Feasibility and safety of intracranial carotid implantation with covered stents for advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma involving the carotid artery: A preliminary investigation

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of implanting covered stents in cases of advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (ASCCHN) where the carotid artery was involved.

Methods

A total of 30 patients (29 males and one female) were included in this study, with ages ranging from 40 to 79 years. Among these patients, 28 patients had received radiotherapy and 17 received subsequent adjuvant therapy, while one was receiving treatment for the first time. Eighteen were treated with covered stent implantation in conjunction with surgery, and the remaining 12 received stent implantation alone. The study evaluated and compared the stent implantation's success rate, overall survival (OS), and associated complications.

Results

Successful implantation of covered stents was achieved in all 30 cases. No instances of significant hemorrhage or thromboembolic cerebral infarction occurred during surgery. Of the patients in the salvage surgical group, 15 underwent complete tumor resection with a success rate of 83.3% (15/18), of which four experienced tumor recurrence with a local recurrence rate of 26.7% (4/15). The OS rates at 6 months for all patients, the salvage surgical group, the 15 patients with complete tumor resection, and the nonsurgical group were 64.0%, 66.8%, 75.5%, and 58.6%, respectively. At 12 months, the OS rates were 21.4%, 29.3%, 43.2%, and 11.8%, respectively. Notably, the OS of the 15 patients who underwent complete tumor resection was significantly higher than that of the 12 patients who received stent implantation alone (p = 0.044). All cerebrovascular accidents occurred in patients with radiotherapy history, and subsequent adjuvant therapy had no significant effect on the OS time in the salvage surgical and nonsurgical groups (p = 0.935; p = 0.526).

Conclusion

In cases of ASCCHN involving the carotid artery, the implantation of covered stents is a safe and feasible procedure.

Risk, prevention, screening and management of carotid artery stenosis in head & neck cancer patients-An evidence based review

Our review aims to clarify the incidence of carotid artery stenosis, risks of development, screening, management, and primary prevention strategies documented in the literature after radiation therapy for head and neck cancers. The high prevalence of carotid stenosis after radiation therapy for head and neck cancers has made surveillance and risk stratification critical. In addition to general cardiovascular risk factors such as smoking, diabetes, and dyslipidemia, risk factors for carotid artery stenosis after head and neck radiation included total plaque score, radiotherapy use and dosage, length of time after radiotherapy, and age greater than 50. Cancer subtype, namely nasopharyngeal cancer, may be correlated with increased risk as well, though contrasting results have been found. Interestingly, however, no significant relationship has been found between radiotherapy dose and stroke risk. Surgical management of post-radiation carotid stenosis is similar to that of stenosis unrelated to radiation, with carotid endarterectomy considered to be the gold standard treatment and carotid artery stenting being an acceptable, less-invasive alternative. Medical management of these patients has not been well-studied, but antiplatelet therapy, statins, and blood pressure control may be beneficial. The mainstay of screening for radiation-induced stenosis has been Doppler ultrasound, with measurement of changes in the intima-media thickness being a primary marker of disease development. A literature review was carried out using the MeSH terms "Carotid Artery Stenosis," "Head and Neck Neoplasms," and "Radiotherapy."

Arterial stiffness as an ultrasound biomarker of radiation-induced carotid artery disease

Background: Radiation-induced carotid artery disease (RICAD) is an important issue in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors after radiotherapy (RT). The risk of cerebrovascular disease in these patients is doubled. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of RT on carotid artery stiffness in HNC patients. Patients and methods: Conventional arterial stiffness parameters were measured in a total of 50 HNC survivors treated with RT for at least 5 years and compared to 50 unirradiated HNC patients. Elastic modulus (Ep) and Beta stiffness index (β) were measured in proximal, mid and distal common carotid artery (CCA). Results: The mean age of the subjects was 68±9 years (range: 44-84) in the irradiated group and 67±10 years (range: 45-85) in the control group. The RT group was treated with a mean radiation exposure of 60.3±6.7 Gy (range: 44-72) in the neck. Carotid stiffness parameters showed significant group differences: Ep in the RT group was 2.329±1.222 vs 1.742±828 in the non-RT group (p=0.006) and β index in the RT group was 23±11 vs 15±8 in the non-RT group (p<0.001). Radiation-induced carotid stiffness was quantified and cervical exposure to RT increased Ep in 575 kPa (p=0.014) and β in 7 units (p<0.003). Conclusions: Ep and β index could be suitable ultrasound biomarkers of radiation-induced atherosclerosis in HNC survivors. Further prospective studies are needed to feature RICD in this setting.