The difference in mortality rates between endovascular and conservative treatment for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia(CLTI):A propensity score matching study

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of this study was to examine the impact of endovascular therapy versus conservative therapy on mortality rates among patients with CLTI. In addition, the outcomes of amputation free survival(AFS) were also studied in both groups.

METHODS

In this observational registry study, we retrospectively analyzed patients admitted to the Department of Vascular Surgery at Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, from January 2016 to September 2023. Patients were categorized into an endovascular treatment group and a conservative treatment group. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Propensity score matching was employed to balance covariates between the two groups, resulting in matched samples. We compared all-cause mortality between the groups and used univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to assess the impact of treatment on patient mortality both before and after matching.

RESULTS

A total of 120 patients with a mean age of (72±11) years were enrolled in this study, comprising 76 patients in the endovascular treatment group and 44 patients in the conservative treatment group. The median follow-up duration was 33.5 (21.3 , 45.0) months, during which the all-cause mortality rate was 32 out of 120 (26.7%). In terms of clinical characteristics, significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding age, hypertension, Rutherford classifications, and Wounds, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) scores (P < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found in gender, diabetes, coronary artery disease (CAD), smoking status, hyperlipidemia, prior ischemic stroke, or lesion site (P > 0.05). Prior to propensity score matching, univariate Cox regression analysis indicated that age, gender, smoking status, Rutherford classifications, and WIfI scores were significantly associated with patient mortality (P < 0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that age and smoking status were independently associated with patient mortality (P < 0.05). Using propensity score matching, 23 pairs of patients were successfully matched between the two groups. The 1-year and 3-year mortality rates in the endovascular group were 13.0% and 38.5%, respectively, compared to 17.4% and 36.0% in the conservative treatment group. No statistically significant differences were observed in 1-year (P=0.681) or 3-year (P=0.753) mortality rates between the two groups. Cox regression analysis also showed no significant difference in the risk of death between the two groups (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.14-5.55; P=0.880). AFS did not differ significantly between the two groups (Breslow-Wilcoxon p=0.225).

CONCLUSION

No significant differences were observed in 1-year and 3-year mortality rates between endovascular treatment and conservative treatment, and not all patients with CLTI require revascularisation to achieve an AFS that is similar to patients undergoing revascularisation, although the efficacy of conservative versus endovascular treatment in CLTI patients is still unclear. Age and smoking status emerged as independent risk factors associated with an elevated risk of mortality.

Comparing the efficacy and safety of endovascular therapy versus surgical revascularization for critical limb-threatening ischemia: A systematic review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is a severe manifestation of peripheral artery disease (PAD) that can lead to limb amputation and significantly reduce quality of life. In addition to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), endovascular therapy and surgical revascularization are the two revascularization options for CLTI. In recent years, there has been an ongoing debate about the best approach for CLTI patients. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine the current evidence and compare the clinical outcomes of endovascular therapy and surgical revascularization for CLTI.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) for studies comparing the outcomes of endovascular therapy versus surgery in patients with CLTI. The primary outcomes were major adverse limb events (MALE) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), while secondary outcomes included risk of bleeding, wound complications, readmission, unplanned reoperation, acute renal failure, and length of hospital stay. Pooled data was analyzed using the fixed-effect model or the random-effect model in Review Manager 5.3. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool were used to assess the bias of included studies.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies (47,609 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. The overall effect favors surgery over endovascular intervention in terms of MALE [odds ratio (OR) 1.13, 95% CI (1.01-1.28), P = 0.04]. Endovascular therapy is associated with lower MACE rates compared to surgery [OR 0.62, 95% CI (0.51-0.76), P < 0.00001]. Furthermore, the risk of bleeding, wound complications, readmission, unplanned reoperation, acute renal failure as well as the length of hospital stay was lower for endovascular intervention. Finally, there was no statistically significant difference in 30-day mortality between the two groups [OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.79-1.12, P = 0.52; Fig. 3i], and the pooled studies were homogeneous [P = 0.39; I2 = 5%].

CONCLUSION

Surgery may be the preferred treatment option for CLTI patients, as it is associated with a lower risk of MALE than endovascular therapy. However, endovascular therapy may be associated with a lower risk of MACE and lower rates of bleeding, wound complications, readmission, unplanned reoperation, acute renal failure, and shorter hospital stays. There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day mortality between the two groups. Ultimately, the decision to use endovascular therapy or surgery as the primary treatment strategy should be based on a multi-disciplinary team approach with careful consideration of patient characteristics and anatomy.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic biomarker in patients with peripheral artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a simple and routinely obtained parameter reflecting systemic inflammation, including in peripheral artery disease (PAD).

METHODS

This systematic review aimed to assess the role of NLR as a prognostic biomarker in patients with PAD. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, EBSCO, and Cochrane. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool risk ratios, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). A bivariate model was used to generate summary receiver operating characteristics with the corresponding area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

This review included 5243 patients with PAD from nine eligible studies. High NLR corresponded to at least a twofold increased risk of all-cause mortality (ACM), major adverse limb events (MALE), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). NLR's performance was good for predicting 1-year ACM (AUC 0.71 [95% CI: 0.59-0.79], sensitivity 58.2% [95% CI: 45.3-71.0], specificity 72.6% [95% CI: 65.6-79.62], PPV 41.0% [95% CI: 31.2-50.7], NPV 82.7% [95% CI: 74.1-91.3]) and 1-year MALE (AUC 0.78 [95% CI: 0.75-0.80], sensitivity 65.4% [95% CI: 41.6-89.2], specificity 77.7% [95% CI: 71.0-84.3], PPV 53.7% [95% CI: 47.3-60.1], NPV 83.91% [95% CI: 73.2-94.6]). However, these values tended to decrease as the follow-up duration extended, except for the pooled specificities, which exhibited the opposite pattern.

CONCLUSION

NLR emerges as a simple and cost-effective prognostic biomarker with decent performance for poor outcomes in patients with PAD (PROSPERO Registration No.: CRD42023486607).

