Treatment of mantle-cell lymphomas with intermittent two-hour infusion of cladribine as first-line therapy or in first relapse

SAMHD1 Mutations and Expression in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patients

SAMHD1 (sterile alpha motif domain and histidine-aspartate domain-containing protein 1) is a deoxynucleoside triphosphate triphosphohydrolase regulating innate immune and modulating DNA damage signaling. It plays an important role in the development of some tumors. SAMHD1 was also reported as a barrier to cytarabine, a common chemotherapy drug for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and as a biomarker of grim prognosis for acute myelocytic leukemia (AML) patients. However, SAMHD1 expression and function in MCL have not been well-defined. In the present study, we evaluated SAMHD1 expression by immunohistochemistry and its gene structure by Sanger sequencing in MCL. Our results showed that SAMHD1 was positive in 36 (62.1%) patients. Importantly, SAMHD1-positive patients were associated with lower chemotherapy response rate (p = 0.023) and shorter overall survival (p = 0.039) than SAMHD1-negative cases. These results suggest that SAMHD1 is an adverse biomarker for MCL patients, which is due to the high expression of SAMHD1 and rapid cell proliferation. These findings were confirmed in an in vitro study using the siRNA technique. Silencing the SAMHD1 gene in the MCL cell line Jeko-1 significantly decreased cell proliferation and increased cell apoptosis. The MCL cell line with SAMHD1 knockdown showed lower Ki-67 proliferation index, higher caspase-3, and higher sensitivity to cytarabine. Furthermore, for the first time, four previously unreported missense mutations (S302Y, Y432C, E449G, and R451H) in exon 8 and exon 12 of the SAMHD1 gene were discovered by sequencing. The mutations had not been found to corelate with SAMHD1 protein expression detected by immunohistochemistry. The biological functions of this mutated SAMHD1 remain to be investigated.

The addition of rituximab to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy results in a significant improvement in overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma: results of a randomized UK National Cancer Research Institute trial

Mantle cell lymphoma is an incurable and generally aggressive lymphoma that is more common in elderly patients. Whilst a number of different chemotherapeutic regimens are active in this disease, there is no established gold standard therapy. Rituximab has been used widely to good effect in B-cell malignancies but there is no evidence that it improves outcomes when added to chemotherapy in this disease. We performed a randomized, open-label, multicenter study looking at the addition of rituximab to the standard chemotherapy regimen of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma. A total of 370 patients were randomized. With a median follow up of six years, rituximab improved the median progression-free survival from 14.9 to 29.8 months (P<0.001) and overall survival from 37.0 to 44.5 months (P=0.005). This equates to absolute differences of 9.0% and 22.1% for overall and progression-free survival, respectively, at two years. Overall response rates were similar, but complete response rates were significantly higher in the rituximab arm: 52.7% vs. 39.9% (P=0.014). There was no clinically significant additional toxicity observed with the addition of rituximab. Overall, approximately 18% of patients died of non-lymphomatous causes, most commonly infections. The addition of rituximab to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy significantly improves outcomes in patients with mantle cell lymphoma. However, these regimens have significant late toxicity and should be used with caution. This trial has been registered (ISRCTN81133184 and clinicaltrials.gov:00641095) and is supported by the UK National Cancer Research Network.

Chronic cladribine administration increases amyloid beta peptide generation and plaque burden in mice

Background

The clinical uses of 2-chloro-2′-deoxyadenosine (2-CDA) or cladribine which was initially prescribed to patients with hematological and lymphoid cancers is now extended to treat patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Previous data has shown that 2-CDA has high affinity to the brain and readily passes through the blood brain barrier reaching CSF concentrations 25% of that found in plasma. However, whether long-term administration of 2-CDA can lead to any adverse effects in patients or animal models is not yet clearly known.

Methodology

Here we show that exposure of 2-CDA to CHO cells stably expressing wild-type APP751 increased generation and secretion of amyloid β peptide (Aβ) in to the conditioned medium. Interestingly, increased Aβ levels were noticed even at non-toxic concentrations of 2-CDA. Remarkably, chronic treatment of APdE9 mice, a model of Alzheimer's disease with 2-CDA for 60 days increased amyloid plaque burden by more than 1-fold. Increased Aβ generation appears to result from increased turnover of APP as revealed by cycloheximide-chase experiments. Additionally, surface labeling of APP with biotin and immunoprecipitation of surface labeled proteins with anti-biotin antibody also indicated increased APP at the cell surface in 2-CDA treated cells compared to controls. Increased turnover of APP by 2-CDA in turn might be a consequence of decreased protein levels of PIN 1, which is known to regulate cis-trans isomerization and phosphorylation of APP. Most importantly, like many other oncology drugs, 2-CDA administration led to significant delay in acquiring a reward-based learning task in a T maze paradigm.

