Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone for ovulation induction in polycystic ovary syndrome: a prospective, randomized trial of two starting doses in a chronic low-dose step-up protocol

Comparison of two different starting doses of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) for intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles in non-obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): a retrospective cohort study

We aimed to compare the efficacy of two different starting doses of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH), 37.5 vs. 75 international units (IU) for intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles in non-obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). A total of 109 women who underwent first rFSH stimulated IUI cycle were included in this retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome measure was the clinical pregnancy rate. No significant difference was found in terms of clinical pregnancy rate between the two groups (22% for the 37.5-IU group and 24% for the 75-IU group, respectively, p = .808). There was no significant difference in monofollicular development rate among the groups (p = .354). The total rFSH consumption was lower in the 37.5-IU group compared to the 75-IU group (p< .001). There was no statistically significant difference in pregnancy rates between the 37.5-IU and 75-IU groups in both normal weight (BMI: 19-24.9 kg/m²) and overweight (BMI: 25-29.9 kg/m²) women (p = .889 and .518, respectively). These results suggest that the starting doses of 37.5 and 75 IU of rFSH do not show significant difference in clinical pregnancy rates in non-obese PCOS women undergoing IUI cycles.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Low-dose gonadotropin treatment is advised for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). However, there are few comparative data on the efficacy of different starting doses of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) for intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles in PCOS women.What the results of this study add? There was no statistically significant difference in pregnancy rates of non-obese patients with PCOS having IUI whether rFSH was started at 37.5 or 75 international units (IU).What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? A starting dose of 37.5 IU of rFSH may be a reasonable approach for IUI cycles in non-obese PCOS women.

[Ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophins in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome]

OBJECTIVES

The main objective of this study was to describe the ovulation rate in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome, treated with ovulation induction/intra-uterine insemination and follitropin alfa by gonadotrophins at a second attempt.

METHODS

An observational, national and multicentre study was carried out: 51 French physicians (endocrinologists, gynaecologists) participated. Eligible patients were followed according to the usual clinical practices. The primary endpoint was the number of ovulations (spontaneous or triggered). Quality of life evaluation (by FertiQoL), compliance, and patient satisfaction were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of 202 patients (mean age: 29.9 years; mean infertility: 2.9 years) were included: 78.4% met the Rotterdam definition. The ovulation rate was 93.3% (95% confidence interval [89.8; 96.8]%). At 12 weeks of gestation, 38 patients had an ongoing pregnancy. A difference of 10 points of the mean total FertiQoL score was observed between the two attempts. No patient reported missing injection. More than 9 in 10 patients said they were satisfied to very satisfied with the use of the pen injector for administration of follitropin alfa. Eight patients (4.0%) had hyperstimulation leading to cycle cancellation, and two patients (1.1%) reported ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

At the second cycle of follitropin alfa stimulation, a high rate of ovulations, satisfactory compliance and tolerance profile associated with a change in quality of life were reported.

Use of letrozole and clomiphene citrate combined with gonadotropins in clomiphene-resistant infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a prospective study

Background

Gonadotropin has been used to stimulate ovulation in clomiphene-resistant infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), but it is associated with overstimulated cycles with the development of many follicles. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and efficacy of letrozole and clomiphene citrate (CC) combined with human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) in CC-resistant infertile women with PCOS.

Methods

Ninety-four women received the letrozole + HMG, 90 women received CC + HMG, and 71 women received HMG only. All women received one treatment regimen in one treatment cycle. All patients were given HMG 75 IU on alternate days daily starting on day 3 or day 7 until the day of administration of human chorionic gonadotropin.

Results

The rate of monofollicular development was 80.2% in the letrozole + HMG group, 65.3% in the CC + HMG group, and 54.7% in the HMG-only group (P<0.05 for letrozole + HMG vs the other two groups). The number of developing follicles (≥14 mm follicles) and the cycle cancellation rate due to ovarian hyperresponse were the lowest in the letrozole + HMG group, but the difference was not significant. The ovulation and pregnancy rate were similar among the three protocols. The HMG dose needed and the mean duration of treatment were significantly lower in the letrozole + HMG and CC + HMG groups compared with the HMG-only group.

Conclusion

Letrozole in combination with HMG is an effective protocol for reducing the risks of hyperstimulation for ovarian induction in CC-resistant women with PCOS. This combination may be more appropriate in patients who are particularly sensitive to gonadotropin.

WITHDRAWN: Recombinant FSH versus urinary gonadotrophins or recombinant FSH for ovulation induction in subfertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome

This review has been replaced by a review entitled 'Gonadotrophins for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome'.

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

Clomiphene citrate co-treatment with low dose urinary FSH versus urinary FSH for clomiphene resistant PCOS: randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of clomiphene citrate [CC] co-administration during the use of exogenous low-dose urinary FSH [uFSH] for induction of ovulation in CC-resistant infertile PCOS women.