Association Between Wound Healing and the Japanese Below-the-Knee Chronic Total Occlusion Score in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia After Endovascular Therapy

INTRODUCTION

In the current study, we hypothesized that the Japanese below-the-knee chronic total occlusion score could be used to stratify the lesion difficulty of endovascular therapy for below-the-knee chronic total occlusion through angiographic evaluation. We thus aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of the Japanese below-the-knee chronic total occlusion score in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia after successful endovascular therapy for below-the-knee chronic total occlusion.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center observational study. We enrolled 139 consecutive patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (149 limbs), who underwent successful endovascular therapy for chronic total occlusion between February 2008 and December 2017. The Japanese below-the-knee chronic total occlusion score was assessed based on the definition of the target arterial path. The evaluation items were the rate of amputation-free survival and wound healing at 1 year, and the association between wound healing at 1 year and the Japanese below-the-knee chronic total occlusion score.

RESULTS

The rates of amputation-free survival and wound healing at 1 year were 88.0 and 56.4%, respectively. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis identified direct flow to the wound (hazard ratio: 2.34, 95% confidence interval: 1.28-4.66; p<0.01); Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection stages 1-3 (hazard ratio: 2.81, 95% confidence interval: 1.63-5.18; p<0.01); and a Japanese below-the-knee chronic total occlusion score ≤1 (hazard ratio: 1.70, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-2.98; p=0.04) to be predictors of wound healing.

CONCLUSIONS

A Japanese below-the-knee chronic total occlusion score ≤1, direct flow to the wound, and Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection stages 1-3 were found to be associated with wound healing after successful endovascular therapy for below-the-knee chronic total occlusion in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This study was conducted to evaluate the prognostic impact of the Japanese below-the-knee chronic total occlusion (J-BTK CTO) score in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) after successful endovascular treatment (EVT). The results showed that the J-BTK CTO score not only evaluates the difficulty of EVT but also can predict limb prognosis. Using the J-BTK CTO score, it seems possible to predict the limb prognosis and make it useful in clinical practice.

How multidisciplinary clinics may mitigate socioeconomic barriers to care for chronic limb-threatening ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Although multidisciplinary clinics improve outcomes in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), their role in addressing socioeconomic disparities is unknown. Our institution treats patients with CLTI at both traditional general vascular clinics and a multidisciplinary Limb Preservation Program (LPP). The LPP is in a minority community, providing expedited care at a single facility by a consistent team. We compared outcomes within the LPP with our institution's traditional clinics and explored patients' perspectives on barriers to care to evaluate if the LPP might address them.

METHODS

All patients undergoing index revascularization for CLTI from 2014 to 2023 at our institution were stratified by clinic type (LPP or traditional). We collected clinical and socioeconomic variables, including Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Patient characteristics were compared using χ2, Student t, or Mood median tests. Outcomes were compared using log-rank and multivariable Cox analysis. We also conducted semi-structured interviews to understand patient-perceived barriers.

RESULTS

From 2014 to 2023, 983 limbs from 871 patients were revascularized; 19.5% of limbs were treated within the LPP. Compared with traditional clinic patients, more LPP patients were non-White (43.75% vs 27.43%; P < .0001), diabetic (82.29% vs 61.19%; P < .0001), dialysis-dependent (29.17% vs 13.40%; P < .0001), had ADI in the most deprived decile (29.38% vs 19.54%; P = .0061), resided closer to clinic (median 6.73 vs 28.84 miles; P = .0120), and had worse Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) stage (P < .001). There were no differences in freedom from death, major adverse limb event (MALE), or patency loss. Within the most deprived subgroup (ADI >90), traditional clinic patients had earlier patency loss (P = .0108) compared with LPP patients. Multivariable analysis of the entire cohort demonstrated that increasing age, heart failure, dialysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and increasing WIfI stage were independently associated with earlier death, and male sex was associated with earlier MALE. Ten traditional clinic patients were interviewed via convenience sampling. Emerging themes included difficulty understanding their disease, high visit frequency, transportation barriers, distrust of the health care system, and patient-physician racial discordance.

CONCLUSIONS

LPP patients had worse comorbidities and socioeconomic deprivation yet had similar outcomes to healthier, less deprived non-LPP patients. The multidisciplinary clinic's structure addresses several patient-perceived barriers. Its proximity to disadvantaged patients and ability to conduct multiple appointments at a single visit may address transportation and visit frequency barriers, and the consistent team may facilitate patient education and improve trust. Including these elements in a multidisciplinary clinic and locating it in an area of need may mitigate some negative impacts of socioeconomic deprivation on CLTI outcomes.

Validity of Routinely Reported Rutherford Scores Reported by Clinicians as Part of Daily Clinical Practice

Routinely reported structured data from the electronic health record (EHR) are frequently used for secondary purposes. However, it is unknown how valid routinely reported data are for reuse. This study aimed to assess the validity of routinely reported Rutherford scores by clinicians as an indicator for the validity of structured data in the EHR. This observational study compared clinician-reported Rutherford scores with medical record review Rutherford scores for all visits at the vascular surgery department between April 1, 2016 and December 31, 2018. Free-text fields with clinical information for all visits were extracted for the assignment of the medical record review Rutherford score, after which the agreement with the clinician-reported Rutherford score was assessed using Fleiss' Kappa. A total of 6,633 visits were included for medical record review. Substantial agreement was shown between clinician-reported Rutherford scores and medical record review Rutherford scores for the left ( k  = 0.62, confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-0.63) and right leg ( k  = 0.62, CI: 0.60-0.64). This increased to the almost perfect agreement for left ( k  = 0.84, CI: 0.82-0.86) and right leg ( k  = 0.85, CI: 0.83-0.87), when excluding missing clinician-reported Rutherford scores. Expert's judgment was rarely required to be the deciding factor (11 out of 6,633). Substantial agreement between clinician-reported Rutherford scores and medical record review Rutherford scores was found, which could be an indicator for the validity of routinely reported data. Depending on its purpose, the secondary use of routinely collected Rutherford scores is a viable option.

