Differential effects of citrate versus PPACK anticoagulation on measured platelet inhibition by abciximab, eptifibatide and tirofiban

Application of Auxiliary VerifyNow Point-of-Care Assays to Assess the Pharmacodynamics of RUC-4, a Novel αIIbβ3 Receptor Antagonist

Introduction  Prehospital therapy of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with αIIbβ3 antagonists improves clinical outcomes, but they are difficult to use in prehospital settings. RUC-4 is a novel αIIbβ3 antagonist being developed for prehospital therapy of STEMI that rapidly achieves high-grade platelet inhibition after subcutaneous administration. Standard light transmission aggregometry (LTA) is difficult to perform during STEMI, so we applied VerifyNow (VN) assays to assess the pharmacodynamics of RUC-4 relative to aspirin and ticagrelor.

Methods  Blood from healthy volunteers was anticoagulated with phenylalanyl-prolyl-arginyl chloromethyl ketone (PPACK) or sodium citrate, treated in vitro with RUC-4, aspirin, and/or ticagrelor, and tested with the VN ADP + PGE ₁ , iso-TRAP, and base channel (high concentration iso-TRAP + PAR-4 agonist) assays. The results were correlated with both ADP (20 µM)-induced LTA and flow cytometry measurement of receptor occupancy and data from individuals treated in vivo with RUC-4.

Results  RUC-4 inhibited all three VN assays, aspirin did not affect the assays, and ticagrelor markedly inhibited the ADP + PGE ₁ assay, slightly inhibited the iso-TRAP assay, and did not inhibit the base channel assay. RUC-4's antiplatelet effects were potentiated in citrate compared with PPACK. Cut-off values were determined to correlate the results of the VN iso-TRAP and base channel assays with 80% inhibition of LTA.

Conclusion  The VN assays can differentiate the early potent anti-αIIbβ3 effects of RUC-4 from delayed effects of P2Y12 antagonists in the presence of aspirin. These pharmacodynamic assays can help guide the clinical development of RUC-4 and potentially be used to monitor RUC-4's effects in clinical practice.

Electrical impedance vs. light transmission aggregometry: Testing platelet reactivity to antiplatelet drugs using the MICELI POC impedance aggregometer as compared to a commercial predecessor

BACKGROUND

Patients' responses to antiplatelet therapy significantly vary, with individuals showing high residual platelet reactivity associated with thrombosis. To personalize thrombosis management, platelet function testing has been suggested as a promising tool able to monitor the antithrombotic effect of antiplatelet agents in real-time. We have prototyped the MICELI, a miniature and easy-to-use electrical impedance aggregometer (EIA), measuring platelet aggregation in whole blood. Here, we tested the capability of the MICELI aggregometer to quantify platelet reactivity on antiplatelet agents, as compared with conventional light-transmission aggregometry (LTA).

METHODS

Platelet aggregation in ACD-anticoagulated whole blood and platelet-rich plasma of healthy donors (n = 30) was evaluated. The effect of clopidogrel, ticagrelor, cangrelor, cilostazol, and tirofiban on ADP-induced aggregation was tested, while aspirin was evaluated with arachidonic acid and collagen. Platelet aggregation was recorded using the MICELI or BioData PAP-8E (Bio/Data Corp.) aggregometers.

RESULTS

The MICELI aggregometer detected an adequate and comparable dose-dependent decrease of platelet aggregation in response to increments of drugs' concentrations, as compared to LTA (the inter-device R² = 0.79-0.93). Platelet aggregation in platelet-rich plasma recorded by LTA showed higher sensitivity to antiplatelet agents, but it couldn't distinguish between different drug doses as indicated by saturation of the aggregatory response.

CONCLUSION

Platelet aggregation in whole blood as recorded by EIA represents a better model system for evaluation of platelet reactivity as compared with platelet aggregation in platelet-rich plasma as recorded by LTA, since EIA takes into consideration the modulatory effect of other blood cells on platelet hemostatic function and pharmacodynamics of antiplatelet drugs in vivo. As such, the MICELI impedance aggregometer could be potentially employed for the point-of-care monitoring of platelet function in patients on-treatment for personalized tailoring of their antiplatelet regimen.

