Ticlopidine-induced cholestatic hepatitis: report of three cases and review of the literature

A joint allergist/cardiologist classification for thienopyridines hypersensitivity reactions based on their symptomatic patterns and its impact on the management strategies

The role and importance of thienopyridines such as ticlopidine, clopidogrel, and prasugrel is well-established for several indications, ranging from prevention of acute coronary syndromes to percutaneous coronary interventions, where the dual antiplatelet therapy represents the gold standard to avoid denovo coronary stenosis. However, there is a significant cohort of patients with coronary artery disease who may manifest hypersensitivity reactions to thienopyridines. The examination of the various case reports from medical literature leads to identify mainly four clinical patterns of hypersensitivity to thienopyridines which involves more frequently cutaneous, hematologic, and articular tissues, therefore the kind and predominance of clinical symptoms may determine a different clinical approach to overcome or neutralize thienopyridines hypersensitivity.

Use of antiplatelet agents for prevention of ischemic stroke

Overall management to lower risk for ischemic stroke is multifaceted. Management includes measures to treat risk factors for accelerated atherosclerosis and stroke, antithrombotic therapies to lower the risk for thromboembolism, and surgery to treat a defined arterial or cardiac lesion. Treatment decisions are made on a case-by-case basis, with most patients receiving some combination of medication and recommendations for lifestyle modification. Some patients will also undergo surgical or endovascular interventions. This article discusses antithrombotic treatment for ischemic stroke prevention, placing major emphasis on the indications for and administration of antiplatelet therapy.

[A case of ticlopidine induced acute cholestatic hepatitis and pure red cell aplasia]

Ticlopidine inhibits platelet aggregation and provides beneficial secondary prevention of cerebrovascular and coronary artery disease. Frequently reported adverse effects of ticlopidine include diarrhea, nausea, and rash. However, to our knowledge, there are only a few published reports of the simultaneous occurrence of cholestatic hepatitis and pure red cell aplasia. Here we report a patient with simultaneous severe cholestatic hepatitis and pure red cell aplasia associated with ticlopidine. Although these adverse effects are rare, periodic hematological and liver function tests are recommended after starting ticlopidine.

Cilostazol, clopidogrel or ticlopidine to prevent sub-acute stent thrombosis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Sub-acute thrombosis is a serious complication of coronary artery stenting. Clopidogrel plus aspirin is the accepted prophylactic regimen, but has yet to be proven superior to ticlopidine plus aspirin, and a new regimen combining cilostazol and aspirin has been introduced.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis of all trials that compared >or=2 oral anti-thrombotic strategies in patients undergoing coronary stent placement to determine which treatment optimally prevents adverse cardiac events in the 30 days following stent insertion. We used meta-regression to compare all strategies to a shared control strategy: ticlopidine plus aspirin. We also compared randomized trials to historically controlled and other non-randomized trials. We conducted sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis to assess for possible heterogeneity.

RESULTS

In comparison to ticlopidine plus aspirin the odds-ratios for cardiac events, with 95% confidence intervals were: aspirin alone, 4.29 (3.09-5.97), coumadin plus aspirin, 2.65 (2.18-3.21), clopidogrel plus aspirin, 1.06 (0.86-1.31), cilostazol plus aspirin, 0.73 (0.47-1.14). Among trials that compared clopidogrel plus aspirin to ticlopidine plus aspirin, historically controlled trials were statistically distinct from randomized trials. The analysis of cilostazol was sensitive to the small size of the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither clopidogrel plus aspirin nor cilostazol plus aspirin can be statistically distinguished from ticlopidine plus aspirin for the prevention of adverse cardiac events in the 30 days after stenting. A randomized trial including cilostazol is warranted.

Hepatotoxicity associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

NSAIDs are one of most frequently prescribed agents in clinical practice. Whereas hepatotoxicity is a rare complication of most NSAIDs (typically 1 to 10 per 100,000 persons exposed), the high level of usage means that these drugs cause liver disease. Because of their divergent chemical structures, the mechanisms and clinicopathological manifestations of hepatotoxicity vary widely. The reactive metabolite syndrome, in which serious rash, eosinophilia, and other forms of tissue injury are common, may be incited by several NSAIDs, including newer agents. Women, people aged more than 50 years, and for some drugs, the type of arthritis, may be risk factors for drug-induced liver injury. The spectrum of NSAID-drug related hepatotoxicity continues to expand, with reports of interactive toxicity in adults with hepatitis C and recognition of rare cases of liver disease associated with non-selective, selective, and preferential COX-2 inhibitors. Better outcomes require people taking NSAIDs to be aware of possible drug reactions involving the liver, and prescribers should be vigilant for early symptoms of hepatotoxicity so that incriminated agents are discontinued promptly.