Conclusions

Taken together, these data provide compelling evidence for the first time that chronic 2-CDA administration can increase amyloidogenic processing of APP leading to robustly increased plaque burden which may be responsible for the observed deficits in learning skills. Thus chronic treatment of mice with 2-CDA can have deleterious effects in vivo.

Cladribine: mode of action and implications for treatment of multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system. The inflammation is driven significantly by autoreactive lymphocytes, which recruit cells of the innate immune system such as macrophages that contribute to subsequent tissue damage, ultimately resulting in demyelination and axonal damage that are characteristic in MS lesions. Cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine [2-CdA]) is a synthetic chlorinated deoxyadenosine analog that is biologically active in selected cell types and provides targeted and sustained reduction of circulating T and B lymphocytes implicated in the pathogenesis of MS. The biologic activity of cladribine depends on the preferential accumulation of cladribine phosphates in cell types with a high intracellular ratio of deoxycytidine kinase to 5'-nucleotidases. Cladribine-phosphates interfere with DNA synthesis and repair through incorporation into DNA and through inhibition of enzymes involved in DNA metabolism, including DNA polymerase and ribonucleotide reductase. This in turn leads to DNA strand breaks and ultimately cell death. This review explores the mechanism of action of cladribine further, in the context of recent clinical data, after completion of the phase III, 96-week, placebo-controlled CLARITY study. In this study, cladribine tablets demonstrated significant efficacy on clinical and neuroimaging outcomes in relapsing-remitting MS.

Beyond hairy cell: the activity of cladribine in other hematologic malignancies

Before the contemporary development of rationally designed antineoplastic therapies, cladribine was identified as a lymphocyte-specific agent. Its profound impact on the natural history of hairy cell leukemia, with responses approaching 100% and a median duration of response of nearly a decade after only a single 7-day course, is well known and revolutionized the treatment of hairy cell leukemia. However, cladribine's impressive activity in other lymphoproliferative disorders has been generally underappreciated. Multiple single-arm phase 2 trials have demonstrated cladribine's potency across the full spectrum of lymphoid malignancies. In a limited number of phase 3 trials and cross-study analyses, cladribine compared favorably with fludarabine, another purine nucleoside analog that is more commonly used in the treatment of indolent lymphoid malignancies. Cladribine has been noted to have particular activity among lymphoid disorders with few effective therapies, specifically, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma, and mantle cell lymphoma. Recently approved novel agents may act in synergy with cladribine for these conditions and should be incorporated into future clinical studies.

Cladribine: not just another purine analogue?

Cladribine was synthesized as a purine analogue drug that inhibited adenosine deaminase. It received FDA approval in the 1980s for treatment of hairy cell leukemia. Given its toxicity towards lymphocytes and its corresponding immunosuppressive effects, it has been studied and found efficacious in a variety of hematologic malignancies and autoimmune conditions, most recently multiple sclerosis. This review highlights pharmacological, toxicological and clinical data for the use of cladribine. It also discusses existing and new mechanisms that may contribute to its unique clinical activity. Emerging data show that in addition to its known purine nucleoside analogue activity, cladribine possesses epigenetic properties, inhibiting S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase and DNA methylation. This may contribute to its efficacy and highlights the importance of studying combination therapy with other epigenetic or targeted agents. Clinical trials are underway in a variety of malignant and nonmalignant conditions.

Mantle cell lymphoma: advances in biology and therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Mantle cell lymphoma is characterized by dysregulation of cyclin D1, but this is not sufficient for lymphoma development. It is a difficult disease to treat, being incurable with standard chemotherapy and having a median survival of approximately 5 years. The purpose of this review is to update recent advances in mantle cell lymphoma biology with prognostic and potentially therapeutic implications, and mantle cell lymphoma treatment approaches and new agents.

RECENT FINDINGS

Genetic alterations that cooperate with cyclin D1 have been described that alter proliferation, in particular p27Kip and p16INK4, or apoptosis. Biological factors such as high-proliferation signature defined by gene expression profiles, loss of p27 and presence of mutant p53 confer poor prognosis. Proliferative rate also predicts patient outcome. Clinical criteria such as the international prognostic index, follicular lymphoma international prognostic index or a formula using age, performance status, white blood cell count and lactate dehydrogenase, separate prognostic groups. Not all patients require therapy at diagnosis. Although the best reported results have been with rituximab-hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone-methotrexate/cytarabine, a cooperative group study of this regimen appears not quite as successful. Consolidation of remission after rituximab-cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine-prednisone with high-dose therapy/stem-cell support prolongs remission and consolidation with radioimmunotherapy shows promise. Intensifying induction by alternating intensified rituximab-cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine-prednisone with rituximab and high-dose cytarabine, followed by high-dose therapy appears quite promising. Novel agents active in relapsed disease include bortezomib, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, antibodies and cyclin pathway-directed agents such as flavopiridol and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors.

