A phase I study of sequential vinorelbine followed by paclitaxel

Phase I/II Trial of Paclitaxel and Vinorelbine in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Chemotherapeutic combination regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer traditionally have been based on platin compounds. However, a mechanistic rationale could lead to effective non-platin combinations. Paclitaxel and vinorelbine are antimicrotubule agents with different mechanisms of action, both of which have single agent activity against non-small cell lung cancer. A Phase I/II trial of paclitaxel Day 1 and vinorelbine Days 1-3 every 21 days was, therefore, performed for patients with Stage IIIB or Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer who had not previously received chemotherapy for metastatic disease. In the Phase I investigation, up to 4 patients were treated at each dose level. The maximum tolerated dose level was found to be paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 IV Day 1 and vinorelbine 16 mg/m2 IV Days 1-3, with dose-limiting toxicities of fatigue, myalgia, and mucositis at higher doses. This dose level was then expanded with an additional 15 patients. Of the 23 patients treated for up to 10 cycles at or near the maximum tolerated dose level (19 patients with paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 IV Day 1 and vinorelbine 16 mg/m2 Days 1-3, and 4 patients with paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 IV Day 1 and vinorelbine 13 mg/m2 Days 1-3), 7 patients achieved partial response and 5 patients achieved minor response. Fatigue, myalgia, peripheral neuropathy, and transient leukopenia were the most common cumulative toxicities seen. The non-platin chemotherapy doublet of paclitaxel and vinorelbine given on this convenient 3-day schedule is worthy of further investigation in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Phase I Study of Doxil® and Vinorelbine in Patients with Advanced Malignancies

INTRODUCTION

This study was designed to define the maximum tolerated dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) and multiday vinorelbine (VNB), without and with prophylactic filgrastim, and to identify antineoplastic effect.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with resistant cancers were treated with Doxil 50 mg/m2 every four weeks, and with VNB 15 mg/m2 on the same day. The VNB dose escalations were accomplished in subsequent patient cohorts by adding VNB doses on consecutive days. When the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of VNB with Doxil was defined, prophylactic filgrastim was added to define a second MTD.

RESULTS

Of 29 patients entered, two had early adverse events, and 27 received at least one full cycle with at least one month follow-up. The MTD of VNB, combined with Doxil 50 mg/m2, was 15 mg/m2 on day 1, with neutropenia as the dose-limiting toxicity. With prophylactic filgrastim, the MTD was 15 mg/m2 daily for two days, with neutropenia and stomatitis as dose-limiting toxicities. Palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia occurred frequently, usually after the third cycle. Objective responses were documented in six patients, all of whom received multiday VNB.

CONCLUSION

Doxil 50 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 28-day cycle can be safely combined with VNB 15 mg/m2 day 1, or with VNB 15 mg/m2 days 1 and 2 with filgrastim prophylaxis. Antineoplastic activity was observed in this heavily pretreated population. Future studies of Doxil 35-40 mg/m2 with multiday VNB may be worthwhile, especially in metastatic breast cancer.

Phase II Study of Paclitaxel Combined With Vinorelbine in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer

Paclitaxel and vinorelbine are two drugs active against breast cancer. A phase II study was initiated with the aim of assessing the efficacy and feasibility of the combination. Twenty-six patients presenting with advanced breast cancer with a taxane- and vinorelbine-free line of chemotherapy were included and treated with vinorelbine (20 mg/m2 on D1, D15), followed by paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 on D1), every 3 weeks. A 48% (95% CI: 35-61) response rate was obtained in the 23 patients evaluable for response. Vinorelbine was administered on D15, as scheduled, in 72% of cycles. The main toxicity observed was grade III to IV neutropenia in 73% of patients. Febrile neutropenia was reported in three patients. Disease-free survival was 118 days, and overall median survival was 361 days. This combination of paclitaxel and vinorelbine is feasible and effective in patients with early relapse or previously treated with first-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease.

