Cancer prone persons. A randomized screening trial based on colonoscopy: background, design and recruitment

Success rate of acquiring informed consent and barriers to participation in a randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for non-curative stage IV colon cancer in Japan (JCOG1107)

BACKGROUND

Successful achievement of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is dependent on the acquisition of informed consent (IC) from patients. The aim of this study was to prospectively calculate the proportion of participation in a surgical RCT and to identify the reasons for failed acquisition of IC.

METHODS

A 50-insitution RCT was conducted to evaluate oncological outcomes of open and laparoscopic surgery for stage IV colon cancer (JCOG1107: UMIN-CTR 000000105). The success rate of obtaining IC was evaluated in eight periods between January 2013 and January 2021. In addition, reasons for failed acquisition of IC were identified from questionnaires.

RESULTS

In total, 391 patients were informed of their eligibility for the trial, and 168 (42%) were randomly assigned to either the laparoscopic surgery group (n = 84) or open surgery group (n = 84). The success rate of IC acquisition ranged from 33 to 58% in three periods. The most common reasons for failed IC acquisition were the patients' preference for one approach of surgery based on recommendations from referring doctors and family members, and anxiety/unhappiness about randomization.

CONCLUSIONS

The success rate of acquiring IC from patients for an RCT of laparoscopic versus open surgery for stage IV colon cancer was lower than the expected rate planned in the protocol. To obtain the planned rate, investigators should make efforts to inform patients and their families about the medical contributions a surgical RCT can make and recognize that the period in equipoise may be limited.

Success rate of informed consent acquisition and factors influencing participation in a multicenter randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for stage II/III colon cancer in Japan (JCOG0404)

INTRODUCTION

Successful completion of randomized controlled trials (RCT) is dependent on informed consent (IC) acquisition from patients. The aim of this study was to prospectively calculate the proportion of participation in a surgical RCT and to identify the reasons for failed IC acquisition.

METHODS

A 30-institute RCT was conducted to evaluate oncological outcomes of open and laparoscopic surgery for stage II/III colon cancer (JCOG0404: UMIN-CTR C000000105). The success rate of obtaining IC, which was supported by a DVD that helped patients understand this trial, was evaluated in eight periods between October 2004 and March 2009. In addition, reasons for failed IC acquisition were identified from questionnaires.

RESULTS

A total of 1767 patients were informed of their eligibility for the trial, and 1057 (60%) were randomly assigned to either the laparoscopic surgery (n = 529) or open surgery (n = 528) group. The success rate of IC acquisition ranged from 50% to 62% in eight periods. The most common reasons for failed IC acquisition were anxiety/unhappiness about the randomization, patients' preference for one form of surgery, and strong recommendations from referring doctors or relatives.

CONCLUSIONS

With the assistance of a DVD, high success rates of IC acquisition were obtained for an RCT of laparoscopic versus open surgery for stage II/III colon cancers. To obtain such a rate, investigators should make efforts to inform patients, their relatives, and referring doctors about the medical contributions a surgical RCT can make.

Recruitment to multicentre trials--lessons from UKCTOCS: descriptive study

OBJECTIVE

To describe the factors that contributed to successful recruitment of more than 200,000 women to the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening, one of the largest ever randomised controlled trials.

DESIGN

Descriptive study.

SETTING

13 NHS trusts in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland.

PARTICIPANTS

Postmenopausal women aged 50-74; exclusion criteria included ovarian malignancy, bilateral oophorectomy, increased risk of familial ovarian cancer, active non-ovarian malignancy, and participation in other ovarian cancer screening trials.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Achievement of target recruitment, acceptance rates of invitation, and recruitment rates.

RESULTS

The trial was set up in 13 centres with 27 adjoining local health authorities. The coordinating centre team was led by one of the senior investigators, who was closely involved in planning and day to day trial management. Of 1 243,282 women invited, 23.2% (288 955) replied that they were eligible and would like to participate. Of those sent appointments, 73.6% (205 090) attended for recruitment. The acceptance rate varied from 19% to 33% between trial centres. Measures to ensure target recruitment included named coordinating centre staff supporting and monitoring each centre, prompt identification and resolution of logistic problems, varying the volume of invitations by centre, using local non-attendance rates to determine the size of recruitment clinics, and organising large ad hoc clinics supported by coordinating centre staff. The trial randomised 202,638 women in 4.3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Planning and trial management are as important as trial design and require equal attention from senior investigators. Successful recruitment needs constant monitoring by a committed proactive management team that is willing to explore individual solutions for different centres and use central resources to improve local recruitment. Automation of trial processes with web based trial management systems is crucial in large multicentre randomised controlled trials. Recruitment can be further enhanced by using information videos and group discussions. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN22488978.