The potency of selatogrel, a reversible antagonist of the P2Y12 receptor, is affected by calcium concentration

Here, we report the in vitro characterization of the P2Y12 receptor antagonist selatogrel (ACT-246475). Binding studies with radiolabeled selatogrel demonstrated that selatogrel is a competitive antagonist of ADP binding to the P2Y12 receptor with a fast onset of action. Consequently, selatogrel was confirmed to be a potent inhibitor of P2Y12-mediated intra-platelet signaling and ADP-induced platelet activation. Characterization of selatogrel in platelet-rich plasma in vitro demonstrated that the mode of anti-coagulation affected the anti-platelet potency. Specifically, in platelet-rich plasma containing physiological calcium concentration (anticoagulated with a direct thrombin inhibitor), selatogrel achieved half-maximal inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation at a 3-fold lower concentration than in conditions with low calcium concentration (anticoagulated with citrate). Furthermore, calcium-dependent reduction in selatogrel potency was observed in whole blood platelet aggregation using the VerifyNow™ system with a 3.7-fold potency loss in low calcium conditions. A comparable potency loss was also observed with the reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonists ticagrelor, cangrelor and elinogrel. Furthermore, receptor-binding experiments using radiolabeled selatogrel confirmed a 3-fold lowering of selatogrel binding affinity to the P2Y12 receptor in low calcium conditions. In conclusion, our data suggest that in low calcium conditions (i.e., citrate-anticoagulated blood), there is a risk of underestimating the potency of reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonists. To avoid overdosing, and a potential increase in bleeding risk, we propose that the ex vivo evaluation of reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonists should be performed with platelet assay systems containing physiological calcium concentration.

Preclinical Studies of RUC-4, a Novel Platelet αIIbβ3 Antagonist, in Non-Human Primates and With Human Platelets

Introduction

We are developing the novel αIIbβ3 antagonist, RUC-4, for subcutaneously (SC)-administered first-point-of-medical-contact treatment for ST Segment Elevated Myocardial Infarction (STEMI).

Methods

We studied the: 1. pharmacokinetics (PK) of RUC-4 at 1.0, 1.93, and 3.86 mg/kg IV, IM, and SC in non-human primates (NHPs); 2. impact of aspirin on RUC-4 IC₅₀ in human platelet-rich plasma (PRP); 3. effect of different anticoagulants on the RUC-4 IC₅₀ in human PRP; and 4. relationship between αIIbβ3 receptor blockade by RUC-4 and inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation.

Results

1. All doses of RUC-4 were well tolerated, but animals demonstrated variable temporary bruising. IM and SC RUC-4 reached dose-dependent peak levels within 5-15 min, with T_½ s between 0.28 and 0.56 hrs. Platelet aggregation studies in NHPs receiving IM RUC-4 demonstrated >80% inhibition of the initial slope of ADP-induced aggregation with all 3 doses 30 minutes post-dosing, with subsequent dose-dependent loss of inhibition over 4-5 hours. 2. The RUC-4 IC₅₀ for ADP-induced platelet aggregation was unaffected by aspirin treatment (40±9 nM vs. 37±5 nM; p=0.39). 3. The RUC-4 IC₅₀ was significantly higher in PRP prepared from PPACK-anticoagulated blood compared to citrate-anticoagulated blood using either TRAP (122±17 vs. 66±25 nM; p=0.05; n=4) or ADP (102±22 vs. 54±13; p<0.001; n=5). 4. There was a close correspondence between receptor blockade and inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation, with aggregation inhibition beginning with ~40% receptor blockade and becoming nearly complete at >80% receptor blockade.

Discussion

Based on these results and others, RUC-4 has now progressed to formal preclinical toxicology studies.