SUMMARY

New insights into mantle cell lymphoma biology may lead to targeted therapy. Meanwhile, combinations of existing therapeutic approaches seem to have improved outcomes.

Cladribine combined with cyclophosphamide and mitoxantrone is an active salvage therapy in advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility, efficacy and toxicity of the combined therapy consisting of cladribine (2-CdA), mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide (CMC regimen) in patients with refractory or relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Thirty six patients, 14 with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), 10 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 5 with follicular lymphoma (FL), 3 with small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), and 4 with T-cell lymphoma were enrolled to the study. The CMC protocol consisted of 2-CdA at a dose of 0.12 mg/kg in a 2-hour infusion on days 1 through 3, mitoxantrone 10 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1 and cyclophosphamide 650 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1. The CMC courses were repeated at intervals of 4 weeks. Thirty three patients were available for evaluation of response. Overall response rate (OR) was 58% (95% CI, 41--75%). Seven patients (21%; 95% CI, 7--35%) achieved a complete response (CR) and 12 patients (36%; 95% CI, 20--52%) achieved a partial response (PR). Seven of 19 patients with CR/PR are still in remission with a median follow-up of 3 months (range, 2-17 months). The median failure-free survival (FFS) was 5 months (range, 2-17 months). The median overall survival (OS) for the entire group was 9 months (range, 0.1-7 months). There was a significant difference in OS between responders and nonresponders after CMC therapy (log rank test, P = 0.015). When different disease status before CMC treatment was considered, a trend toward longer survival of recurrent patients was observed (log rank test, P = 0.08). Grade 3-4 neutropenia developed in 14 (39%) patients, and 16 episodes (15%) of grade 3-4 infections were observed. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia or anemia was seen in 9 patients (25%) and 10 patients (28%), respectively. The results of our study show that the CMC regimen is effective salvage therapy with acceptable toxicity in heavily pretreated patients with NHL including MCL and DLBCL.

Expanding therapeutic options in mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) still carries a poor prognosis. Chemoimmunotherapy (combination with rituximab) is the routine first-line therapy, although data strongly suggest a benefit from intensification through high-dose therapy with stem cell transplantation consolidation or dose-intense chemotherapy with HyperCVAD (fractionated cyclophosphamide/vincristine/doxorubicin/dexamethasone)/rituximab. Unfortunately, most patients still experience relapse, and a multitude of novel agents are currently being tested in this setting, including proteasome inhibitors with bortezomib (the first of its class and first Food and Drug Administration-approved drug in MCL), mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, Bcl-2 inhibitors, and antiangiogenesis agents, among others. Because of the relative rarity of the disease-MCL represents 6% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma-an obvious effort is needed to enroll patients on clinical trials. Not surprisingly, as in other non-Hodgkin lymphomas, MCL appears more and more as a heterogeneous disease, which might impact future clinical trial design through pharmacogenomics and hopefully help us develop smaller "molecular" relevant trials.

New Directions in the Treatment of Mantle Cell Lymphoma: An Overview

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is one of the most challenging lymphomas to treat. In the first-line setting, high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation or hyperCVAD/rituximab suggest benefit, especially in patients aged < 60 years. Nucleoside analogue-based regimens represent an alternate option in patients ineligible for HDT. Fludarabine in combination with cyclophosphamide or mitoxantrone has shown activity, and the results were superior with the addition of rituximab. Other cytotoxic agents, such as cladribine, clofarabine, or bendamustin, showed promising activity as well. A variety of new monoclonal antibody (MoAb) agents, such as humanized anti-CD20, alemtuzumab, anti-HLA-DR, anti-CD22 (as an immunotoxin carrier), anti-CD40, as well as MoAb-targeting TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 are being tested. Radioimmunotherapy with Yttrium 90-ibritumomab tiuxetan and Iodine 131 tositumomab have been tested alone or in combination with chemotherapy, including as part of HDT and autologous stem cell transplantation, in which they showed the best results. New vaccine modalities are exploring the use of tumor cell-based vaccines or of agents that block or activate costimulatory pathways/molecules, such as CTLA-4-Ig. Allogenic transplantation represents a potential curative option for MCL, especially nonmyeloablative transplantation, more feasible in that population. A plethora of novel biologic agents have surfaced, such as bortezomib, temsirolimus, thalidomide, lenalidomide, MoAb anti-vascular endothelial growth factor or vascular endothelial growth factor-Trap, and flavopiridol. Other targets include gene transcription through histone regulation; nuclear factor-ķB pathway; protein kinase C inhibitors; small-molecules targeting apoptosis, such as antisense Bcl-2, pan-Bcl-2 family member inhibitors; MoAb agonists of cell death receptors; caspases regulators (inhibitors of apoptosis proteins, survivin); and MDM2 antagonist regulators of p53. A molecular approach to define biomarkers might help identify subgroups of patients and help develop rational therapies.