Open surgery of common femoral artery occlusive disease: a contemporary review

INTRODUCTION

Endovascular therapy has gradually gaining more importance for the treatment of common femoral artery (CFA) occlusive disease due to satisfactory perioperative outcomes. However, endovascular interventions seem to provide acceptable outcomes only in the short-term period. Endarterectomy still remains the gold standard with well-established mid- and long-term outcomes. The aim of this study was to analyze all appropriate studies about mid- and long-term outcomes of CFA endarterectomy, regardless of the type of technique used in the framework of a narrative contemporary review.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

This narrative review was conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The main inclusion criterion was the availability of data on isolated CFA endarterectomy including mid (1-5 years) and long (6-10 years) term results.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Four studies have been selected. In the mid-term period CFA endarterectomy showed an excellent primary patency rate regardless the clinical presentation (up to 95% and 100% in intermittent claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia). About the type of reconstruction, a statistically significant difference was found between patchplasty and direct suture in terms of primary patency (97% vs. 89.9%, P=0.02). In the long-term period the overall primary patency rate was about 95%, regardless of the clinical condition (P=0.04). Overall long-term limb salvage rate ranged from 87% to 92%, with a relatively significant difference between intermittent claudication (100%), and chronic limb-threatening ischemia (82%) (P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Considering long-term clinical outcomes and the subsequent durability, surgical treatment is still the cornerstone for CFA occlusive disease, regardless of the type of technique used for both endarterectomy and arterial reconstruction. Due to its reduced invasiveness, high-risk patients may benefit from an endovascular-first approach.

Sarcopenia is a possible risk factor for amputation after peripheral arterial interventions

OBJECTIVES

Sarcopenia has been demonstrated to be related to unfavorable clinical outcomes in patients with vascular diseases. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between sarcopenia and clinical results in patients with peripheral arterial disease who underwent endovascular therapy (EVT).

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study involved patients with PAD who underwent peripheral EVT at Ankara City Hospital, between January 2018 and December 2021. Two groups of patients were created: sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients according to computed tomography angiography muscle measurements. Primary outcome measures were major and minor amputation and survival. Mortality, amputation, and clinical characteristics were compared between the two patient groups. Hazard ratios (HRs) for amputation were calculated for each risk factor via univariate and multivariate analyses. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay and post-procedural complications.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 29.9 ± 9 months for all patients. A total number of 100 patients (mean age 63.5 ± 9.2 years) were involved in the study cohort. A significant association was identified between mortality and sarcopenia (p < .001). The mortality rate in the group with sarcopenia was significantly higher than the other group; 65.7% (23 patients) versus (20%, 13 patients) (p < .001). The major amputation rate in the group with sarcopenia was 57.1%, the major amputation rate in the group without sarcopenia was calculated as 15.4%, revealing that the major amputation rate was detected to be significantly higher in the sarcopenia group (p < .001). Multivariate regression analyses showed that only sarcopenia (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.21-1.27; p = 0.15) was independently associated with major amputation in patients with PAD after EVT. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a statistically significant difference between the survival curves of sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia patients (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia seems to be a possible risk factor associated with amputation in patients with PAD who undergo EVT. The results of this study imply that sarcopenia is a possible risk factor for overall survival in patients with PAD.

Documentary analysis of national and international guidance for community clinicians referring patients with suspected chronic limb-threatening ischaemia

BACKGROUND

Delayed referral of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) from the community to vascular services may increase risk of amputation due to delayed revascularisation. Lack of appropriate guidance for clinicians in the community may contribute to this problem. This documentary analysis investigated referral guidance available to primary care clinicians.

METHODS

National and international documents providing guidance on CLTI management were identified by searching sources including Medline, Embase, Guidelines International Network and College/Society websites. Data were extracted on referral recommendations, target audience and author groups. Recommendations were coded according to the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy. Clinical practice guideline quality and ease of implementation were assessed independently by two reviewers using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II and Guideline Implementability Appraisal (GLIA) tools, respectively.

RESULTS

12 documents containing guidance on CLTI referrals were included. Five were clinical practice guidelines. Nine targeted clinicians in the community among their audience, yet only one included a primary care clinician in their author group. Recommendations on identification and referral of CLTI were often in non-specific language and frequently assumed specialist knowledge of vascular disease. Just 4 of the 93 behaviour change techniques were identified in the guidance documents. Three relevant domains of the AGREE II tool were scored for five clinical practice guidelines: stakeholder involvement (range 21.4%-52.4%, mean 42.9%), clarity of presentation (range 71.4%-92.9%, mean 82.9%) and applicability (25.0%-57.1%, mean 36.8%). The GLIA tool identified barriers to ease of implementation for all five clinical practice guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Most guidance for clinicians in the community on the management of CLTI has been written without their input and assumes knowledge of vascular disease, which may be lacking. Future guidance development should involve community clinicians, consider using additional behaviour change techniques, and improve the applicability and ease of implementation of recommendations.