RUC-4: a novel αIIbβ3 antagonist for prehospital therapy of myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

Treatment of myocardial infarction within the first 1 to 2 hours with a thrombolytic agent, percutaneous coronary intervention, or an αIIbβ3 antagonist decreases mortality and the later development of heart failure. We previously reported on a novel small molecule αIIbβ3 antagonist, RUC-2, that has a unique mechanism of action. We have now developed a more potent and more soluble congener of RUC-2, RUC-4, designed to be easily administered intramuscularly by autoinjector to facilitate its use in the prehospital setting. Here, we report the properties of RUC-4 and the antiplatelet and antithrombotic effects of RUC-2 and RUC-4 in animal models.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

RUC-4 was ≈ 20% more potent than RUC-2 in inhibiting human ADP-induced platelet aggregation and much more soluble in aqueous solutions (60-80 mg/mL). It shared RUC-2's specificity for αIIbβ3 versus αVβ3, did not prime the receptor to bind fibrinogen, or induce changes in β3 identified by a conformation-specific monoclonal antibody. Both RUC-2 and RUC-4 prevented FeCl3-induced thrombotic occlusion of the carotid artery in mice and decreased microvascular thrombi in response to laser injury produced by human platelets infused into transgenic mice containing a mutated von Willebrand factor that reacts with human but not mouse platelets. Intramuscular injection of RUC-4 in nonhuman primates at 1.9 and 3.85 mg/kg led to complete inhibition of platelet aggregation within 15 minutes, with dose-dependent return of platelet aggregation after 4.5 to 24 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

RUC-4 has favorable biochemical, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, antithrombotic, and solubility properties as a prehospital therapy of myocardial infarction, but the possibility of increased bleeding with therapeutic doses remains to be evaluated.

Clinical and economic studies of eptifibatide in coronary stenting

Platelet adhesion and aggregation at the site of coronary stenting can have catastrophic clinical and economic consequences. Therefore, effective platelet inhibition is vital during and after percutaneous coronary intervention. Eptifibatide is an intravenous antiplatelet agent that blocks the final common pathway of platelet aggregation and thrombus formation by binding to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors on the surface of platelets. In clinical studies, eptifibatide was associated with a significant reduction of mortality, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, recent trials conducted in the era of dual antiplatelet therapy and newer anticoagulants failed to demonstrate similar results. The previously seen favorable benefit of eptifibatide was mainly offset by the increased risk of bleeding. Current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend its use as an adjunct in high-risk patients who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with traditional anticoagulants (heparin or enoxaparin), who are not otherwise at high risk of bleeding. In patients receiving bivalirudin (a newer safer anticoagulant), routine use of eptifibatide is discouraged except in select situations (eg, angiographic complications). Although older pharmacoeconomic studies favor eptifibatide, in the current era of P2Y12 inhibitors and newer safer anticoagulants, the increased costs associated with bleeding make the routine use of eptifibatide an economically nonviable option. The cost-effectiveness of eptifibatide with the use of strategies that decrease the bleeding risk (eg, transradial access) is unknown. This review provides an overview of key clinical and economic studies of eptifibatide well into the current era of potent antiplatelet agents, novel safer anticoagulants, and contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Development of glycoprotein IIb–IIIa antagonists: translation of pharmacodynamic effects into clinical benefit

This article will review the development of glycoprotein IIb-IIIa antagonists, with particular emphasis on the characteristics and pharmacodynamic studies of each agent that is available for clinical use. Abciximab is a Fab fragment of the 7E3 antibody that has high affinity and a slow rate of dissociation from glycoprotein IIb-IIIa. In contrast, the small molecules eptifibatide and tirofiban, have a much more rapid rate of dissociation, with an off time of 10 to 15 s. Accordingly, the circulating pool of abciximab is predominantly associated with platelets, whereas maintenance of a consistent concentration of tirofiban and eptifibatide in the blood is critical in order to achieve and sustain their inhibitory effects. The affinity of abciximab and tirofiban for glycoprotein IIb-IIIa are substantially greater than that of eptifibatide, necessitating maintenance of greater molar concentrations of eptifibatide in blood in order to achieve effective inhibition of the binding of fibrinogen to the activated conformer of glycoprotein IIb-IIIa.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of batifiban coadministered with antithrombin agents in Chinese healthy volunteers

