokinetic properties of the analogues such as bioavailability, solubility, intra- or intermolecular hydrogen bond forming capacity, and ability to bind carrier proteins. Substitutions at positions 3 ([N(beta)-(2-pyridyl-methyl)d-Dap(3)]degarelix, IC(50) = 2.71 nM) (5), 7 ([Pra(7)]degarelix, IC(50) = 2.11 nM) (16), and 8 ([N(delta)-(IGly)Orn(8)]degarelix, IC(50) = 1.38 nM) (20) and N-methylation ([N(alpha)-methyl-Leu(7)]degarelix, IC(50) = 1.47 nM) (32) yielded analogues that were equipotent to degarelix (2) in vitro (IC(50) = 1.64 nM) but shorter acting in vivo. Out of the 33 novel analogues tested for the duration of action in this series, two analogues ([N(epsilon)-cyclohexyl-Lys(8)]degarelix, IC(50) = 1.50 nM) (23) and ([N(beta)-(IbetaAla)Dap(8)]degarelix, IC(50) = 1.98 nM) (26) had antagonist potencies and duration of action similar to that of azaline B {inhibited LH (>80%) release for >72 h after sc injection to castrated male rats at a standard dose of 50 mug/rat in 5% mannitol}. Under similar conditions analogues ([N(gamma)-(IGly)Dab(8)]degarelix, IC(50) = 1.56 nM) (21) and ([IOrn(8)]degarelix, IC(50) = 1.72 nM) (18) had a longer duration of action {inhibited LH (>96 h) release} than azaline B; however they were shorter acting than degarelix. Hydrophilicity of these analogues, a potential measure of their ability to be formulated for sustained release, was determined using RP-HPLC at neutral pH yielding analogues with shorter as well as longer retention times. No correlation was found between retention times and antagonist potency or duration of action.

Design and synthesis of potent hexapeptide and heptapeptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists by truncation of a decapeptide analogue sequence

A novel strategy for designing reduced-size analogues of the decapeptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) was developed. As opposed to previous attempts to delete residues from either of the peptide's termini, our approach is based upon the known importance of both C- and N-terminals of GnRH analogues for receptor recognition, whereas the central part of the molecule is replaced by a short spacer. The present truncation strategy was successful for generation of reduced-size hexapeptide and heptapeptide antagonists possessing potent antagonistic capacity. The same methodology was not suitable for the generation of reduced-size agonists, suggesting different conformational characteristics for GnRH agonists and antagonists. A heptapeptide antagonist designed by this method was shown to inhibit serum levels of luteinizing hormone in castrated rats in vivo. Structure-activity studies suggested that the structural preferences for GnRH receptor recognition are similar to those reported for decapeptide antagonists. Our studies resulted in a heptapeptide GnRH antagonist (Ac-D-Nal2-D-Cpa-D-Pal-Gly-Arg-Pro-D-Ala-NH2) with high receptor binding affinity (IC50 = 7 nM), as compared to that of GnRH itself (IC50 = 2 nM). The highest affinity of a hexapeptide antagonist that we have synthesized was somewhat lower (IC50 = 45 nM).

Design of potent dicyclic (1-5/4-10) gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists

In three earlier papers, the structures and biological potencies of numerous mono- and dicyclic antagonists of GnRH were reported. Among these, two families, each containing two to four members were identified that had very high antagonist potencies in an antiovulatory assay (within a factor of 2 of those of the most potent linear analogues) and high affinities (K(i) < 0.5 nM) for the rat GnRH receptor (rGnRHR). The most favored cycles bridged the side chains of residues (4-10),(1,2) (5-8),(2) (4-10/5-8),(2) (1-3),(3) and (1-3/4-10).(3) Our goal was to identify a consensus model of bioactive conformations of GnRH antagonists, yet these biocompatible constraints did not sufficiently restrain the spatial location of the N-terminal tripeptide with respect to the C-terminal heptapeptide, due largely to the rotational freedom about the bonds connecting these regions. Examination of models derived from NMR studies of cyclo(4-10) analogues suggested a large number of possible cyclic constraints such as cyclo (0-8), (1-8), or (2-8). All analogues tested with these substitutions were inactive as antiovulatory agents at 1 mg/rat (5-9) and had low affinity for rGnRHR. On the other hand, bridging positions 3 and 8 with a [DAsp(3)] to [Dbu(8)] (12, K(i) = 13 nM) or [Orn(8)] (13, K(i) = 14 nM) in the parent compound cyclo(3-8)[Ac-DNal(1),DCpa(2),DXaa(3), Arg(5),DNal(6),Xbb(8),DAla(10)]GnRH yielded analogues that blocked ovulation at 250 microgram/rat. Analogue 14 (K(i) = 2.3 nM), with a [DAsp(3), Lys(8)] bridge, was fully active at 50 microgram/rat. Loss of potency (>20-fold) was observed with the substitution of [DAsp(3)] in 14 by [DGlu(3)] in 15 (K(i) = 23 nM). Dicyclic analogues possessing the (4-10) cycle and selected (1-6), (2-6), and (2-8) cycles led to analogues that were inactive at doses of 500 microgram/rat or larger. Two analogues with (1-8/4-10) cycles (16, K(i) = 1.1 nM) or (3-8/4-10) cycles (22, K(i) = 17 nM) showed full antiovulatory potency at 250 microgram/rat. None of these substitutions yielded analogues potent enough (>80% inhibition of ovulation at 5 microgram/rat or less and K(i) < 0.5 nM) to be candidates for structural analysis by NMR. On the other hand, four dicyclic (1, 1'-5/4-10) analogues met this criterion: dicyclo(1, 1'-5/4-10)[Ac-Asp(1)(Gly),DCpa(2),DTrp(3),Asp(4),Dbu(5 ), DNal(6), Dpr(10)]GnRH (32, K(i) = 0.22 nM), dicyclo(1, 1'-5/4-10)[Ac-Asp(1)(Gly),DCpa(2),DNal(3),Asp(4),Dbu(5 ), DNal(6), Dpr(10)]GnRH (34, K(i) = 0.38 nM), dicyclo(1, 1'-5/4-10)[Ac-Asp(1)(betaAla),DCpa(2), DTrp(3),Asp(4),Dbu(5),DNal(6), Dpr(10)]GnRH (40, K(i) = 0.15 nM), and dicyclo(1, 1'-5/4-10)[Ac-Glu(1)(Gly), DCpa(2),DTrp(3),Asp(4),Dbu(5),DNal(6), Dpr(10)]GnRH (41, K(i) = 0.24 nM). Since they differed slightly in terms of the (1,1'-5) bridge length (21 and 22 atoms) and bridgehead configuration, we may hypothesize that they assume similar bioactive conformations that satisfy a very discriminating receptor, since many other closely related analogues were significantly less potent.