Revascularization Outcomes Stratified by Glycemic Control in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) has increased alongside rising rates of diabetes mellitus (DM). While diabetic patients with CLTI have worse outcomes compared to patients without diabetes, conflicting data exist on the relationship between the severity of DM and CLTI outcomes. Close inspection of the relationship between DM severity and outcomes in CLTI may benefit surgical decision-making and patient education.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who received endovascular intervention or surgical bypass for CLTI at our multidisciplinary Limb Preservation Program from 2013 to 2019 to collect patient characteristics using Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) reporting standards, arterial lesion characteristics from recorded angiograms, and outcomes, including survival, amputation, wound healing, and revascularization patency. Controlled DM was defined as SVS Grade 1 (controlled, not requiring insulin) and Grade 2 (controlled, requiring insulin), while uncontrolled DM was defined as SVS Grade 3 (uncontrolled), and DM severity was assessed using preoperative hemoglobin A1c (HgbA1c) values. Product-limit Kaplan-Meier was used to estimate survival functions. Univariable Cox proportional hazards analyses guided variable selection for multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

Our Limb Preservation Program treated 177 limbs from 141 patients with DM. Patients with uncontrolled DM were younger (60.44 ± 10.67 vs. 65.93 ± 10.89 years old, P = 0.0009) and had higher HgbA1c values (8.97 ± 1.85% vs. 6.79 ± 1.10%, P < 0.0001). Fewer patients with uncontrolled DM were on dialysis compared to patients with controlled DM (15.6% vs. 30.9%, P = 0.0278). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, DM control did not affect time to mortality, limb salvage, wound healing, or loss of patency. However, multivariable proportional hazards analysis demonstrated increased risk of limb loss in patients with increasing HgbA1C (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.96 [1.42-2.80], P < 0.0001) or dialysis dependence (HR = 15.37 [3.44-68.73], P = 0.0003), increased risk of death in patients with worsening pulmonary status (HR = 1.70 [1.20-2.39], P = 0.0026), and increased risk of delayed wound healing in patients who are male (HR = 0.48 [0.29-0.79], P = 0.0495). No independent association existed between loss of patency with any of the variables we collected.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with uncontrolled DM, as defined by SVS reporting standards, do not have worse outcomes following revascularization for CLTI compared to patients with controlled DM. However, increasing HgbA1c is associated with a greater risk for early amputation. Before revascularization, specific attention to the level of glycemic control in patients with DM is important, even if DM is "controlled." In addition to aggressive attempts at improved glycemic control, those with elevated HgbA1c should receive careful education regarding their increased risk of amputation despite revascularization. Future work is necessary to incorporate the severity of DM into risk models of revascularization for the CLTI population.

In-patient characteristics of peripheral artery disease in Germany

Background: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) frequently leads to hospital admission. Sex related differences in in-patient care are a current matter of debate. Patients and methods: Data were provided from the German national in-patient sample provided by the Federal Bureau of Statistics (DESTATIS). Trends on risk profiles, therapeutic procedures, and outcomes were evaluated from 2014 until 2019 stratified by sex and PAD severity. Results: Two-thirds of an annual >191,000 PAD in-patient cases applied to male sex. Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) was recorded in 49.6% of male and 55.2% of female cases (2019). CLTI was as a major risk factor of in-hospital amputation (OR 229) and death (OR 10.5), whereas endovascular revascularisation (EVR) with drug-coated devices were associated with decreased risk of in-hospital amputation (OR 0.52; all p<0.001). EVR applied in 47% of CLTI cases compared to 71% in intermittent claudication (IC) irrespective of sex. In-hospital mortality was 4.3% in male vs. 4.8% in female CLTI cases, minor amputations 18.4% vs. 10.9%, and major amputation 7.5% vs. 6.0%, respectively (data 2019; all p<0.001). After adjustment, female sex was associated with lower risk of amputation (OR 0.63) and death (OR 0.96) during in-patient stay. Conclusions: Male PAD patients were twice as likely to be admitted for in-patient treatment despite equal PAD prevalence in the general population. Among in-patient cases, supply with invasive therapy did not relevantly differ by sex, however is strongly reduced in CLTI. CLTI is a major risk factor of adverse short-term outcomes, whereas female sex was associated with lower risk of in-patient amputation and/or death.

Adherence to vascular care guidelines for emergency revascularization of chronic limb-threatening ischemia

Objective

In 2022, the National Health Service Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) indicator for vascular surgery, with its pay-for-performance incentive for timely (5-day) revascularization of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), was introduced. We sought to assess its effects in terms of (1) changes in the care pathway process measures relating to timing and patient outcomes; and (2) adherence to the Peripheral Arterial Disease Quality Improvement Framework (PAD-QIF) guidelines for patients admitted with CLTI.

Methods

A retrospective before-and-after cohort study was performed from January to June 2022 of nonelective admissions for CLTI who underwent revascularization (open, endovascular, or hybrid) at Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, a regional vascular "hub." The diagnostic and treatment pathway timing-related process measures recommended in the PAD-QIF were compared between two 3-month cohorts-before vs after introduction of the CQUIN.

Results

For the two cohorts (before vs after CQUIN), 17 of 223 and 17 of 219 total admissions met the inclusion criteria, respectively. After introduction of financial incentives, the percentage of patients meeting the 5-day targets for revascularization increased from 41.2% to 58.8% (P = .049). Improvements were also realized in the attainment of PAD-QIF targets for a referral-to-admission time of ≤2 days (from 82.4% to 88.8%; P = .525) and admission-to-specialist-review time of ≤14 hours (from 58.8% to 76.5%; P = .139). An increase also occurred in the percentage of patients receiving imaging studies within 2 days of referral (from 58.8% to 70.6%; P = .324). The reasons for delay included operating list pressures and unsuitability for intervention (eg, active COVID-19 [coronavirus disease 2019] infection). No statistically significant changes to patient outcomes were observed between the two cohorts in terms of complications (pre-CQUIN, 23.5%; post-CQUIN, 41.2%; P = .086), length of stay (pre-QUIN, 12.0 ± 12.0 days; post-QUIN, 15.0 ± 21.0 days; P = .178), and in-hospital mortality (pre-QUIN, 0%; post-QUIN, 5.9%). Other PAD-QIF targets relating to delivery of care were poorly documented for both cohorts. These included documented staging of limb threat severity with the WIfI (wound, ischemia, foot infection) score (2.9% of patients; target >80%), documented shared decision-making (47.1%; target >80%), documented issuance of written information to patient (5.9%; target 100%), and geriatric assessment (6.3%; target >80%).

