A phase I trial of the oral platinum analogue JM216 with concomitant radiotherapy in advanced malignancies of the chest

Advances in oral delivery of anti-cancer prodrugs

INTRODUCTION

Most anticancer drugs have poor aqueous solubility and low permeability across the gastrointestinal tract. Furthermore, extensive efflux by P-glycoproteins (P-gp) in the small intestine also limits the efficient delivery of anticancer drugs via oral route. Area covered: This review explores the prodrug strategy for oral delivery of anticancer drugs. Different categories of oral anticancer prodrugs along with recent clinical studies have been comprehensively reviewed here. Furthermore, novel anticancer prodrugs such as polymer-prodrugs and lipid-prodrugs have been discussed in detail. Finally, various nanocarrier-based approaches employed for oral delivery of anticancer prodrugs have also been discussed. Expert opinion: Premature degradation of anticancer prodrugs in the gastrointestinal tract could lead to variable pharmacokinetics and undesired toxicity. Despite their increased aqueous solubility, the oral bioavailability of several anticancer prodrugs are limited by their poor permeability across the gastrointestinal tract. These limitations can be overcome by the use of functional excipients (polymers, lipids, amino acids/dipeptides), which are specifically absorbed via transporters and receptor-mediated endocytosis. Oral delivery of anticancer prodrugs using nanocarrier-based drug delivery system is a recent development; however it should be justified based on the comparative advantages of encapsulating prodrug in a nanocarrier versus the use of anticancer prodrug molecule itself.

An open-label, dose-finding study of the combination of satraplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

Purpose: Satraplatin is a third generation oral platinum, which has demonstrated antitumor activity. The aim of this phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of satraplatin and gemcitabine in patients previously treated with chemotherapy and in patients without prior chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: Two separate MTDs were planned in two different patient groups (those with and without prior chemotherapy treatment). Dose escalations were planned in cohorts of three patients. Tumor measurements were obtained every two cycles. Assessment of response was performed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST criteria v.1.0). Results: Thirty subjects were enrolled. A MTD of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² days 1 and 8 plus satraplatin 60 mg/m² days 1–3, every 21 days was determined in the prior chemotherapy group. No MTD could be determined for the no prior chemotherapy group treated with this schedule. Five patients completed 12 treatment cycles; 22 serious adverse events (SAE) were observed. Although not an entry criteria, overall confirmed response was observed in 17 (24%) evaluable patients (complete response, CR = 1 and partial response, PR = 3) and in 3/7 (43%) patients with measure prostate cancer lesions. Conclusions: In this phase Ib study, the combination of satraplatin and gemcitabine demonstrated to be safe and efficacious in particular in patients with prostate cancer.

Phase I study of the effects of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and safety of satraplatin in patients with refractory solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Satraplatin is an oral platinum analog with demonstrated activity in a range of malignancies. The current study was designed to evaluate the effect of varying degrees of renal impairment on the safety and pharmacokinetics (PKs) of satraplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced solid tumors, refractory to standard therapies, were eligible. The study included four cohorts of patients with varying levels of renal function, and eight patients per cohort: Group 1 (G1) = normal renal function; G2 = mild renal impairment [creatinine clearance (CrCl) 50-80 ml/min]; G3 = moderate impairment (CrCl 30 to <50 ml/min); G4 = severe impairment (CrCl <30 ml/min). Satraplatin was administered orally at 80 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-5 every 35 days.

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients were enrolled, 8 patients in each renal function group. Each group tolerated the dose of 80 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-5 every 35 days without the need for dose deescalation. The most common adverse events were fatigue (63%), nausea (56%), diarrhea (53%), anorexia (47%), constipation (38%), vomiting (28%), anemia, dyspnea, and thrombocytopenia (25%). There were no dose-limiting toxic effects in any study group. There was increased exposure to plasma platinum and plasma ultrafiltrate platinum in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

Satraplatin PKs was altered in patients with renal impairment. However, a corresponding increase in satraplatin-related toxic effects was not observed.

Current status and future prospects for satraplatin, an oral platinum analogue

Platinum drugs are major chemotherapeutic agents that are used alone or in combination with other systemic agents and/or radiation therapy in the management of many human malignancies. All three platinum drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration, cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin, are administrated intravenously. Satraplatin is the first orally administered platinum drug under active clinical investigation. Satraplatin and its major metabolite, JM118, have shown antineoplastic activity in in vitro, in vivo, and in clinical settings. Use of satraplatin as an alternative platinum cytotoxic agent is particularly attractive because of the convenience of administration, milder toxicity profile, lack of cross-resistance with cisplatin, theoretical advantage as a radiosensitizer, and activity in cancers historically nonresponsive to platinum drugs. The most mature clinical data for satraplatin come from the recently completed phase III trial that investigated the efficacy of satraplatin and prednisone on hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients who had failed a course of other chemotherapy agents. Preliminary reports show that the combination is statistically superior to placebo and prednisone in multiple end points, including progression-free survival, prostate-specific antigen response, objective tumor response, pain response, and duration of pain response. The difference in overall survival, however, did not reach statistical significance.