The combined use of batifiban, a synthetic platelet GPII b/ IIIa receptor antagonist, and antithrombin agents is an attractive option for the treatment of patients with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and those scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention. To observe whether antithrombin agents affect the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of batifiban in combination therapy and optimize clinical administration dosage of batifiban, an open-label and parallel study was conducted. Thirty healthy subjects were randomly divided into three groups, which were sequentially treated with batifiban alone, or oral coadministration of clopidogrel, aspirin and UFH, or batifiban coadministered with these antithrombin agents. Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time points. The evaluation index included the inhibition of platelet aggregation and pharmacokinetic parameters. The pharmacokinetic parameters of batifiban and batifiban coadministered with antithrombin agents showed no significant differences. The mean inhibition rate of platelet aggregation (%) suggested that neither batifiban alone nor antithrombin agents alone could provide such potent inhibition rate (>80%) to obtain the best clinical efficacy, but they had a synergistic effect on platelet inhibition. No serious adverse effects were observed. The results in these healthy subjects suggest that batifiban coadministrated with antithrombin agents could achieve optimum clinical treatment effect for patients with NSTE ACS, and also those scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention.

Anti-platelet therapy: glycoprotein IIb-IIIa antagonists

Glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa antagonists inhibit the aggregation of activated platelets. Three agents are approved for clinical use. In this review, the characteristics of each agent, their pharmacodynamic profile, results in pivotal clinical trials and the associated clinical implications are discussed. GP IIb-IIIa antagonists have greatest benefit when used as adjunctive therapy during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) when the patient has intra-coronary thrombosis. These agents appear to provide greatest benefit when used in combination with heparin. The clinical niche for parenteral GP IIb-IIIa antagonists is evolving. The rapid onset and offset of GP IIb-IIIa antagonists plus dosing designed to inhibit extensively platelet aggregation differentiates them from oral agents. The contemporary niche appears to include patients in transition, such as individuals requiring emergent PCI before oral agents are fully active and for unstable patients requiring transport to PCI centres, particularly in patients likely to have intracoronary thrombus. Subsequent studies should evaluate the optimal duration of therapy with GP IIb-IIIa antagonists.

Optimal use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions

Discovery of the central role of platelets in the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and ischaemic complications of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) has led to the widespread use of oral and parenteral platelet inhibitors to treat these conditions. Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa (also known as α(IIb)β(3)) receptors on the surface of platelets play an essential role in platelet aggregation and serve as a key mediator in the formation of arterial thrombus. When activated, GP IIb/IIIa receptors bind to fibrinogen, which serves as the 'final common pathway' in platelet aggregation. Of the numerous agents developed for modulating platelet activity, intravenous platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists are the most potent. There are four agents in clinical use, including abciximab, eptifibatide, tirofiban and lamifiban, although lamifiban is not approved for use in the US. While all agents block fibrinogen binding to GP IIb/IIIa, they do so by different mechanisms. Abciximab is a humanized form of a murine monoclonal antibody directed against GP IIb/IIIa, eptifibatide is a synthetic, cyclic heptapeptide that contains a lysine-glycine-aspartic acid (KGD) sequence that mimics the arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) sequence found on GP IIb/IIIa, tirofiban is a non-peptide antagonist derived by optimization of the tyrosine analogue that structurally mimicks the RGD-containing loop of the disintegrin echistatin, and lamifiban is a synthetic, non-cyclic, non-peptide, low-molecular-weight compound. In clinical trials, use of these agents reduces ischaemic adverse cardiovascular events in patients with ACS undergoing PCI, but at a cost of increased bleeding.

Heparin but not citrate anticoagulation of blood preserves platelet function for prolonged periods

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines state that platelet aggregation studies should be conducted within 4 h of venepuncture because of the decline in sensitivity to platelet agonists. This constrains studies of platelet activity in clinical situations where samples need to be transported or there are unavoidable delays prior to assessment.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to compare systematically the responses of platelets stored in the presence of either citrate or heparin, the two most widely used anti-coagulants, using a range of standard techniques.

METHODS

Blood was taken from healthy volunteers and either assessed immediately or stored at ambient temperature (18-25 degrees C) for 24 h. Platelet reactivity to a range of agonists was determined by a combination of 96-well plate techniques; light transmission aggregometry, thrombi adhesion, ATP and ADP release, and TxA(2) release; by whole blood aggregometry; and by PFA-100.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Testing using 96-well plate techniques allowed for the simultaneous measurement of responses to multiple concentrations of multiple agonists. The responses of platelets from blood anti-coagulated with heparin were predominantly preserved in all assays after 24 h storage, whereas, responses of platelets stored in blood anti-coagulated with citrate were greatly diminished. Consequently, anti-coagulation with heparin, but not citrate, preserves platelet responses for up to 24 h as determined by a range of techniques.