Conclusions

The pay-for-performance incentive CQUIN indicators appear to have raised the profile for the need for early revascularization to treat CLTI, engaging senior hospital management, and reducing the time to revascularization in our cohort. Further data collection is required to detect any resultant changes in patient outcomes. Documentation of guideline targets for delivery of care was often poor and should be improved.

Limb Salvage and Survival in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: The Need for a Fast-Track Team-Based Approach

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) represents the end-stage form of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and is associated with a very poor prognosis and high risk of limb loss and mortality. It can be considered very similar to a terminal cancer disease, reflecting a large impact on quality of life and healthcare costs. The aim of this study is to offer an overview of the relationship between CLTI, limb salvage, and mortality, with a focus on the need of a fast-track team-based management that is a driver to achieve better survival results. This review can be useful to improve management of this growing impact disease, and to promote the standardisation of care and communication between specialist and non-specialist healthcare professionals.

Hospital clinicians' perceptions and experiences of care pathways for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) is a condition associated with significant risks of lower limb loss and mortality, which increase with delays in management. Guidance recommends urgent referral and assessment, but delays are evident at every stage of the CLTI patient pathway. This study uses qualitative methods to explore hospital clinicians' experiences and perceptions of the existing CLTI pathway.

METHODS

A qualitative interview study was conducted. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 13 clinicians involved in the assessment of patients referred to hospital with suspected CLTI, identified via purposive sampling from English vascular surgery units. Clinicians included podiatrists, vascular specialist nurses and doctors. Reflexive thematic analysis was performed on the data from a critical realist position.

RESULTS

The need for speed was the single overarching theme identified. Four linked underlying themes were also identified; 1. Vascular surgery as the poor relation (compared to cancer and other specialties), with a sub-theme of CLTI being a challenging diagnosis. 2. Some patients are more equal than others, with sub-themes of diabetes vs. non-diabetes, hub vs. spoke and frailty vs. non-frail. 3. Life in the National Health Service (NHS) is tough, with sub-themes of lack of resource and we're all under pressure. 4. Non-surgeons can help.

CONCLUSIONS

The underlying themes generated from the rich interview data describe barriers to timely referral, assessment and management of CLTI, as well as the utility of non-surgical roles such as podiatrists and vascular specialist nurses as a potential solution for delays. The overarching theme of the need for speed highlights the meaning given to adverse consequences of delays in management of CLTI by clinicians involved in its assessment. Future improvement projects aimed at the CLTI pathway should take these findings into account.

Association of Sarcopenia With Mortality in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Undergoing Endovascular Revascularization

INTRODUCTION

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is the most severe form of peripheral artery disease and leads high mortality. Sarcopenia, characterized by the loss of muscle mass or poor muscle quality, is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the association between sarcopenia and the long-term outcomes in patients with CLTI after endovascular revascularization.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients with CLTI who underwent endovascular revascularization between January 2015, and December 2021. The skeletal muscle area was calculated at the third lumbar vertebra from computed tomography images using the manual trace method and normalized to patient height. Sarcopenia was defined as a third lumbar skeletal muscle index of <40.8 cm2/m2 in males and <34.9 cm2/m2 in females. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used for survival analysis and to evaluate the association between sarcopenia and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 137 patients (90 men; mean age 71.7 ± 9.6 y) were enrolled for the study, of whom 56 (40.8%) had sarcopenia. The 3-year overall survival rate in patients with CLTI who underwent endovascular revascularization was 71.2%. The sarcopenic group had a significantly worse 3-year overall survival rate than the nonsarcopenic group (55.3% versus 78.6%, P = 0.001). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses revealed that sarcopenia (hazard ratio, 2.262; 95% confidence interval, 1.132-4.518; P = 0.021) and dialysis (hazard ratio, 3.021; 95% confidence interval, 1.337-6.823; P = 0.008) were independently associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality, whereas technical success had significantly opposing correlation with mortality. (hazard ratio, 0.400, 95% confidence interval, 0.194-0.826, P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia can be highly prevalent in patients with CLTI who undergo endovascular revascularization, and is independently associated with long-term mortality. These results may help risk stratification to assist in personalized assessment and clinical decision-making.

The natural history of chronic limb-threatening ischemia after technical failure of endovascular intervention

OBJECTIVES

The treatment for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) has changed dramatically in the last few decades with a shift toward an endovascular-first approach and aggressive revascularization to achieve limb salvage. As the size of the CLTI population and intervention rates increase, patients will continue to experience technical failure (TF). Here, we describe the natural history of patients after TF of endovascular intervention for CLTI.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with CLTI who attempted endovascular intervention or bypass at our multidisciplinary limb salvage center from 2013 to 2019. Patient characteristics were collected according to the Society for Vascular Surgery's reporting standards. Primary outcomes included survival, limb salvage, wound healing, and revascularization patency. Product-limit Kaplan-Meier estimated survival functions for these outcomes, and between-group comparisons were made using Mantel-Cox log-rank nonparametric tests.

RESULTS

We identified 242 limbs from 220 unique patients who underwent primary bypass (n = 30) or attempted endovascular intervention (n = 212) at our limb salvage center. Endovascular intervention was a TF in 31 (14.6%) limbs. After TF, 13 limbs underwent secondary bypass and 18 limbs were managed medically. Patients who experienced TF tended to be older (P < .001), male (P = .003), current tobacco users (P = .014), have longer lesions (P = .001), and have chronic total occlusions of target arteries (P < .001) as compared with those who experienced technical success. Furthermore, the TF group had worse limb salvage (P = .047) and slower wound healing (P = .028), but their survival was not different. Survival, limb salvage, and wound healing were not different in patients who received secondary bypass or medical management after TF. The secondary bypass group was older (P = .012) and had a lower prevalence of tibial disease (P = .049) than the primary bypass group and trended toward decreased survival, limb salvage, and wound healing (P = .059, P = .083, and P = .051, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased age, male sex, current tobacco use, longer arterial lesions, and occluded target arteries are associated with TF of endovascular intervention. Limb salvage and wound healing are relatively poor after TF of endovascular intervention, but survival appears comparable with patients who experience technical success. Secondary bypass may not always rescue patients after TF, though our sample size limits statistical power. Interestingly, patients who received a secondary bypass after TF trended toward decreased survival, limb salvage, and wound healing compared with primary bypass.