Synergistic and antagonistic combinations of drugs in human prostate cancer cell lines in vitro

Microtubulin binding agents such as docetaxel have significant preclinical and clinical activity in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer. We have previously used median-effect analysis to define both synergistic and antagonistic drug combinations which may be of value in management of human disease. These studies extend our findings in defined prostate cancer cell lines. A semi-automated microtiter culture system was used. Docetaxel was combined with 18 other agents, incubated with DU 145, LnCaP or PC 3 prostate cancer cell lines for 72 h and the cells then incubated with MTT to determine cytotoxic effect. Both doublet and triplet combinations were examined. Synergy and antagonism as measured by the combination index were determined for each combination. The non-mutually exclusive criterion was applied. Docetaxel demonstrated cytotoxic additive effects or synergy with -retinoic acid, cyclosporin A and vinorelbine in all three cell lines. Docetaxel combined with either epirubicin or doxorubicin displayed cytotoxic synergistic effects in hormone-refractory DU 145 and PC 3 cell lines. In contrast, drugs which have been combined clinically to treat hormone-refractory prostate cancer, i.e. cisplatin, carboplatin or etoposide, were antagonistic when combined with docetaxel. We conclude that combinations of docetaxel with either -retinoic acid or vinorelbine may offer an enhanced cytotoxic effect in the management of hormone-refractory prostate cancer and need to be evaluated for therapeutic effect. The combination of docetaxel with an anthracycline was also synergistic in the two hormone-refractory cell lines, DU 145 and PC3, thus suggesting a potential role in advanced disease after endocrine failure. Combinations of docetaxel with platinum or etoposide may lead to subadditive effects in treatment.

In vitro search for synergy and antagonism: evaluation of docetaxel combinations in breast cancer cell lines

The use of combination chemotherapy is the accepted standard for most human malignancies but little attention has been paid to drug interactions. A combination of drugs may be synergistic, additive, or antagonistic in cytotoxic activity. This study evaluated combinations of agents with docetaxel, one of the most active agents in human breast cancer, using a median effects model to look at synergy or antagonism in vitro as a potential predictor of clinical outcome. Three human breast cancer cell lines, MCF7/wt, MCF7/adr (multiply drug resistant), and BT474 were grown to confluence, plated into 96 well dishes, and incubated with combinations of drugs for 72h. Cytotoxic effect was measured by the MTT assay. Median effect analysis was used to calculate the combination index (CI) with values less than 1 indicating synergism, 1 additive effects, and greater than 1 antagonism. Potentially useful combinations for clinical study which were identified included docetaxel with vinorelbine, docetaxel with dexrazoxane, docetaxel with cis-retinoic acid, docetaxel with disulfiram and either doxorubicin or epirubicin, and docetaxel with dexrazoxane and epirubicin.

Weekly vinorelbine is an effective palliative regimen after failure with anthracyclines and taxanes in metastatic breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is no gold standard for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma who have experienced failure with anthracyclines and taxanes. A biologic rationale suggests that the mechanism of taxane resistance could be because of an excess of depolymerized tubulin that could enhance sensitivity to vinorelbine. The objective of the study was to assess the tolerance and efficiency of weekly vinorelbine in metastatic breast carcinoma after failure with taxanes.

METHODS

Patients with measurable disease, a World Health Organization performance status of less than 3 and a life expectancy longer than 3 months were eligible. Persistent taxane-induced neuropathy higher than Grade 1 was an exclusion criterion. The initial planned dose was 30 mg/m(2)/week on an outpatient basis without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Neutrophil and platelet counts of 1.0 and 80 g/L, respectively, were required before each new injection; otherwise vinorelbine was delayed for 7 days with a dose reduction of 5 mg/m(2) at the second episode. The dose also was reduced if Grade 3 or 4 toxicity occurred. If the adverse event persisted or if the delay exceeded 14 days between 2 injections given at a dose of 20 mg/m(2), vinorelbine was definitively discontinued.

RESULTS

Between November 1997 and March 1999, 40 patients with a median age of 49 (range, 39-69) were enrolled. All of them had previously received anthracyclines and taxanes. Because of the delays in neutrophil recovery, the median dose intensity did not exceed 22.5 mg/m(2)/week (range, 11.25-30), and the initial planned dose of 30 mg/m(2)/week appeared unfeasible without G-CSF. The starting dose therefore was 25 mg/m(2)/week after the first 6 patients. Neutropenia led to fever in only three patients. Other severe toxicities were Grade 2-3 neuropathy (n = 5), Grade 2-3 ileus (n = 7), Grade 3 anemia (n = 4), and Grade 3 sepsis (n = 1). Objective responses were observed in 10 of 40 patients (25%), 7 of whom had visceral metastases and 4 who were refractory to taxanes (including 2 patients with liver involvement > 50%). The median time to failure was 6 months (range, 4-12) for responding patients. Disease stabilization was achieved in 9 patients (23%) for a median duration of 5 months (range, 4-6). The median survival duration for the whole population was 6 months (range, 2-18+).