METHODS

In a randomised controlled setting, 174 CC-resistant infertile PCOS women were randomized into two parallel groups; Group I received CC 100 mg/day for 5 days plus uFSH 37.5 IU/day while group II received only uFSH 37.5 IU /day. Subsequent increments of uFSH by 37.5 IU/day were made according to response. Primary outcome was ovulation rate. Secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rates, number of follicles, endometrial thickness, and gonadotropins consumption.

RESULTS

Our results have demonstrated that group I compared to group II had significantly higher ovulation rate per intention to treat [ITT] [72.4 % vs. 34.2 %, p < 0.001]. Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were comparable between the two groups. Group I consumed significantly lower total FSH dose and needed significantly shorter stimulation duration compared to group II.

CONCLUSION

CC co-administered during low dose HP uFSH versus uFSH for CC-resistant PCOS yields significantly higher ovulation rate and less consumption of FSH.

Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (follitropin alfa) versus purified urinary follicle-stimulating hormone in a low-dose step-up regimen to induce ovulation in Japanese women with anti-estrogen-ineffective oligo- or anovulatory infertility: results of a single-blind Phase III study

Purpose

We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (follitropin alfa) and purified urinary human follicle-stimulating hormone (urofollitropin) for ovulation induction in Japanese women with anovulatory infertility;also to verify the noninferiority (in terms of ovulation rate) of follitropin alfa versus urofollitropin.

Methods

In a Phase III, multicenter, single-blind, parallel-group study, we enrolled 265 Japanese women aged 20-39 years. The patients were menstruating without apparent ovulation or were amenorrheic (with a positive progestin challenge test), and had failed to conceive with anti-estrogen ovulation-induction therapy. The patients underwent a low-dose step-up regimen using follitropin alfa or urofollitropin with a starting dose of 75 IU. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who ovulated (mid-luteal serum progesterone ≥5 ng/mL and/or confirmed clinical pregnancy). Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients with a dominant follicle (≥18 mm) and the duration of stimulation.

Results

Ovulation occurred in 79.1% and 82.6% of the patients who received follitropin alfa and urofollitropin, respectively, in the full-analysis set (n = 261), and in 79.2% and 82.5% of the per-protocol set (n = 251). The predefined noninferiority criteria for the primary endpoint were achieved. No significant differences were observed in any secondary endpoint. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by a similar proportion of patients in each group (follitropin alfa, 53.5%; urofollitropin, 50.0%).

Conclusions

No significant difference in the primary efficacy endpoint (rate of ovulation) was observed between follitropin alfa and purified urofollitropin in women with anovulatory infertility who were menstruating or had progestin-positive amenorrhea. The use of treatment holidays in this study prevents comparison of the data with previous trials that utilized consecutive daily doses.

Predicting the FSH threshold dose in women with WHO Group II anovulatory infertility failing to ovulate or conceive on clomiphene citrate

BACKGROUND

The objective of this investigation was to establish independent predictors of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) threshold dose in anovulatory women undergoing ovulation induction with FSH preparations.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-one patients with WHO Group II anovulatory infertility failing to ovulate or conceive on clomiphene citrate underwent ovarian stimulation with FSH-only preparations following a low-dose step-up protocol. The individual FSH threshold dose was defined as the FSH dose when meeting the human chorionic gonadotrophin criteria (one follicle ≥17 mm, or 2–3 follicles ≥15 mm). The influence of demographics, physical characteristics, obstetric and infertility and menstrual cycle history, ovarian ultrasonography, endocrine parameters and type of gonadotrophin preparation on the FSH threshold dose was assessed through multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

In the univariate analysis, age, body mass index (BMI), failure to ovulate with clomiphene citrate, menstrual cycle history (amenorrhea, oligomenorrhea or anovulatory cycles of 21–35 days), mean ovarian volume, LH/FSH ratio, testosterone and free androgen index were significant (P < 0.05) predictors of FSH threshold dose. In the multivariate analysis, menstrual cycle history, mean ovarian volume and BMI remained significant (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The individual FSH threshold dose for ovulation induction in anovulatory women can be predicted based on three variables easily determined in clinical practice: menstrual cycle history, mean ovarian volume and BMI. A FSH dosage nomogram was constructed based on these parameters.

Improved monofollicular ovulation in anovulatory or oligo-ovulatory women after a low-dose step-up protocol with weekly increments of 25 international units of follicle-stimulating hormone

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness and efficiency of two low-dose step-up protocols for ovulation induction in women with anovulatory infertility (World Health Organization group II).

DESIGN

Open-label, prospective, randomized, group-comparative, multicenter study.

SETTING

Eighteen infertility centers in Europe and Canada.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred fifty-eight anovulatory or oligo-ovulatory infertile women.

INTERVENTION(S)

Patients were randomly assigned to one of two protocols for one cycle of follitropin beta (rFSH) using a pen device. The starting dosage was 50 IU/day for 7 days. In the absence of follicles > or =12 mm, the daily dosage was increased by either 25 or 50 IU per week.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The percentage of all subjects treated who ovulated after one treatment cycle (efficacy) and the total rFSH dose to reach ovulation (efficiency).

