Cancer patients as 'experts' in defining quality of life domains. A multicentre survey by the Italian Group for the Evaluation of Outcomes in Oncology (IGEO)

Quality of life in home-dwelling cancer patients aged 80 years and older: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Quality of Life (QoL) in elderly cancer patients is a topic that has been little explored. This systematic review aims to identify, assess, and report the literature on QoL in home-dwelling cancer patients aged 80 years and older and what QoL instruments have been used.

METHODS

We systematically searched the databases of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsykINFO, Scopus, Epistemonikos and Cinahl to identify studies of any design measuring QoL among home-dwelling cancer patients aged 80 years and older. We screened the titles and abstracts according to a predefined set of inclusion criteria. Data were systematically extracted into a predesigned data charting form, and descriptively analyzed. The included studies were assessed according to the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklists, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement (PRISMA) checklist was used to ensure rigor in conducting our investigations and reporting our findings. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021240170).

RESULTS

We included three studies that specifically analyze QoL outcomes in the subgroup of home-dwelling cancer patients aged 80 years and older, with a total of 833 participants having various cancer diagnoses. 193 of the participants included in these three studies were aged 80 years or more. Different generic and cancer-specific QoL instruments as well as different aims and outcomes were studied. All three studies used a diagnosis-specific instrument, but none of them used an age-specific instrument. Despite heterogeneity in cancer diagnoses, instruments used, and outcomes studied, QoL in home-dwelling cancer patients aged over 80 years old seems to be correlated with age, physical function, comorbidity, living alone, needing at-home care services, being in a poor financial situation and having a small social network.

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review revealed only three studies exploring QoL and its determinants in the specific subgroup of home-dwelling cancer patients aged 80 years and over. A gap in the knowledge base has been identified. Future studies of this increasingly important and challenging patient group must be emphasized. Subgroup analyses by age must be performed, and valid age and diagnosis specific QoL instruments must be used to generate evidence in this segment of the population.

Walking on thin ice: How cancer survivors manage disclosure at work

Purpose: Work issues for cancer survivors are often not addressed, although many individuals are diagnosed during central years of employment. To examine the impact of dynamic factors on how survivors navigate disclosure about cancer at work, a semi-structured focus group study was conducted with 27 survivors. Method: Grounded theory was implemented to develop a disclosure model. Results: The disclosure model illustrates pre-disclosure processes, processes during disclosing, and potential outcomes of disclosure, including how perceptions of safety and choice affect the outlet, structure, and the emotional, cognitive, social, and behavioral effects of disclosure. Conclusions: Survivors' disclosure experiences are influenced by a complex interaction of factors at the level of the individual, social support system, work environment, and healthcare system, with perceptions of choice as key points of intervention by psycho-oncology providers.

Evaluation of Quality of Life in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer by Means of the Thyroid-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaire: A 5-Year Longitudinal Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with malignancy suffer impairment of their quality of life (QoL). QoL has been evaluated in thyroid cancer patients. Since 2010, a new inventory, the thyroid-specific patient-reported outcome (ThyPRO) measure for benign thyroid disorders, has been available.

AIM

This study evaluated QoL longitudinally in patients with a history of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) by means of the ThyPRO questionnaire. Methods : From 2012 to 2016, QoL was evaluated yearly in 123 adult DTC patients by means of ThyPRO. The ThyPRO questionnaire consists of 13 scales on which higher scores represent greater impact on QoL in areas affected by thyroid pathology. Disease-specific morbidity due to possible inadequate L-T4 treatment was evaluated by means of the Billewicz scale (BS). The same examinations were conducted in 192 control subjects who had undergone surgery for benign thyroid pathology.

RESULTS

DTC and control subjects had similar scores on all but one scale; scores on the hyperthyroid symptoms scale were significantly higher in DTC patients than in controls. Over the 5 years, scores did not change significantly in the DTC group. Overall, QoL and BS scores showed a slight, but not significant, improvement during the study period in DTC patients. BMI impacted on several ThyPRO scales. No significant differences between genders were noted in DTC.

