Complementary role of echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance in the non-invasive evaluation of suspected arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

Phenotypic expression of ARVC: How 12 lead ECG can predict left or right ventricle involvement. A familiar case series and a review of literature

AIMS

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited heart-muscle disease primarily affecting the right ventricle (RV) and potentially causing sudden death in young people. The natural history of the disease is firstly characterized by a concealed form progressing over a biventricular involvement. Three different cases coming from the same family are presented together with a review of the literature.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Multi-parameter analysis including imaging and electrocardiographic analysis is presented since the first medical referral with follow-up ranging from 11 to 38years. Case 1 presented a typical RV involvement in agreement with the ECG pattern. Case 2 presented a prevalent left ventricular involvement leading from the beginning to a pattern of dilated cardiomyopathy in agreement with his ECG evolution over the years. On the other side, Case 3 came to observation with a typical RV involvement (similar to Case 1) but with ECG evolution of typical left ventricle involvement (similar to Case 2). The genetic analysis showed a mutation in desmoglein-2 (DSG2) gene: p. Arg49His. Comparison between size and localization of ventricular dyskinesia at cardiovascular imaging and the surface 12 lead electrocardiography are proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

ARVC may lead to an extreme phenotypic variability in clinical manifestations even within patients coming from the same family in which ARVC is caused by the same genetic mutation. ECG progression over time reflects disease evolution and in particular cases may anticipate wall motion abnormalities by years.

The multi-modality cardiac imaging approach to the Athlete's heart: an expert consensus of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging

The term 'athlete's heart' refers to a clinical picture characterized by a slow heart rate and enlargement of the heart. A multi-modality imaging approach to the athlete's heart aims to differentiate physiological changes due to intensive training in the athlete's heart from serious cardiac diseases with similar morphological features. Imaging assessment of the athlete's heart should begin with a thorough echocardiographic examination.Left ventricular (LV) wall thickness by echocardiography can contribute to the distinction between athlete's LV hypertrophy and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). LV end-diastolic diameter becomes larger (>55 mm) than the normal limits only in end-stage HCM patients when the LV ejection fraction is <50%. Patients with HCM also show early impairment of LV diastolic function, whereas athletes have normal diastolic function.When echocardiography cannot provide a clear differential diagnosis, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging should be performed.With CMR, accurate morphological and functional assessment can be made. Tissue characterization by late gadolinium enhancement may show a distinctive, non-ischaemic pattern in HCM and a variety of other myocardial conditions such as idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy or myocarditis. The work-up of athletes with suspected coronary artery disease should start with an exercise ECG. In athletes with inconclusive exercise ECG results, exercise stress echocardiography should be considered. Nuclear cardiology techniques, coronary cardiac tomography (CCT) and/or CMR may be performed in selected cases. Owing to radiation exposure and the young age of most athletes, the use of CCT and nuclear cardiology techniques should be restricted to athletes with unclear stress echocardiography or CMR.

Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: proposed modification of the task force criteria

BACKGROUND

In 1994, an International Task Force proposed criteria for the clinical diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) that facilitated recognition and interpretation of the frequently nonspecific clinical features of ARVC/D. This enabled confirmatory clinical diagnosis in index cases through exclusion of phenocopies and provided a standard on which clinical research and genetic studies could be based. Structural, histological, electrocardiographic, arrhythmic, and familial features of the disease were incorporated into the criteria, subdivided into major and minor categories according to the specificity of their association with ARVC/D. At that time, clinical experience with ARVC/D was dominated by symptomatic index cases and sudden cardiac death victims-the overt or severe end of the disease spectrum. Consequently, the 1994 criteria were highly specific but lacked sensitivity for early and familial disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Revision of the diagnostic criteria provides guidance on the role of emerging diagnostic modalities and advances in the genetics of ARVC/D. The criteria have been modified to incorporate new knowledge and technology to improve diagnostic sensitivity, but with the important requisite of maintaining diagnostic specificity. The approach of classifying structural, histological, electrocardiographic, arrhythmic, and genetic features of the disease as major and minor criteria has been maintained. In this modification of the Task Force criteria, quantitative criteria are proposed and abnormalities are defined on the basis of comparison with normal subject data.