Successful Salvage with High-Dose Sequential Chemotherapy Coupled with In Vivo Purging and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in 2 Patients with Primary Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Presenting in the Leukemic Phase

We report the results of an aggressive salvage regimen in 2 patients with advanced-stage leukemic-phase mantle cell lymphoma who were refractory to previous conventional therapies. We combined multiple phases of a cytoreductive regimen including rituximab and sequential high-dose treatment with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The regimen consisted of a debulking phase with fludarabine, idarubicin, high-dose cytarabine, and high-dose methotrexate; a mobilization and in vivo purging phase with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; high-dose sequential chemotherapy with etoposide, mitoxantrone, and melphalan followed by ASCT; and, finally, posttransplantation consolidation with rituximab for treatment of minimal residual disease. With this regimen, these 2 refractory patients with multiple poor prognostic factors are in complete remission at 41 and 42 months following transplantation. Although the fact that these 2 patients are still in remission beyond 3 years after ASCT is encouraging, we need a longer follow-up to comment on their long-term survival.

Reduced-dose cladribine (2-CdA) plus mitoxantrone is effective in the treatment of mantle-cell and low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine) (2-CdA) has been shown to be effective in mantle-cell (MCL) and low-grade lymphomas (lgNHL). The aim of this multicentre study was to evaluate the rate and duration of remissions and to examine the toxicity of the combination of reduced-dose 2-CdA and mitoxantrone (CdM) in MCL and lgNHL as first-line therapy or for patients in their relapse. A total of 285 courses, median of five courses per patient, were administered to 62 evaluable patients (42 previously untreated, 20 relapsed) with 5 mg/m(2) 2-CdA per day given as an intermittent 2-h infusion over 3 consecutive days combined with 8 mg/m(2) mitoxantrone on days 1 and 2 for the untreated patients or 12 mg/m(2) mitoxantrone on day 1 for patients in their first relapse for a maximum of six cycles every four weeks. 32 follicular, 18 MCL, 9 lymphoplasmacytoid, 2 marginal zone and 1 unclassified low-grade B-cell lymphoma were involved in the study. 56 of the 62 patients responded to CdM resulting in an overall response rate of 90% (95% confidence interval (CI), 80-96%) with a complete remission (CR) rate of 44% (95% CI, 31-57%) and a median duration of remission of 25 months (range 6-42+). The overall survival rate at 48 months was 80%. For 42 previously untreated patients, the overall response rate was 88% (95% CI, 74-96%) with a CR rate of 38% (95% CI, 24-54%), whereas the response rate for the group of 20 previously treated patients was similar with a 95% overall response (95% CI, 75-100%) and a CR rate of 55% (95% CI, 32-77%). In MCL, CdM showed a high activity, achieving a response rate of 100% (95% CI, 81-100%) with a CR rate of 44% and a median duration of remission of 24 months (range 6-35+). Myelosuppression was the major toxicity with 23% grade 3 granulocytopenia and 50% grade 4. Thrombocytopenia was less commonly observed, with only 8% grades 3 and 4. These results demonstrate that the combination of reduced-dose 2-CdA and mitoxantrone is a highly active regimen in the treatment of low-grade lymphomas, and in particular of MCL.

Mantle cell lymphoma: a biological and therapeutic paradigm

Recent classifications of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) have strictly individualized mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) on the basis of a combination of morphologic, immunophenotypic, and cytogenetic criteria. This clinicopathological entity now appears to be a biological and therapeutic model for the understanding and treatment of hematologic malignancies. The lymphomogenesis of MCL could be explained by a series of genetic abnormalities which occur at different steps of the disease: (1) mutation and/or loss of the ATM gene in centrocytic cells of the follicle mantle of lymph nodes, leading to the loss of ATM function, particularly involved during the V(D)J recombination process; (2) a t(11;14)(q13;q32) translocation which induces a constitutive Bcl-1/PRAD1/CCND1 expression, responsible for cell cycle activation of centrocytic cells characteristic of typical MCL; and (3) secondary additional chromosomal aberrations, such as a p53 mutation, observed in blastic transformation of MCL. Despite the evaluation of a number of treatment modalities, the optimal management of MCL has not yet been defined: (1) conventional and intensified chemotherapy and monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody therapy appear to be effective for the improvement of response rates and event-free or overall survivals; (2) combinations of different treatment modalities must be tested to modify the natural dismal outcome of the disease; and (3) innovative approaches should be developed. From this point of view, all these considerations offer a fine opportunity for extensive medical reflection.