Cost-utility analysis of early versus delayed endovascular intervention in critical limb-threatening ischemia patients with rest pain

OBJECTIVE

The prevalence of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and poor health outcomes are high in Germany. Serious consequences of CLTI such as amputation and mortality can be effectively prevented by the early use of evidence-based therapeutic measures such as endovascular intervention. We have developed a cost-utility analysis to compare endovascular intervention with bare metal stents (BMSs) and endovascular intervention after conservative treatment from the German payer perspective.

METHODS

A Markov model, with a 5-year time horizon and seven states, was developed: (1) intervention, (2) stable 1, (3) major amputation, (4) reintervention, (5) stable 2, (6) care, and (7) all-cause death. Transition probabilities were obtained by pooling the outcomes from multiple clinical studies. The costs were estimated using data from the German diagnosis-related group system, the German rehabilitation fund, and related literature. Health-state utilities were obtained from the reported data. The primary outcomes were the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs.

RESULTS

Early BMS intervention after 5 years resulted in a cost of €23,913 and an increase of 2.5 QALYs per patient, and endovascular intervention with BMS after conservative treatment after 5 years resulted in a cost of €18,323 and an increase of 2 QALYs per patient. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €12,438. The number of major amputations was reduced by 6%. The results of the structural, deterministic, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were robust.

CONCLUSIONS

Early endovascular intervention with BMS resulted in more QALYs and a reduced risk of major amputation for early-stage CLTI patients. Our results showed that early endovascular intervention is very cost-effective according to World Health Organization recommended cost-effectiveness thresholds. However, the clinical decision regarding the use of early endovascular intervention should be determined by individual patient-level eligibility and the physician's judgment.

Outcome in octogenarian patients with lower extremity artery disease after endovascular revascularisation: a retrospective single-centre cohort study using in-patient data

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the clinical benefit of endovascular revascularisation (EVR) in octogenarian (aged ≥80 years) patients with lower extremity artery disease (LEAD).

DESIGN

Retrospective single-centre study.

SETTING

University hospital with a specialised centre for vascular medicine.

PARTICIPANTS

681 LEAD patients undergoing EVR between 2010 and 2016 were stratified by age.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Technical success, complications and mortality.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 172 (25.3%) octogenarian and 509 (74.7%) non-octogenarian patients. Despite higher LEAD stages and complexity of EVR in octogenarians, primary technical success rate (79% octogenarians vs 86% non-octogenarians, p=0.006) and 1-year survival (87% vs 96%, p<0.001) were overall on high levels. Especially for the octogenarians, 1-year survival depends on the presence of chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) (octogenarians: non-CLTI 98%; CLTI 79% p<0.001 vs non-octogenarians: non-CLTI 99%; CLTI 91%, p<0.001). In octogenarians, female sex (HR 0.45; 95% CI (0.24 to 0.86); p=0.015), the intake of statins (HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.65; p=0.001) and platelet aggregation inhibitors (HR 0.10; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.45; p=0.003) were independently associated with improved survival after EVR.

CONCLUSION

EVR can be performed safely and with sustained clinical benefit also in octogenarian patients with LEAD. After-care including medical adherence is of particular importance to improve long-term survival.

Management of chronic peripheral artery disease patients with indication for endovascular revascularization

With an increasing global burden of patients with chronic peripheral artery disease (PAD) the safe and effective provision of lower limb revascularisation is a growing medical need. Endovascular procedures for the treatment of PAD have become a crucial cornerstone of modern vascular medicine, and the first line revascularisation approach if technically feasible and taking patient choice into consideration. With the increasing age of patients with PAD and the increasing number of comorbidities open vascular surgery is also often not feasible. We outline a framework of key messages, endorsed by the board of the European Society of Vascular Medicine for pre-, peri- and post procedural management of patients requiring endovascular arterial procedures of the lower limbs. These key messages emphasize the important and increasing role of interventional vascular physicians.

Therapeutic Alternatives in Diabetic Foot Patients without an Option for Revascularization: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

The healing of foot wounds in patients with diabetes mellitus is frequently complicated by critical limb threatening ischemia (neuro-ischemic diabetic foot syndrome, DFS). In this situation, imminent arterial revascularization is imperative in order to avoid amputation. However, in many patients this is no longer possible ("too late", "too sick", "no technical option"). Besides conservative treatment or major amputation, many alternative methods supposed to decrease pain, promote wound healing, and avoid amputations are employed. We performed a narrative review in order to stress their efficiency and evidence.

METHODS

The literature research for the 2014 revision of the German evidenced-based S3-PAD-guidelines was extended to 2020.

RESULTS

If revascularization is impossible, there is not enough evidence for gene- and stem-cell therapy, hyperbaric oxygen, sympathectomy, spinal cord stimulation, prostanoids etc. to be able to recommend them. Risk factor management is recommended for all CLTI patients. With appropriate wound care and strict offloading, conservative treatment may be an effective alternative. Timely amputation can accelerate mobilization and improve the quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Alternative treatments said to decrease the amputation rate by improving arterial perfusion and wound healing in case revascularization is impossible and lack both efficiency and evidence. Conservative therapy can yield acceptable results, but early amputation may be a beneficial alternative. Patients unfit for revascularization or major amputation should receive palliative wound care and pain therapy. New treatment strategies for no-option CLTI are urgently needed.

Team-Based Care in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Team-based care has been proposed as a tool to improve health care delivery, especially for the treatment of complex medical conditions. Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is a complex disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality which often involves the care of multiple specialty providers. Coordination of efforts across the multiple physician specialists, nurses, wound care specialists, and administrators is essential to providing high-quality and efficient care. The aim of this review is to discuss the multiple facets of care of the CLTI patient and to describe components important for a team-based care approach.