Broadening the clinical use of platinum drug-based chemotherapy with new analogues. Satraplatin and picoplatin

The three platinum-containing drugs that have been thus far approved by the FDA - cisplatin, carboplatin and oxaliplatin - have had a significant effect in the treatment of patients with some malignancies such as testicular, ovarian and colorectal cancer. However, much more remains to be achieved to widen the therapeutic use of this important class of drug, either via further analogue development or by judicious use of combining the existing drugs with new molecularly targeted agents. Two analogues arising from an academic (Institute of Cancer Research)/pharmaceutical (Johnson Matthey/AnorMed) collaboration - satraplatin (JM-216) and picoplatin (JM-/AMD-473) - have recently shown promising clinical activity; satraplatin (an orally available drug) in hormone-refractory prostate cancer and picoplatin in small-cell lung cancer. There have also been advances in delivery vehicles for platinum drugs (e.g., the diaminocyclohexane [DACH]-based AP-5346 and aroplatin/liposomal cis-bis-neodecanoato-trans-(R,R)-1,2-diaminocyclohexane platinum (II) [L-NDDP] are in early clinical development). Platinum-based drugs have also been successfully combined with molecularly targeted drugs (e.g., the recent approval of the vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody bevacizumab with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with NSCLC).

Satraplatin in Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer and Other Tumour Types

Satraplatin is the first orally administered platinum drug to be evaluated in the clinic. Oral satraplatin plus prednisone improved progression free survival significantly relative to prednisone alone in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer in a randomised study. Furthermore, single-agent satraplatin has demonstrated activity in ovarian cancer and small cell lung cancer similar to that observed with single-agent cisplatin or carboplatin. In >600 treated patients, satraplatin was generally well tolerated and the most common adverse event was non-cumulative myelosuppression.

Satraplatin: an orally available platinum analog for the treatment of cancer

Satraplatin is a novel, orally bioavailable, platinum anticancer drug. Platinum analogs form the mainstay of treatment for a number of cancers, including lung, ovarian, colorectal and head and neck cancer. A disadvantage of the currently marketed platinum analogs is that they must all be administered via intravenous infusion. In addition, their utility is often limited by toxicity, particularly neurotoxicity, ototoxicity and renal toxicity. Satraplatin has preclinical antitumor activity comparable with that of cisplatin and, clinically, has a more manageable side-effect profile. Satraplatin is active in lung, ovarian and prostate cancer, and appears to have good efficacy in combination with radiation for lung and head and neck cancer. Preclinical data suggest it may also be effective for the treatment of certain cisplatin-refractory tumors. A large, randomized Phase III trial is currently evaluating satraplatin in combination with prednisone for the treatment of patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer whose disease has progressed following prior systemic therapy. Positive results from this trial would support regulatory approval for satraplatin for this indication. The availability of an active oral platinum agent, such as satraplatin, with few of the serious toxicities associated with traditional intravenous platinum compounds makes satraplatin an alternative to other platinum agents and a new treatment option in the oncologist's armamentarium.

New-generation platinum drugs in the treatment of cisplatin-resistant cancers

Platinum drugs with altered stable ligands, such as oxaliplatin and satraplatin, produce a different DNA-adduct profile to cisplatin. This results in a distinct therapeutic profile, and clinical trials with these agents demonstrate significant anticancer activity in diseases with inherent or acquired resistance to cisplatin, such as colorectal and prostate cancers as well as previously treated ovarian and germ-cell cancer. An alternative approach to increasing the efficacy associated with platinum therapy is to enhance tumour delivery by coupling platinum drugs with a polymer or encapsulating the agent in a liposome. The early clinical trials of these novel delivery formulations are promising but, as yet, have not confirmed that the delivery of platinum to the tumour cell DNA is increased.

Synthesis, characterization and antitumor activity of novel octahedral Pt(IV) complexes

Novel platinum(IV) complexes were synthesized having octahedral structure for new antitumor agents. The series of (1,4-butanediamine)Pt(IV) complexes of the type trans,cis-[PtA(2)Cl(2)(1,4-butanediamine)] (A=hydroxo 9, acetato 12, trifluoroacetato 13 as axial ligands) and trans-[PtA(2)(malonate)(1,4-butanediamine)] (A=hydroxo 16, acetato 17, trifluoroacetato 18) were synthesized and characterized by IR, NMR and elemental analysis. The molecular structures of 12, 13 and 18 have been determined by X-ray diffraction methods. The crystals are monoclinic, P2 1/c with a=21.165 (5), b=9.050 (3), c=15.293 (3) A, beta=103.89 (2) degrees and Z=8 for 12, a=10.178 (5), b=12.894 (9), c=12.182 (8) A, beta=91.01 (5) degrees and Z=4 for 13 and a=10.460 (5), b=11.199 (8), c=15.641 (7) A, beta=98.41 (5) degrees, Z=4 for 18. Three crystallographically independent molecules of 12, 13 and 18 have octahedral coordination around Pt(IV) cation. The trans,cis-[PtA(2)Cl(2)(1,4-butanediamine)] were prepared by acetylation or trifluoroacetylation of trans,cis-[Pt(OH)(2)Cl(2)(1,4-butanediamine)]. The trans-[PtA(2)malonate(1,4-butanediamine)] 17 and 18 was prepared by a similar method. The in vitro cytotoxicity of theses Pt(IV) complexes have been evaluated against 12 cancer cell lines assayed by MTS method. The IC(50) values of the compounds 12 and 13 were shown to be lower than those of cisplatin. The in vivo antitumor activity of the Pt(IV) complexes was evaluated using mice bearing L1210 leukemia, B16 melanoma and L1210/cis-DDP cancer animal models. The compound 18 was found to highest activity against cisplatin-resistant cancer cells, L1210/cis-DDP, in vivo.