High-dose intravenous gamma-globulins for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a prompt response

Treatment of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis in HIT in mice using deglycosylated KKO: a novel therapeutic?

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is characterized by thrombocytopenia associated with a highly prothrombotic state due to the development of pathogenic antibodies that recognize human platelet factor 4 (hPF4) complexed with various polyanions. Although nonheparin anticoagulants are the mainstay of care in HIT, subsequent bleeding may develop, and the risk of developing new thromboembolic events remain. We previously described a mouse immunoglobulin G2bκ (IgG2bκ) antibody KKO that mimics the sentinel features of pathogenic HIT antibodies, including binding to the same neoepitope on hPF4-polyanion complexes. KKO, like HIT IgGs, activates platelets through FcγRIIA and induces complement activation. We then questioned whether Fc-modified KKO could be used as a novel therapeutic to prevent or treat HIT. Using the endoglycosidase EndoS, we created deglycosylated KKO (DGKKO). Although DGKKO retained binding to PF4-polyanion complexes, it inhibited FcγRIIA-dependent activation of PF4-treated platelets triggered by unmodified KKO, 5B9 (another HIT-like monoclonal antibody), and IgGs isolated from patients with HIT. DGKKO also decreased complement activation and deposition of C3c on platelets. Unlike the anticoagulant fondaparinux, injection of DGKKO into HIT mice lacking mouse PF4, but transgenic for hPF4 and FcγRIIA, prevented and reversed thrombocytopenia when injected before or after unmodified KKO, 5B9, or HIT IgG. DGKKO also reversed antibody-induced thrombus growth in HIT mice. In contrast, DGKKO was ineffective in preventing thrombosis induced by IgG from patients with the HIT-related anti-PF4 prothrombotic disorder, vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Thus, DGKKO may represent a new class of therapeutics for targeted treatment of patients with HIT.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Focus on Thrombosis

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is an immune-mediated disorder caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 and heparin. Thrombosis is a central and unpredictable feature of this syndrome. Despite optimal management, disease morbidity and mortality from thrombosis remain high. The hypercoagulable state in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is biologically distinct from other thrombophilic disorders in that clinical complications are directly attributable to circulating ultra-large immune complexes. In some individuals, ultra-large immune complexes elicit unchecked cellular procoagulant responses that culminate in thrombosis. To date, the clinical and biologic risk factors associated with thrombotic risk in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia remain elusive. This review will summarize our current understanding of thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with attention to its clinical features, cellular mechanisms, and its management.

Intravenous Immune Globulin (IVIG) for Treatment of Autoimmune Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) for autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (aHIT), including platelet recovery, IVIG dose, dosing weight, IVIG product used, and complications reported.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception through June 21, 2020. Search terms included heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, HIT, intravenous immune globulin, IVIG, autoimmune HIT, aHIT, and immune globulin.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Patients administered IVIG for HIT and diagnosed by immunoassay (optical density ≥2) or positive activation assay were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Twenty-four cases were reviewed; 92% had persistent aHIT. Time to IVIG administration post-nonheparin anticoagulant initiation was 9 days (median). Most common IVIG cumulative dose was 2 g/kg (dosed as 1 g/kg/d for 2 consecutive days); 75% had a favorable platelet increase (≥50 × 10⁹/L) within 5 days of initial IVIG dosing.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

aHIT is characterized by critically low platelets, thrombosis, and a persistent delay in platelet recovery despite treatment with a nonheparin anticoagulant. An immunoassay and subsequent confirmatory activation assay (at low, high, and 0 IU/mL unfractionated heparin levels) is recommended to confirm diagnosis. Patients nonresponsive to nonheparin anticoagulants within 5 days of initiation should be evaluated for IVIG treatment (2 g/kg cumulative dose). More data are needed to clarify appropriate IVIG dosing weight, although based on current published literature, it is recommended to use actual body weight.

CONCLUSIONS

Data reported support use of IVIG as adjunctive therapy for patients with aHIT. Judicious IVIG use based on key clinical and laboratory findings is critical.

Autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and venous limb gangrene after aortic dissection repair: in vitro and in vivo effects of intravenous immunoglobulin

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic disorder characterized by heparin-dependent antibodies that activate platelets (PLTs) via PLT FcγIIa receptors. "Autoimmune" HIT (aHIT) indicates a HIT subset where thrombocytopenia progresses or persists despite stopping heparin; aHIT sera activate PLTs strongly even in the absence of heparin (heparin-independent PLT-activating properties). Affected patients are at risk of severe complications, including dual macro- and microvascular thrombosis leading to venous limb gangrene. High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) offers an approach to interrupt heparin-independent PLT-activating effects of aHIT antibodies.

CASE REPORT

A 78-year-old male who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass for aortic dissection developed aHIT, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and deep vein thrombosis; progression to venous limb gangrene occurred during partial thromboplastin time (PTT)-adjusted bivalirudin infusion (underdosing from "PTT confounding"). Thrombocytopenia recovered with high-dose IVIG, although the PLT count increase began only after the third dose of a 5-day IVIG regimen (0.4 g/kg/day × 5 days). We reviewed case reports and case series of IVIG for treating HIT, focusing on various IVIG dosing regimens used.

RESULTS

Patient serum-induced PLT activation was inhibited in vitro by IVIG in a dose-dependent fashion; inhibition of PLT activation by IVIG was much more marked in the absence of heparin versus the presence of heparin (0.2 U/mL). Our literature review indicated 1 g/kg × 2 IVIG dosing as most common for treating HIT, usually associated with rapid PLT count recovery.

CONCLUSION

Our clinical and laboratory observations support dose-dependent efficacy of IVIG for decreasing PLT activation and thus correcting thrombocytopenia in aHIT. Our case experience and literature review suggests dosing of 1 g/kg IVIG × 2 for patients with severe aHIT.

Intravenous immunoglobulin as an adjunct therapy in persisting heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious adverse drug reaction caused by transient antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes, resulting in platelet activation and potentially fatal arterial and/or venous thrombosis. Most cases of HIT respond to cessation of heparin and administration of an alternative non-heparin anticoagulant, but there are cases of persisting HIT, defined as thrombocytopenia due to platelet activation/consumption for greater than seven days despite standard therapy. These patients remain at high risk for thrombotic events, which may result in limb-loss and mortality. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been proposed as an adjunct therapy for these refractory cases based on its ability to saturate FcγRIIa receptors on platelets, thus preventing HIT antibody binding and platelet activation. We describe 2 cases of persisting HIT (strongly positive antigen and functional assays, and persisting thrombocytopenia >7 days) with rapid clinical response to IVIg. We performed in-vitro experiments to support IVIg response. Healthy donor platelets (1 × 10e6) were treated with PF4 (3.75 μg/mL) for 20 min followed by 1-hour incubation with patients' sera. Platelet activation with and without addition of IVIg (levels equivalent to those reached in a patient after treatment with 2 gm/Kg) was evaluated in the PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA). A significantly decreased platelet activation was demonstrated after the addition of IVIg to both patient samples, which correlated well with the rapid clinical response that each patient experienced. Thus, our study supports the use of IVIg as an adjunct therapy for persisting HIT.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in the Critically Ill Patient

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is associated with clinically significant morbidity and mortality. Patients who are critically ill are commonly thrombocytopenic and exposed to heparin. Although HIT should be considered, it is not usually the cause of thrombocytopenia in the medical-surgical ICU population. A systematic approach to the patient who is critically ill who has thrombocytopenia according to clinical features, complemented by appropriate laboratory confirmation, should lead to a reduction in inappropriate laboratory testing and reduce the use of more expensive and less reliable anticoagulants. If the patient is deemed as being at intermediate or high risk for HIT or if HIT is confirmed by means of the serotonin-release assay, heparin should be stopped, heparin-bonded catheters should be removed, and a direct antithrombin or fondaparinux should be initiated to reduce the risk of thrombosis. Warfarin is absolutely contraindicated in the acute phase of HIT; if administered, its effects must be reversed by using vitamin K.

