Spin-rotation and NMR shielding constants in XF molecules (X = B, Al, Ga, In, and Tl)

Extended Benchmark Set of Main-Group Nuclear Shielding Constants and NMR Chemical Shifts and Its Use to Evaluate Modern DFT Methods

An extended theoretical benchmark set, NS372, for light main-group nuclear shieldings and NMR shifts has been constructed based on high-level GIAO-CCSD(T)/pcSseg-3//CCSD(T)/cc-pVQZ reference data. After removal of the large static-correlation cases O₃, F₃^-, and BH from the statistical evaluations for the ¹⁷O, ¹⁹F, and ¹¹B subsets, the benchmark comprises overall 372 shielding values in 117 molecules with a wide range of electronic-structure situations, containing 124 ¹H, 14 ¹¹B, 93 ¹³C, 43 ¹⁵N, 31 ¹⁷O, 47 ¹⁹F, 14 ³¹P, and 6 ³³S shielding constants. The CCSD(T)/pcSseg-3 data are shown to be close to the basis-set and method limit and thus provide an excellent benchmark to evaluate more approximate methods, such as density functional approaches. This dataset has been used to evaluate Hartree-Fock (HF) and MP2, and a wide range of exchange-correlation functionals from local density approximation (LDA) to generalized gradient approximations (GGAs) and meta-GGAs (focusing on their current-density functional implementations), as well as global hybrid, range-separated hybrid, local hybrid, and double-hybrid functionals. Starting with absolute shielding constants, the DSD-PBEP86 double hybrid is confirmed to provide the highest accuracy, with an aggregate relative mean absolute error (rel. MAE) of only 0.9%, followed by MP2 (1.1%). MP2 and double hybrids only show larger errors for a few systems with the largest static-correlation effects. The double-hybrid B2GP-PLYP, the two local hybrids cLH12ct-SsirPW92 and cLH12ct-SsifPW92, and the current-density functional meta-GGA cB97M-V follow closely behind (all 1.5%), as do some further functionals, cLH20t and cMN15-L (both 1.6%), as well as B2PLYP and KT3 (both 2.0%). Functionals on the lower rungs of the usual ladder offer the advantage of lower computational cost and access to larger molecules. Closer examination also reveals the best-performing methods for individual nuclei in the test set. Different ways of treating τ-dependent functionals are evaluated. When moving from absolute shielding constants to chemical shifts, some of the methods can benefit from systematic error compensation, and the overall error range somewhat narrows. Further methods now achieve the 2% threshold of relative MAEs, including functionals based on TPSS (TPSSh, cmPSTS).

Relativistic Calculations of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Parameters

Relativistic effects are important for the accurate evaluation of the observables of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, the nuclear magnetic shielding and the indirect spin–spin coupling tensors. Some of the most notable relativistic effects, in particular for light elements in the vicinity of heavy nuclei, are due to spin–orbit effects, an effect difficult to evaluate when starting from a non-relativistic wavefunction. Two- and four-component relativistic methods include spin–orbit effects variationally, and the recent improvements in the computational efficiency of these methods open new opportunities for accurate calculations of NMR parameters also for molecules with heavy elements. We here present an overview of the different approximations that have been introduced for calculating relativistic effects with two- and four-component methods and how these methods can be used to calculate the NMR parameters. We will also give some examples of systems that have been studied computationally with two- and four-component relativistic methods and discuss the importance of relativistic effects on the shielding and indirect spin–spin coupling constants.

Theoretical analysis of NMR shieldings in XSe and XTe (X = Si, Ge, Sn and Pb): the spin-rotation constant saga

How the electronic contribution to the spin-rotation constant is close to the paramagnetic contribution of the NMR absolute shielding constant?