Superovulation and intrauterine insemination in cases of treated mild pelvic disease

Surgical management of endometriosis to optimize fertility

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Surgery is an integral element of treatment for infertility caused by endometriosis. This review summarizes the purported mechanisms of infertility in endometriosis, as well as the impacts of surgery for endometriosis on fertility, including pregnancy achieved spontaneously and with assisted reproductive technology (ART).

RECENT FINDINGS

Endometriosis' effect on fertility is multifactorial. The sequela of increased inflammation resulting from endometriosis causes alterations in ovarian, tubal, and uterine function. Removing or destroying these lesions reduces inflammation. Surgical treatment of both early-stage endometriosis and deeply infiltrating endometriosis improves spontaneous pregnancy rates and ART pregnancy rates. Conventional or robotic laparoscopy is the preferred surgical approach.

SUMMARY

Endometriosis has detrimental effects on fertility, including negative impacts on oocyte, tubal, and endometrial function. Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis elevates both spontaneous and ART pregnancy rates above those achieved with expectant management alone. The resection or destruction of endometriosis implants reduces inflammation, which likely improves the multifactorial infertility related to endometriosis. This topic is complex and controversial; more research in the form of high-quality randomized control trials is needed.

Endometriosis and infertility: how and when to treat?

Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial-like tissue (glands or stroma) outside the uterus, which induces a chronic inflammatory reaction. Although endometriosis impairs fertility, it does not usually completely prevent conception. The question of evidence based-medicine guidelines in endometriosis-associated infertility is weak in many situations. Therefore, we will highlight in this issue where the challenges are.

Significance of the serum CA-125 level in intrauterine insemination cycles

Objective

There are limited data regarding the significance of elevated serum CA-125 level during IUI cycles, even though it is used widely during the initial evaluation of infertile patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of serum CA-125 levels during IUI cycles.

Methods

Among the patients with controlled ovarian stimulation and IUI cycles at Seoul National University Hospital from Jan 2005 through Dec 2009, 92 cases with no identified endometriotic lesion, ovarian tumor, salpingeal lesion, or uterine myoma were selected. To compare the clinical characteristics between the pregnancy group and the non-pregnancy group, the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test were used.

Results

The overall pregnancy rate was 18.5% (17/92). The pregnancy group showed a higher number of follicles 16 mm in diameter (p=0.036), endometrial thickness (p<0.001), ampules of gonadotropin (p=0.009), and higher body mass index (p=0.022) than the non-pregnancy group. No significant difference was observed in the serum CA-125 level or the proportion of patients with CA-125 exceeding 17 IU/mL between the two groups.

Conclusion

The prognostic value of serum CA-125 level among infertile patients with IUI cycles is considered limited.

No difference in cycle pregnancy rate and in cumulative live-birth rate between women with surgically treated minimal to mild endometriosis and women with unexplained infertility after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination

OBJECTIVE

The association between infertility and minimal to mild endometriosis is controversial and poorly understood. The clinical pregnancy rate (PR) per cycle after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) with or without intrauterine insemination (IUI) is reportedly lower in women with surgically untreated minimal to mild endometriosis than in women with unexplained infertility. It is possible that prior laparoscopic removal of endometriosis has a positive effect on the clinical PR after COH and IUI. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that after COH and IUI the PR per cycle and the cumulative live-birth rate (CLBR) are equal or higher in women with recently surgically treated minimal to mild endometriosis when compared with women with unexplained infertility.

DESIGN

A retrospective, controlled cohort study.

SETTING

Leuven University Fertility Centre, a tertiary academic referral center.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred seven women treated during 259 cycles with COH and IUI including patients with endometriosis (n = 58, 137 cycles) and unexplained infertility (n = 49, 122 cycles). All patients with endometriosis had minimal (n = 41, 100 cycles) or mild (n = 17, 37 cycles) disease that had been laparoscopically removed within 7 months before the onset of treatment with COH and IUI.

INTERVENTION(S)

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation using clomiphene citrate (23 cycles) or gonadotrophins (236 cycles) in combination with IUI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Clinical PR per cycle and CLBR within four cycles of treatment with COH and IUI.

RESULT(S)

The clinical PR per cycle was comparable in women with minimal or mild endometriosis (21% or 18.9%, respectively) and in women with unexplained infertility (20.5%). The CLBR within four cycles of COH and IUI was also comparable in women with minimal endometriosis, mild endometriosis, and unexplained infertility (70.2%, 68.2 %, 66.5%, respectively).

CONCLUSION(S)

The data from our study suggest that COH and IUI shortly after laparoscopic excision of endometriosis is as effective as COH and IUI in patients with unexplained subfertility.