Treatment of refractory delayed onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)

Delayed onset heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), is characterized by a late nadir due to persistent platelet-activating IgG antibodies. It typically begins or worsens 5 or more days after heparin is discontinued with complications such as thrombosis up to 3 weeks after exposure to heparin.1-3 In 50% of cases, the platelet count can decrease to very low numbers (<20 000/μL), which is not usual for typical HIT. Here we report 2 cases of post-operative delayed onset HIT manifesting as severe thrombocytopenia that persisted despite cessation of heparin and initiation of argatroban. Key Clinical Question: Is intravenous immunoglulin beneficial in severe refractory delayed-onset HIT?

IVIg for Treatment of Severe Refractory Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) complicated by severe thrombocytopenia and thrombosis can pose significant treatment challenges. Use of alternative anticoagulants in this setting may increase bleeding risks, especially in patients who have a protracted disease course. Additional therapies are lacking in this severely affected patient population.

METHODS

We describe three patients with HIT who had severe thromboembolism and prolonged thrombocytopenia refractory to standard treatment but who achieved an immediate and sustained response to IVIg therapy. The mechanism of action of IVIg was evaluated in these patients and in five additional patients with severe HIT. The impact of a common polymorphism (H/R 131) in the platelet IgG receptor FcγRIIa on IVIg-mediated inhibition of platelet activation was also examined.

RESULTS

At levels attained in vivo, IVIg inhibits HIT antibody-mediated platelet activation. The constant domain of IgG (Fc) but not the antigen-binding portion (Fab) is required for this effect. Consistent with this finding, IVIg had no effect on HIT antibody binding in a solid-phase HIT immunoassay (platelet factor 4 enzyme-linked immunoassay). The H/R131 polymorphism in FcγRIIa influences the susceptibility of platelets to IVIg treatment, with the HH131 genotype being most susceptible to IVIg-mediated inhibition of antibody-induced activation. However, at high doses of IVIg, activation of platelets of all FcγRIIa genotypes was significantly inhibited. All three patients did well on long-term anticoagulation therapy with direct oral anticoagulants.

CONCLUSIONS

These studies suggest that IVIg treatment should be considered in patients with HIT who have severe disease that is refractory to standard therapies.

Risk factors for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: Focus on Fcγ receptors

Fcγ receptors have critical roles in the pathophysiology of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a severe immune-mediated complication of heparin treatment. Activation of platelets, monocytes and neutrophils by platelet-activating anti-PF4/heparin IgG antibodies results in thrombocytopenia, hypercoagulability and thrombosis in susceptible patients, effects that depend on FcγRIIA. In addition, FcγRIIIA receptors probably contribute to clearance of platelets sensitised by HIT immune complexes. FcγRI has also been reported to be involved in monocyte activation by HIT IgG antibodies and synthesis of tissue factor. This review focuses on the role of these FcγRs in HIT pathophysiology, including the potential influence of several gene variations associated with variable risk of HIT and related thrombosis. In particular, the 276P and 326Q alleles of CD148, a protein tyrosine phosphatase that regulates FcγRIIA signalling, are associated with a lower risk of HIT, and platelets from healthy donors expressing these alleles are hyporesponsive to anti-PF4/H antibodies. It was also recently demonstrated that the risk of thrombosis is higher in HIT patients expressing the R isoform of the FcγRIIA H131R polymorphism, with HIT antibodies shown to activate RR platelets more efficiently, mainly explained by an inhibitory effect of normal IgG2, which bound to the FcγRIIA 131H isoform more efficiently. Environmental risk factors probably interact with these gene polymorphisms affecting FcγRs, thereby increasing thrombosis risk in HIT.

Why "R" HIT patients predisposed to thrombosis?

In this issue of Blood, Rollin et al demonstrate that heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (HIT) patients homozygous for arginine (R) at position 131 in the immunoglobulin (Ig)G receptor FcγRIIA have a significantly higher incidence of thrombosis, and show that plasma IgG may play a key role in modulating the thrombotic process.

