Trends in lower extremity surgical and endovascular revascularization in Germany

Real-world VASCADE closure device versus manual compression use and outcomes in patients with severe common femoral artery disease

BACKGROUND

The VASCADE closure device deploys an extravascular collagen plug. Its use in those with access site disease undergoing peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the VASCADE closure device compared to manual compression (MC) in patients with moderate femoral access site disease.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective review of patients undergoing PVI with at least moderate access site disease. Our institutional database was linked to the Vascular Quality Initiative database, and 200 patients were selected from a 1:1 propensity-matched cohort. Data on procedural metrics and outcomes up to 30-days were abstracted.

RESULTS

There were 103 procedures that used VASCADE and 97 used MC. Baseline variables were similar between groups. The mean age was 68.2 ± 11.2 years and 37.6% were women. Closing mean activated clotting time (ACT) was shorter in VASCADE (198 s VASCADE vs. 213 s MC; p = 0.018). There was a nonsignificant decrease in external compression device use with VASCADE (VASCADE 19.0% vs. MC 28.1%; p = 0.15). At 30-days, there was a nonsignificant reduction in hematoma with VASCADE (3.8% vs. 7.8% MC; p = 0.25) and no difference in retroperitoneal bleeding (0.5%). Pseudoaneurysm rate was similar (1.3% VASCADE vs. 1.7% MC; p = 0.79). The 30-day mortality rate was similar between the two groups and not related to the procedure (1.3% VASCADE vs. 0.9% MC; p = 0.79).

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing PVI with at least moderate access site disease, safety and efficacy after using VASCADE was comparable with MC.

Clinical Outcomes of Ambulatory Endovascular Treatment Using 4-French and 6-French Femoral Access Strategies: The Bio4amb Multicentre Trial

Purpose

Ambulatory peripheral vascular interventions have been steadily increasing. In ambulatory procedures, 4F devices might be particularly useful having the potential to reduce access-site complications; however, further evidence on their safety and efficacy is needed.

Materials and Methods

BIO4AMB is a prospective, non-randomized mulitcentre, non-inferiority trial conducted in 35 centres in Europe and Australia comparing the use of 4F- and 6F-compatible devices. The main exclusion criteria included an American Society of Anaesthesiologists class ≥ 4, coagulation disorders, or social isolation. The primary endpoint was access-site complications within 30 days.

Results

The 4F group enrolled 390 patients and the 6F group 404 patients. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Vascular closure devices were used in 7.7% (4F group) and 87.6% (6F group) of patients. Patients with vascular closure device use in the 4F group were subsequently excluded from the primary analysis, resulting in 361 patients in the 4F group. Time to haemostasis was longer for the 4F group, but the total procedure time was shorter (13.2 ± 18.8 vs. 6.4 ± 8.9 min, p < 0.0001, and 39.1 ± 25.2 vs. 46.4 ± 27.6 min, p < 0.0001). Discharge on the day of the procedure was possible in 95.0% (4F group) and 94.6% (6F group) of patients. Access-site complications were similar between the groups (2.8% and 3.2%) and included predominantly groin haematomas and pseudoaneurysms. Major adverse events through 30 days occurred in 1.7% and 2.0%, respectively.

Conclusions

Ambulatory peripheral vascular interventions are feasible and safe. The use of 4F devices resulted in similar outcomes compared to that of 6F devices.

Supplementary Information

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00270-020-02738-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Follow-up of patients after revascularisation for peripheral arterial diseases: a consensus document from the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases and the European Society for Vascular Surgery

Peripheral arterial diseases comprise different clinical presentations, from cerebrovascular disease down to lower extremity artery disease, from subclinical to disabling symptoms and events. According to clinical presentation, the patient's general condition, anatomical location and extension of lesions, revascularisation may be needed in addition to best medical treatment. The 2017 European Society of Cardiology guidelines in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery have addressed the indications for revascularisation. While most cases are amenable to either endovascular or surgical revascularisation, maintaining long-term patency is often challenging. Early and late procedural complications, but also local and remote recurrences frequently lead to revascularisation failure. The rationale for surveillance is to propose the accurate implementation of preventive strategies to avoid other cardiovascular events and disease progression and avoid recurrence of symptoms and the need for redo revascularisation. Combined with vascular history and physical examination, duplex ultrasound scanning is the pivotal imaging technique for identifying revascularisation failures. Other non-invasive examinations (ankle and toe brachial index, computed tomography scan, magnetic resonance imaging) at regular intervals can optimise surveillance in specific settings. Currently, optimal revascularisation surveillance programmes are not well defined and systematic reviews addressing long-term results after revascularisation are lacking. We have systematically reviewed the literature addressing follow-up after revascularisation and we propose this consensus document as a complement to the recent guidelines for optimal surveillance of revascularised patients beyond the perioperative period.