CONCLUSIONS

The ThyPRO questionnaire indicates that illness perception is similar after thyroidectomy for malign and benign pathology. Only a marginal improvement in QoL was noted in DTC subjects over the 5-year study period. In both groups, females showed a greater perception of illness than males.

Quality of life determinants in older patients with cancer: Results from a French prospective monocenter cohort

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to describe determinants of quality of life (QOL) quoted by vulnerable older patients with cancer and compare them with domains included in cancer-specific QOL questionnaires.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective, monocenter, observational study was performed in a French university hospital. Cancer patients Patients with cancer aged over 74 years were recruited when referred for an out-patient geriatric evaluation (n = 102). After geriatric assessment, they were invited to respond to open-ended questions, Q1: "For you, what is most important to have a good QOL?" Q2: "What could improve your QOL?" Q3: "What could worsen your QOL?" A Delphi process was conducted to categorize patient responses according to content analysis.

RESULTS

The most frequently patient-reported determinants for high quality of life were maintaining close ties with family/friends or social relations, autonomy for decision and mobility without depending on others, being in good health, not suffering from pain and the absence of problems concerning relatives. Global health status, physical functioning/mobility, social functioning and worries about others were the more frequently mentioned QOL domains related to the EORTC QLQ-C30 and ELD14 questionnaires. Some determinants of QOL were not linked to pre-defined domains, some others without a 100% consensus after the Delphi process, illustrating the subjectivity of QOL analysis by a single practitioner.

CONCLUSION

Patient interview with open-ended questions provides valuable supplementary information to QOL questionnaires, in order to personalize health related (cancer treatment, pain management…) and global (maintenance of autonomy and family/social relations…) assessment and intervention.

[Recommendations for the implementation of multi-professional staffs (MPS) in care services]

The context and constraints of modern medicine (hospital beds and caregivers' reductions, ambulatory shift, new therapeutic approaches, integration of supportive care…) combined with new societal and Health system changes (ageing population, chronic diseases, new requirements of the patients…) redefine the orientations of care and question professional practices. The participative approach (PA) as a model of team organization proposes solutions involving the skills of the various interacting caregivers and experimental knowledge and consideration of patient needs. The multi-professional staff (MPS) is a collaborative tool of this participative approach that federates a team around a health or care project personalized from the crosschecked eyes of care professionals and from a shared decision-making process. Its objective is to combine the improvement of quality of care with quality of life at work. It requires a transversal mindset of teams, intrinsic values and specific characteristics. Its organization is simple but requires some rules and we will develop the main steps to success. This article, which is the result of a joint reflection and experience of health professionals, shows the principles and wants to demonstrate the weakness of MPS. The interest of the French National Cancer Institute for this collaborative tool is an asset for further work in the perspective of generalization of MPS for all patients with chronic disease and not only for patients at palliative phase.

Women's Free-text Comments on their Quality of Life: An Exploratory Analysis from the UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trials for Early Breast Cancer

Aims

Exploratory analysis of patients' unsolicited written comments in the first 2 years of the Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trial quality of life study highlighted a potential effect of non-treatment-related problems on the ratings and interpretation of patient self-reported questionnaires. At 5 years of follow-up all eligible subjects were invited to write comments to further explore these findings.

Materials and methods

Using inductive qualitative methods informed by the exploratory analysis, comments were allocated to relevant themes. Key patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), clinical and demographic factors were collated for patients who did and did not comment at 5 years and comparisons between the groups explored.

Results

Of 2208 women completing baseline PROMs, 482 proffered comments from 0 to 24 months, forming nine distinct themes, including chronic conditions, life events and psychosocial concerns. At 5 years, 1041/1727 (60.3%) women contributed comments, of whom 500 randomly selected participants formed the sample for analysis. Findings revealed comorbidity, impaired physical functioning and psychosocial problems as key themes, with prevalent adverse effects from local and systemic treatments. Eight new themes emerged at 5 years, including ageing, concerns about future cancer and positive aspects of care. Women commenting were better educated, slightly older and more likely to have had chemotherapy compared with non-commenters. They had significantly worse PROM scores for global health and key quality of life domains relevant to the difficulties they revealed.