Increased risk of thrombosis in FcγRIIA 131RR patients with HIT due to defective control of platelet activation by plasma IgG2

Thrombosis results in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) from cellular activation involving Fc receptors. In this study, the FcγRIIA 131RR genotype was found to increase the risk of thrombosis in HIT patients (odds ratio: 5.9; 95% confidence interval: 1.7-20). When platelet aggregation tests (PATs) were performed with platelet-rich plasma (PRP), a shorter lag time was measured in 131RR donors compared to individuals with the HR and HH genotypes in response to HIT plasma or 5B9, a recently developed humanized monoclonal antibody to PF4/heparin. Importantly, this difference was no longer detectable when PATs were performed with washed platelets or immunoglobulin (Ig)G-depleted PRP. Moreover, polyclonal IgG or monoclonal IgG1 added to IgG-depleted PRP increased the lag time in response to 5B9. HH platelets were also sensitive to IgG2, which in contrast, failed to inhibit the response of 131RR platelets to 5B9. Finally, higher tissue factor messenger RNA levels were measured in the whole blood of 131RR donors after activation by HIT antibodies, with increased phospholipid procoagulant activity. These results demonstrate that HIT patients homozygous for the FcγRIIA 131R allele have a higher risk of thrombosis, probably due to increased cell activation by antibodies to PF4/heparin, with a lower inhibitory effect of endogenous IgG, especially from the IgG2 subclass.

Evidence for the use of intravenous immunoglobulins--a review of the literature

Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) were first introduced in the middle of the twentieth century for the treatment of primary immunodeficiencies. In 1981, Paul Imbach noticed an improvement of immune-mediated thrombocytopenia, in patients receiving IVIg for immunodeficiencies. This opened a new era for the treatment of autoimmune conditions with IVIg. Since then, IVIg has become an important treatment option in a wide spectrum of diseases, including autoimmune and acute inflammatory conditions, most of them off-label (not included in the US Food and Drug Administration recommendation). A panel of immunologists and internists with experience in IVIg therapy reviewed the medical literature for published data concerning treatment with IVIg. The quality of evidence was assessed, and a summary of the available relevant literature in each disease was given. To our knowledge, this is the first all-inclusive comprehensive review, developed to assist the clinician when considering the use of IVIg in autoimmune diseases, immune deficiencies, and other conditions.

Immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia resulting from preceding exposure to heparin catheter flushes

Immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening adverse effect of heparin. It can result from any type of heparin exposure and by any route of administration; however only a few cases are reported after exposures to small quantities of heparin from catheter flushes. The major clinical problem associated with HIT is thrombosis. Early detection and institution of alternative, non-heparin anticoagulation are important. We report a patient with HIT associated with use of therapeutic-dose unfractionated heparin in whom immune sensitization to heparin was triggered by two 500-unit exposure to UFH associated with intravascular catheter flushing for antineoplastic chemotherapy in a patient with colon adenocarcinoma.