Association of diabetic foot care and amputation rates in Germany

Podologists are nurses who care for the diabetic foot (orthotics, offloading devices, blisters, calluses, treatment of fungus infection and patient education). In contrast to podiatrists, they are not qualified to perform any surgical treatment or wound care. We analysed whether there is an association between the decrease in major amputations and the number of podologic foot care (PFC) visits prescribed in Germany. Detailed list of all major lower limb amputations (OPS 5-864) performed from 2007 to 2011 was provided by the Federal Statistical Office. Data were separated for the 16 federal states in Germany. Detailed lists of the number of PFC treatments for each of the 5 years were derived from the federal report of the statutory health insurance. The total numbers of hospitalised cases per year having diabetes mellitus documented as an additional diagnosis were used to adjust for the different rates of people with diabetes in each federal state. Within a 5-year time period, population-based major amputations per 100 000 people dropped from 21·7 in 2007 to 17·5 in 2011 (-18·5%); whereas the number of PFC treatments per 1000 insured increased from 22 in 2007 to 60 in 2011 (+172·7%). The total number of major amputations divided by the total number of hospitalised cases with the additional diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM) shows an inverse correlation with the number of PFC treatments per 1000 insured (Pearson's correlation factor is -0·52049). The five countries with the highest increase in PFC compared with the five countries with the lowest increase (35·6 versus 15·4 per 1000 insured) will have only small differences in the decrease in major amputation rates in this period (-5·1 versus -3·4 per 100.000). There is a strong association between increasing utilisation PFC and decreasing major amputations in Germany. Further study is required to document the cost-effectiveness of this service.

Primary stenting of TASC C and D femoropopliteal lesions: results of the STELLA register at 30 months

BACKGROUND

The 1-year results of the prospective register STELLA suggested that primary stenting of long femoropopliteal (FP) lesions (≥15-cm) was a sure and effective treatment. However, the long-term results of this technique remain unknown.

METHODS

STELLA is a prospective monocentric register of patients treated for FP lesions ≥15-cm (Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus [TASC] C and D) by direct stenting (Flexstar(®), Bard). The patients with de novo atheromatous lesions were included between November 2008 and October 2009 when the guidewire had crossed the lesion. Restenoses were excluded. The follow-up was coordinated by a clinical research assistant. Clinical and ultrasound evaluation were carried out every 3 months for 12 months, then every 6 months up to 30 months. Restenosis was defined by an index of peak systolic velocity >2.4.

RESULTS

Among the 58 patients (62 limbs) included, 40.3% presented an effort ischemia and 59.7% a critical ischemia (CI). The mean age was 71 ± 12 years. The lesions were classified as TASC D in 37.1% of the cases. The median length of the stenting was 26 ± 18 cm. The average follow-up was 26.1 months (1-30). At 30 months, a complete follow-up was obtained in 55 patients (58 limbs). The rate of survival was 79.6%. Nine of the 11 patients deceased presented initially with CI. Death was in connection with CI in 2 cases. At the date of latest news, 98.3% of the patients were under antiaggregating treatment, 20% received antivitamin K treatment, 75% received statins, and 75% received angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors. The rates of maintenance of the primary and secondary clinical improvement were 68.6 ± 6.0% and 82.6 ± 5.1% at 12 months and 65.1 ± 6.2% and 78.4 ± 5.6% at 30 months, respectively. The mean Rutherford index was 4.1 ± 1.0 in preoperative, 0.7 ± 1.2 at 12 months, and 0.6 ± 1.1 at 30 months (P < 0.001). Two major amputations were carried out at 9 and 28 months for patients initially with CI. The mean systolic pressure index was 0.6 ± 0.1 in preoperative and 1.0 ± 0.2 at 1-year and 0.9 ± 0.3 at 30 months (P < 0.001). The rates of primary and secondary patency were 66 ± 6.3% and 80.9 ± 9.5% at 12 months and 62.2 ± 6.6% and 77.2 ± 5.9% at 30 months, respectively. Between 0 and 12 months, 12 (19.3%) intrastent restenosis (ISR) were noted. One ISR was observed after 12 months. At the same period, we observed 11 and 1 target lesion revascularization, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In the long run, the primary stenting of long FP lesions (≥15-cm) is a safe and durable treatment. A strong clinical and ultrasound monitoring is indicated during the first year to maintain the clinical improvement.