Conclusions

Difficult personal circumstances and other health concerns affected many women's PROM ratings at 5 years of follow-up, in addition to ongoing cancer treatment effects. Greater attention to multiple sources of distress and adversity could facilitate personalised care and aid interpretation of PROMs.

Is There Still a Role for the Uniscale Assessment of Quality of Life?

Aims and background

To obtain proof of external validity of the visual analogue scale and re-evaluate the use of this instrument in assessing cancer patients' quality of life.

Methods

Consecutive patients attending 79 Italian medical oncology and radiotherapy centers over a period of 1 week were asked to fill out both a questionnaire concerning the presence of 19 problems and a 100-mm linear visual analogue scale evaluating their quality of life. Quality of life was rated as “good” and “bad” when given a score of 70-100 and 0-30, respectively. Multifactorial logistic models were used where good and bad quality of life were correlated with explanatory variables including patient and disease characteristics and the presence or absence of the 19 problems.

Results

Gender, level of education, treatment setting, Karnofsky performance status, disease extent, and the presence of 12 out of 19 problems were found to be correlated with good quality of life. A similar pattern of correlations was found with bad quality of life.

Conclusions

Due to the difficulties in attaining reliable assessment of quality of life using psychometric questionnaires, the further proof of validity obtained in this study allows us to propose the re-evaluation of the role of the uniscale in measuring the quality of life of cancer patients.

Quality-of-Life Priorities in Patients with Thyroid Cancer: A Multinational European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Phase I Study

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to determine quality of life (QoL) issues that are relevant to thyroid cancer patients cross-culturally, and to identify those with highest relevance to them in addition to the more general issues covered by the core European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30).

METHODS

A systematic literature search provided a list of potentially relevant QoL issues to supplement the core questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30, which is widely used in research and in care and addresses QoL issues relevant to all groups of cancer patients. A panel of experts revised this list, and thyroid cancer patients rated the issues regarding their relevance for QoL by selecting the 25 issues that they would include in a thyroid cancer-specific QoL module.

RESULTS

The literature search and expert discussion provided a list of 71 QoL issues that was rated by thyroid cancer patients (n = 110) from seven countries. All issues were of high priority to at least some of the patients. The most frequently selected issues were sudden attacks of tiredness, exhaustion, quality of sleep, employment, social support, fear of cancer progression, fear of second operation, difficulties swallowing, and globus sensation.

CONCLUSIONS

Thyroid cancer patients cross-culturally rate fatigue-related issues as highly important for their QoL, calling for increased efforts to find successful treatments for this problem. Vocational rehabilitation is also highly relevant for them and should therefore be an important aim of multidisciplinary care. The third important area of concern is psychological issues, especially fear of progression and of additional treatments.

Exercise intervention in people with cancer undergoing neoadjuvant cancer treatment and surgery: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant cancer treatment decreases physical fitness. Low levels of physical fitness are associated with poor surgical outcome. Exercise training can stimulate skeletal muscle adaptations, such as increased mitochondrial content and improved oxygen uptake capacity that may contribute to improving physical fitness. This systematic review evaluates the evidence in support of exercise training in people with cancer undergoing the "dual hit" of neoadjuvant cancer treatment and surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic database search of Embase Ovid, Ovid Medline without Revisions, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Library and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify trials addressing the effect of exercise training in people scheduled for neoadjuvant cancer treatment and surgery. Data extraction and analysis were based on a pre-defined plan.

RESULTS

The database search yielded 6489 candidate abstracts. Ninety-four references included the required terms. Four studies were eligible for inclusion (breast cancer, locally advanced rectal cancer). All studies reported that exercise training was safe and feasible and that adherence rates were acceptable (66-96%). In-hospital exercise training improves physical fitness however the impact on HRQoL and other clinical important outcomes was uncertain.

CONCLUSION

This is the first systematic review of the effects of exercise training in people scheduled for "dual-hit" treatment. This evidence synthesis indicates that this approach is safe and feasible but that there are insufficient controlled trials in this area to draw reliable conclusions about the efficacy of such an intervention, the optimal characteristics of the intervention, or the impact on clinical or patient reported outcomes.

