Dalstein V, Riethmuller D, Sautière JL, Prétet JL, Kantelip B, Schaal JP, Mougin C. Detection of cervical precancer and cancer in a hospital population; benefits of testing for human papillomavirus.
Eur J Cancer 2004;
40:1225-32. [PMID:
15110887 DOI:
10.1016/j.ejca.2004.01.021]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2003] [Revised: 01/15/2004] [Accepted: 01/19/2004] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The aim was to determine the relevance of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in identifying high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse (CIN2/3+) in a hospital population (n=3574) characterised by a high rate of cytological abnormalities and high-risk HPV infections. According to the results of the initial Papanicolaou and HPV test, women were directly referred for colposcopy/biopsy or recalled for a control visit. Sensitivity and specificity were corrected for verification bias. HPV-testing sensitivity was 94.3%, higher than that of cytological testing at any cut-off point (65.1%-86.8%), while specificity was greater for cytology than for HPV testing (99.3% or 91.8% versus 83.4%). The combination of both tests allowed 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value. We conclude that HPV testing is a relevant tool for the detection of cervical disease. The best way of combining cytology and HPV detection in screening programmes should be evaluated in large-scale studies.
Collapse