Guidelines on the Use of Intravenous Immune Globulin for Hematologic Conditions

Canada's per capita use of intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) grew by approximately 115% between 1998 and 2006, making Canada one of the world's highest per capita users of IVIG. It is believed that most of this growth is attributable to off-label usage. To help ensure IVIG use is in keeping with an evidence-based approach to the practice of medicine, the National Advisory Committee on Blood and Blood Products of Canada (NAC) and Canadian Blood Services convened a panel of national experts to develop an evidence-based practice guideline on the use of IVIG for hematologic conditions. The mandate of the expert panel was to review evidence regarding use of IVIG for 18 hematologic conditions and formulate recommendations on IVIG use for each. A panel of 13 clinical experts and 1 expert in practice guideline development met to review the evidence and reach consensus on the recommendations for the use of IVIG. The primary sources used by the panel were 3 recent evidence-based reviews. Recommendations were based on interpretation of the available evidence and where evidence was lacking, consensus of expert clinical opinion. A draft of the practice guideline was circulated to hematologists in Canada for feedback. The results of this process were reviewed by the expert panel, and modifications to the draft guideline were made where appropriate. This practice guideline will provide the NAC with a basis for making recommendations to provincial and territorial health ministries regarding IVIG use management. Specific recommendations for routine use of IVIG were made for 7 conditions including acquired red cell aplasia; acquired hypogammaglobulinemia (secondary to malignancy); fetal-neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia; hemolytic disease of the newborn; HIV-associated thrombocytopenia; idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura; and posttransfusion purpura. Intravenous immune globulin was not recommended for use, except under certain life-threatening circumstances, for 8 conditions including acquired hemophilia; acquired von Willebrand disease; autoimmune hemolytic anemia; autoimmune neutropenia; hemolytic transfusion reaction; hemolytic transfusion reaction associated with sickle cell disease; hemolytic uremic syndrome/thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura; and viral-associated hemophagocytic syndrome. Intravenous immune globulin was not recommended for 2 conditions (aplastic anemia and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation) and was contraindicated for 1 condition (heparin-induced thrombocytopenia). For most hematologic conditions reviewed by the expert panel, routine use of IVIG was not recommended. Development and dissemination of evidence-based guidelines may help to facilitate appropriate use of IVIG.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in neonates

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), an immune-mediated response to heparin administration, has been recognized in adults for some time, but only recently recognized in neonates and children. HIT Type I is a mild, self-limiting condition. HIT type II is a severe immune reaction to heparin that leads to thrombocytopenia and often thromboembolic complications. The incidence of HIT Type II is 2-5 percent in adults on heparin products and may be as high in neonates and children. The mortality rate from HIT in adults is 7-30 percent and is unknown but potentially high in newborns as well. The cardinal sign of HIT is a drop in platelet count by 50 percent or platelet counts below 70,000-100,000/mm3. This drop usually occurs five to ten days after the first exposure to heparin. Treatment is immediate cessation of all heparin therapy and initiation of alternative anticoagulants, especially the direct thrombin inhibitors lepirudin and argatroban. This article reviews the literature on HIT and presents a case of neonatal HIT following heart surgery.

Immunomodulatory Effects of Intravenous Immunoglobulins as a Treatment for Autoimmune Diseases, Cancer, and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is a safe preparation, made of human plasma of thousands of healthy donors. The fascinating history of gamma globulin therapy begins in 1930 when Finland treated pneumococcal pneumonia patients with equine serum, which prolonged their survival from pneumonia. Since then, significant breakthroughs were achieved by Cohn, Bruton, Imbach, and others, whose clinical contribution to the world of medicine was of great importance. Originally IVIG was used to treat immunodeficiencies. Later on the use of IVIG extended to autoimmune diseases as well. The efficacy of IVIG has been established only in several autoimmune diseases; clinical reports of trials, series, and case reports indicate significant improvement in many more autoimmune diseases. IVIG have also showed antimetastatic effects in a variety of cancer cell lines, as well as in a few case reports. The efficiency of IVIG has also been observed in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), either as a result of an autoimmune disease or spontaneous. Several attempts were made to discover the immunomodulatory effects of IVIG, but it is still not fully understood. Clearly IVIG has multiple mechanisms of actions, which are thought to cooperate synergistically. One of the main mechanisms of actions of IVIG is its ability to neutralize pathogenic autoantibodies via anti-idiotypic antibodies within IVIG preparation. The ability of IVIG to neutralize pathogenic autoantibodies is of great importance in many autoimmune diseases, as well as in RPL. In cancer cell lines, IVIG modulates the immune system in a few ways, including the induction of IL-12 secretion, which consequently activates natural killer cells, and the induction of expression of proapoptotic genes only in cancer cells. Side effects from IVIG are rare and mostly mild and transient. More importantly adverse effects can be minimized by administration to a selective patient population in a proper way: slow infusion rate of 0.4 g/Kg body weight IVIG for 5 consecutive days, given in monthly cycles. The only downside of IVIG therapy is its high price. Therefore, clinicians should balance efficiency versus cost in deciding whether or not to treat certain conditions with IVIG.