Exercise intervention in people with cancer undergoing adjuvant cancer treatment following surgery: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Remaining physically active during and after cancer treatment is known to improve associated adverse effects, improve overall survival and reduce the probability of relapse. This systematic review addresses the question: is an exercise training programme beneficial in people with cancer undergoing adjuvant cancer treatment following surgery.

METHODS

A systematic database search of Embase, Ovid, Medline without Revisions, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov for any randomised controlled trials (RCT) or non-RCT addressing the effect of an exercise training programme in those having adjuvant cancer treatment following surgery was conducted.

RESULTS

The database search yielded 6489 candidate abstracts of which 94 references included the required terms. A total of 17 articles were included in this review. Exercise training is safe and feasible in the adjuvant setting and furthermore may improve measures of physical fitness and health related quality of life (HRQoL).

CONCLUSION

This is the first systematic review on exercise training interventions in people with cancer undergoing adjuvant cancer treatment following surgery. Due to the lack of adequately powered RCTs in this area, it remains unclear whether exercise training in this context improves clinical outcomes other physical fitness and HRQoL. It remains unclear what is the optimal timing of initiation of an exercise programme and what are the best combinations of elements within an exercise training programme to optimise training efficacy. Furthermore, it is unclear if initiating such exercise programmes at cancer diagnosis may have a long-lasting effect on physically activity throughout the subsequent life course.

MS-20, a chemotherapeutical adjuvant, reduces chemo-associated fatigue and appetite loss in cancer patients

A small pilot study of the fermented soybean extract MicrSoy-20(MS-20) demonstrated its ability to restore chemotherapy-induced immunosuppression and improve quality of life (QoL). This randomized, cross-over, comparative trial was conducted to confirm the effects of MS-20 on QoL and to understand its underlying mechanism when used in conjunction with chemotherapy. One hundred forty-three patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy were randomly assigned to 2 groups. Group 1 was administered MS-20 for 1 wk followed by 3 wk of concomitant MS-20 plus chemotherapy. Group 2 was administered chemotherapy for 3 wk. QoL was assessed by the EORTC/QLQ-C30 questionnaire and visual analogue scales (VAS). Changes in immunological parameters and antioxidant profiles were also examined. Significant increases were observed in EORTC/QLQ-C30 scores for physical (4.45, P = 0.023) and social (3.99, P = 0.023) functioning in Group 1 patients compared to Group 2 patients. VAS scores for fatigue and appetite loss significantly improved with MS-20 treatment (P < 0.001). Group 1 patients exhibited smaller decreases in peripheral blood mononuclear cells compared to Group 2 patients (P = 0.026). Other immunological parameters, antioxidant, and safety profiles were not significantly different between treatment groups. Addition of MS-20 as an adjuvant to chemotherapy can be effective in improving QoL for cancer patients.

Patients' perceptions of quality of life during active treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer: the importance of preoperative exercise

PURPOSE

The purpose of this longitudinal study was to explore advanced rectal cancer patients' perceptions of quality of life (QoL) during participation in a pre-surgery structured exercise program.

METHODS

Patients (n = 10) participated in repeated semi-structured in-depth interviews which covered four broad QoL domains (i.e., physical, psychological, social, and spiritual well-being). Patients' personal accounts of QoL were explored prior to (0 weeks), midway (3 weeks), and at completion (6 weeks) of the program. Data were analyzed using strategies grounded in a phenomenological approach.

RESULTS

Participation in the program facilitated positive changes in QoL over time by (1) fostering a greater sense of vitality, (2) cultivating a positive attitude, (3) enhancing social connections, and (4) fostering a strong sense of purpose in life for these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these data, preoperative exercise programs can be effective in promoting QoL among patients diagnosed and treated for locally advanced rectal cancer during a particularly difficult time in the cancer trajectory. Additional research is needed to develop and evaluate implementation strategies to facilitate the delivery of preoperative exercise programs as part of routine care in this population.

Patients' and Health Care Providers' Evaluation of Quality of Life Issues in Advanced Cancer Using Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Palliative Care Module (FACIT-Pal) Scale

Background

To examine the agreement of Health Care Providers (HCPs) and patients’ evaluation of quality of life on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness therapy - Palliative care module (FACIT-Pal) scale.