Intrahepatic cholestasis and pure red cell aplasia associated with ticlopidine

A 77-year-old woman developed jaundice and anemia 3 and 8 weeks, respectively, after starting ticlopidine (100 mg daily) for cerebral infarction. From the laboratory findings, including histological study of the liver and bone marrow specimen, ticlopidine-induced intrahepatic cholestasis and pure red cell aplasia were highly suspected. Jaundice slowly improved after the withdrawal of ticlopidine. Anemia immediately improved with steroid therapy. These are very rare adverse effects of ticlopidine; nevertheless, periodic laboratory examinations are recommended.

Fulminant liver disease

Fulminant liver disease, acute liver failure (ALF), is one of the most intriguing and challenging conditions in the entire field of internal medicine. ALF is defined as the onset of hepatic encephalopathy and coagulopathy in patients with no known underlying liver disease within 8 to 26 weeks of onset of illness. Many cases develop within a few days, dramatically transforming an otherwise healthy individual to a patient with a high risk for developing multi-organ failure and death.

A new Poisson and Bayesian-based method to assign risk and causality in patients with suspected hepatic adverse drug reactions: a report of two new cases of ticlopidine-induced hepatotoxicity

OBJECTIVE

The diagnosis of drug-induced hepatotoxicity is based on circumstantial evidence and is often inaccurate. We have designed a method based on published data to assign causality to suspected cases of drug-induced hepatotoxicity.

DESIGN

Forty-seven published cases of ticlopidine-induced hepatotoxicity were identified by a Medline-based literature search. Data regarding abnormal liver function in patients receiving ticlopidine were obtained from the only published placebo-ticlopidine clinical trial (the Canadian American Ticlopidine Study; CATS). Thus, we calculated the maximum number of expected hepatotoxicity cases in patients exposed to ticlopidine and those not exposed to the drug by means of the Poisson distribution. The calculated odds ratio was used as a prior odd for subsequent quantification, using a Bayesian-based approach, of individual ticlopidine-induced hepatotoxicity likelihood. Concretely, the prior odd is modified by several separate likelihood ratios: age; sex; AST level; ALT level; alkaline phosphatase level; total bilirubin level; latent period of adverse reaction appearance; and period of remission of adverse reaction. This methodology was applied to two new cases of suspected ticlopidine-induced hepatotoxicity.

RESULTS

The prior probability of ticlopidine-induced hepatotoxicity derived from CATS data is 61.29%. This is in contrast with the 28.83% incidence rate of drug-induced liver alterations in the general population. Alkaline phosphatase levels and total bilirubin levels were six times the normal values among individuals with ticlopidine-induced hepatotoxicity than in the general population. They were the most relevant likelihood ratios of the Bayesian model to establish a high level of causality relationship between a hepatotoxicity event and ticlopidine use.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed method, which links information from clinical trials with the profile of clinical hepatotoxicity of a drug defined from published cases reported after a drug is marketed, can be a useful tool for drug postmarketing surveillance research.

Drug-induced liver disease

The incidence of drug-induced liver disease appears to be increasing, reflecting the increasing number of new agents that have been introduced into clinical use over the past several decades. Among the topics covered, the author discusses incidence, diagnosis, risk factors, clinical presentations, hepatitis, and vascular injury. The author also reviews the hepatic injury seen with commonly prescribed drugs, emphasizing newer developments in the field and recent publications and reports.

Drug-induced liver disease

The past year has seen several additions to the list of drugs that cause hepatic injury. Many of these agents produce fulminant hepatic necrosis and, in some cases, were withdrawn from the market (eg, bromfenac). Other drugs had warnings placed in their labeling along with stringent monitoring guidelines to alert physicians and patients alike to the potential for severe hepatic injury (eg, troglitazone, tolcapone). New reports of hepatoxicity continued to appear for many older agents, in some cases expanding the hepatotoxic spectrum for the drugs. Vanishing bile duct syndrome has drawn increasing attention and is now associated with more than 30 drugs. Ibuprofen is among those drugs newly described as causing this syndrome. Hepatitis C virus infection was reported as a possible risk factor for ibuprofen hepatotoxicity, raising the issue of safe use of nonprescription as well as prescription drugs in patients with underlying liver disease. Reports have appeared about acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity in several dozen children from unintentional overdoses, in addition to cases of therapeutic misadventure in adults.