RECENT FINDINGS

Observational studies have reported improved outcomes when using a team-based care approach in the care of the patients with CLTI, including reduction in mean wound healing times, decreasing rate of amputations, and readmissions. Team-based care can streamline care of CLTI patients by raising awareness, facilitating early recognition, and providing prompt vascular assessment, revascularization, and surveillance. This approach has the potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce downstream health care costs.

Long-term Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors After Endovascular Treatment in Patients With Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia

Endovascular therapy is considered as an alternative to surgical bypass as the first-line treatment in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia. However, the risk factors for poor long-term outcomes are not extensively studied. We investigated long-term clinical outcomes in chronic limb threatening ischemia patients who underwent endovascular therapy and found that end-stage renal disease, Rutherford category-6, and suboptimal endovascular therapy were common predictors for poor outcomes. These findings are emphasizing the importance of renal function and wound severity in the prognosis of chronic limb threatening ischemia and suggest the importance of more complete revascularization.

Background and Objectives

Endovascular therapy (EVT) first strategy has been widely adopted for the treatment of chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients in real-world practice. This study aimed to investigate long-term outcomes of CLTI patients who underwent EVT and identify prognostic factors.

Methods

From the retrospective cohorts of a Korean multicenter endovascular therapy registry, 1,036 patients with CLTI (792 men, 68.8 ± 9.5 years) were included. The primary endpoint was amputation-free survival (AFS) defined as the absence of major amputation or death. Secondary endpoints were major adverse limb events (MALE; a composite of major amputation, minor amputation, and reintervention).

Results

Five-year AFS and freedom from MALE were 69.8% and 61%, respectively. After multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.476; p<0.001), end-stage renal disease (ESRD; HR, 2.340; p<0.001), Rutherford category (RC) 6 (HR, 1.456; p=0.036), and suboptimal EVT (HR, 1.798; p=0.005) were identified as predictors of major amputation or death, whereas smoking (HR, 0.594; p=0.007) was protective. Low body mass index (HR, 1.505; p=0.046), ESRD (HR, 1.648; p=0.001), femoropopliteal lesion (HR, 1.877; p=0.004), RC-6 (HR, 1.471; p=0.008), and suboptimal EVT (HR, 1.847; p=0.001) were predictors of MALE. The highest hazard rates were observed during the first 6 months for both major amputation or death and MALE. After that, the hazard rate decreased and rose again after 3–4 years.

Conclusions

In CLTI patients, long-term outcomes of EVT were acceptable. ESRD, RC-6, and suboptimal EVT were common predictors for poor clinical outcomes.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02748226

Sex-related differences in outcome after endovascular revascularization for lower extremity artery disease

Background: Sex-related differences may influence the outcome of endovascular revascularization (EVR) in patients with lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) even under optimized healthcare supply. Patients and methods: LEAD patients who underwent EVR at the Department of Cardiology I - Coronary and Peripheral Vascular Disease, Heart Failure, University Hospital Muenster, Germany between 2014 and 2016 were included into the retrospective study. Detailed information on risk factors and co-morbidities, medication, LEAD related measures, and interventional parameters were assessed. Outcome defined as technical success rate, complications, and mortality was analyzed up to 12 months follow-up. Results: In total, 165 female and 437 male LEAD patients were included. Women and men presented with comparable severity of LEAD in terms of critical limb threatening ischemia (46.2%), wound status (34.9%), and amputation rate (9.6%, all n.s.) at index. Intake of platelet inhibitors (65.8% female vs. 70.0% male), oral anticoagulants (21.3% vs. 25.4%), and statins (65.6% vs. 76.0%) was observed less frequently in female patients. Against the background of high technical success (85%), in-hospital death (0.8%), severe adverse cardiac (MCE; 1.7%), and limb events (MALE; 6.1%) occurred at low rates in either sex. Adjusted long-term mortality was not affected by patients' sex (female HR 0.755; p=0.312). Conclusions: Despite critical LEAD stages in every second patient, EVR was performed safe with high technical success rates in female and male patients. Long-term outcomes were observed at comparatively low rates in both sexes at the specialized vascular center. During aftercare, supply with statin therapy turned out improvable particularly in female LEAD patients.

[Randomized study of tolerability, safety and efficacy of Pletax in intermittent claudication]

AIM

This study was aimed at assessing tolerability, safety and therapeutic efficacy of Pletax® (cilostazol) compared with Trental® (pentoxifylline) in patients with moderate-to-severe intermittent claudication.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included a total of one hundred 40-to-65-year-old patients presenting with confirmed diagnosis of moderate-to-severe intermittent claudication. Depending on the therapeutic regimen, the patients were divided into two groups. Group 1: 50 patients orally took Pletax® (cilostazol) at a dose of 100 mg twice daily 30 minutes before meals or 2 hours after meals together with conventional therapy. Group 2: 50 patients took oral Trental® (pentoxifylline) in a dose of 400 mg 3 times daily 30 minutes before meals or 2 hours after meals along with conventional therapy. The duration of the follow up period amounted to 24 weeks for both groups. The treadmill test was carried out at room temperature, with the running track tilt angle of 0° at a speed of 3 km/h. The primary parameters of efficacy were as follows: the dynamics of the minimal walking distance (a distance walked by the patient until the appearance of pain in the extremity) and dynamics of the maximal walking distance (a distance walked by the patients until full stop due to pain in the extremity).