Methods

Sixty advanced cancer patients and fifty-six health care providers involved in their care at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre completed a modified version of the FACIT- Pal. In the survey, patients and HCPs indicated the 10 top issues affecting the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer most profoundly. The percentage of participants selecting each item as one of their 10 most relevant items was calculated in HCPs and patients.

Results

There were differences in relative rankings of QOL issues among patients and HCPs. Among the top 10 items which were identified from both patients and HCPs, there were differences in the rankings. Patients ranked emotional support from family (40.9%) as most important followed by pain (38.6%), lack of energy (31.8%) and able to enjoy life (29.6%). HCPs ranked in the following order: pain (73.2%), lack of energy (63.4%), nausea (51.2%) and dyspnea (51.2%) whereas patients rated nausea at 18.2 % and dyspnea at 9.09%.

Conclusion

There is a discrepancy between scores of patients and HCPs as they may prioritize differently. HCPs tended to put more emphasis on physical symptoms, whereas patients had emotional and global issues as priorities.

Quality of life of women undergoing chemotherapy for a gynaecological oncological disease in Turkey

AIM

Studies have shown effects of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy on quality of life in cases of gynaecological cancer. Very few studies are available examining the quality of life of individuals in Turkey who have been diagnosed with gynaecological cancer and undergoing treatment.

METHOD

This study was performed to evaluate the quality of life of such patients using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 Quality of Life Index. Chi-square Yates, Mann-Whitney-U tests and variance analysis used for statistical analizing.

RESULTS

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 Quality of Life Index mean points for "general well-being and quality of life" of the patients were found to be 60.5 ± 25.0. In the sub-groups of the Quality of Life Index determined fatigue (60.1 ± 24.8), economic difficulties (46.9 ± 33.3), pain and loss of appetite (42.9 ± 27.8; 42.9 ± 34.0) and insomnia (40.1 ± 34.0) were the symptoms most reported to have a negative effect on quality of life. Statistical significance was noted for marital status and income status (p<0.05) but not educational level.

CONCLUSION

Determination of quality of life of women with a diagnosis of gynaecological oncological disease who are undergoing chemotherapy enables provision of a more comprehensive and higher quality of care.

Somatically ill persons' self-nominated quality of life domains: review of the literature and guidelines for future studies

OBJECTIVE

To review which domains somatically ill persons nominate as constituting their QoL. Specific objective is to examine whether the method of enquiry affect these domains.

METHODS

We conducted two literature searches in the databases PubMed/Medline, CINAHL and Psychinfo for qualitative studies examining patients' self-defined QoL domains using (1) SEIQoL and (2) study-specific questions. For each database, two researchers independently assessed the eligibility of the retrieved abstracts and three researchers subsequently classified all QoL domains.

RESULTS

Thirty-six eligible papers were identified: 27 studies using the SEIQoL, and nine presenting data derived from study-specific questions. The influence of the method of enquiry on patients' self-nominated QoL domains appears limited: most domains were presented in both types of studies, albeit with different frequencies.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides a comprehensive overview of somatically ill persons' self-nominated QoL domains. However, limitations inherent to reviewing qualitative studies (e.g., the varying level of abstraction of patients' self-defined QoL domains), limitations of the included studies and limitations inherent to the review process, hinder cross-study comparisons. Therefore, we provide guidelines to address shortcomings of qualitative reports amenable to improvement and to stimulate further improvement of conducting and reporting qualitative research aimed at exploring respondents' self-nominated QoL domains.