RESULT(S)

The 25-IU group had a higher incidence of monofollicular growth (41.3% of 80 vs. 21.8% of 78 women) and ovulation (81.3% vs. 60.3%), a lower cumulative rFSH dose (887 IU vs. 984 IU), and fewer cancellations due to hyperresponse (>3 follicles > or =15 mm; 5.0% vs. 20.5%). Both protocols were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION(S)

Weekly increments of 25 IU in the daily dose were more effective and efficient than 50-IU increments.

Urofollitropin and ovulation induction

Anovulation is a common cause of female infertility. Treatment for women with anovulation is aimed at induction of ovulation. Ovulation induction with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is indicated in women with WHO type II anovulation in whom treatment with clomifene citrate (clomifene) has failed. The majority of these women have polycystic ovary syndrome. The major disadvantages of ovulation induction with FSH are the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and the risk of higher order multiple pregnancies. To reduce the rate of complications due to multiple follicular development, FSH should be administered using a chronic low-dose protocol with small dose increments. In women with WHO type I anovulation, an exogenous supply of luteinizing hormone (LH) is required to achieve an adequate follicular response to FSH treatment. Thus, ovulation induction with FSH is not the treatment of choice in these women. FSH is a hormone that stimulates follicle growth and oocyte maturation. Endogenous FSH is produced by the pituitary gland and exists as a family of isohormones exhibiting distinct oligosaccharide structures. FSH for exogenous administration is derived from urine or is produced as recombinant FSH. The commercially available FSH products all contain different mixtures of FSH isoforms. To determine the effectiveness of urofollitropin (urinary-derived FSH), a comparison with the other available gonadotropins was made (i.e. recombinant FSH and human menopausal gonadotropin). Urofollitropin and recombinant FSH appear to be equally effective and well tolerated for ovulation induction. Human menopausal gonadotropin is comparably effective to urofollitropin in terms of pregnancy outcomes. It remains unclear whether human menopausal gonadotropins have a higher risk of overstimulation and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome compared to urofollitropin in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. In practice, recombinant products are more convenient to use but are also more expensive. Therefore, if availability is not an issue but costs are, there is still a place for the use of urofollitropins for ovulation induction.

Gonadotrophins in ovulation induction

For anovulatory women who fail to ovulate or conceive with clomiphene citrate, gonadotrophin ovulation induction has been the conventional second-line therapy. The aim of treatment is to achieve monofollicular development and ovulation. This differs fundamentally from the aim of ovarian stimulation for IVF, in which multiple follicular development is the goal. The small therapeutic window of ovulation induction requires a rigorous approach to monitoring, and willingness to cancel the cycle when multiple follicle development occurs. The two most widely used approaches are the low-dose step-up and the step-down protocols. While the latter more closely mimics the normo-ovulatory cycle, outcomes are similar. For safety reasons, the step-down protocol has not been widely adopted. The principle risks of ovulation induction are ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and multiple pregnancy. There is a need to individualize treatment if outcomes are to be optimized. The role of adjuvant therapies remains unclear. However, prediction models based on initial screening parameters enable the optimal dose of FSH to be determined, and the identification of patients with a poor prognosis for successful treatment.

Gonadotrophin treatment in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome

Gonadotrophin treatment in clomiphene citrate resistant polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patients, using either low-dose step-up or low-dose step-down protocols, is highly effective to achieve singleton live births. Concomitant use of gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogues (GnRHa), which will block the endogenous feedback for monofollicular development during the low-dose step-up protocol, should not be employed. It is more difficult to induce ovulation in patients with more 'severe' PCOS, characterized by obesity and insulin resistance. There is need for optimization of starting doses for both the low-dose step-up and step-down protocols. Such optimization will prevent hyperstimulation due to a starting dose far above the FSH threshold, as well as minimize the time-consuming low-dose increments by starting with a higher dose in women with augmented FSH threshold. External validation of reported models for prediction of FSH response is warranted for tailoring and optimizing treatment for everyday clinical practice. Although preliminary, the partial cessation of follicular development, along with regression leading to atresia, lends support to the LH ceiling theory, emphasizing the delicate balance and need for both FSH and LH in normal follicular development. Future well-designed randomized controlled trials will reveal whether IVF with or without in-vitro maturation of the oocytes will improve safety and efficacy compared with classical ovulation induction strategies.

FSH and LH together in ovarian stimulation

The authors review the physiology of the ovulatory cycle and the role of the gonadotrophins in ovulation induction in patients with anovulatory disorders and in multifollicular development for assisted reproductive technologies. The use of gonadotrophins with luteinizing hormone (LH) activity and the use of recombinant LH associated with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) are discussed. The authors point out that administration of gonadotrophins with LH activity is essential in hypogonadotropic hypogonadal anovulation, and data available in the medical literature allow the conclusion that recombinant LH may be added to all ovarian stimulation protocols because it is difficult to determine which patients will benefit from LH administration and there is no evidence that LH affects adversely the outcome of ovarian stimulation. The use of recombinant LH in addition to recombinant FSH may be particularly useful when a GnRH antagonist is associated with the ovarian stimulation regimen, by preventing the fall in estradiol and diminishing FSH requirements.