CONCLUSIONS

The present modifications of the Task Force Criteria represent a working framework to improve the diagnosis and management of this condition.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00024505.

Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: proposed modification of the Task Force Criteria

BACKGROUND

In 1994, an International Task Force proposed criteria for the clinical diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) that facilitated recognition and interpretation of the frequently nonspecific clinical features of ARVC/D. This enabled confirmatory clinical diagnosis in index cases through exclusion of phenocopies and provided a standard on which clinical research and genetic studies could be based. Structural, histological, electrocardiographic, arrhythmic, and familial features of the disease were incorporated into the criteria, subdivided into major and minor categories according to the specificity of their association with ARVC/D. At that time, clinical experience with ARVC/D was dominated by symptomatic index cases and sudden cardiac death victims-the overt or severe end of the disease spectrum. Consequently, the 1994 criteria were highly specific but lacked sensitivity for early and familial disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Revision of the diagnostic criteria provides guidance on the role of emerging diagnostic modalities and advances in the genetics of ARVC/D. The criteria have been modified to incorporate new knowledge and technology to improve diagnostic sensitivity, but with the important requisite of maintaining diagnostic specificity. The approach of classifying structural, histological, electrocardiographic, arrhythmic, and genetic features of the disease as major and minor criteria has been maintained. In this modification of the Task Force criteria, quantitative criteria are proposed and abnormalities are defined on the basis of comparison with normal subject data.

CONCLUSIONS

The present modifications of the Task Force Criteria represent a working framework to improve the diagnosis and management of this condition. Clinical Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00024505.

Left ventricular noncompaction and cardiomyopathy: cause, contributor, or epiphenomenon?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss unresolved issues pertaining to aetiology and diagnosis of isolated left ventricular noncompaction.

RECENT FINDINGS

Left ventricular noncompaction may be sporadic or familial and is linked to mutations in mitochondrial, cytoskeletal, Z-line, and sarcomeric proteins. Severe childhood manifestations include fetal hydrops or sudden infant death syndrome. Adults with severe phenotypes have a similarly guarded prognosis due to heart failure, arrhythmia and thromboembolism. Conversely, healthy individuals may fulfil current imaging criteria for diagnosis. Left ventricular noncompaction is also observed in families with hypertrophic or dilated cardiomyopathy, casting doubt on its acceptance as a distinct disease entity.

SUMMARY

The extent of myocardial compaction may be a continuous trait within the population. Sensitive imaging techniques may detect subtle variations in morphology that fall within the normal range, underscoring the need for more restrictive diagnostic criteria, as in mitral valve prolapse. Conversely, rather than being a root cause of myocardial dysfunction, left ventricular noncompaction may represent a secondary consequence of a genetic alteration, well-tolerated when the heart is otherwise normal. In the presence of a pathogenic mutation, disruption to myocyte function at a molecular level may be the primary disease determinant, with noncompaction arising as a maladaptive remodelling response that compounds the disease process through subendocardial ischaemia and fibrosis.

The utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Perceptions of the utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the evaluation of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy have changed considerably in the past decade. This review offers an up-to-date perspective on the diagnostic role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the genetics era.

RECENT FINDINGS

Originally hailed as a putative gold standard in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, cardiovascular magnetic resonance has received a more guarded reception lately owing to interobserver variability and lack of standardized protocols. Recent studies have nonetheless affirmed its value as an integral component of the diagnostic work-up. Quantitative volume analysis is relatively robust, but visualization of myocardial fat by spin-echo imaging is less reliable. Interpretation of wall motion abnormalities appears reproducible among expert readers. Emerging data suggest a key role for late gadolinium enhancement in detection of left ventricular involvement.

SUMMARY

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy is facilitated by appropriate patient selection and preparation, experienced readers and operators, and a dedicated, comprehensive protocol. Indications for magnetic resonance assessment include proven arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy in the family, unexplained ventricular arrhythmia, inverted T-waves in the right precordial or lateral leads, and/or family history of sudden cardiac death. Arrhythmia suppression is essential for optimal electrocardiographic triggering and image acquisition.