Phase I and subsequent phase II study of filgrastim (r-met-HuG-CSF) and dose intensified cyclophosphamide plus epirubicin in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and advanced solid tumors

Dose intensity in anthracycline-based chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: mature results of the randomised clinical trial ANZ 9311

PURPOSE

The separate impacts of dose and dose intensity of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer remain uncertain. The primary objective of this trial was to compare a short, high-dose, intensive course of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) with a longer conventional dose regimen delivering the same total dose of chemotherapy.

METHODS

This open label trial randomised 235 women with metastatic breast cancer to receive either high-dose epirubicin 150 mg/m² and cyclophosphamide 1500 mg/m² with filgrastim support every 3 weeks for 3 cycles (HDEC) or standard dose epirubicin 75 mg/m² and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m² every 3 weeks for 6 cycles (SDEC). Primary outcomes were time to progression, overall survival and quality of life.

RESULTS

In 118 patients allocated HDEC 90% of the planned dose was delivered, compared to 96% in the 117 participants allocated SDEC. There were no significant differences in the time to disease progression (5.7 vs. 5.8 months, P = 0.19) or overall survival (14.5 vs. 16.5 months, P = 0.29) between HDEC and SDEC, respectively. Patients on HDEC reported worse quality of life during therapy, but scores improved after completion to approximate those reported by patients allocated SDEC. Objective tumour response was recorded in 33 (28%) on HDEC and 42 patients (36%) on SDEC. HDEC produced more haematologic toxicity.

CONCLUSION

For women with metastatic breast cancer, disease progression, survival or quality of life were no better with high-dose intensity compared to standard dose EC chemotherapy. Australian Clinical Trials Registry registration number ACTRN12605000478617.

High-dose thiotepa, etoposide and carboplatin as conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with high-risk non-Hodgkin lymphoma

High-dose chemotherapy conditioning regimens followed by autologous stem cell transplantation generally provide good results in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. We have evaluated the effects of a high-dose regimen comprising thiotepa, etoposide and carboplatin. After debulking and mobilization with high-dose cyclophosphamide or other schedules, forty-five patients at various disease stages were conditioned with thiotepa, etoposide and carboplatin prior to autologous stem cell transplantation. The overall response rate was 77.8% (30 CR, 66.7%; 5 PR, 11.1%). Ten patients (22.2%) did not respond. Two patients (4.4%) died from transplant-related complications. The mean 5-year overall survival was 71.1%: 12 patients relapsed within the first 5 years of follow-up. The overall response rate and 5-year overall survival were better for patients with an International Prognostic Index (IPI) 1 at diagnosis than for those with IPI 2 and IPI 3 (P<0.005 for all). The thiotepa, etoposide and carboplatin conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in non-Hodgkin lymphoma has a good anti-lymphoma effect and provides encouraging results in terms of response to treatment and 5-year overall survival. Its good tolerance and acceptable toxicity suggest that it may a very useful in the management of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Dose-dense chemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma is a heterogeneous disease that represents the seventh leading cause of cancer death. Second-generation and third-generation chemotherapy regimens have only produced a marginal improvement in outcome over the administration of the cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone regimen in aggressive forms of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. This has led to the development of different strategies for improving disease-free and overall survival in this disease. Dose intensification achieved by condensing the intervals between each chemotherapy cycle is possible with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support, which reduces neutropenia and its complications. Clinical trials indicate that this strategy may improve the outcomes in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma, particularly elderly patients. Nurses can play a major role in the implementation of evidence-based supportive care strategies in clinical practice to ensure safe use of dose-dense chemotherapy regimens.

Chemotherapy dose intensity in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: is dose intensity an emerging paradigm for better outcomes?

BACKGROUND

Higher chemotherapy dose intensity has been studied as a way of improving the clinical outcomes in various malignancies, including non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).

METHODS

We reviewed clinical trials that have studied the relation between dose and response in cancer chemotherapy, the theory behind dose-intense chemotherapy, and the clinical results with dose-escalated and dose-dense therapy in aggressive NHL.

RESULTS

Myeloablative high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplantation produces higher 5-year survival rates than standard salvage chemotherapy in relapsed aggressive lymphoma, but its role as initial therapy is not yet clear. Nonmyeloablative dose-escalated chemotherapy is feasible with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support, but this approach does not improve outcomes. Dose-dense (14-day) CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) with G-CSF support produces better results than 21-day CHOP in patients with previously untreated aggressive lymphoma, without additional toxicity. The addition of etoposide to dose-dense CHOP may provide further benefits in younger patients. The addition of rituximab to G-CSF-supported dose-dense CHOP is feasible. Preliminary data suggest the feasibility of dose-dense chemotherapy for NHL with the once-per-cycle G-CSF, pegfilgrastim.

CONCLUSION

Dose-dense chemotherapy with G-CSF support produced better clinical outcomes in both younger and older patients. Phase 3 trials of dose-dense CHOP plus rituximab with CSF support are warranted.