Influence of preparative procedures on assay of platelet function and apparent effects of antiplatelet agents

Previous studies have shown that anticoagulants alter platelet reactivity and the apparent effects of antiplatelet agents. This study was conducted to identify the impact of methods of preparation of blood samples on an assay of platelet function and the effects of antiplatelet agents. The activation of platelets was identified with the use of flow cytometry in response to thrombin (1 and 10 nmol/L), adenosine diphosphate (0.2 and 1 micromol/L), platelet activating factor (1 nmol/L), and convulxin (1 and 10 ng/ml). Antiplatelet effects were assessed after the addition in vitro of tirofiban (50 ng/ml) and cangrelor (10 nmol/L). Results were compared in whole blood and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) anticoagulated with corn trypsin inhibitor (32 microg/ml, a specific inhibitor of factor XIIa). The fraction of young platelets was quantified with thiazole orange, which identifies ribonucleic acid. The activation of platelets was consistently less in PRP compared with whole blood. Activation in PRP was 23 +/- 15% that in whole blood for thrombin, 65 +/- 26% for adenosine diphosphate, 40 +/- 20% for platelet activating factor, and 49 +/- 25% for convulxin (p <0.01 for each comparison). The fraction of young platelets in PRP was 39 +/- 11% that in whole blood (p <0.001). The effects of antiplatelet agents varied with agonist and antiplatelet agent but were generally greater in PRP compared with whole blood (p <0.05). In conclusion, platelet reactivity is lower and the effects of antiplatelet agents are greater and potentially misleading in PRP compared with whole blood. The accuracy of platelet function testing may be improved by performance in whole blood.

Optimal platelet inhibition in patients undergoing PCI: data from the Multicenter Registry of High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Adequate Platelet Inhibition (MR PCI) study

BACKGROUND

Optimal inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) may afford greater protection against ischemic events during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The objective of this study was to test several antiplatelet regimens in elective high-risk PCI patients by comparing different combinations of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and clopidogrel.

METHODS

The study was a randomized open-label study at 3 heart centers in India. One hundred twenty patients were enrolled between July 2006 and September 2006. Patients were randomized to 1 of the 4 groups: group A--tirofiban, group B--eptifibatide, group C--tirofiban + clopidogrel 600-mg loading dose, and group D--eptifibatide + clopidogrel 600-mg loading dose. All patients received a clopidogrel maintenance dose after PCI. The primary outcome measure was the IPA assessed at 10 minutes, at 6 to 8 hours, and at 24 hours.

RESULTS

The IPA was higher with high-dose tirofiban compared with eptifibatide at 10 minutes (95.88 +/- 5.85% vs 91.22 +/- 7.52%, P = .003) and at 6 to 8 hours (93.11 +/- 7.6% vs 85.45 +/- 11.03, P < .001). Significantly more patients achieved >95% IPA with the high-dose tirofiban regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

This head-to-head study comparing high-dose tirofiban with double-bolus eptifibatide demonstrated higher degree of platelet inhibition with high-dose tirofiban at 10 minutes and at 6 to 8 hours in patients undergoing elective high-risk PCI. The addition of clopidogrel did not acutely extend the IPA from intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, but did so at 24 hours.

Elevated Plasma Fibrinogen Level Predicts Suboptimal Response to Therapy With Both Single- and Double-Bolus Eptifibatide During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the factors associated with suboptimal platelet inhibition (PI) with single- and double-bolus eptifibatide during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

Although PI > or = 95% measured 10 min after glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy is associated with improved outcomes following PCI, this level of PI often is not achieved.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 150 patients undergoing PCI with single-bolus eptifibatide (180 microg/kg) (n = 100) and double-bolus eptifibatide (180 microg/kg administered 10 min apart) (n = 50) followed by standard infusion (2 microg/kg/min). Measuring platelet aggregation at baseline and at 10 min and 30 to 45 min after eptifibatide bolus, patients were classified as optimal responders (OPT) (> or =95% PI) or suboptimal responders (sub-OPT) (<95% PI) based on 10-min PI after final bolus.