Patients' and health care professionals' evaluation of health-related quality of life issues in bone metastases

The objective of this study was to examine the agreement between health care professionals' (HCPs) and patients' evaluation of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) issues for cancer patients with bone metastases. A total of 413 patients and 152 HCPs were interviewed across five centres worldwide. Mean scores were almost always higher for HCPs than for patients. Patients and HCPs agreed that four issues affect HRQOL of bone metastases patients profoundly: 'long-term (chronic) pain', 'difficulty in carrying out usual daily tasks', 'able to perform self-care' and 'able to perform role functioning'. A substantial difference was found with respect to the perceived importance of psychosocial and somatic issues. Patients emphasised psychosocial issues with a particular focus on 'worry' about loss of mobility, dependence on others and disease progression, HCPs however rated 'symptom' issues as more important, specifically those related to 'pain'. In conclusion, patients and HCPs agreed that pain and physical/role functioning are important to the HRQOL of cancer patients with bone metastases, but patients also emphasized the importance of psychosocial issues to HRQOL. This information has been an important component in the development of a health-related quality of life questionnaire for patients with bone metastases (EORTC QLQ-BM 22).

Comparison of proposed diagnostic criteria with FACT-F and VAS for cancer-related fatigue: proposal for use as a screening tool

The objective was to validate the use of the proposed International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (10th revision) (ICD-10) criteria for fatigue (P-ICD10) through comparison with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Fatigue (FACT-F) subscale and three visual analogue scale (VAS) qualities in cancer patients thought to be fatigued. Fatigue was assessed in 834 cancer patients at three clinical centres in Belgium, using P-ICD10, FACT-F, and VAS to assess: level of energy (VAS1), quality of life (VAS2), and ability to perform daily activities (VAS3). Of the 834 interviewed cancer patients, 54% were classified as fatigued by the P-ICD10 criteria. Internal consistency of P-ICD10 was very good (alpha coefficient 0.82). The principal component analysis corroborated good internal consistency with all variables included in the first component; a second component was used to identify psychological fatigue (concentration and short-term memory disabilities). An abridged set of screening tools based on the first three general symptoms of the P-ICD10 is proposed with 100% specificity and 86% specificity, respectively. There was a marked decrease in FACT-F and VAS1 scores in patients diagnosed as fatigued by the P-ICD10 (mean+/-SD, FACT-F 20+/-9 vs 39+/-8, VAS1 34+/-21 vs 61+/-21). A logistic regression model between P-ICD10 criteria diagnosis and FACT-F (VAS1) identified a score of 34 (61) on the FACT-F scale as a proposed cut-off point for the diagnosis of fatigue. The ICD-10 criteria can be recommended as a diagnostic tool, whereas the FACT-F scale and the level of energy 100-mm VAS assess the intensity of fatigue, and are more suitable for follow-up of cancer-related fatigue.

Individual quality of life in long-term survivors of Hodgkin's lymphoma--a comparative study

This study aimed to use an individual approach in evaluating QoL in long-term survivors of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and their view of what impact the disease has had on life using an extended version of the The Schedule for the Evaluation of the Individual quality of life-Direct Weighting (SEIQoL-DW). Adult long-term survivors from HL (n = 121) were compared with a randomly selected sample of the general population in Stockholm (n = 236). The results showed that the most commonly nominated areas (> 50% of patients and controls) important in life were family, personal health, work and relations to other people. The HL survivors mentioned leisure and finances less frequently than the controls. However, neither the current status in the different areas nor the QoL index score differed between survivors and controls. Thoughts and worries around disease, fatigue and loss of energy and late effects on skin and mucous membrane were the most commonly reported problems following HL. Sixty-six percent of the survivors reported a change in their view of life and of themselves. Demographic and disease characteristics did not influence the ratings of the chosen areas. In conclusion, long-term survivors of HL seem to have adapted well to the situation of having had a life-threatening disease and undergoing treatment, as measured with SEIQoL-DW. The extended Swedish version with a disease-specific module could be of great value when identifying specific issues that are important for the patient at time of evaluation.

Symptoms affecting quality of life in women with gynecologic cancer

OBJECTIVES

To review quality-of-life issues in women diagnosed with gynecologic cancers.

DATA SOURCES

Research studies, review articles, and medical and nursing text-books.

CONCLUSIONS

Women diagnosed with gynecologic cancers carry a heavy physical and emotional burden because of surgical morbidity, chemotherapy toxicities, loss of fertility, changes in body image, sexual concerns, and altered relationships.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Health care providers play a key role in the identification and treatment of the complications of cancer therapy. Minimizing the effect of the symptoms of gynecologic cancer may positively impact the patient's quality of life.