Impact of five prophylactic filgrastim schedules on hematologic toxicity in early breast cancer patients treated with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide

PURPOSE

To evaluate the comparative efficacy of varying intensity schedules of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) support in preventing febrile neutropenia in early breast cancer patients treated with relatively high-dose epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide (EC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From October 1991 to April 1994, 506 stage I and II breast cancer patients were randomly assigned to receive, in a factorial 2 x 2 design, epirubicin 120 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 21 days for 4 cycles +/- lonidamine +/- G-CSF. The following five consecutive G-CSF schedules were tested every 100 randomly assigned patients: (1) 480 microg/d subcutaneously days 8 to 14; (2) 480 microg/d days 8, 10, 12, and 14; (3) 300 microg/d days 8 to 14; (4) 300 microg/d days 8, 10, 12, and 14; and (5) 300 microg/d days 8 and 12.

RESULTS

All of the G-CSF schedules covered the neutrophil nadir time. Schedule 5 was equivalent to the daily schedules (schedules 1 and 3) and to the alternate day schedules (schedules 2 and 4) with respect to incidence of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia (P = .79 and P = .89, respectively), rate of fever episodes (P = .84 and P = .77, respectively), incidence of neutropenic fever (P = .74 and P = .56, respectively), need of antibiotics (P = .77 and P = .88, respectively), and percentage of delayed cycles (P = .43 and P = .42, respectively). G-CSF had no significant impact on the delivered dose-intensity compared with the non-G-CSF arms.

CONCLUSION

In the adjuvant setting, the frequency of prophylactic G-CSF administration during EC could be curtailed to only two administrations (days 8 and 12) without altering outcome. This nonrandomized trial design provides support for evaluating alternative, less intense G-CSF schedules for women with early breast cancer.

Chemotherapy Dose Density in Early-Stage Breast Cancer and Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

Delivering standard-dose chemotherapy on schedule is important for survival in early-stage breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Trials of dose-escalated regimens, in which higher-than-standard doses of chemotherapy are used, have produced equivocal results. In contrast, dose-dense regimens, in which standard doses are given with shorter (usually 14-day) intervals between cycles, have been more efficacious than standard 21-day regimens in trials in both early-stage breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Furthermore, a shorter course of chemotherapy is likely to cause less disruption in patients' lives. Despite the evidence of the importance of maintaining chemotherapy dose intensity (the amount of drug administered/unit of time), undertreatment of patients with early-stage breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is common. Neutropenia is the primary dose-limiting toxicity of many chemotherapy regimens, and it is frequently managed by dose reductions and delays that decrease dose intensity. Colony-stimulating factors reduce the prevalence and severity of neutropenia and its complications, and their proactive use can improve adherence to the planned schedule of both standard-dose and dose-dense chemotherapy The promising results with dose-dense chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma indicate that it should be tested in patients with other chemosensitive tumors.

Filgrastim in patients with neutropenia: potential effects on quality of life

Treatment- and disease-related neutropenia are associated with a number of negative clinical effects such as febrile neutropenia, documented infection, hospitalisation for infection-related morbidity, infection-related mortality, and decreased ability to administer the planned chemotherapy dose on schedule. Reductions or delays in dosage have the ability to jeopardise the effectiveness of treatment by lowering response rates. Not only are clinical outcomes adversely affected, but these complications can have a negative influence on patient quality of life. Filgrastim is a haematopoietic growth factor that primarily acts to stimulate the proliferation and differentiation of neutrophil progenitor cells. Filgrastim is capable of reducing the incidence and severity of neutropenia and the complications that accompany it in patients with cancer or HIV infection. Although there are few data evaluating the effect of treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on quality of life, it is assumed that the benefits would be seen through both the reduction of treatment-related complications and the enhanced potential for long-term disease control. A new, longer-acting form of filgrastim is now available that has the potential to simplify the management of neutropenia and further improve patient quality of life by decreasing the number of necessary injections. Additional prospective controlled trials that contain quality-of-life issues as endpoints are needed.

Dose-escalation study of CHOP with or without prophylactic G-CSF in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND

CHOP is accepted as the gold standard for first line chemotherapy of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). A dose-escalation study of CHOP was conducted to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity profile of CHOP at three-week intervals with or without prophylactic recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rHuG-CSF) in patients with aggressive NHL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The doses of drugs were escalated from 50 mg/m2 to 70 mg/m2 for doxorubicin and from 750 mg/m2 to 2250 mg/m2 for cyclophosphamide, with conventional doses of vincristine and oral prednisolone. After the MTD was determined without rHuG-CSF, dose escalation was conducted with prophylactic rHuG-CSF.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients with NHL were enrolled into the study. The MTD without prophylactic rHuG-CSF was 70 mg/m2 of doxorubicin and 1250 mg/m2 of cyclophosphamide, with neutropenia as a dose-limiting toxicity. The MTD with prophylactic rHuG-CSF was 70 mg/m2 of doxorubicin and 2250 mg/m2 of cyclophosphamide. The overall response rate was 100% (76% complete response and 24% partial response). Progression-free survival and overall survival at five years were 45% and 66%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant dose escalation of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide was feasible with prophylactic rHuG-CSF. The efficacy of dose-escalated CHOP should be compared with that of standard CHOP.