RESULTS

Suboptimal PI was achieved in 61% of patients with single-bolus eptifibatide and in 36% with double-bolus eptifibatide. In the single-bolus group, sub-OPT had higher fibrinogen levels (324 +/- 85 mg/dl vs. 259 +/- 49 mg/dl, p = 0.0002), platelet counts (221 +/- 70 vs. 186 +/- 47, p = 0.008), and white blood cell counts (7.7 +/- 2.3 vs. 6.6 +/- 1.9, p = 0.02). In the double-bolus group, sub-OPT also had higher fibrinogen levels (324 +/- 68 mg/dl vs. 278 +/- 53 mg/dl, p = 0.01) and were more likely to be smokers (38.9% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.01). Multivariable analysis showed that fibrinogen level was the only independent predictor of suboptimal PI, with fibrinogen cutoffs at 375 and 325 mg/dl predicting suboptimal PI (single-bolus: 100% and 90.0%, respectively; double-bolus: 100% and 60%, respectively) with both doses.

CONCLUSIONS

During PCI, both single- and double-bolus eptifibatide provide suboptimal PI in a substantial proportion of patients. A fibrinogen level >375 mg/dl is a strong predictor of suboptimal PI.

Variability in extent of platelet function inhibition after administration of optimal dose of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockers in patients undergoing a high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention

The Ultegra Rapid Platelet Function Assay was used to measure the inhibition of platelet aggregation at baseline and 10 minutes and 8 hours after starting therapy in 114 patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the planned use of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor. The abciximab-treated patients received a 0.25 mg/kg bolus, followed by a 0.125 microg/kg/min infusion for 12 hours; the eptifibatide-treated patients received 2 boluses of 180 microg/kg administered 10 minutes apart, followed by a 2 microg/kg/min infusion for 24 hours; the tirofiban-treated patients received a 25 microg/kg bolus, followed by a 0.15 microg/kg/min infusion for 18 hours. Ten minutes after starting therapy, the mean level of platelet inhibition was 86 +/- 9% for abciximab, 92 +/- 6% for eptifibatide, and 95 +/- 5% for tirofiban (p <0.001); > or =95% platelet inhibition was achieved in 29% of the patients treated with abciximab, 44% of those receiving eptifibatide, and 68% of the those receiving tirofiban (p = 0.02). In conclusion, at the evaluated doses, tirofiban seemed to be the most effective drug in achieving "optimal" platelet inhibition very early after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Platelet activation predicts recurrent ischemic events after percutaneous coronary angioplasty: a 6 months prospective study

INTRODUCTION

An increasing amount of evidence indicates that platelet reactivity, despite a standard anti-thrombotic therapy, is a potential risk factor for recurrent myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease. We now hypothesize that this condition, measured by collagen-epinephrine (CEPI) or collagen-ADP (CADP) closure times (CT) by Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA-100), may predict the recurrence of coronary events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CEPI and CADP-CT were measured 30+/-8 h after PCI in 175 consecutive patients admitted with a diagnosis of stable angina (n=94) or acute coronary syndromes (n=81) and prospectively followed up for a mean period of 6 months. We stratified the patients in accordance to both the CEPI-CT (<or> 190 s), reflecting the intensity of cycloxygenase inhibition by aspirin and the distribution into quartiles for CADP-CT.

RESULTS

CEPI-CT<190 s as well as CADP-CT<82 s were associated with a higher rate of clinical recurrence (hazard ratio 8.5, p<0.001 and 22.9, p<0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis after adjustment for other risk factors confirmed that the lowest CADP-CT quartile significantly correlates with the risk of recurrent coronary events (hazard ratio 36.5, p<0.01), as well as CEPI-CT<190 s (hazard ratio 6.7, p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

An enhanced platelet function after PCI when measured under high shear rates by PFA-100 is an independent predictor of a worst clinical outcome, even during a short term follow-up and may help in patients risk stratification.