Two patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia followed by idiopathic (immune) thrombocytopenic purpura: case report

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) are separate and well-recognized clinical syndromes, 10both having potential for disastrous outcomes. Sequential occurrence of these two diseases has not been reported in the literature. We report herein two patients who were initially diagnosed as having HIT but whose later clinical course was similar to ITP. Although dysfunction of immune system seems to play a role, the precise mechanisms for the development of these diseases are unclear. As both conditions have different natural histories and require different treatment modalities, it is important to recognize that these two diseases may be seen sequentially.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombotic sequelae: a review

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) occurs in 1-5% of patients treated with heparin. The pathogenesis involves the formation of antibodies to heparin-platelet factor 4 complexes, and the major clinical sequelae are thrombotic. Diagnosis is based on a combination of clinical and laboratory data. Treatment consists of stopping heparin, but, insofar as the risk of thrombosis remains high, treatment by alternative antithrombotic agents is indicated. Most clinical experience has been with danaparoid sodium and hirudin. The use of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) in subsequent HIT episodes has been described, but is not recommended, especially with the introduction of new agents, such as oral thrombin inhibitors and pentasaccharides, which are hoped to reduce the use of heparins and the occurrence of HIT.

IVIg inhibits reticuloendothelial system function and ameliorates murine passive-immune thrombocytopenia independent of anti-idiotype reactivity

Although the mechanism of action of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in treating antibody-dependent thrombocytopenia remains unclear, most studies have suggested that IVIg blocks the function of Fc receptors in the reticuloendothelial system (RES) and/or the protective effect may be due to the presence of variable region-reactive (anti-idiotype) antibodies within IVIg. We evaluated the effect of IVIg on platelet counts in a murine model of passively induced immune thrombocytopenia (PIT). Although IVIg was unable to neutralize the binding of two platelet-specific monoclonal antibodies to their target antigens either in vivo or in vitro, it was able to prevent PIT as well as ameliorate pre-established PIT mediated by these antibodies. IVIg adsorbed against the antibody used to induce thrombocytopenia or endogenous murine immunoglobulin also protected against PIT, indicating that antibodies with anti-idiotype activity present in IVIg are not necessary for its effective treatment of PIT. IVIg significantly blocked the ability of the RES to clear antibody-sensitized red blood cells. F(ab')2 fragments of IVIg, which are unable to block the RES but retain the idiotypic regions, were ineffective at protecting mice from PIT. Our data suggest that IVIg exerts its rapid effect by inhibiting RES function and that anti-idiotype interactions are not required.

A study of 20 SLE patients with intravenous immunoglobulin--clinical and serologic response

OBJECTIVE

To test the clinical response of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients to intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg), and whether the clinical response of IVIg treatment in SLE is accompanied by modification of SLE-associated autoantibodies/antibodies (Abs) and complement levels.

METHODS

Twenty SLE patients were treated with high-dose (2 g/kg) IVIg monthly, in a 5-d schedule. Each patient received between 1-8 treatment courses. They were evaluated for the clinical response, Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM) score before and after IVIg, levels of antinuclear antibody (ANA), dsDNA (double-stranded DNA), SS-A or SS-B, ENA (extractable nuclear antigens), C3 and C4 levels before and after the treatment, and before and after each treatment course.

RESULTS

A beneficial clinical response following IVIg treatment was noted in 17 out of 20 patients (85%). Few clinical manifestations responded more to treatment: arthritis, fever, thrombocytopenia, and neuropsychiatric lupus. In 9 patients evaluated before and after IVIg, mean SLAM score decreased from 19. 3+/-4.7 to 4+/-2.9 (P<0.0001). There was a tendency towards abnormal levels of complement and Abs before IVIg courses among the treatment responders compared with the non-responders, and similarly the former tended to have normalization of their abnormal levels more than the latter. These differences were found statistically significant only with respect to C4 and SS-A or SS-B levels before IVIg courses.

CONCLUSION

IVIg has a high response rate among SLE patients. A combination of clinical manifestations, Abs and complement levels may aid in the future in predicting who among SLE patients will benefit more from IVIg treatment.