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly vinorelbine is an active salvage therapy for metastatic breast carcinoma after failure with anthracyclines and taxanes, even in patients with taxane-refractory metastatic breast carcinoma. This confirms that vinorelbine and taxanes are not cross-resistant.

Drug interactions of paclitaxel and docetaxel and their relevance for the design of combination therapy

The taxanes' interaction with other anticancer drugs have been extensively investigated in in vitro and in animal models as well as in humans due to the outstanding antitumor activity in a broad range of malignancies. Paclitaxel and docetaxel are endowed of a rich and complex pharmacology whereby different pharmacodynamic effects are observed depending on the sequence of their administration in respect with the companion drug, and the type of drug that is combined. Pharmacokinetic interference is often but not always a basis of the pharmacodynamic effect. In addition, the vehicle of clinical formulation, especially Cremophor EL for paclitaxel, influence the pharmacological effect. Finally, new interaction based on as yet unknown mechanisms drive the two taxanes to multiple additive/synergistic relationships with new signal transduction drugs, such as modulators of the epidermal-growth-factor family of receptors and farnesyl-transferase inhibitors. The ongoing effort to better understanding such a rich pharmacology is worth continuing in view of designing new and better combinations of the taxanes.

The relevance of drug sequence in combination chemotherapy

The concept of combining chemotherapeutic agents to increase the cytotoxic efficacy has evolved greatly over the past several years. In the past, the rationale for combination chemotherapy centered on attacking different biochemical targets, overcoming drug resistance in heterogenous tumors, and increasing the dose-density of combination chemotherapy to take advantage of tumor growth kinetics. The overall goal was to improve clinical efficacy with acceptable clinical toxicity. It is now apparent that the sequence of drug administration can significantly enhance the therapeutic effect of chemotherapy. These sequence-dependent effects can be explained by chemotherapy-induced cell cycle perturbations, or by pharmacodynamic interactions between the agents in combination. In this review, we focus on drug combinations with taxanes and camptothecins, which we believe best illustrate the importance of the cell cycle and pharmacologic interactions in the sequential administration of chemotherapy. As our understanding of the cell cycle grows, our ability to appropriately sequence chemotherapy can have a great impact on the treatment of human cancers. Copyright 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

Vinorelbine combined with paclitaxel infused over 96 hours (VI-TA-96) for patients with metastatic breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Vinorelbine (VI) and paclitaxel (TA) are among the most active single agents in the treatment of patients with breast carcinoma, and both have microtubules as their cytotoxic target. This Phase I-II study combined these 2 agents and used a 96-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion of paclitaxel to maximize their cytotoxic activities.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic breast carcinoma who were previously treated with chemotherapy were administered increasing doses of a 96-hour paclitaxel i.v. infusion from Days 1 to 5, with a first fixed dose of vinorelbine (12.5 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 5) every 3 weeks. The dose of paclitaxel was then decreased starting from the previously established tolerated dose, and a second fixed dose of vinorelbine (15 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 5) was given. This identified 2 acceptable doses of paclitaxel (110 mg/m(2) with VI 12.5 mg/m(2) and 90 mg/m(2) with VI 15 mg/m(2)). The latter was used in the subsequent Phase II study.

RESULTS

For the 50 patients treated with any dose, the complete response (CR) and the CR plus partial response (PR) rates were, respectively, 14% and 48% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34-67%). When only the 27 patients treated with the Phase II dose were considered, the figures were, respectively, 11% and 52% (95% CI, 42-62%). The median time to progression was 26 weeks, and the median survival 51 weeks. The dose-limiting toxicity was febrile neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

At the dose schedule identified for the Phase II study, the VI-TA-96 combination has considerable antitumor activity; pharmacoeconomic interest (it requires about half the doses of the agents administered singly); no major toxicity, except G4 neutropenia; and no need for premedication. This combination may be recommended as one of the most effective therapeutic options for patients with metastatic breast carcinoma who were pretreated mainly with anthracycline-containing chemotherapy.