Pharmacodynamics of two different dosing regimens of tirofiban in citrate or PPACK anticoagulated blood

The primary objective of this study was to compare the inhibitory activity of tirofiban measured with the rapid platelet function assay (RPFA) and with light transmission aggregometry using two different anticoagulants (citrate versus PPACK). Twenty patients treated with tirofiban for percutaneous coronary intervention were studied at six time points during tirofiban treatment. Tirofiban was given with a bolus dose of 10 microg/kg and an infusion of 0.10 microg/kg per min (10 patients) or with a bolus dose of 15 microg/kg and an infusion of 0.15 microg/kg per min (10 patients). Inhibition of platelet function appeared highest using citrated blood and the RPFA-device and lowest when assessed by aggregometry in PPACK-anticoagulated blood. Only the higher dose of tirofiban achieved an inhibition of platelet aggregation of at least 80% in all test systems.

The use of the point of care Helena ICHOR/Plateletworks and the Accumetrics Ultegra RPFA for assessment of platelet function with GPIIB-IIIa antagonists

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a newly modified rapid platelet function analysis system (ICHOR/ Plateletworks) and to compare the results obtained with those of traditional light transmission aggregometry (LTA), and the Ultegra/RPFA system.

BACKGROUND

Anti-platelet therapy is standard of care for patients as an adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or for medical management of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS). Recent clinical trial results suggest that the three currently approved platelet GPIIb-IIIa receptor antagonists, eptifibatide, tirofiban and abciximab, may vary in extent of inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) at the approved doses. Thus, pharmacodynamic evaluations of these agents to determine the extent of platelet function inhibition, especially during the periprocedural time of a cardiac intervention, are necessary. A rapid measurement method as a surrogate for LTA, the current gold standard, would be ideal in order to have the option for dose monitoring or adjustment prior to or during an intervention. The Helena ICHOR/ Plateletworks may be useful for point of care testing.

METHODS

Blood samples collected in D-Phe-Pro-Arg-chloromethyl ketone dihydrochloride (PPACK) anticoagulant were treated with increasing concentrations of eptifibatide, tirofiban or abciximab. LTA was carried out in conjunction with the ICHOR/Plateletworks, using a modified method, and Accumetrics Ultegra with RPFA cartridges.

RESULTS

This study demonstrated that platelet inhibition measured by the ICHOR/Plateletworks mirrored the level of IPA obtained with LTA. In contrast, the Ultegra system had less correlation when compared to LTA at inhibition levels < 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these data, the ICHOR/ Plateletworks utilized under modified guidelines may serve as a surrogate for LTA when rapid measurements are necessary.A rapid platelet function measurement method as a surrogate for light transmission aggregometry (LTA), the current gold standard, is ideal in order to have the option for GPIIb-IIIa antagonist dose monitoring or adjustment prior to or during a coronary intervention. A newly modified rapid platelet function analysis system (ICHOR/Plateletworks was evaluated and compared to the results obtained with traditional light transmission aggregometry (LTA), and the Ultegra/RPFA system. Blood samples collected in D-Phe-Pro-Arg-chloromethyl ketone dihydrochloride (PPACK) anticoagulant were treated with increasing concentrations of eptifibatide, tirofiban or abciximab. LTA was carried out in conjunction with the ICHOR/Plateletworks, using a modified method, and Accumetrics Ultegra with RPFA cartridges. Based on these data, the ICHOR/Plateletworks utilized under modified guidelines may serve as a surrogate for LTA when rapid measurements are necessary.

The Effect of Glycoprotein IIIa PIA1/A2 Polymorphism on the PFA-100 Response to GP IIbIIIa Receptor Inhibitors—The Importance of Anticoagulants Used