RESULTS

Analysing efficacy demonstrated higher results of Pletax® compared with Trental®. The obtained findings suggested that Pletax® showed a significant clinical effect as soon as at 2 weeks, followed by advantage during the whole period of follow up. Analysing the parameters of the minimal and maximal walking distances in the group of patients taking Pletax® demonstrated clear superiority over the Trental® group as soon as by week 2 of administration, which preserved during the whole follow-up period. The minimal pain-free walking distance in the Pletax group at baseline amounted to 92.9±83.4 m (Trental group - 92.3±78.4; p=0.3), followed by an increase at week 8 to 126±115 m (Trental group - 116±96.3; p=0.51), at week 16 to 136±116 m (Trental group - 118±95.5; p=0.04), at week 24 to 149±126 b (Trental group - 127±98.9; p=0.01). At the same time, the effect of Pletax® and Trental® on the secondary parameter of efficacy, i.e., the ankle-brachial index was comparable: at baseline - 0.472 and 0.482 (p=0.28), at 2 weeks - 0.48 and 0.483 (p=031), at 8 weeks - 0.49 and 0.485 (p=0.74), at 16 weeks - 0.494 and 0.492 (p=0.2), at 24 weeks - 0.501 and 0.496 (p=0.45).

CONCLUSION

The obtained findings demonstrated advantages of Pletax® over Trental®, manifesting themselves in the achievement of the highest parameters by such criteria as the minimal and maximal walking distance. High safety and efficacy of Pletax® were confirmed by low frequency of unfavourable events during therapy.

[Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in haemodynamically unstable patients with bleeding (webinar review)]

This article reviews a webinar of the European Society for Vascular Surgery and the Endovascular Trauma and Resuscitation Management Society, dedicated to using endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in haemodynamically unstable patients, briefly covering the main conclusions of the reports and underlining prospects of this method. Possibilities of using aortic balloon occlusion arise interest of various-specialty medical experts, and the number of scientific works in this field has increasingly been growing, thus explaining the need for measures and studies on the subject concerned.

Day case angioplasty in a secondary care setting - initial experience

Background: Peripheral artery disease presents an increasing healthcare burden worldwide. Day-case angioplasty in a secondary care setting can be a safe and effective means of meeting the growing demand for lower limb revascularisation. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of a day-case-based angioplasty service in a UK district general hospital. Patients and methods: Consecutive patients undergoing endovascular revascularisation between August 2018-February 2020 were analysed retrospectively. All patients were discussed at a multi-disciplinary (diabetic foot) team meeting following a day case algorithm. Patient and procedural characteristics, technical success, peri-procedural complications, and 30-day outcome of day-case angioplasties were compared with those requiring overnight stay or were hospitalized. Results: Fifty-seven percent of 138 patients were diabetic, mean age 75 ± 12 years, 95% had critical limb ischaemia (Fontaine III 12%, IV 83%), and baseline ankle brachial pressure index [ABPI] 0.40 ± 0.30. Sixty-three patients (45%) were treated as planned day cases, 21 (15%) required overnight admission for social indications. Fifteen (11%) were planned admissions with the need for sequential debridement procedures, and 39 (28%) were already hospitalised at the time of referral to the vascular service. The overall technical success was 92% and not successful procedures mainly occurred in patients > 80 years. The ABPI increased at the initial follow-up to 0.84 ± 0.18. Fifty-three percent required treatment of > 1 level, 80% included recanalisations of chronic total occlusions, and average total lesion length was 133 ± 90 mm. Closure devices were employed in all cases. There were no major peri-procedural complications. A single minor access-site related bleeding episode (0.8%) occurred, requiring 24 h observation in hospital. While significantly more wounds had closed in out-patients, the mortality, major amputation and target lesion revascularization did not differ between groups. Conclusions: Safe and effective day-case-based angioplasty can be provided in a secondary care setting for patients with critical limb ischaemia needing complex multi-level procedures.

[Diabetic foot syndrome-Part 2 : Revascularization, treatment alternatives, care structures, recurrency prophylaxis]

Diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) is the most frequent reason for major amputations in Germany. The majority of foot lesions are triggered by repetitive pressure in diabetic polyneuropathy. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) impairs wound healing and is the main risk factor for amputations. The treatment of wounds and infections as well as timely revascularization are decisive. The use of endovascular and vascular surgical methods depends on the distribution pattern and length of the occlusion processes. Both procedures are complementary. Bypass surgery is of great importance for neuroischemic DFS. Multidisciplinary centers that provide revascularization in DFS can achieve an improvement of arterial blood flow in 90% of the cases and reduce the amputation rate by up to 80%. Due to the high recurrence rate of diabetic foot lesions, measures for secondary prophylaxis are of exceptional importance (podological and orthopedic technical care, foot surgery).

Isolated femoral artery revascularisation with or without iliac inflow improvement - a less invasive surgical option in critical limb ischemia

Background: Isolated femoral artery revascularisation (iFAR) represents a well-established surgical method in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) involving common femoral artery disease. Data for iFAR in multilevel PAD are inconsistent, particularly in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcome of iFAR in CLI regarding major amputation and reintervention and to identify associated risk factors for this outcome. Patients and methods: The data used have been derived from the German Registry of Firstline Treatment in Critical Limb Ischemia (CRITISCH). A total of 1200 patients were enrolled in 27 vascular centres. This sub-analysis included patients, which were treated with iFAR with/without concomitant iliac intervention. For detection of risk factors for the combined endpoint of major amputation and/or reintervention, selection of variables for multiple regression was conducted using stepwise forward/backward selection by Akaike's information criterion. Results: 95 patients were included (mean age: 72 years ± 10.82; 64.2% male). Of those, 32 (33.7%) participants reached the combined endpoint. Risk factor analysis revealed continued tobacco use (odds ratio [OR] 2.316, confidence interval [CI] 0.832-6.674), TASC D-lesion (OR: 2.293, CI: 0.869-6.261) and previous vascular intervention in the trial leg (OR: 2.720, CI: 1.037-7.381) to be associated with reaching the combined endpoint. Conclusions: iFAR provides a reasonable, surgical option to treat CLI. Lesion length (TASC D) seems to have a negative impact on outcome. Further research is required to better define the future role of iFAR for combined femoro-popliteal lesions in CLI - best in terms of a randomised controlled trial.