Acceptability of cancer chemoprevention trials: impact of the design

BACKGROUND

Chemoprevention could significantly reduce cancer burden. Assessment of efficacy and risk/benefit balance is at best achieved through randomized clinical trials.

METHODS

At a periodic health examination center 1463 adults were asked to complete a questionnaire about their willingness to be involved in different kinds of preventive clinical trials.

RESULTS

Among the 851 respondents (58.2%), 228 (26.8%) agreed to participate in a hypothetical chemoprevention trial aimed at reducing the incidence of lung cancer and 116 (29.3%) of 396 women agreed to a breast cancer chemoprevention trial. Randomization would not restrain participation (acceptability rate: 87.7% for lung cancer and 93.0% for breast cancer). In these volunteers, short-term trials (1 year) reached a high level of acceptability: 71.5% and 73.7% for lung and breast cancer prevention respectively. In contrast long-term trials (5 years or more) were far less acceptable: 9.2% for lung cancer (OR=7.7 CI(95%) 4.4-14.0) and 10.5 % for breast cancer (OR=6.9 CI(95%) 3.2-15.8). For lung cancer prevention, the route of administration impacts on acceptability with higher rate 53.1% for a pill vs. 7.9% for a spray (OR=6.7 CI(95%) 3.6-12.9).

CONCLUSION

Overall healthy individuals are not keen to be involved in chemo-preventive trials, the design of which could however increase the acceptability rate.

A systematic review of reasons for nonentry of eligible patients into surgical randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The low recruitment rates into surgical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) threaten the validity of their findings. We reviewed the reasons for nonentry of eligible patients into surgical RCTs that would form the basis for future prospective research.

METHODS

A systematic review of the English language literature for studies reporting reasons for nonentry of eligible patients into surgical RCTs and of recommendations made to improve the low recruitment rates.

RESULTS

We reviewed 401 articles, including 94 articles presenting the results of 62 studies: 23 reports of recruitment into real surgical RCTs, 11 surveys of patients regarding hypothetical surgical RCTs, 10 surveys of clinicians and 18 literature reviews. The most frequently reported patient-related reasons for nonentry into surgical RCTs were preference for one form of treatment, dislike of the idea of randomization, and the potential for increased demands. Distrust of clinicians caused by a struggle to understand, explicit refusal of a no-treatment (placebo) arm, and the mere inability to make a decision were frequently reported in studies of real RCTs and patient surveys, but were not emphasized in surveys of clinicians and review articles. Difficulties with informed consent, the complexity of study protocols, and the clinicians' loss of motivation attributable to lack of recognition were the most commonly reported clinician-related reasons.

CONCLUSIONS

There seems to be a discrepancy between real reasons for nonentry of eligible patients into surgical RCTS and those perceived by the clinicians, which require further prospective research. A summary and discussion of main recommendations sighted in the literature is presented.

A randomised comparison of UK genetic risk counselling services for familial cancer: psychosocial outcomes

The aim of the study was to compare psychosocial outcomes for 50 new clinic attendees, referred for cancer genetic counselling to five UK centres. The centres represented England, Scotland and Wales, and were randomly selected from groups ranked by different levels of clinical activity in cancer genetics practice. Questionnaires assessed demographic data, risk perception, mental health and use of health services pre-consultation and at 1 and 12 months follow-up. Satisfaction was measured for attendees and referring doctors at follow-up. A total of 256 unaffected adults fulfilled the study criteria. The five centres varied widely with respect to service organisation and activity, but all had a greater proportion of unaffected attendees with a breast cancer risk (61–91%) than either a bowel cancer risk (0–33%) or ovarian cancer risk (3–25%). There were no significant differences in the psychosocial data between centres pre-counselling. No significant change over time occurred for any of the centres for risk perception or general psychological distress. There were significant differences between centres in reduction of cancer worry from baseline to 12 months and with the number of women who were recommended to have mammographic surveillance who had not received this. Overall, one-third of women for whom mammography had been recommended had not been screened within 1 year of follow-up. Subsequent attendance at the GP, but not at a hospital, was associated with risk level, but differences between centres could not be analysed. Satisfaction differed significantly between centres for 4 : 14 aspects of service provision and with 3 : 17 items concerning communication; satisfaction was high overall. Over 90% of referring doctors were moderately/very satisfied with the service, but 23% were dissatisfied with waiting times and 19% with access to preventive treatment. Results differed significantly between centres for doctor's satisfaction with the provision of referral criteria and prescribing information. In conclusion, there were relatively few significant differences in psychosocial outcomes between centres, considering the wide variation in service organisation and activity. These significant differences were not consistent across the centres, therefore, differences could not be linked to specific aspects of service provision.