Antithrombotic drugs including glycoprotein (GP) IIb IIIa receptor inhibitors have significantly reduced ischaemic events in coronary disease. Variability in the response to GP receptor inhibitors has been observed both with healthy individuals and in clinical studies. One single nucleotide polymorphism on GP IIIa (PI(A1/A2)) correlates with increased risk for cardiovascular events in many studies. In this study we investigated whether this polymorphism associates with individual differences in the response to GP IIb IIIa receptor inhibitors in healthy individuals. Fresh blood samples were collected randomly from individuals without a history of coronary disease. Blood samples were anticoagulated with either sodium citrate or with PPACK. The ability of different GP IIb IIIa receptor inhibitors (tirofiban, eptifibatide and abciximab) to inhibit platelet aggregation was investigated using a commercial PFA-100 analyser. At baseline, the function of platelets with different PI(A) genotypes did not differ from each other. With sodium citrate anticoagulated samples, tirofiban prolonged the closure time slightly more rapidly when platelets with PI(A 2 A 2) genotype were used than with other genotypes (p<0.05) both on epinephrine-collagen and ADP-collagen coated membranes. With eptifibatide or abciximab no differences were observed. If an anticoagulant not affecting Ca(2+) concentration (PPACK) was used, no differences were observed between different GP IIIa genotypes and the ability of any of the GP IIb IIIa receptor inhibitors to prolong the closure time. The effect of tirofiban and eptifibatide was significantly affected by the anticoagulant used (p<0.001), whereas abciximab functioned equally regardless of the anticoagulant. Glycoprotein IIIa PI(A2) allele has been found in many studies to associate with risk of thrombosis. In healthy controls the function of GP IIb IIIa receptor inhibitors on platelets with different PI(A) genotypes was modified by anticoagulants used. PI(A) polymorphism does not explain the interindividual variance in the response to GP IIb IIIa receptor inhibitors in healthy individuals. The study, however, demonstrates the importance of the anticoagulant used in in vitro studies and the important role of Ca(2+) concentration with tirofiban and eptifibatide, but not with abciximab.

Inhibition of platelet aggregation with eptifibatide, bivalirudin, and heparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention receiving clopidogrel pretreatment (The PharmacoDynamic Evaluation of Angiomax, Clopidogrel with or without INtegrilin [DEACON] study)

The present study assessed the magnitude of inhibition of platelet aggregation induced by adenosine diphosphate and thrombin receptor activating peptide achieved with unfractionated heparin, the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin, and the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor eptifibatide in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and and were treated with concomitant aspirin and clopidogrel.

Comparative pharmacodynamic evaluation of eptifibatide and tirofiban HCl in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (the TAM1 Study)

We performed a comparative analysis of platelet aggregation inhibition achieved with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors eptifibatide and tirofiban HCl in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and used light transmission aggregometric assays with D-phenylalanyl-L-prolyl-L-arginine chloromethyl ketone as an anticoagulant and 20 micromol of adenosine diphosphate as an agonist. Taking into account the differences in clinical efficacy of these 2 drugs in large trials investigating percutaneous coronary intervention, we hypothesized that the variable clinical effects might be related to variability in the magnitude and consistency of platelet aggregation inhibition achieved with dosing regimens of these glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.

Variable inhibition of high-shear-induced platelet plug formation by eptifibatide and tirofiban under conditions of platelet activation and high von Willebrand release: a randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists have become a mainstay for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes. Yet, they have rarely been evaluated under relevant pathophysiologic conditions, for example, high shear rates in the presence of physiologic calcium concentrations. We compared the efficacy of eptifibatide and tirofiban versus placebo on high shear-induced platelet plug formation in a model in which healthy subjects exhibit von Willebrand factor concentrations and platelet activation comparable to patients with acute coronary syndromes.

METHODS

Thirty male volunteers received 2 ng/kg endotoxin and standard doses of eptifibatide, tirofiban, or placebo over a period of 5 hours in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, double-dummy parallel-group trial. Platelet inhibition was measured with the Platelet Function Analyzer-100 (PFA-100) and the Ultegra method.

RESULTS

Although bolus infusion of both GPIIb/IIIa antagonists inhibited high shear-induced platelet plug formation, continuous infusion of eptifibatide prolonged closure times more effectively than did tirofiban (P <.008). Interestingly, tirofiban had only placebo-like effects on platelet plug formation after 2 hours. However, when additional drug was exogenously added, closure time values were maximally prolonged in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard doses, particularly of tirofiban, have limited impact on high shear-induced platelet plug formation at physiologic Ca(2+) concentrations.